RESUMO
Real-world practice patterns of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) among gastroenterologists are not well-described. The aim is to describe practice patterns of EoE diagnosis and management and assess concordance with consensus guidelines. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of gastroenterologists in the USA using Qualtrics, which was dispersed through the North Carolina Society of Gastroenterology (NCSG) and the American College of Gastroenterology member listservs. A similar survey was sent to NCSG members in 2010 and responses were compared in a subanalysis. Of 240 respondents, 37% (n = 80) worked in an academic setting versus 63% (n = 138) community practice setting. Providers saw a median of 18 (interquartile range 2-100) EoE patients annually and 24% (n = 52) were 'very familiar' with EoE guidelines. A proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) trial was required by 37% of providers prior to EoE diagnosis. In total, 60% used a ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field cut point for diagnosis and 62% biopsied from the proximal and distal esophagus on initial exam. Only 12% (n = 28) followed EoE diagnosis guidelines. For first-line treatment, 7% used dietary therapy, 32% topical steroids, and 61% used PPIs; 67% used fluticasone as first-line steroid; 41% used maintenance steroid treatment in responders. In the NCSG cohort, a higher proportion in 2017 followed guideline diagnosis recommendations compared with 2010 (14% vs. 3%; P = 0.03) and a higher proportion used dietary therapy as first-line treatment (13% vs. 3%; P = 0.046). There is variability in EoE practice patterns for EoE management, with management differing markedly from consensus guidelines. Further education and guideline dissemination are needed to standardize practice.
RESUMO
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) effectively treats Clostridioides difficile infection and alters the gut microbiota in the long term, but potential adverse effects are poorly understood. We report a man with a family history of ulcerative colitis who developed ulcerative proctitis within a year of FMT.
RESUMO
Expert groups recommend annual chest computed tomography for lung cancer screening (LCS) in high-risk patients. Lung cancer screening in primary care is a complex process that includes identification of the at-risk population, comorbidity assessment, and shared decision making. We identified three key processes required for high-quality screening implementation in our academic primary care practice: (1) systematic collection of lifetime cumulative smoking history to identify potentially eligible patients; (2) visit-based clinical reminders and order sets embedded in the electronic health record (EHR); and (3) tools to facilitate shared decision making and appropriate test ordering. We applied quality improvement techniques to address gaps in these processes. Over 12 months, we developed and implemented a nurse protocol for collecting complete smoking history and entering that data into discrete EHR fields. We obtained histories on over 50% of the clinic's more than 2,300 known current and former smokers, aged 55-80 years. We then built and pilot tested an automated visit-based reminder (VBR) system, driven by the discrete smoking history data. The VBR included an order set and template for documentation of shared decision making. Physicians interacted with the VBR in approximately 30% of opportunities for use. Further work is needed to better understand how to systematically provide appropriate LCS in primary care environments.
Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/normas , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Hospitais de Prática de Grupo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Cleansing is essential for health and hygiene. Personal cleansing agents, such as soap, one of the earliest to be developed, were initially expected to deliver only cleansing benefits, but consumer expectations came with time to encompass health and cosmetic benefits. This demand led to the development of an array of milder cleansing agents with a broader spectrum of application. Cleansing products are sold around the world in different forms such as bars (the most widely used), liquids, gels, and creams. The present paper discusses the chemistry, formulation, product attributes, and benefits of various types of personal wash products.