Food insecurity in urban American Indian and Alaska Native populations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Food insecurity is an important social determinant of health that was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Both food insecurity and COVID-19 infection disproportionately affect racial and ethnic minority groups, particularly American Indian and Alaska Native communities; however, there is little evidence as to whether food insecurity is associated with COVID-19 infection or COVID-19 preventive behaviors such as vaccination uptake. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations between food insecurity, COVID-19 infection, and vaccination status among urban American Indian and Alaska Native adults seen at 5 clinics serving urban Native people. METHODS: In partnership with health organizations in Alaska, Colorado, Kansas, Minnesota, and New Mexico, the study team conducted a cross-sectional survey in 2021 to assess food security status and attitudes, barriers, and facilitators for COVID-19 testing and vaccination. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of food security status with sociodemographic factors and COVID-19 infection and vaccination status. Marginal standardization was applied to present results as prevalence differences. RESULTS: Among 730 American Indian and Alaska Native adults, the prevalence of food insecurity measured during the pandemic was 38%. For participants who reported persistent food security status before and during the pandemic (n = 588), the prevalence of food insecurity was 25%. Prevalence of COVID-19 infection and vaccination did not vary by food security status after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of food insecurity among American Indian and Alaska Native communities likely increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, despite the high prevalence of food insecurity, community-led efforts to reduce COVID-19 infection and increase vaccination uptake across Indian Health Service and Tribal healthcare facilities may have mitigated the negative impacts of the pandemic for families experiencing food insecurity. These successful approaches serve as an important reference for future public health efforts that require innovative strategies to improve overall health in American Indian and Alaska Native communities.

Tribal Perspectives on Patient Navigation for Rural Native Veterans Using Veteran Health Administration Services.

American Indian and Alaska Native (Native) Veterans enrolled in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits program are far less likely to access health care compared to other racial/ethnic groups, in part driven by challenges posed by often distant, complex, and culturally unresponsive health care that does not easily interface with the Indian Health Service (IHS) and local Tribal Health Care. To address this disparity, in 2020 the Veteran's Health Administration's (VHA) Office of Rural Health (ORH) initiated the development of a patient navigation program designed specifically for rural Native Veterans. There are no navigation programs for rural Native Veterans to guide development of such a program. Hence, the project team sought perspectives from rural Native Veterans, their families, and community advocates, (n = 34), via video and phone interviews about the role and functions of a Veteran patient navigator and personal characteristics best be suited for such a position. Participants believed a navigator program would be useful in assisting rural Native Veterans to access VHA care. They emphasized the importance of empathy, support, knowledge of local culture, and of Veteran experience within tribal communities, adeptness with VHA systems, and personnel consistency. These insights are critical to create a program capable of increasing rural Native Veteran access to VHA services.

Comparison of the Skindex-Teen and the Skindex-29 quality of life survey instruments in a predominantly American Indian adolescent population.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The Skindex-29 and Skindex-Teen assess dermatology-related quality of life among adults and adolescents, respectively. This study directly compared the same adolescents' responses to the Skindex-29 relative to Skindex-Teen in a predominantly American Indian and/or Alaska Native population. This population is underrepresented in medical research. Although skin-related quality-of-life issues are widespread, American Indian and/or Alaska Native adolescents are not well-represented in related studies. METHODS: Data were collected in-person by self-report survey at two regional powwows in Denver, Colorado in 2021 and 2022. Respondents completed the full Skindex-29 and Skindex-Teen (40 unique items total). RESULTS: Eighty-six adolescents, 12-17 years old, completed the survey. The majority (70.9%, 61/86) of respondents self-identified as American Indian and/or Alaska Native. Analyses were conducted with all respondent survey data. Nearly two-thirds (64.0%, 55/86) of our respondents had a Skindex-29 score that revealed their quality of life was impaired at least mildly by skin disease. The Skindex-29 and Skindex-Teen demonstrated good reliability; there was substantial concordance between responses to the two measures (r values ranged from 0.88 to 0.97 for similar subscales). Compared to younger adolescents (aged 12-14), older adolescents (aged 15-17) reported worse dermatology-related quality of life and emotional toll based on higher Skindex-29 total, Skindex-Teen total, Skindex-29 Emotional subscale, and Skindex-Teen Psychosocial Functioning subscale scores. CONCLUSIONS: American Indian and/or Alaska Native adolescents suffer from skin-related quality-of-life issues. The Skindex-Teen and Skindex-29 generated similar information regarding quality of life in young patients with skin disease. While the Skindex-Teen may be slightly more relevant to adolescents, these surveys were highly concordant. Both the Skindex-Teen and Skindex-29 exhibited frequent "never" responses to questions about impact of skin conditions on relationships with others and tendencies to stay home. Thus, careful attention should be paid to such questions to ensure their relevance to adolescents.

"We don't separate out these things. Everything is related": Partnerships with Indigenous Communities to Design, Implement, and Evaluate Multilevel Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities.

Multilevel interventions (MLIs) are appropriate to reduce health disparities among Indigenous peoples because of their ability to address these communities' diverse histories, dynamics, cultures, politics, and environments. Intervention science has highlighted the importance of context-sensitive MLIs in Indigenous communities that can prioritize Indigenous and local knowledge systems and emphasize the collective versus the individual. This paradigm shift away from individual-level focus interventions to community-level focus interventions underscores the need for community engagement and diverse partnerships in MLI design, implementation, and evaluation. In this paper, we discuss three case studies addressing how Indigenous partners collaborated with researchers in each stage of the design, implementation, and evaluation of MLIs to reduce health disparities impacting their communities. We highlight the following: (1) collaborations with multiple, diverse tribal partners to carry out MLIs which require iterative, consistent conversations over time; (2) inclusion of qualitative and Indigenous research methods in MLIs as a way to honor Indigenous and local knowledge systems as well as a way to understand a health disparity phenomenon in a community; and (3) relationship building, maintenance, and mutual respect among MLI partners to reconcile past research abuses, prevent extractive research practices, decolonize research processes, and generate co-created knowledge between Indigenous and academic communities.

Social Determinants of Health, Tribal Payments, and Probability of Contracting COVID-19 in American Indian and Alaska Native Peoples.

Little is known about the relationships between demographic and economic social determinants of health and the probability of contracting COVID-19 in American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) peoples. In addition, we do not know if and how tribal payments, unique to AI/AN peoples, are associated with the probability of contracting COVID-19. We surveyed 767 AI/AN patients of five geographically disparate health organizations that primarily served AI/AN peoples in urban settings between January and May of 2021. We used univariate modified Poisson regressions to estimate the influence of age, gender, household composition, education, household income, and tribal payments on risk of contracting COVID-19, with results presented as both risk and risk difference. Fifteen percent of the sample contracted COVID-19, and individuals who lived in households with two or more generations had an 11-percentage point elevated risk of contracting COVID-19 compared to those who lived alone. Twenty-seven percent of participants received tribal payments; receipt was associated with seven percentage points (change from 18% probability to 11% probability) lower risk of contracting COVID-19. Our findings showed interventions specifically designed to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in multigenerational households, and regular tribal payments may help improve health outcomes in urban AI/AN populations.

Mental health symptom associations with COVID-19 testing and vaccination among urban American Indian and Alaska Native people.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially impacted American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities. Rates of infection, hospitalization, and mortality have been severe relative to non-Hispanic whites. While AI/AN communities have had some of the highest levels of COVID-19 vaccination, utilization rates remain suboptimal and there is a need to identify facilitators and barriers to testing and vaccination. Methods: We examined cross-sectional survey data from January to May 2021, among 619 AI/AN patients from five tribal health organizations (AK, CO, KS, NM, WA). Exposures include perceived stress, Kessler distress, PTSD screening, and AUDIT-C alcohol misuse screen. Poisson regression was used to estimate associations with prevalence of COVID-19 testing and vaccination. Results: Over three-quarters of participants were tested for COVID-19 and nearly half were vaccinated. Perceived stress and positive PTSD screening were associated with reduced vaccination prevalence, Prevalence Ratio (PR) 0.83 (0.73, 0.93) and PR 0.80 (0.66, 0.98), respectively. There was reduced prevalence of COVID-19 testing in subgroups with lower reported psychological resilience and PTSD, PR 0.78 (0.64, 0.95). Conclusions: Past-month perceived stress and positive PTSD screening are associated with reduced prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination in urban AI/AN people. Subgroups reporting limited resilience and PTSD symptoms had lower prevalence of COVID-19 testing. The complex relationship between mental health and COVID-19 testing and vaccination warrants further exploration to identify interventions to improve health among urban AI/AN people, a population with known disparities in both mental health and COVID-19 outcomes.

The Relationship between All-Cause Dementia and Acute Diabetes Complications among American Indian and Alaska Native Peoples.

BACKGROUND: American Indian and Alaska Native people (AI/AN) bear a disproportionate burden of diabetes. Growing evidence shows significant associations between several acute diabetes complications and dementia among diabetes patients. However, little is known about these relationships among AI/AN adults. Here, we aim to investigate these associations among AI/AN adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study extracted data from the Indian Health Service's (IHS) National Data Warehouse and related administrative databases. A total of 29,337 IHS actual users with diabetes who were 45+ years old during fiscal year 2013 were included. All-cause dementia and diabetes complications were identified using ICD-9 diagnostic codes. Negative binomial regression models were used to evaluate the associations of interest. RESULTS: Nearly 3% of AI/AN diabetes patients had a dementia diagnosis. After controlling for covariates, dementia was associated with a 94% higher rate of severe hypoglycemia (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR = 1.94, 95% CI:1.50-2.51), 52% higher rate of severe hyperglycemia (IRR = 1.52, 95% CI, 1.11-2.08), and 92% higher rate of any acute complication (IRR = 1.92, 95% CI:1.53-2.41). CONCLUSIONS: AI/AN diabetes patients with dementia suffered from considerably higher rates of acute diabetes complications than their counterparts without dementia. The clinical management of patients with comorbid diabetes and dementia is particularly challenging and may require individualized treatment approaches.

Potential Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Air Pollution on Dementia: A Longitudinal Analysis in American Indians Aged 55 Years and Older.

(1) Background: American Indians are disproportionately affected by air pollution, an important risk factor for dementia. However, few studies have investigated the effects of air pollution on the risk of dementia among American Indians. (2) Methods: This retrospective cohort study included a total of 26,871 American Indians who were 55+ years old in 2007, with an average follow-up of 3.67 years. County-level average air pollution data were downloaded from land-use regression models. All-cause dementia was identified using ICD-9 diagnostic codes from the Indian Health Service's (IHS) National Data Warehouse and related administrative databases. Cox models were employed to examine the association of air pollution with dementia incidence, adjusting for co-exposures and potential confounders. (3) Results: The average PM2.5 levels in the IHS counties were lower than those in all US counties, while the mean O3 levels in the IHS counties were higher than the US counties. Multivariable Cox regressions revealed a positive association between dementia and county-level O3 with a hazard ratio of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.02-1.50) per 1 ppb standardized O3. PM2.5 and NO2 were not associated with dementia risk after adjusting for all covariates. (4) Conclusions: O3 is associated with a higher risk of dementia among American Indians.

Medication Engagement, Determinants of Health, and A1C Levels Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes within a Tribal Health System.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between determinants of health, medication engagement, and A1C levels in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) receiving Tribal health and pharmacy services. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 2020-2021 electronic health record data was conducted and included adult patients with T2DM using Choctaw Nation Health Services Authority prescribed ≥1 noninsulin glucose-lowering medication in 2020, had ≥1 A1C value in 2020 and 2021, and had a valid zip code in 2021. Patients receiving both insulin and other noninsulin glucose-lowering medication were included. The proportion of days covered (PDC) was used to calculate medication engagement. Statistical analyses included bivariate analysis and linear regression. RESULTS: There were 3787 patients included in the analyses; 62.5% were considered engaged (PDC ≥ 0.8). The mean 2020 A1C level was 8.0 (64 mmol/mol) ± 1.8; 33% had an A1C of <7%, 42% had an A1C of 7% to 9%, and 25% had an A1C >9%. The mean A1C in 2021 was 7.9 (63 mmol/mol) ± 1.7; 34% had an A1C of <7%, 44% had an A1C of 7% to 9%, and 22% had an A1C >9%. Older age was weakly correlated with higher engagement; higher engagement was associated with lower A1C levels while adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Medication engagement was associated with lower A1C levels, and older age was weakly associated with higher engagement to noninsulin glucose-lowering medications, consistent with previous literature. No determinants of health were significantly associated with A1C levels while adjusting for covariates.

Dermatology Access and Needs of American Indian and Alaska Native People.

OBJECTIVES: To describe skin disease prevalence, access to dermatologic care, and teledermatology interest among American Indians and Alaska Natives. METHODS: Data were collected via self-report surveys administered in person at two community powwows in Denver, Colorado in 2021 and 2022. RESULTS: Most American Indian and/or Alaska Native respondents (94.5%, n=225) reported at least one skin disease. The top three active skin diseases among adolescents were acne, scarring, and eczema. The top three among adults were dry skin, hair loss, and acne. Only 20.9% (n=47) of respondents with skin disease had seen a dermatologist. Approximately one-third of respondents (34.0%, n=81) were open to engaging with teledermatology in their home; 43.3% (n=103) were open to engaging with teledermatology in their local clinic; 42.0% (n=100) were not interested in engaging teledermatology from their home or in their local clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Skin disease is prevalent and access to dermatologic care is poor among American Indian and Alaska Native people.

Food Insecurity in Urban American Indian and Alaska Native Populations During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: Food insecurity is an important social determinant of health that was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Both food insecurity and COVID-19 infection disproportionately affect racial and ethnic minority groups, particularly American Indian and Alaska Native communities; however, there is little evidence as to whether food insecurity is associated with COVID-19 infection or COVID-19 preventive behaviors such as vaccination uptake. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations between food insecurity, COVID-19 infection, and vaccination status among urban American Indian and Alaska Native adults seen at 5 clinics serving urban Native people. Methods: In partnership with health organizations in Alaska, Colorado, Kansas, Minnesota, and New Mexico, the study team conducted a cross-sectional survey in 2021 to assess food security status and attitudes, barriers, and facilitators for COVID-19 testing and vaccination. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of food security status with sociodemographic factors and COVID-19 infection and vaccination status. Marginal standardization was applied to present results as prevalence differences. Results: Among 730 American Indian and Alaska Native adults, the prevalence of food insecurity measured during the pandemic was 38%. For participants who reported persistent food security status before and during the pandemic (n=588), the prevalence of food insecurity was 25%. Prevalence of COVID-19 infection and vaccination did not vary by food security status after adjustment for confounders. Conclusions: High rates of food insecurity among American Indian and Alaska Native communities likely increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, despite the high prevalence of food insecurity, community-led efforts to reduce COVID-19 infection and increase vaccination uptake across Indian Health Service and Tribal healthcare facilities may have mitigated the negative impacts of the pandemic for families experiencing food insecurity. These successful approaches serve as an important reference for future public health efforts that require innovative strategies to improve overall health in AIAN communities.