Surgical Intelligence can Lead to Higher Adoption of Best Practices in Minimally Invasive Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of surgical intelligence for automatically monitoring critical view of safety (CVS) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in a real-world quality initiative. BACKGROUND: Surgical intelligence encompasses routine, AI-based capture and analysis of surgical video, and connection of derived data with patient and outcomes data. These capabilities are applied to continuously assess and improve surgical quality and efficiency in real-world settings. METHODS: LCs conducted at two general surgery departments between December 2022 and August 2023 were routinely captured by a surgical intelligence platform, which identified and continuously presented CVS adoption, surgery duration, complexity, and negative events. In March 2023, the departments launched a quality initiative aiming for 75% CVS adoption. RESULTS: 279 procedures were performed during the study. Adoption increased from 39.2% in the 3 pre-intervention months to 69.2% in the final 3 months (P < .001). Monthly adoption rose from 33.3% to 75.7%. Visualization of the cystic duct and artery accounted for most of the improvement; the other two components had high adoption throughout. Procedures with full CVS were shorter (P = .007) and had fewer events (P = .011) than those without. OR time decreased following intervention (P = .033). CONCLUSION: Surgical intelligence facilitated a steady increase in CVS adoption, reaching the goal within 6 months. Low initial adoption stemmed from a single CVS component, and increased adoption was associated with improved OR efficiency. Real-world use of surgical intelligence can uncover new insights, modify surgeon behavior, and support best practices to improve surgical quality and efficiency.

Time from injury and age interact in relationship with perceived quality of life outcomes following vocation-focused neuropsychological rehabilitation.

At the group level, community-based neuropsychological rehabilitation interventions with a vocational focus are generally effective among individuals with brain injuries. However, individual participants vary significantly in the extent of their improvement, prompting attempts to elucidate individual, injury-related, and environmental factors affecting prognosis. In this study, we examined the relationships between one such factor - "time from injury" (the time between injury and intervention) - and two outcome measures: employment status and perceived quality of life (PQoL), in 157 brain injury survivors, before and after a holistic neuropsychological vocational rehabilitation program. We also examined whether relationships between the variables were moderated by age at onset of treatment and injury severity. In the entire sample, both the proportion of employed participants and average PQoL increased following program participation. Neither, time from injury, severity, nor age at onset of treatment predicted the increase in employment proportion, and severity was not a significant predictor of PQoL. However, an interactive effect indicated that when treatment was started at a younger age, longer time from injury predicted higher levels of PQoL, but when treatment was started at older ages, longer time from injury predicted lower levels of PQoL. When interpreted alongside existing literature, these results suggest that delaying vocational components of rehabilitation can be beneficial for younger participants, while the effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation can be maximized by starting as early as possible among older participants. Most importantly, regardless of age, it appears that vocational rehabilitation can be effective even when initiated many years after injury.

How, when, and for whom: decisions regarding remote neuropsychological assessment during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic.

Neuropsychological assessment provides crucial information about cognitive, behavioral, and socioemotional functioning in medical, educational, legal, and social contexts. During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, the Israeli Ministry of Health initially mandated that all psychological assessments be postponed. However, as referrals to time-sensitive, high-need, and high-stakes assessments began to accumulate, it became necessary to consider remote solutions. In the current paper, we describe the considerations that affected the transition to remote activity in a prominent Israeli provider of neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation services, referring to technological and environmental conditions, cognitive requirements, and tasks, as well as to legal, regulatory, and funding issues. After discussing how assessments should be conducted to maximize feasibility and validity while minimizing risks to clients and clinicians, we propose a preliminary model for deciding whether specific referrals warrant remote administration. The model delineates key factors in decisions regarding remote assessment, emphasizing the distinct roles of the referring clinician and the neuropsychologist who conducts the assessment, and highlighting the need for collaboration between them. The abrupt need for remote assessments during the pandemic required a quick response with little preparation. The lessons learned from this process can be applied in the future, so that the need for remote services can be met with greater certainty and uniformity.

Neuropsychological assessment in the Israeli healthcare system: a practitioners' survey.

BACKGROUND: The current study examines self-reported professional practices and attitudes of Israeli neuropsychologists, in an attempt to understand how they contribute to funding of neuropsychological assessment (NPA) through the Israeli healthcare system. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-nine neuropsychologists (176 board-certified experts and 103 interns) participated in an online survey that targeted characteristics of NPA practice in Israel, attitudes toward NPA, and familiarity with healthcare referral procedures. RESULTS: Overall, 68% of respondents conducted NPA, with a smaller proportion of experts (56%) doing so than interns (88%). The most common purpose of NPA was to provide treatment recommendations, and respondents listed indications for NPA that matched indications for neuropsychological rehabilitation. Almost two thirds of respondents reported that none of the NPAs that they performed received healthcare funding. While all practitioners believed that the healthcare system should fund NPA, the majority demonstrated lack of familiarity with referral procedures. CONCLUSIONS: To increase referral rates and create effective neuropsychological services within the Israeli healthcare system, neuropsychologists should work more closely with physicians in integrated care teams. In addition, they should engage in greater advocacy activities that will emphasize the need for publicly funded NPA.

Familiarity with Neuropsychological Assessment among Israeli Physicians.

OBJECTIVE: The current study examines whether Israeli physicians are familiar with neuropsychological assessment (NPA) in general and with referral to NPA in particular. METHOD: In total, 274 physicians in relevant fields participated in an online survey that targeted levels of familiarity with NPA, beliefs about assessment needs, and actual referral practices. RESULTS: Israeli physicians see many patients with neuropsychological difficulties, but assess fewer patients for these difficulties by themselves. Approximately 80% of participants reported that they had heard of NPA before, but only 25% knew how to refer patients to NPA. Familiarity was greater among neurologists and neurosurgeons than among family doctors. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians had only general knowledge about NPA, with little practical understanding of how to refer patients to such a service. To increase referral rates and create consistent demand for effective neuropsychological services, neuropsychologists should engage in greater advocacy activity that will lead to clarification of referral procedures.

Spatial attention and neural asymmetry in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Patterns of lateralized dysfunction in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) were examined using the Posner spatial attention paradigm. While controls responded faster to left visual field targets than to right, patients lacked this asymmetry. The difference in asymmetry patterns was significant for the invalid cue condition, but not for the valid cue condition. Reversal of normal asymmetry was correlated with obsession severity. Findings support aberrant hemispheric balance in OCD.

Effects of asymmetric dopamine depletion on sensitivity to rewarding and aversive stimuli in Parkinson's disease.

The onset and progression of Parkinson's disease (PD) motor symptoms is generally asymmetric, reflecting differential extent of nigral pathology and resulting dopamine depletion in each of the hemispheres. Given the role of dopamine in processing rewarding and aversive events, and considering findings associating asymmetric neural activity with differential sensitivity to positive and negative stimuli, the current study examined the possibility that dopamine asymmetry in PD is related to differential approach and avoidance tendencies. An original task assessing and comparing sensitivity to positive and negative probabilistic feedback was administered to 29 right-handed participants with idiopathic PD, 16 with predominant right-side and 13 with predominant left-side motor symptoms, to compare the two groups. As dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) has shown different effects on reward and punishment processing, all participants were assessed in both off- and on-medication states. As predicted, when off medication, participants with relatively greater dopamine deficit in the left hemisphere minimized losses better than they increased gains, while those with a greater right hemisphere deficit showed a trend toward the opposite pattern. Medication reversed the relationship between gain and loss sensitivity in the left-hemisphere PD group, but not in the right-hemisphere group. Particularly in the left-hemisphere PD group, findings support the possibility that subcortical dopaminergic asymmetry is reflected in behaviorally-expressed approach and avoidance tendencies. Furthermore, the effects of DRT on approach and avoidance appear to interact with asymmetry, shedding light on previous conclusions regarding the role of dopamine in reinforcement processing.