Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the vitamin D status of people in the West of Ireland.

OBJECTIVE: Identify the impact of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions on the vitamin D status of individuals in the west of Ireland. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Adults who had wintertime serum 25(OH)D analysis completed in Galway University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 16,725 participants (2015-2020 (n = 13,449) and 2020-2021 (n = 3276)). Baseline demographics; sex, age, origin of the sample and the date of sample collection. RESULTS: Median serum vitamin D and serum vitamin D3 concentrations were higher in the 5-month period from October-February 2020-2021 (61 nmol/L (± 36-85 nmol/L) and 60 nmol/L (± 34-85 nmol/L)) respectively, than for the corresponding 5-month period (October-February) in 2015-2020 (53 nmol/L (± 32-78 nmol/L) and 51 nmol/L (± 30-77 nmol/L)) respectively. These changes coincided with a decline in the prevalence of deficiency. In the 5-month period October-February 2020-2021, 19.2% of the population were vitamin D deficient (< 30 nmol/L) compared to 22.5% in the corresponding 5-month period in 2015-2020, and 38.1% were vitamin D deficient (< 50 nmol/L) in the 5-month period October-February 2020-2021 compared to 46.6% in the corresponding 5-month period in 2015-2020. Males were more likely to be deficient at both thresholds (p < 0.001). For the total cohort, at the < 30 nmol/L threshold, inpatients (25.5%) and nursing home residents (34.1%) had higher prevalence of deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D levels were higher in the 5-month period of October-February 2020-2021, and this precipitated a decline in deficiency at both thresholds, indicating that lockdown coincided with enhanced vitamin D status. We postulate that it may be attributable to changes in diet and/or supplementation, or increased sun exposure, but further confirmatory studies are required.

How do women feel about being weighed during pregnancy? A qualitative exploration of the opinions and experiences of postnatal women.

OBJECTIVE: to explore routine weighing in antenatal care and weight management in pregnancy with women who have been weighed during pregnancy. DESIGN: a qualitative study utilising semi-structured telephone interviews, and thematic analysis. SETTING: participants resided in Dublin, Ireland and had been weighed during pregnancy. PARTICIPANTS: individual telephone interviews conducted with ten postpartum women (nine months postpartum). FINDINGS: experiences of routine weighing were positive, and participants believed it should be part of standard antenatal care. Several benefits to routine weighing were cited, including providing reassurance and minimising postpartum weight retention. It was felt that there was a lack of information provided on gestational weight gain and healthy lifestyle in pregnancy, and that healthcare professionals are ideally placed to provide this advice. Increased information provision was seen as a method to improve healthy lifestyle behaviours in pregnancy. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: these findings contribute to the current debate about the re-introduction of routine weighing throughout pregnancy (Allen-Walker et al., 2016). Women stated that they expected to be weighed during pregnancy and, contrary to previous claims, there was no evidence that routine weighing during antenatal care caused anxiety. From discussions it was clear that women desired more information on gestational weight gain and a healthy lifestyle, and felt that health professionals should provide this.