RESUMO
Purpose: To determine whether peripheral blood leukocyte numbers and serum markers of inflammation can be used to predict which patients with primary uveal melanoma will develop metastasis. Design: Retrospective study. Participants: Medical records of patients with uveal melanoma (UM) who received treatment for primary UM between February 1992 and December 2020 at the Erasmus University Medical Center (Rotterdam, The Netherlands) and the Rotterdam Eye Hospital (Rotterdam, The Netherlands) were reviewed. Methods: Inclusion criteria were the presence of a melanoma of the choroid or ciliary body and the availability of data from peripheral blood samples taken before treatment of the melanoma. Data including patient demographics, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels; erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); number of leukocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes; and histopathologic findings were obtained from medical records. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were calculated. Main Outcome Measures: Metastasis-free survival. Results: Of the 807 patients with UM, serum and leukocyte data were available for 183 of them at the time of primary tumor treatment. In the total group, no correlation was found between ESR before treatment; the number of leukocytes; percentages of neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes; or NLR or LMR values and any of the clinical characteristics or metastasis-free survival. Among patients who underwent enucleation, those with negative BAP1 findings showed significantly lower numbers of leukocytes (P < 0.05). In the entire cohort, a significant association was found between high CRP levels and longer metastasis-free survival (MFS; P = 0.049). Conclusions: The total blood leukocyte number was related to loss of BAP1 staining in patients who underwent enucleation, with lower leukocyte counts correlating with absent BAP1 staining. Higher CRP levels were associated with a longer MFS in the entire cohort. Neither the NLR nor the LMR is a good predictor for metastasis developing in patients with UM.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of potential age-related eye conditions in elderly who are assisted by home healthcare nurses. The number of referrals to the general practitioner (GP), feasibility of screening and associations between vision loss and health outcomes were also studied. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in which trained home healthcare nurses screened the eyes of 151 patients [mean age 80 (50-96 years)] using their available correction, with VISION 2020 Netherlands screeners (e.g. acuity/field loss). Health outcomes were assessed with questionnaires. RESULTS: Distance decimal visual acuity was ≤0.3 in 20.5% (unilateral) and 19.9% (bilateral) of patients, and near visual acuity was ≤0.4 in 17.7% (unilateral) and 33.3% (bilateral). Macular dysfunction was present in 21.5% (unilateral) and 8.3% (bilateral) and peripheral field problems in 11.4% (unilateral) and 7.9% (bilateral). GP referrals were proposed in 21.5%; in 40%, the GP or ophthalmologist was already aware of eye problems. Although health problems were prominent in participants (8.6% fractures, 22% depression and 18% anxiety), no significant associations were found between vision loss and self-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: Sixty per cent of frail elderly home healthcare patients had an ophthalmologic condition. Although a large number was already known in eye health care, >20% was referred with an unrecognized ophthalmologic problem. Basic ophthalmologic screening by home healthcare nurses might be a potentially relevant tool to reduce the burden of age-related vision loss, contributing to the joint World Health Organization - VISION 2020 initiative to eliminate avoidable blindness. Relevant health outcomes do not seem to be clearly related to having visual impairment, but rather to having general health problems.