Utilization of a periodontal endoscope in nonsurgical periodontal therapy: A randomized, split-mouth clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The removal of subgingival calculus to obtain gingival health is an integral part of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. The periodontal endoscope is used by some clinicians to help enhance access to effectively remove subgingival calculus; however, longer-term studies on this subject are still lacking. The purpose of this randomized, controlled clinical trial was to compare the clinical outcomes of scaling and root planing (SRP) using a periodontal endoscope versus conventional SRP using loupes for up to 12 months, utilizing a split-mouth design. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were recruited who exhibited generalized stage II or stage III periodontitis. SRP was rendered by the same experienced hygienist using either a periodontal endoscope or conventional SRP using loupes, following random assignment of the left and right halves of the mouth. All periodontal evaluations were done by the same periodontal resident at baseline, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after therapy. RESULTS: Single-rooted teeth interproximal sites displayed a significantly lower percentage of improved sites (P < 0.05) than multirooted teeth for probing depth and clinical attachment level (CAL). Maxillary multirooted interproximal sites favored the use of the periodontal endoscope at the 3- and 6-month time periods (P = 0.017 and 0.019, respectively) in terms of the percentage of sites with improved CAL. Mandibular multirooted interproximal sites showed more sites with improved CAL using conventional SRP than with the periodontal endoscope (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Overall, the use of a periodontal endoscope was more beneficial in multirooted sites compared to single-rooted sites, specifically in maxillary multirooted sites.

Bone Regeneration in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) and Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to analyze and compare the effects of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) and plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) combined with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) on bone regeneration outcomes in maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) procedures. A total of 15 patients in need of MSA were consecutively recruited. Maxillary sinuses were grafted with DBBM alone (control group), DBBM mixed with A-PRF (PRF group), or DBBM mixed with PRGF (PRGF group). After a 6-month healing period, bone core biopsy samples were collected prior to implant placement for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. The mean percentage of mineralized tissue (MT) was 20.33 ± 11.50 in the control group, 32.20 ± 7.29 for the PRF group, and 34.80 ± 6.83 for the PRGF group, with no statistically significant differences across the three groups (P > .05). The mean percentage of remaining bone grafting material (RBGM) was 24.00 ± 7.94 for the control group, 26.00 ± 7.78 for the PRF group, and 15.80 ± 8.23 for the PRGF group, with no statistically significant differences across the three groups (P > .05). Finally, the mean percentage of nonmineralized tissue (NMT) was 55.66 ± 7.77 for the control group, 41.40 ± 8.32 for the PRF group, and 49.60 ± 5.68 for the PRGF group, with no statistically signifcant differences across the three groups (P > .05). These findings suggest that the addition of A-PRF and PRGF to DBBM does not enhance new bone formation outcomes in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. Neither of the two platelet concentrates were superior to the other in any of the variables assessed.

Calculus removal with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts in vitro.

BACKGROUND: Efficient calculus removal is a primary goal in periodontal therapy. Diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts (DIs) offer promise for improved scaling and were evaluated in vitro. METHODS: Extracted human teeth with moderate to severe calculus had areas of calculus ( approximately 5 x 5 mm) delineated with small burs. Each calculus area was treated under 2.5x magnification to the point of visible root cleanliness with sharp Gracey curets (hand instruments [HIs]), plain ultrasonic inserts (PIs), or ultrasonic inserts with fine-grit diamond coating; the latter two were used in a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at a medium power setting. Each curet or insert was used for four teeth and then replaced by a new instrument. The time needed to clean each tooth/surface was recorded. The total area treated and the area of the residual calculus were calculated using an imaging analysis program. RESULTS: The mean time required for clinical calculus removal was 29.7 seconds for DIs, 91.9 seconds for PIs, and 49.8 seconds for HIs (all P <0.0001 from each other). Overall, the mean percentage of residual calculus was 6.3% for DIs, 5.4% for PIs, and 3.1% for HIs (significant differences between HIs and the other treatments). CONCLUSIONS: In vitro calculus removal was faster with DIs, followed by HIs and PIs. More residual calculus was found with the DIs; however, the 1% to 3% difference (93.7% clean versus 94.6% clean versus 96.9% clean with DIs, PIs, and HIs, respectively) does not seem to be clinically significant.

Periodontal regeneration with peptide-enhanced anorganic bone matrix in particulate and putty form in dogs.

BACKGROUND: Peptide-enhanced (using the peptide 15 [P-15] synthetic peptide) anorganic bone matrix (ABM) particulate (PPart) grafts have demonstrated clinical and histologic success in human periodontal defects. Dispersion of ABM/P-15 in sodium hyaluronate carrier (PPutty) improves the handling properties of the graft material. The healing of ABM/P-15 particulate and ABM/P-15 putty was compared in critical-sized fenestration defects in 16 mongrel dogs. METHODS: After full thickness flap reflection, 7 mm diameter fenestrations were made with a trephine in the mid-root of both maxillary canines in each dog. Bone, periodontal ligament, and cementum were removed as completely as possible with hand root planing within the trephine-produced notches. By random allocation, each defect was filled with PPart or PPutty, and the flaps were closed with sutures. One dog contributing two defects served as a negative control. Block sections were retrieved at 3 and 8 weeks for histologic processing. Three 6-mu step serial sections in the center of the defects were used for analysis. Parameters measured included the original length of the wound, linear amount of periodontal regeneration including new cementum, bone and connective tissue, and area measurements of new bone and remaining particles. PPutty and PPart results were compared for significant differences using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: Clinical healing was uneventful in all cases. There was no evidence of inflammation or adverse tissue reactions with either material. The controls showed minimal regeneration at the periphery of the defect. Histomorphometric evaluation of the grafted defects revealed the following: at 3 weeks, there was minimal new bone formation (occupying 4.2% of the grafted area for the PPutty and 1.2% for the PPart). The grafted particles occupied 21.2% and 35.6% of the area for the PPutty and PPart, respectively (P = 0.039). At 8 weeks, there was a tendency for greater new bone formation compared to 3 weeks with both materials. There was significantly more new bone with the PPutty (49.3%) compared to the PPart (14.8%) (P = 0.045). The grafted particles occupied 7.9% and 17% of the grafted area for the PPutty and PPart, respectively (no significant difference). There were no significant differences for any of the linear measurements. ABM/P-15 PPutty had superior handling characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Both ABM/P-15 materials yielded satisfactory healing and resulted in the greater regeneration of fenestration defects in dogs at 8 weeks compared to controls. In addition, AMB/P-15 putty resulted in more bone formation compared to ABM/P-15 particulate.

Evaluation of hard tissue replacement composite graft material as a ridge preservation/augmentation material in conjunction with immediate hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants.

BACKGROUND: Immediate placement of dental implants (DI) in fresh extraction sockets is associated with remaining voids around the DI and often a partial dehiscence or thin facial alveolar plate. Bone replacement grafts are often used to correct these problems. This study evaluated the use of a layered composite of PMMA (poly-methyl-methacrylate), PHEMA (poly-hydroxyl-ethyl-methacrylate), and calcium hydroxide grafts (HTR) as a ridge preservation/ augmentation material used in conjunction with an immediate DI placement technique. METHODS: Twenty-three patients requiring 1 or 2 extractions that were treatment planned for immediate DI placement received 4.0 or 3.25 mm diameter hydroxyapatite-coated cylindrical implants in the extraction sockets. HTR was used to fill the remaining socket void and enhance the facial ridge width. A collagen hemostatic was placed to cover the DI sites, flaps released, and primary closure attempted with sutures. DI uncovering was performed at about 6 months. Measurements were taken to the nearest 0.5 mm of the internal socket width and total ridge width at DI placement and uncovering. RESULTS: Thirty DIs were placed in the 23 patients. Mean initial internal socket width was 6.9 mm. The total ridge width showed a mean change from 9.1 mm to 8.4 mm; 60% of the areas showed a net increase or no change, while 40% showed a decrease in overall ridge width. DI success rate was 97% out to 6 months of loading. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that HTR is a useful adjunct in the placement of immediate DIs for filling of socket voids and preservation of ridge width.

Use of HTR synthetic bone as an augmentation material in conjunction with immediate implant placement: a case report.

Immediate placement of dental implants (DI) in fresh extraction sockets is associated with remaining voids around the DI and often a partial dehiscence or thin facial alveolar plate. Bioplant HTR synthetic bone (HTR) was used as a ridge preservation/augmentation material in conjunction with this method of DI placement. A 61-year-old white woman requiring extraction of tooth 12 opted for immediate DI placement. HTR was used to fill the remaining socket void and enhance the facial ridge width, and primary closure was attempted with sutures. DI uncovering was performed at about 6 months. Measurements were taken to the nearest 0.5 mm of the internal socket width and total site width at DI placement and uncovering. The internal socket width was essentially maintained (6.8 vs 6.6 mm), and the total ridge width showed a change from 8.7 to 9.1 mm. The results of this case suggest that HTR is a useful adjunct in the placement of immediate DIs for the preservation of ridge width.

Use of HTR synthetic bone grafts in conjunction with immediate dental implants.

Immediate placement of dental implants in fresh extraction sockets is associated with remaining voids around the implants and often a partial dehiscence or thinning of the facial alveolar plate. Nine patients had Bioplant HTR synthetic bone used as a ridge preservation/augmentation material in conjunction with immediate placement of 10 implants. Hard tissue replacement (HTR) was used to fill the remaining socket void and enhance the facial ridge width, and the wound closed as completely as possible. Dental implants were uncovered at approximately 6 months. Measurements taken of the internal socket width and total ridge width at the implant placement and uncovering showed the mean internal socket width was maintained (7.2 mm vs 6.9 mm), and the total ridge width exhibited a mean change from 9.6 mm to 8.8 mm. Of the 10 implant sites, 7 showed a net increase, 2 no change, and 1 a decrease in overall ridge width. All 10 implants were restored for at least 6 months. These clinical results suggest that HTR is a useful adjunct in the placement of immediate dental implants for the preservation of ridge width and provides a good base for functional and esthetic prosthetic reconstruction.