Arterial stiffness, endothelial dysfunction and impaired fibrinolysis are pathogenic mechanisms contributing to cardiovascular risk in ANCA-associated vasculitis.

Cardiovascular disease is a complication of systemic inflammatory diseases including anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). The mechanisms of cardiovascular morbidity in AAV are poorly understood, and risk-reduction strategies are lacking. Therefore, in a series of double-blind, randomized case-control forearm plethysmography and crossover systemic interventional studies, we examined arterial stiffness and endothelial function in patients with AAV in long-term disease remission and in matched healthy volunteers (32 each group). The primary outcome for the case-control study was the difference in endothelium-dependent vasodilation between health and AAV, and for the crossover study was the difference in pulse wave velocity (PWV) between treatment with placebo and selective endothelin-A receptor antagonism. Parallel in vitro studies of circulating monocytes and platelets explored mechanisms. Compared to healthy volunteers, patients with AAV had 30% reduced endothelium-dependent vasodilation and 50% reduced acute release of endothelial active tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), both significant in the case-control study. Patients with AAV had significantly increased arterial stiffness (PWV: 7.3 versus 6.4 m/s). Plasma endothelin-1 was two-fold higher in AAV and independently predicted PWV and tPA release. Compared to placebo, both selective endothelin-A and dual endothelin-A/B receptor blockade reduced PWV and increased tPA release in AAV in the crossover study. Mechanistically, patients with AAV had increased platelet activation, more platelet-monocyte aggregates, and altered monocyte endothelin receptor function, reflecting reduced endothelin-1 clearance. Patients with AAV in long-term remission have elevated cardiovascular risk and endothelin-1 contributes to this. Thus, our data support a role for endothelin-blockers to reduce cardiovascular risk by reducing arterial stiffness and increasing circulating tPA activity.

A randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded end point trial comparing the effects of spironolactone to chlorthalidone on left ventricular mass in patients with early-stage chronic kidney disease: Rationale and design of the SPIRO-CKD trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased left ventricular (LV) mass and arterial stiffness. In a previous trial, spironolactone improved these end points compared with placebo in subjects with early-stage CKD, but it is not known whether these effects were specific to the drug or secondary to blood pressure lowering. AIM: The aim was to investigate the hypothesis that spironolactone is superior to chlorthalidone in the reduction of LV mass while exerting similar effects on blood pressure. DESIGN: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point clinical trial initially designed to compare the effects of 40weeks of treatment with spironolactone 25mg once daily to chlorthalidone 25mg once daily on the co-primary end points of change in pulse wave velocity and change in LV mass in 350 patients with stages 2 and 3 CKD on established treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker. Because of slow recruitment rates, it became apparent that it would not be possible to recruit this sample size within the funded time period. The study design was therefore changed to one with a single primary end point of LV mass requiring 150 patients. Recruitment was completed on 31 December 2016, at which time 154 patients had been recruited. Investigations included cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, applanation tonometry, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and laboratory tests. Subjects are assessed before and after 40weeks of randomly allocated drug therapy and at 46weeks after discontinuation of the study drug.

Top-down lipidomics of low density lipoprotein reveal altered lipid profiles in advanced chronic kidney disease.

This study compared the molecular lipidomic profile of LDL in patients with nondiabetic advanced renal disease and no evidence of CVD to that of age-matched controls, with the hypothesis that it would reveal proatherogenic lipid alterations. LDL was isolated from 10 normocholesterolemic patients with stage 4/5 renal disease and 10 controls, and lipids were analyzed by accurate mass LC/MS. Top-down lipidomics analysis and manual examination of the data identified 352 lipid species, and automated comparative analysis demonstrated alterations in lipid profile in disease. The total lipid and cholesterol content was unchanged, but levels of triacylglycerides and N-acyltaurines were significantly increased, while phosphatidylcholines, plasmenyl ethanolamines, sulfatides, ceramides, and cholesterol sulfate were significantly decreased in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Chemometric analysis of individual lipid species showed very good discrimination of control and disease sample despite the small cohorts and identified individual unsaturated phospholipids and triglycerides mainly responsible for the discrimination. These findings illustrate the point that although the clinical biochemistry parameters may not appear abnormal, there may be important underlying lipidomic changes that contribute to disease pathology. The lipidomic profile of CKD LDL offers potential for new biomarkers and novel insights into lipid metabolism and cardiovascular risk in this disease.

Endothelin-A receptor antagonism modifies cardiovascular risk factors in CKD.

Arterial stiffness and impaired nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability contribute to the high risk for cardiovascular disease in CKD. Both asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of NO production, and endothelin-1 (ET-1) oppose the actions of NO, suggesting that ET-1 receptor antagonists may have a role in cardiovascular protection in CKD. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover study in 27 patients with proteinuric CKD to compare the effects of the ET(A) receptor antagonist sitaxentan, nifedipine, and placebo on proteinuria, BP, arterial stiffness, and various cardiovascular biomarkers. After 6 weeks of treatment, placebo and nifedipine did not affect plasma urate, ADMA, or urine ET-1/creatinine, which reflects renal ET-1 production; in contrast, sitaxentan led to statistically significant reductions in all three of these biomarkers. No treatment affected plasma ET-1. Reductions in proteinuria and BP after sitaxentan treatment was associated with increases in urine ET-1/creatinine, whereas reduction in pulse-wave velocity, a measure of arterial stiffness, was associated with a decrease in ADMA. Taken together, these data suggest that ET(A) receptor antagonism may modify risk factors for cardiovascular disease in CKD.

The effect of daily UVA phototherapy for 2 weeks on clinic and 24-h blood pressure in individuals with mild hypertension.

Latitude and season determine exposure to ultraviolet radiation and correlate with population blood pressure. Evidence for Vitamin D causing this relationship is inconsistent, and temperature changes are only partly responsible for BP variation. In healthy individuals, a single irradiation with 20 J/cm2 UVA mobilises NO from cutaneous stores to the circulation, causes arterial vasodilatation, and elicits a transient fall in BP. We, therefore, tested whether low-dose daily UVA phototherapy might be an effective treatment for mild hypertension. 13 patients with untreated high-normal or stage 1 hypertension (BP 130-159/85-99 mm Hg), confirmed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), were recruited. Using home phototherapy lamps they were either exposed to 5 J/cm2 full body UVA (320-410 nm) radiation each day for 14 days, or sham-irradiated with lamps filtered to exclude wavelengths <500 nm. After a washout period of 3 ± 1 week, the alternate irradiation was delivered. 24-h ABP was measured on day 0 before either irradiation sequence and on day 14. Clinic BP was recorded on day 0, and within 90 min of irradiation on day 14. There was no effect on 24-h ABP following UVA irradiation. Clinic BP shortly after irradiation fell with UVA (-8.0 ± 2.9/-3.8 ± 1.1 mm Hg p = 0.034/0.029) but not sham irradiation (1.1 ± 3.0/0.9 ± 1.5 mm Hg). Once daily low-dose UVA does not control mildly elevated BP although it produces a transient fall shortly after irradiation. More frequent exposure to UVA might be effective. Alternatively, UVB, which photo-releases more NO from skin, could be tried.

Effects of Spironolactone and Chlorthalidone on Cardiovascular Structure and Function in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized, Open-Label Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, treatment with spironolactone in early-stage CKD reduced left ventricular mass and arterial stiffness compared with placebo. It is not known if these effects were due to BP reduction or specific vascular and myocardial effects of spironolactone. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point study conducted in four UK centers (Birmingham, Cambridge, Edinburgh, and London) comparing spironolactone 25 mg to chlorthalidone 25 mg once daily for 40 weeks in 154 participants with nondiabetic stage 2 and 3 CKD (eGFR 30-89 ml/min per 1.73 m2). The primary end point was change in left ventricular mass on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were on treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker and had controlled BP (target ≤130/80 mm Hg). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in left ventricular mass regression; at week 40, the adjusted mean difference for spironolactone compared with chlorthalidone was -3.8 g (95% confidence interval, -8.1 to 0.5 g, P=0.08). Office and 24-hour ambulatory BPs fell in response to both drugs with no significant differences between treatment. Pulse wave velocity was not significantly different between groups; at week 40, the adjusted mean difference for spironolactone compared with chlorthalidone was 0.04 m/s (-0.4 m/s, 0.5 m/s, P=0.90). Hyperkalemia (defined ≥5.4 mEq/L) occurred more frequently with spironolactone (12 versus two participants, adjusted relative risk was 5.5, 95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 22.1, P=0.02), but there were no patients with severe hyperkalemia (defined ≥6.5 mEq/L). A decline in eGFR >30% occurred in eight participants treated with chlorthalidone compared with two participants with spironolactone (adjusted relative risk was 0.2, 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 1.1, P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Spironolactone was not superior to chlorthalidone in reducing left ventricular mass, BP, or arterial stiffness in nondiabetic CKD.

The pharmacokinetic profile of sitaxsentan, a selective endothelin receptor antagonist, in varying degrees of renal impairment.

AIM: To investigate the pharmacokinetic profile of a single 100-mg oral dose of sitaxsentan, a selective endothelin type A receptor antagonist, in subjects with normal and impaired renal function. METHODS: This was an open label, single oral dose study in subjects with normal [creatinine clearance (CrCL) > or = 80 ml min(-1)] and impaired renal function (mild renal impairment CrCL 51-80 ml min(-1), moderate impairment CrCL 31-50 ml min(-1), severe impairment CrCL < or = 30 ml min(-1)). All subjects received a dose of 100 mg sitaxsentan. RESULTS: Twenty-four subjects were enrolled, six in each of the normal and three renal impairment groups. The mean plasma sitaxsentan concentrations were comparable across the groups, as were the mean values for C(max) (10.3-13.9 microg ml(-1)), AUC(infinity) (18.7-22.5 h microg(-1) ml(-1)), oral clearance (CL/F, 82.3-94.9 ml min(-1)), volume of distribution (Vz/F, 64.8-69.6 l) and elimination half-life (t(1/2), 8.6-9.6 h). There was substantial overlap among the four groups in the individual subject values for CL/F and Vz/F and no relationship between either of these parameters and CrCL. CONCLUSION: After a single 100-mg oral dose of sitaxsentan there were no differences in its pharmacokinetics among subjects with normal or impaired renal function.

First-in-Man Demonstration of Direct Endothelin-Mediated Natriuresis and Diuresis.

Endothelin (ET) receptor antagonists are potentially novel therapeutic agents in chronic kidney disease and resistant hypertension, but their use is complicated by sodium and water retention. In animal studies, this side effect arises from ETB receptor blockade in the renal tubule. Previous attempts to determine whether this mechanism operates in humans have been confounded by the hemodynamic consequences of ET receptor stimulation/blockade. We aimed to determine the effects of ET signaling on salt transport in the human nephron by administering subpressor doses of the ET-1 precursor, big ET-1. We conducted a 2-phase randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in 10 healthy volunteers. After sodium restriction, subjects received either intravenous placebo or big ET-1, in escalating dose (≤300 pmol/min). This increased plasma concentration and urinary excretion of ET-1. Big ET-1 reduced heart rate (≈8 beats/min) but did not otherwise affect systemic hemodynamics or glomerular filtration rate. Big ET-1 increased the fractional excretion of sodium (from 0.5 to 1.0%). It also increased free water clearance and tended to increase the abundance of the sodium-potassium-chloride cotransporter (NKCC2) in urinary extracellular vesicles. Our protocol induced modest increases in circulating and urinary ET-1. Sodium and water excretion increased in the absence of significant hemodynamic perturbation, supporting a direct action of ET-1 on the renal tubule. Our data also suggest that sodium reabsorption is stimulated by ET-1 in the thick ascending limb and suppressed in the distal renal tubule. Fluid retention associated with ET receptor antagonist therapy may be circumvented by coprescribing potassium-sparing diuretics.

Carotid artery intima-media complex thickening in patients with relatively long-surviving type 1 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: The factors responsible for premature coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 1 diabetes are ill defined. We therefore assessed carotid intima-media complex thickness (IMT) in relatively long-surviving patients with type 1 diabetes as a marker of atherosclerosis and correlated this with traditional risk factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of 148 patients with relatively long-surviving (>18 years) type 1 diabetes (76 men and 72 women) attending the Centre for Diabetes and Endocrinology, Johannesburg. METHODS: The mean common carotid artery IMT and presence or absence of plaque was evaluated by high-resolution B-mode ultrasound. Their median age was 48 years and duration of diabetes 26 years (range 18-59 years). Traditional risk factors (age, duration of diabetes, glycemic control, hypertension, smoking and lipoprotein concentrations) were recorded. Three response variables were defined and modeled. Standard multiple regression was used for a continuous IMT variable, logistic regression for the presence/absence of plaque and ordinal logistic regression to model three categories of "risk." RESULTS: The median common carotid IMT was 0.62 mm (range 0.44-1.23 mm) with plaque detected in 28 cases. The multiple regression model found significant associations between IMT and current age (P=.001), duration of diabetes (P=.033), BMI (P=.008) and diagnosed hypertension (P=.046) with HDL showing a protective effect (P=.022). Current age (P=.001) and diagnosed hypertension (P=.004), smoking (P=.008) and retinopathy (P=.033) were significant in the logistic regression model. Current age was also significant in the ordinal logistic regression model (P<.001), as was total cholesterol/HDL ratio (P<.001) and mean HbA(1c) concentration (P=.073). CONCLUSIONS: The major factors influencing common carotid IMT in patients with relatively long-surviving type 1 diabetes are age, duration of diabetes, existing hypertension and HDL (protective) with a relatively minor role ascribed to relatively long-standing glycemic control.

Arterial stiffness &Sri Lankan chronic kidney disease of unknown origin.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common and independently associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Arterial stiffness contributes to CVD risk in CKD. In many developing countries a considerable proportion of CKD remains unexplained, termed CKDu. We assessed arterial stiffness in subjects with Sri Lankan CKDu, in matched controls without CKD and in those with defined CKD. Aortic blood pressure (BP), pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx) were assessed in 130 subjects (50 with CKDu, 45 with CKD and 35 without CKD) using the validated TensioMed™ Arteriograph monitor. Brachial and aortic BP was lower in controls than in CKDu and CKD subjects but no different between CKDu and CKD. Controls had a lower PWV compared to subjects with CKDu and CKD. Despite equivalent BP and renal dysfunction, CKDu subjects had a lower PWV than those with CKD (8.7 ± 1.5 vs. 9.9 ± 2.2 m/s, p < 0.01). Excluding diabetes accentuated the differences in PWV seen between groups (controls vs. CKDu vs. CKD: 6.7 ± 0.9 vs. 8.7 ± 1.5 vs. 10.4 ± 1.5 m/s, p < 0.001 for all). Sri Lankan CKDu is associated with less arterial stiffening than defined causes of CKD. Whether this translates to lower cardiovascular morbidity and mortality long term is unclear and should be the focus of future studies.

Diurnal variation in blood pressure and arterial stiffness in chronic kidney disease: the role of endothelin-1.

Hypertension and arterial stiffness are important independent cardiovascular risk factors in chronic kidney disease (CKD) to which endothelin-1 (ET-1) contributes. Loss of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) dipping is associated with CKD progression, but there are no data on 24-hour arterial stiffness variation. We examined the 24-hour variation of BP, arterial stiffness, and the ET system in healthy volunteers and patients with CKD and the effects on these of ET receptor type A receptor antagonism (sitaxentan). There were nocturnal dips in systolic BP and diastolic BP and pulse wave velocity, our measure of arterial stiffness, in 15 controls (systolic BP, −3.2±4.8%, P<0.05; diastolic BP, −6.4±6.2%, P=0.001; pulse wave velocity, −5.8±5.2%, P<0.01) but not in 15 patients with CKD. In CKD, plasma ET-1 increased by 1.2±1.4 pg/mL from midday to midnight compared with healthy volunteers (P<0.05). Urinary ET-1 did not change. In a randomized, double-blind, 3-way crossover study in 27 patients with CKD, 6-week treatment with placebo and nifedipine did not affect nocturnal dips in systolic BP or diastolic BP between baseline and week 6, whereas dipping was increased after 6-week sitaxentan treatment (baseline versus week 6, systolic BP: −7.0±6.2 versus −11.0±7.8 mm Hg, P<0.05; diastolic BP: −6.0±3.6 versus −8.3±5.1 mm Hg, P<0.05). There was no nocturnal dip in pulse pressure at baseline in the 3 phases of the study, whereas sitaxentan was linked to the development of a nocturnal dip in pulse pressure. In CKD, activation of the ET system seems to contribute not only to raised BP but also the loss of BP dipping. The clinical significance of these findings should be explored in future clinical trials.

Ethnic differences in the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in persons with diabetes when first presenting at a diabetes clinic in South Africa.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence and associated risk factors for diabetic retinopathy (DR) within a multiethnic population at presentation to a diabetes clinic in South Africa. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Retinal photography was conducted using a nonmydriatic digital camera without mydriasis and graded by one of three senior graders. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between any DR, referable DR, and clinical risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 1,537 persons with type 1 and 3,978 with type 2 diabetes were included. Prevalence of any DR in type 1 diabetes was 35.2% (background DR 26% and referable DR 9.2%) and in type 2 diabetes was 20.5% (14.1 and 6.4%, respectively). In type 1 diabetes, there was an increased risk of any DR in Asian Indians, whereas the risk of referable DR was increased for indigenous Africans compared with Caucasians. In type 2 diabetes, the risk was increased for all non-Caucasians compared with Caucasians. Longer duration of diabetes and elevated HbA(1c) were independently associated with any and referable DR in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, with the addition of hypertension and smoking in type 1 diabetes when adjusted for age at diagnosis of diabetes, sex, and ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of DR in this population from South Africa was similar to that reported globally; however, ethnic differences were observed. Increasing duration of diabetes and poor glycemic control were the strongest risk factors associated with any and referable DR in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

What is the best method of proteinuria measurement in clinical trials of endothelin receptor antagonists?

AIMS: To determine whether protein-creatinine ratio (PCR) and albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) are comparable to 24h urine protein in terms of agreement and repeatability, and therefore whether they are suitable for monitoring and comparing reduction in proteinuria in clinical trials of endothelin receptor antagonists. MAIN METHODS: Using data from a recent study of sitaxentan in 27 patients with proteinuric chronic kidney disease, the assays were compared with reference to their agreement, repeatability, the number of measurements required to obtain accurate results and correlation with reduction in proteinuria at baseline. KEY FINDINGS: The median coefficient of variation was lower for PCR than 24h urine protein (25 vs. 28%) but the range was higher (70 vs. 47%). When converted into the same units, mean difference between 24h urine protein and both PCR (0.03 g/day), and ACR (0.10 g/day), was small. However, scatter increased with mean level of proteinuria, such that agreement fell substantially above 1.5 g/day. According to 2-factor within-subjects ANOVA, the assay used was not a significant source of variation (PCR p=0.63, ACR p=0.38). With 3 measurements at each time point, baseline proteinuria correlated equally well with change in proteinuria, and percentage change was detected accurately by all 3 methods. SIGNIFICANCE: PCR and ACR may well be suitable replacements for 24h urine protein in the clinical trial context due to their similar accuracy and repeatability, greater convenience and lower cost. However, a randomised control trial comparing all 3 assays in a larger and more diverse population is necessary before 24h urine protein can be replaced.

Risk factors for metabolic syndrome independently predict arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease and minimal comorbidity.

OBJECTIVE: Metabolic syndrome (MS) is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but its contribution to arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction in CKD is not well defined. We hypothesized that risk factors for MS would independently predict arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction in CKD patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Risk factors for MS, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CF-PWV) and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) as measures of arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction, respectively, were assessed in 113 minimally comorbid CKD patients and in 23 matched control subjects. RESULTS: CF-PWV correlated with systolic blood pressure (SBP), waist circumference, and plasma glucose (r(2) = 0.25, 0.09, and 0.09; P < 0.01 for all). FMD correlated with SBP (r(2) = 0.09; P < 0.01) and waist circumference (r(2) = 0.03; P < 0.05). CF-PWV increased progressively (r(2) = 0.07; P < 0.01) with increasing number of risk factors for MS. In multiple linear regression, SBP and waist circumference were independent determinants of CF-PWV, whereas only SBP predicted FMD. CONCLUSIONS: The number of MS risk factors is an important determinant of arterial stiffness in CKD patients irrespective of the degree of renal impairment. Although BP remains the major determinant of arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction, waist circumference independently predicts arterial stiffness. MS risk factors, particularly abdominal girth, are potential targets for future interventional studies in patients with CKD.

Selective endothelin-A receptor antagonism reduces proteinuria, blood pressure, and arterial stiffness in chronic proteinuric kidney disease.

Proteinuria is associated with adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes that are not prevented by current treatments. Endothelin 1 promotes the development and progression of chronic kidney disease and associated cardiovascular disease. We, therefore, studied the effects of selective endothelin-A receptor antagonism in proteinuric chronic kidney disease patients, assessing proteinuria, blood pressure (BP), and arterial stiffness, key independent, surrogate markers of chronic kidney disease progression and cardiovascular disease risk. In a randomized, double-blind, 3-way crossover study, 27 subjects on recommended renoprotective treatment received 6 weeks of placebo, 100 mg once daily of sitaxsentan, and 30 mg once daily of nifedipine long acting. Twenty-four-hour proteinuria, protein:creatinine ratio, 24-hour ambulatory BP, and pulse wave velocity (as a measure of arterial stiffness) were measured at baseline and week 6 of each treatment. In 13 subjects, renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate were assessed at baseline and week 6 of each period. Compared with placebo, sitaxsentan reduced 24-hour proteinuria (-0.56±0.20 g/d; P=0.0069), protein:creatinine ratio (-38±15 mg/mmol; P=0.0102), BP (-3.4±1.2 mm Hg; P=0.0069), and pulse wave velocity (-0.64±0.24 m/s; P=0.0052). Nifedipine matched the BP and pulse wave velocity reductions seen with sitaxsentan but did not reduce proteinuria. Sitaxsentan alone reduced both glomerular filtration rate and filtration fraction. It caused no clinically significant adverse effects. Endothelin-A receptor antagonism may provide additional cardiovascular and renal protection by reducing proteinuria, BP, and arterial stiffness in optimally treated chronic kidney disease subjects. The antiproteinuric effects of sitaxsentan likely relate to changes in BP and renal hemodynamics.

Blood pressure and not uraemia is the major determinant of arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease and minimal co-morbidity.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have increased risk of cardiovascular disease to which co-morbidity and associated conventional risk factors contribute. We hypothesised that arterial stiffness (AS) and endothelial dysfunction (ED), as surrogates of cardiovascular risk, would worsen as renal function declined even in patients without co-morbidity and that this would relate to emerging cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), as a measure of AS, and flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery, as a measure of ED, were assessed in CKD patients without established cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: PWV increased linearly as renal function declined (r(2) = 0.08, p < 0.01) whereas FMD was reduced only in patients with advanced kidney disease. In multivariable analysis, blood pressure was the major determinant of PWV and FMD. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and asymmetric dimethylarginine, and isoprostanes and endothelin-1, were independent predictors of PWV and FMD, respectively. However, renal function did not independently predict either AS or ED. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that declining renal function, in the absence of significant co-morbidity, is associated with progressive arterial stiffness, but only patients close to dialysis exhibit endothelial dysfunction. Whilst blood pressure remains the major determinant of PWV and FMD, inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelin-nitric oxide balance contribute to cardiovascular risk, in this non-comorbid cohort.

Renal dysfunction does not affect the peripheral-to-central arterial pressure transfer function.

Arterial generalized transfer functions (GTFs) are increasingly used to estimate central pressure from peripheral measurements. Analysis of derived central waveforms may be valuable in the assessment of patients with chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to assess whether the GTF is affected by renal disease. Ninety-four subjects with varying degrees of renal function (Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative stages 1 to 5; 14 controls) had simultaneous measurements of carotid and radial waveforms made by applanation tonometry. GTFs were calculated by Fourier analysis for each subject group. Derived carotid waveforms were obtained by applying an independently generated GTF to the radial waveform. Glomerular filtration rate inversely correlated with central systolic (R = -0.42; P < 0.001), mean (R = -0.34; P < 0.01) and diastolic (R = --0.27, P < 0.01) blood pressures, as well as central augmentation index (R = -0.30; P< 0.01) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (R = -0.33; P < 0.001). Derived waveforms were not significantly different from measured waveforms in terms of systolic blood pressure, augmentation index, maximum slope, or the delay between the incident and reflected waves, although the derived waveforms slightly underestimated the systolic ejection period (-4.4 ± 0.9 ms; P < 0.001). Overall root-mean-square error was 2.4 ± 0.1 mm Hg. No significant relationship existed between the degree of bias of any derived waveform measure and glomerular filtration rate or chronic kidney disease stage (P > 0.16). No significant differences between chronic kidney disease stages were observed in transfer function gain or phase (P > 0.05). We conclude that the peripheral-to-central GTF is not affected by degree of renal dysfunction and can be used with equivalence in patients with varying degrees of chronic kidney disease.

Greater functional ETB receptor antagonism with bosentan than sitaxsentan in healthy men.

Endothelin (ET)-1 is implicated in the development of hypertension and a role for endothelin receptor antagonists (ETRAs) in the management of hypertension is emerging. ETRAs are classified as selective or mixed depending on their degree of ET(A):ET(B) receptor blockade. As yet, there are no comparative studies in humans that measure biochemical and functional ET(B) blockade achieved by currently licensed ETRAs. We therefore investigated the effects of bosentan, a mixed ETRA, and sitaxsentan, an ET(A) selective ETRA, on plasma ET-1 concentrations and ET(B)-mediated vasodilatation to ET-3. In a randomized, double-blind, 3-way crossover study, 10 healthy subjects received 7 days of placebo, bosentan 250 mg, and sitaxsentan 100 mg daily. Plasma ET-1 concentrations were measured at baseline and 3 hours on day 1 and predose on day 7. Subjects also underwent forearm blood flow measurements on day 7 of each period with brachial artery infusion of ET-3 (60 pmol/min for 5 minutes). Bosentan, but not placebo or sitaxsentan, significantly increased plasma ET-1 concentrations at day 7 (+0.70+/-0.20 pg/mL; P<0.005). Maximal ET-3-mediated vasodilatation was seen at 2 minutes following placebo (30+/-6%) and sitaxsentan (21+/-11%); however, this was abolished by bosentan, with a reduction in forearm blood flow of 8+/-3% (P<0.01 versus placebo and sitaxsentan). Bosentan but not sitaxsentan increases circulating plasma ET-1 levels and abolishes acute ET-3-mediated vasodilatation, confirming that the mixed ET(A/B) antagonist bosentan, but not the selective ET(A) antagonist sitaxsentan, causes functional ET(B) blockade at clinically relevant doses in healthy human subjects.

Blood pressure-independent reduction in proteinuria and arterial stiffness after acute endothelin-a receptor antagonism in chronic kidney disease.

Endothelin 1 is implicated in the development and progression of chronic kidney disease and associated cardiovascular disease. We, therefore, studied the effects of selective endothelin-A receptor antagonism with BQ-123 on key independent surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk (blood pressure, proteinuria and renal hemodynamics, arterial stiffness, and endothelial function) in patients with nondiabetic chronic kidney disease. In a double-blind, randomized crossover study, 22 subjects with proteinuric chronic kidney disease received, on 2 separate occasions, placebo or BQ-123. Ten of these subjects also received nifedipine (10 mg) as an active control for the antihypertensive effect of BQ-123. Blood pressure, pulse wave velocity, flow-mediated dilation, renal blood flow, and glomerular filtration rate were monitored after drug dosing. BQ-123 reduced blood pressure (mean arterial pressure: -7+/-1%; P<0.001 versus placebo) and increased renal blood flow (17+/-4%; P<0.01 versus placebo). Glomerular filtration rate remained unchanged. Proteinuria (-26+/-4%; P<0.01 versus placebo) and pulse wave velocity (-5+/-1%; P<0.001 versus placebo) fell after BQ-123, but flow-mediated dilation did not change. Nifedipine matched the blood pressure and renal blood flow changes seen with BQ-123. Nevertheless, BQ-123 reduced proteinuria (-38+/-3% versus 26+/-11%; P<0.001) and pulse wave velocity (-9+/-1% versus -3+/-1%; P<0.001) to a greater extent than nifedipine. Selective endothelin-A receptor antagonism reduced blood pressure, proteinuria, and arterial stiffness on top of standard treatment in renal patients. Furthermore, these studies suggest that the reduction in proteinuria and arterial stiffness is partly independent of blood pressure. If maintained longer term, selective endothelin-A receptor antagonism may confer cardiovascular and renal benefits in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Effect of regular phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition in hypertension.

There are no published controlled clinical trials of regular phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor therapy as a long-term treatment of hypertension. In a randomized, double-blind, 2-way crossover study, 25 otherwise untreated hypertensive subjects were administered 50 mg of sildenafil or matched placebo 3 times daily for 16 days, and the effects on ambulatory blood pressure (BP), clinic BP, arterial wave reflection, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, and brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation were assessed. Three subjects were withdrawn because of adverse effects, and the data from the remaining 22 subjects were analyzed. Sildenafil reduced ambulatory BP (mean [SE] change from baseline for average daytime BP: systolic -8 [2] mm Hg versus 2 [2] mm Hg with placebo, P<0.01; diastolic -6 [1] mm Hg versus 0 [1] mm Hg, P<0.01) and clinic BP (change from baseline to 1 hour after drug administration on day 16: systolic -5 [2] mm Hg versus 4 [2] mm Hg, P<0.01; diastolic -5 [1] mm Hg versus 2 [2] mm Hg, P<0.01). Compared with baseline, sildenafil, but not placebo, reduced arterial wave reflection both acutely and after chronic treatment, but the chronic change in arterial wave reflection was not statistically different from the chronic change with placebo. Sildenafil did not affect pulse wave velocity or flow-mediated dilatation. The main adverse effects of sildenafil, which were generally transient and rated as mild or moderate in severity, were dyspepsia, headache, and myalgia. In conclusion, regular sildenafil constitutes effective antihypertensive therapy. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of longer-acting phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors as antihypertensive agents in clinical practice.