Adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with early-stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Older women with breast cancer are underrepresented in clinical trials, and data on the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in such patients are scant. We tested for the noninferiority of capecitabine as compared with standard chemotherapy in women with breast cancer who were 65 years of age or older. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with stage I, II, IIIA, or IIIB breast cancer to standard chemotherapy (either cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin) or capecitabine. Endocrine therapy was recommended after chemotherapy in patients with hormone-receptor-positive tumors. A Bayesian statistical design was used with a range in sample size from 600 to 1800 patients. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. RESULTS: When the 600th patient was enrolled, the probability that, with longer follow-up, capecitabine therapy was highly likely to be inferior to standard chemotherapy met a prescribed level, and enrollment was discontinued. After an additional year of follow-up, the hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death in the capecitabine group was 2.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 3.17; P<0.001). Patients who were randomly assigned to capecitabine were twice as likely to have a relapse and almost twice as likely to die as patients who were randomly assigned to standard chemotherapy (P=0.02). At 3 years, the rate of relapse-free survival was 68% in the capecitabine group versus 85% in the standard-chemotherapy group, and the overall survival rate was 86% versus 91%. Two patients in the capecitabine group died of treatment-related complications; as compared with patients receiving capecitabine, twice as many patients receiving standard chemotherapy had moderate-to-severe toxic effects (64% vs. 33%). CONCLUSIONS: Standard adjuvant chemotherapy is superior to capecitabine in patients with early-stage breast cancer who are 65 years of age or older. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00024102.)

Comparison of Patients' Phenotypes, Guideline-Directed Recommendations Compliance and Rates of Cardiotoxicity between Caribbean and United States Cardio-oncology Programs.

Background: Little is known about the characteristics of oncological patients, cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity, and guidelines-directed interventions in the Caribbean; analysis of cardio-oncology services may shed light on this and clarify links between ethnicity, cultural, and local socioeconomic factors. Objectives: This study compared patients' phenotypes, adherence to guidelines recommendations, and patterns of cardiotoxicity between two cardio-oncology programs: one in the Dominican Republic (DR) and the other in Chicago IL, United States (US). Methods: Patients being considered for or treated with potentially cardiotoxic drugs were followed before, during, and after chemotherapy through both cardio-oncology clinics, where we recorded and compared clinical, demographic, and echocardiographic data. Results: We studied 597 consecutive patients, 330 (55%) from the DR and 267 (45%) from the US. DR vs. US mean age 55± 13/52 ± 13 years; female 77/87% (p < 0.001); breast cancer 57/73% (p < 0.001); treated with anthracyclines + taxanes 47/40% (p = 0.151); monoclonal antibodies + taxanes or platins 37/45% (p < 0.001). Cardiotoxicity DR vs. US occurred in 15/7% (p = 0.001); multivariate logistic regression (OR 2.29; 95% CI, 1.31-3.99; p < 0.005) did not identify age >60, HTN, DM, BMI, tobacco or chemotherapy as predictors. Compliance with ASCO guidelines was similar among both cohorts. Conclusion: Compared to the US cohort, the Caribbean cohort of cancer patients has similar rates of CV risk factors but a higher likelihood of developing drug-induced LV dysfunction. Programs' compliance with ASCO guidelines was equivalent. While further research is needed to ascertain regional variations of cardiotoxicity, these findings underline the relevance of cardio-oncology services in nations with limited resources and high CV risk.

Randomized Trial of Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens Versus Capecitabine in Older Women With Early Breast Cancer: 10-Year Update of the CALGB 49907 Trial.

PURPOSE: Older women with breast cancer remain under-represented in clinical trials. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B 49907 trial focused on women age 65 years and older. We previously reported the primary analysis after a median follow-up of 2.4 years. Standard adjuvant chemotherapy showed significant improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival compared with capecitabine. We now update results at a median follow-up of 11.4 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients age 65 years or older with early breast cancer were randomly assigned to either standard adjuvant chemotherapy (physician's choice of either cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin) or capecitabine. An adaptive Bayesian design was used to determine sample size and test noninferiority of capecitabine. The primary end point was RFS. RESULTS: The design stopped accrual with 633 patients at its first sample size assessment. RFS remains significantly longer for patients treated with standard chemotherapy. At 10 years, in patients treated with standard chemotherapy versus capecitabine, the RFS rates were 56% and 50%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; P = .03); breast cancer-specific survival rates were 88% and 82%, respectively (HR, 0.62; P = .03); and overall survival rates were 62% and 56%, respectively (HR, 0.84; P = .16). With longer follow-up, standard chemotherapy remains superior to capecitabine among hormone receptor-negative patients (HR, 0.66; P = .02), but not among hormone receptor-positive patients (HR, 0.89; P = .43). Overall, 43.9% of patients have died (13.1% from breast cancer, 16.4% from causes other than breast cancer, and 14.1% from unknown causes). Second nonbreast cancers occurred in 14.1% of patients. CONCLUSION: With longer follow-up, RFS remains superior for standard adjuvant chemotherapy versus capecitabine, especially in patients with hormone receptor-negative disease. Competing risks in this older population dilute overall survival benefits.

A phase I study of pemetrexed, carboplatin, and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung or esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose for pemetrexed, alone and in combination with carboplatin, with concurrent radiotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or esophageal cancer were treated every 21 days for two cycles. Regimen 1 was pemetrexed (200-600 mg/m(2)); regimen 2 was pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) with escalating carboplatin doses (AUC = 4-6). Both regimens included concurrent radiation (40-66 Gy; palliative-intent doses were lower). RESULTS: Thirty patients (18 locally advanced and 12 metastatic with dominant local symptoms) were enrolled, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1/2 (n = 8/21/1). All dose levels were tolerable for regimen 1 (n = 18: 15 NSCLC and 3 esophageal cancers) and regimen 2 (n = 12: all NSCLC). In regimen 1, one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 esophagitis/anorexia) occurred (500 mg/m(2)). Grade 3 neutropenia (3 of 18 patients) was the main hematologic toxicity. In regimen 2, one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 esophagitis) occurred (500 mg/m(2); AUC = 6); grade 3/4 leukopenia (4 of 12 patients) was the main hematologic toxicity. Four complete responses (2 pathology proven) and eight partial responses were observed. When systemically active chemotherapy doses were reached, further dose escalation was discontinued, and a phase II dose-range was established (pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 5-6). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 5 or 6) with concurrent radiation is well tolerated, allows for the administration of systemically active chemotherapy doses, and shows signs of activity. To further determine efficacy, safety profile, and optimal dosing, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 30407 is currently evaluating this regimen in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Clinical germline diagnostic exome sequencing for hereditary cancer: Findings within novel candidate genes are prevalent.

Clinical diagnostic exome sequencing (DES) has been effective in diagnosing individuals with suspected genetic conditions; nevertheless little has been described regarding its clinical utility in individuals with a personal and family history of cancer. This study aimed to assess diagnostic yield and clinical characteristics of pediatric and adult patients undergoing germline DES for hereditary cancer. We retrospectively reviewed 2171 patients referred for DES; cases with a personal and/or family history of cancer were further studied. Of 39 cancer patients, relevant alterations were found in eight individuals (21%), including one (3%) positive pathogenic alteration within a characterized gene, two (5%) uncertain findings in characterized genes, and five (13%) alterations in novel candidate genes. Two of the 5 pediatric patients, undergoing testing, (40%) had findings in novel candidate genes, with the remainder being negative. We include brief case studies to illustrate the variety of challenging issues related to these patients. Our observations demonstrate utility of family-based exome sequencing in patients for suspected hereditary cancer, including familial co-segregation analysis, and comprehensive medical review. DES may be particularly useful when traditional approaches do not result in a diagnosis or in families with unique phenotypes. This work also highlights the importance and complexity of analysis of uncharacterized genes in exome sequencing for hereditary cancer.

A phase II trial of perifosine, an oral alkylphospholipid, in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Novel, effective therapies are warranted in the management of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Perifosine is an oral alkylphospholipid that inhibits AKT phosphorylation and has shown preclinical antitumor activity in head and neck cancer cell lines and xenografts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase II trial of perifosine in patients with incurable, recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. Previous therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease was limited to no more than one prior chemotherapy and one prior targeted/biologic agent regimen. Patients had to have measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and adequate laboratory parameters. Perifosine was given as a loading dose of 150 mg every 6 hours x 6 doses orally in the first two days, with antiemetic prophylaxis, followed by 100 mg/day orally without interruption. Administration via gastrostomy tube was allowed. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles (eight weeks). Biomarkers in pathways potentially affected by perifosine, including AKT, P-AKT, P38, p53 and p21 were measured on tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry by manual and automated methods. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled. No objective responses were observed. One patient had stable disease as best response and 18 patients progressed at first evaluation. The median overall survival time was 5.5 months and the median progression-free survival time was 1.7 months. The most frequent toxicities were gastrointestinal (constipation, nausea, vomiting) and fatigue. One patient developed grade 4 anorexia. Although the sample size was small, a significant correlation was detected between high expression of P38 and AKT in baseline tumor tissue and better survival. CONCLUSIONS: Perifosine in the doses and schedule used lacks single-agent activity in SCCHN. Our data do not justify further investigation of perifosine as a single agent in SCCHN.

Phase II trial of gefitinib 250 mg daily in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: An objective response rate of 11% was reported in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated with 500 mg daily gefitinib although the recommended dose in lung cancer is 250 mg. This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of 250 mg daily gefitinib in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Phase II trial with objective response rate as the primary end point. Measurements of quality of life and levels of serum vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-alpha were assessed before and during therapy. RESULTS: In 70 patients, 1 (1.4%) partial response was observed. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.8 and 5.5 months, respectively. Quality of life scores improved transiently during the first weeks of therapy before returning to baseline. Median vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-alpha levels were above the normal range but were not predictive of outcome. Four patients experienced grade 3 drug-related adverse events. Rash of any grade was observed in 64% of subjects. Correlation between disease control (partial response + stable disease), progression-free survival, and overall survival and grade of cutaneous toxicity was observed (P = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.008 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Gefitinib monotherapy at 250 mg in recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN seems to have less activity than was previously observed for 500 mg daily. A dose-response relationship may exist for this agent in SCCHN and grade of cutaneous toxicity attributable to gefitinib is a clinical predictor of better outcome.

Phase II study of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase II study was undertaken to define the efficacy and pharmacodynamics of R115777, a farnesyl transferase inhibitor, in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with measurable stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or stage IV disease received 193 courses of treatment (median, 2.0; range, 1 to 22) with R115777 300 mg administered orally twice daily for 21 of every 28 days. Buccal mucosa samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected before and after 8 days of treatment to evaluate inhibition of farnesyl transferase in vivo. RESULTS: No objective complete or partial responses were documented. Seven patients (16%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8% to 31%) had disease stabilization for greater than 6 months. Median survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 6.5 to 10.5) and time to progression was 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.1). The most severe toxicity was neutropenia (9% grade 3, 7% grade 4) and the most common toxicities were anemia (50% grade 1 or 2, 5% grade 3) and anorexia (50% grade 1 or 2, 2% grade 3). Mild peripheral neuropathy occurred in 25% of patients. Evidence of farnesyl transferase inhibition was documented in 83% of patients. CONCLUSION: Single-agent R115777 was well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC, but demonstrated minimal clinical activity. Inhibition of farnesylation in vivo was consistently documented. On the basis of promising results of farnesyl transferase inhibitor combinations with standard chemotherapy agents, future studies of this agent in NSCLC should be in combination with systemic chemotherapy.

Analysis of further disease progression in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: implications for locoregional treatment.

To determine whether in the natural history of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) a time interval exists when metastases are limited in number and/or destination organs. Thirty-eight stage IIIB (pleural effusion)/IV NSCLC patients were treated on a phase II trial of oxaliplatin and paclitaxel. Patients' charts were reviewed and all sites of disease at initial presentation and at subsequent follow-ups were recorded, including the number of organs involved and the number of individual metastatic sites. At presentation, 74% of patients had metastases confined to one or two organs (including the lung primary). Fifty percent had < or =3 metastatic sites in addition to the lung primary. At last follow-up, 17 patients developed new lesions, 14 in a new organ and 3 in a previously involved organ. Nineteen (50%) had stable (n=12) or progressive (n=7) disease in initially involved sites without developing any new metastatic tumors. Among the 17 patients who presented with < or =4 metastatic sites and no pleural effusion, 11 (65%) had stable or progressive disease in initially involved sites without developing new metastases. These results suggest that a subset of patients who present with metastatic NSCLC may not have widely disseminated disease and that some form of local treatment combined with systemic therapy might be beneficial in these patients. Our data support the feasibility of a clinical trial that incorporates local therapies to sterilize metastases in patients with NSCLC.

A phase II study of bryostatin-1 and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Bryostatin-1 is a macrocyclic lactone, which exhibits pleiotropic biological effects via protein kinase C and has shown preclinical synergy with paclitaxel for enhanced tumor cell apoptosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had stage IIIB (pleural effusion)/IV non-small cell lung cancer, measurable disease, performance status 0-2 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, adequate organ function, and no prior chemotherapy. Patients received dexamethasone premedication followed by paclitaxel at a dose of 90 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 along with bryostatin-1 50 microg/m(2) on days 2, 9, and 16 every 28 days until disease progression. Correlative assays measuring serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and T-lymphocyte numbers were performed based on a previous study showing cytokine induction in vivo by bryostatin-1. Fifteen patients were enrolled. RESULTS: Thirty cycles of the bryostatin-1 and paclitaxel were delivered with a median of 2 per patient (range 1-4). Myalgia was the predominant non-hematologic toxicity encountered as 3 patients developed grade 4 and 1 patient developed grade 3 myalgia. Four patients were removed from the study during cycle 1 for rapid disease progression or myalgia. Eleven patients could be evaluated for response. Five patients had stable disease, two had a mixed response, and four had progressive disease. Ten patients received second-line chemotherapy after leaving the study. Median survival was 31 weeks (95% confidence interval: 5.4-49.3). Correlative data showed a trend towards decreased plasma IL-6 and TNF-alpha after each cycle of therapy presumably due to the dexamethasone premedication and/or paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: This drug combination showed no significant clinical response and was associated with reproducible toxicity. The predominance of myalgia in the absence of elevated serum cytokines suggests a non-inflammatory etiology of this toxicity.

Carboplatin plus vinorelbine with concomitant radiation therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I study.

This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin when administered in combination with a fixed dose of vinorelbine and concomitant radiation therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chemotherapy was administered on days 1 and 8 of two 21 day cycles. It consisted of vinorelbine at 15 mg/m(2) and carboplatin administered at an initial area under the curve (AUC) of 1.5, and increased by an AUC of 0.5 per dose level to a maximum AUC of 3, corresponding with an AUC of 6 per cycle of chemotherapy. Radiation was administered in daily fractions of 200 cGy over 5-7 weeks. We treated 36 patients, of whom 27 had stage II or III disease, and nine had stage IV disease but required thoracic radiation for palliation. Toxicities included neutropenia (three with Grade 4) and esophagitis (seven with Grade 3 and one with Grade 4). Four patients had radiation pneumonitis 4-7 months after completing therapy, three of whom died. The recommended phase II dose of carboplatin is an AUC of 3 on 2 consecutive weeks. Of 33 patients evaluable for response within the radiation field, 17 (52%) had complete or partial response, and 13 had stable disease. Of seven patients evaluable with distant metastatic disease, three had a complete or partial response, and two had stable disease. The median survival for the entire group and for patients with stage II/III disease was 13.5 months. We conclude that the combination of carboplatin, vinorelbine, and radiotherapy is feasible at these doses. It may be a useful alternative for patients not able to tolerate cisplatin-based therapy.

Phase I study of dose-dense alternating doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

We performed a study to determine the feasibility of a rapidly alternating administration of cisplatin/vinorelbine (CV) and docetaxel/gemcitabine (DG) in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty-four patients with NSCLC (6% stage IIIB, 94% stage IV) were enrolled. The initial schema was to give CV on days 1 and 8 followed by DG on days 15 and 22, every 28 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was used on days 9-14 and 23-28. Despite dose reductions, this sequence was not feasible. Therefore, the sequence was switched to give DG before CV, cycle duration was extended to 35 days, and G-CSF was given on days 2-7 and 23-28. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting toxicities. The recommended doses for phase II studies are docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 15, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 15 and 22, every 35 days with G-CSF 5 microg/kg on days 2-7 and 23-28. However, treatment delays were required in subsequent cycles due to cumulative myelosuppression. A less intensive schedule is recommended for subsequent cycles for further testing. Overall response rate was 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14%-45%), and median survival for all patients was 11.8 months. One- and 2-year survival rates were 47% (95% CI, 30%-63%) and 14% (95% CI, 1.4%-40%), respectively. Although initial administration of this regimen was feasible, dose intensity could not be maintained in subsequent cycles due to cumulative myelosuppression. A sequential rather than alternating use of doublet regimens might be more readily feasible and may permit greater maintenance of dose intensity.

Phase I/II study of pemetrexed with or without ABT-751 in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: ABT-751 is an antimitotic and vascular disrupting agent with potent preclinical anticancer activity. We conducted a phase I and randomized double-blind phase II study of pemetrexed with ABT-751 or placebo in patients with recurrent advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: One hundred seventy-one patients received intravenous pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) day 1 and oral ABT-751 or placebo days 1 to 14 of 21-day cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end point included overall survival (OS); pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were also analyzed. RESULTS: The recommended phase II dose of ABT-751 with pemetrexed is 200 mg. Fatigue, constipation, anemia, nausea, and diarrhea were the most common toxicities in both study arms. No pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Median PFS in the ABT-751 arm was 2.3 months versus 1.9 for placebo (P = .819, log-rank) for the intention-to-treat population. However, differences in PFS (P = .112, log-rank) and OS (P = .034, log-rank; median 3.3 v 8.1 months) favoring ABT-751 were seen in the squamous NSCLC subgroup. Baseline circulating tumor cell concentrations were predictive of improved OS (P = .013). Changes from baseline of greater than 20% in plasma levels of placenta growth factor (P = .056), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (P = .03), and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (P = .01) were markers best associated with improved OS. CONCLUSION: Addition of ABT-751 to pemetrexed is well-tolerated, but does not improve outcome in unselected patients with recurrent NSCLC. ABT-751 may have therapeutic potential in squamous NSCLC. Exploratory cellular and molecular analyses in this study identified biomarkers that may correlate with survival.

Long-term outcome of a phase II study of docetaxel-based multimodality chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

We performed a phase II trial to evaluate a docetaxel-based regimen in locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer. Untreated stage II-IVa esophageal cancer patients with performance status 0-2 were included. Tumor resectability was determined prior to initiation of study. Induction docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) day 1 with prophylactic filgrastim was delivered every 21 days for 3 cycles. Subsequent concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) utilized weekly docetaxel (20 mg/m(2)) and concurrent radiotherapy (2 Gy/day) in resectable/resected patients (50 Gy) and in unresectable patients (66 Gy). A total of 78 patients (15 squamous cell carcinoma, 60 adenocarcinoma, 3 mixed/undifferentiated; 68 men, 10 women; median age 61 years) were accrued. The regimen was administered to 59 (76%) potentially resectable patients and 13 (17%) unresectable patients; 6 patients (8%) received the regimen post-operatively. Response rate in 66 evaluable patients following induction chemotherapy was 30%. Sixty-nine patients underwent CRT. Ten patients had disease progression during CRT. Forty-five out of 59 potentially resectable patients underwent esophagectomy after CRT, and 42 patients had complete tumor resection with negative margins. Eighteen out of 59 patients who were potentially resectable patients had pathologic complete response (pCR-31%). Grade 3/4 toxicity during induction chemotherapy included leucopenia, neutropenia, vomiting, and neuropathy. Esophagitis was the predominant toxicity during CRT. Median overall survival was 11.4 months for unresectable patients, 14.3 months for resectable patients and 10.4 months for patients who received the regimen post-operatively (log-rank P = 0.2492). Docetaxel-based CRT regimen is active and tolerable in esophageal cancer. The observed pCR in the potentially resectable group indicates good local control.

A phase 2 study of cetuximab in combination with docetaxel in chemotherapy-refractory/resistant patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab in combination with docetaxel was examined in chemotherapy-refractory/resistant patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine response rate, survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK). METHODS: Patients had evidence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression (> or =1 +) and tumor progression during or disease recurrence within 3 months after chemotherapy. Cetuximab was administered weekly (400 mg/m(2) initial; 250 mg/m(2) thereafter). Docetaxel was administered every 3 weeks (75 mg/m(2)). A response in 3 of the first 21 patients was required to continue accrual to the target sample size of 50 patients. RESULTS: Confirmed responses included 1 complete response (1.8%), 10 partial responses (18.2%), and 20 with stable disease (36.4%). The response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.4% to 33.0%) and median time to disease progression was 104 days. There were no differences in PK parameters of docetaxel alone or with cetuximab. The most common grade 3 of 4 adverse events were leukopenia (27.3%) and acne (21.8%). Four patients (7.3%) discontinued due to allergic reaction. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months with a 1-year survival of 35%. CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab in combination with docetaxel was well tolerated. The response rate supports more definitive evaluation of this combination in the second-line setting.

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9430.

BACKGROUND: Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial 9430 was a randomized phase II trial which investigated the safety and activity of four novel doublets in untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer. The results of the paclitaxel and cisplatin arm have not been reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received paclitaxel 230 mg/m followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m on day 1 every 21 days. All patients received granulocyte colony stimulating factor 5 microg/kg/d beginning on day 3 of each cycle. RESULTS: The patient characteristics of the 34 patients assigned to this treatment arm were: median age 61.5 years (range 41-82), male (76%), performance status 0 (41%), 1 (32%), and 2 (26%). An objective response was observed in 23 patients (68%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 49-83%); 2 complete responses (6%) and 21 partial responses (62%). Median progression-free survival time was 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.8-7.1 month), and median overall survival time was 7.7 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.6 months). The 1-year survival rate observed was 29% (95% CI: 15-45%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was observed in 5 (15%) and 4 (12%) patients, respectively. Two patients developed febrile neutropenia including one patient who died of neutropenic sepsis. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic observed were: sensory neuropathy in eight patients (24%); and hyperglycemia, malaise and nausea were all observed in four patients (12%). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer and Leukemia Group B will not pursue further investigation of paclitaxel and cisplatin due to the modest activity and the toxicity observed on this trial.

Phase I study of induction chemotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy with irinotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel for stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), and determine the phase II dose for the combination of irinotecan-carboplatin-paclitaxel given as induction chemotherapy and with concomitant chest radiotherapy for patients with Stage III non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Patients with Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status of 0 to 2, stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC patients with resectable or unresectable disease were treated with induction chemotherapy (irinotecan 100 mg/m2, carboplatin AUC 5, and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 days 1 and 22) followed by concomitant chemotherapy (irinotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel) and chest radiotherapy (66 Gy for unresectable and 50 Gy for resectable disease) beginning on week 7. The primary objective was to escalate the dose of irinotecan during chemoradiation in sequential cohorts to determine the DLT and MTD of the regimen. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled (median age 63 years, 57% male, 41% performance status 0, 30% resectable). Induction chemotherapy was tolerable and active (response rate 26%; stable disease 60%). Eight patients did not receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy because of progressive disease (5), death (1), hypersensitivity reaction to paclitaxel (1), and withdrawal of consent (1). Twenty-nine patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The concomitant administration of chest radiotherapy with weekly irinotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel was not feasible at the first, second, and third dose levels. DLT was failure to achieve recovery to

A phase II study of ABT-751 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the tolerability and efficacy of ABT-751, an oral antimitotic agent that inhibits polymerization of microtubules, in patients with advanced taxane-refractory non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility was limited to patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC who had received one to two cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, had a performance status of zero to one, and adequate organ function. Treatment included ABT-751 200 mg daily for 21 consecutive days, followed by 7 days off drug. Objectives were to determine response rate, time to tumor progression, survival, and tolerability of ABT-751. RESULTS: All 35 enrolled patients were assessable for survival, response, and tolerability. Median time to tumor progression and overall survival were 2.1 and 8.4 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 2.9%. One patient achieved a partial response that was ongoing 567 days after initial documentation. Treatment was well tolerated; fatigue, constipation, and dehydration were the only treatment related, grade three adverse events occurring in more than one patient. Incidence of grade 3/4 hematologic and blood chemistry toxicities was acceptable, and ABT-751 was not associated with myelosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: ABT-751 associated toxicity was acceptable. The median time to progression and overall survival as demonstrated for ABT-751 were comparable to other agents considered active in this patient population and to current treatments approved for second-line NSCLC. The novel antimitotic targeting of ABT-751 in combination with the compound's acceptable nonmyelosuppressive toxicity profile and efficacy similar to agents currently in use in this setting, warrant further evaluation of this compound in combination with other cytotoxic agents in advanced NSCLC.

Eicosanoid modulation in advanced lung cancer: cyclooxygenase-2 expression is a positive predictive factor for celecoxib + chemotherapy--Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 30203.

PURPOSE: Increased expression of eicosanoids in cancer has been associated with adverse prognosis. We performed a randomized phase II trial to test the hypothesis that inhibitors of two eicosanoid pathways (cyclooxygenase-2 [COX-2], celecoxib and 5-lipoxygenase [5-LOX], zileuton) added to chemotherapy would improve outcome in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC, a performance status of 0 to 2, and no prior therapy were eligible. All patients received carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5.5 mg/mL x min day 1 + gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) days 1 and 8. Patients were randomly assigned to: (a) zileuton 600 mg PO qid, (b) celecoxib 400 mg PO bid, or (c) celecoxib and zileuton at the same doses. Immunohistochemical staining for COX-2 and 5-LOX was performed without knowledge of outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred forty patients were entered and 134 were eligible and treated. There was no survival difference between the arms. COX-2 expression was a negative prognostic marker for overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.51, P = .019 for index >or= 4; HR = 4.16, P = .005 for index = 9) for patients not receiving celecoxib. Patients with increased COX-2 expression (index >or= 4), receiving celecoxib had better survival than did COX-2-expressing patients not receiving drug (HR = .342, P = .005 for OS; HR = .294, P = .002 for failure-free survival). Multivariate analysis confirmed the interaction of COX-2 and celecoxib on survival. 5-LOX expression was neither prognostic nor predictive. CONCLUSION: This study failed to demonstrate the value of dual eicosanoid inhibition or benefit from either agent alone in addition to chemotherapy. However, a prospectively defined subset analysis suggests an advantage for celecoxib and chemotherapy for patients with moderate to high COX-2 expression.