RESUMO
Preclinical studies demonstrated that erythropoietin is neuroprotective in different models of peripheral and central nervous system diseases. We investigated safety and tolerability of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We performed a phase II double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. After screening, 23 patients were randomly assigned to rhEPO or placebo arm. Patients were examined during a six-month lead-in period, and then they received fortnightly either 40,000 units of rhEPO or placebo for 24 months. Primary outcomes were adverse events, safety, and death or tracheotomy. Treatment was safe and well tolerated. One patient in the rhEPO arm dropped out for a superficial phlebitis. Median values of haematocrit, haemoglobin, red cells, and reticulocytes were non-significantly higher in rhEPO than placebo arm. Haemoglobin did not increase >1 g/dl between subsequent doses. Anti-rhEPO antibodies were not detected. Survival and slope of ALSFRS-R curves did not significantly differ between treatment groups. RhEPO treatment was safe and well tolerated in ALS patients. Our results suggest that larger studies are warranted to confirm safety of treatment and to investigate different dose schedule and efficacy.
Assuntos
Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/tratamento farmacológico , Eritropoetina/uso terapêutico , Placebos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Proteínas Recombinantes , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Buprenorphine is a potent opioid available as a transdermal delivery system (TDS) formulation. This open-label study investigated its safety, tolerability, and efficacy in 30 patients with chronic painful neuropathy. Subjects with visual analogue scale (VAS) score > or = 5 under stable analgesic treatment were entered. The starting dosage of 35 microg/h was increased up to 70.0 microg/h in case of unsatisfactory pain control as assessed by fortnightly visits. The primary endpoint was the number of patients achieving at least 30% pain relief at day 42 visit. Treatment was safe over the study period. Nine patients dropped out for side effects, mostly nausea and daily sleepiness. Buprenorphine TDS was well tolerated in 21 patients. Thirteen patients achieved > 30% of pain relief at day 42 visit. Five patients needed to increase the dosage to 52.5 microg/h. Eight patients did not meet the primary outcome, but none allowed increasing the dosage to 70 microg/h, and four patients withdrew consent to continue the study before day 42 visit because of a 'fear to become addicted,' although 40% had obtained VAS reduction. In our study, which needs to be confirmed by a controlled trial, buprenorphine TDS induced clinically meaningful pain relief in about 40% of patients with chronic painful neuropathy, suggesting its use as a third-line treatment.