Clinical breast exam contribution to breast cancer diagnosis in BRCA mutation carriers vs. average to intermediate risk women.

PURPOSE: The contribution of clinical breast exam (CBE) to breast cancer diagnosis in average risk women undergoing regular screening mammography is minimal. To evaluate the role of CBE in high-risk women, we compared BC diagnosis by CBE in BRCA mutation carriers undergoing regular BC surveillance to average to intermediate risk women undergoing regular breast cancer screening. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all consecutive screening visits of BRCA mutation carriers (January 2012-October 2022) and average to intermediate risk women (November 2016-December 2022) was completed. Women with histologically confirmed BC diagnosis were included. Additional CBE yield for BC diagnosis, defined as the percentage of all BC cases detected by CBE alone, was assessed in both groups. RESULTS: Overall, 12,997 CBEs were performed in 1,328 BRCA mutation carriers in whom 134 BCs were diagnosed. In 7,949 average to intermediate risk women who underwent 15,518 CBEs, 87 BCs were diagnosed. CBE contributed to BC diagnosis in 3 (2%) BRCA mutation carriers and 3 (4%) non-carriers. In both groups, over 4,000 CBEs were needed in order to diagnose one cancer. In all 3 BRCA mutation carriers BC was palpated during the surveillance round that did not include MRI. In the average to intermediate risk group, 2 of 3 cancers diagnosed following CBE findings were in a different location from the palpable finding. CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of CBE to BC diagnosis is marginal for all women including BRCA mutation carriers. In BRCA mutation carriers, CBE appears redundant during the MRI surveillance round.

The diagnostic performance of ultrafast MRI to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic performance of ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging (UF-DCE MRI) in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted until September 1, 2023, in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Clinical studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of UF-DCE MRI in breast lesion stratification were screened and included in the meta-analysis. Pooled summary estimates for sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and hierarchic summary operating characteristics (SROC) curves were pooled under the random-effects model. Publication bias and heterogeneity between studies were calculated. RESULTS: A final set of 16 studies analyzing 2090 lesions met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the meta-analysis. Using UF-DCE MRI kinetic parameters, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and area under the curve (AUC) for differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions were 83% (95% CI 79-88%), 77% (95% CI 72-83%), 18.9 (95% CI 13.7-26.2), and 0.876 (95% CI 0.83-0.887), respectively. We found no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two main UF-DCE MRI kinetic parameters, maximum slope (MS) and time to enhancement (TTE). DOR and SROC exhibited low heterogeneity across the included studies. No evidence of publication bias was identified (p = 0.585). CONCLUSIONS: UF-DCE MRI as a stand-alone technique has high accuracy in discriminating benign from malignant breast lesions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: UF-DCE MRI has the potential to obtain kinetic information and stratify breast lesions accurately while decreasing scan times, which may offer significant benefit to patients. KEY POINTS: • Ultrafast breast MRI is a novel technique which captures kinetic information with very high temporal resolution. • The kinetic parameters of ultrafast breast MRI demonstrate a high level of accuracy in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions. • There is no significant difference in accuracy between maximum slope and time to enhancement kinetic parameters.

The characteristics associated with upgrade on surgical pathology of conventional imaging occult DCIS diagnosed by MRI.

PURPOSE: To characterize the clinical, pathological, and imaging features of DCIS occult on conventional imaging diagnosed on MRI-guided biopsy associated with increased risk of invasive disease on surgical excision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients with MRI-detected DCIS occult on conventional imaging between January 2009 and December 2018 were included. Women were divided into two groups based on final pathology: Pure DCIS or DCIS with invasive component. Clinical, imaging, and pathological risk factors for upgrade to invasion were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 50 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 12 (24%) were upgraded to invasive malignancy in the final pathology. The only parameters that showed statistically significant association with upgrade were related to kinetic characteristics: 53% of patients with the combination of fast early upstroke and either plateau or washout curve were upgraded, compared to 12% of women without this combination (p = 0.006). The sensitivity of combined kinetic features for predicting upgrade was 67% (95% CI 35-90%), specificity was 84% (CI 95% 68-94%), positive predictive value was 57% (CI 95% 37-75%), negative predictive value was 89% (CI 95% 77-95%), and OR was 78% (64-88%). CONCLUSION: Kinetic characteristics show the strongest association with upgrade to invasion in DCIS occult on mammogram and US. Larger studies should be encouraged to consolidate our findings, which may have implication for treatment planning.

In Search of the Lost Clip: Outcome of Women After Needle-Guided Lumpectomy of a Marking Clip.

BACKGROUND: Needle localization of a marking clip is required to guide accurate removal of many breast lesions. When the clip is not visualized on specimen radiography, concerns regarding the completeness of cancer removal and long-term outcomes arise. Using a large cohort of women undergoing breast conservation, we examined the magnitude of the problem and the outcome of women with a missing clip. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study including all women undergoing mammographic wire-guided localization between 2013 and 2018 with a specimen radiograph showing a missing clip. The control group included women with successful removal of the clip(s). Data included demographics, cancer and treatment characteristics, and outcome. The groups were compared in regard to margin status, repeat surgery, and recurrence rates. RESULTS: The research group included 43 women [5% of the cohort; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9-7.2] with a missing clip. Positive margins were comparable (7, 17% of cases; 29, 15% of 196 cases in the control group; p = 0.96). Eleven women (33%) had a residual clip visualized on post-operative mammography; in four cases, a percutaneous biopsy of the clip was successful, all with no residual tumor. There was no significant difference in re-excision rates (14% vs. 8%, p = 0.23) or in local or distant recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of women with a missing clip, the clip is not visualized on post-operative mammography. Those with a residual clip can be managed with percutaneous biopsy as long as the lesion was removed with clear margins, with comparable outcomes as women in whom the clip is visualized on specimen radiograph.

Contribution of clinical breast exam to cancer detection in women participating in a modern screening program.

PURPOSE: Despite the controversy surrounding the role of clinical breast exam (CBE) in modern breast cancer screening, it is widely practiced. We examined the contribution of CBE in women undergoing routine screening mammography and in women under the screening age. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including all women participating in a voluntary health screening program between 2007 and 2016. All participants undergo CBE; Screening mammography is done selectively based on age, breast imaging history and insurance coverage. Data collected included demographics, risk factors, previous imaging, and findings on CBE and mammography. Cancer detection rates within 3 months of the visit were calculated separately for women undergoing routine screening mammography, and women under the screening age. RESULTS: There were 14,857 CBE completed in 8378; women; 7% were abnormal. Within 3 months of the visit, 35 breast cancers (2.4 per 1000 visits) were diagnosed. In women within the screening age who completed a mammogram less than one year prior to the visit (N = 1898), 4 cancers (2.1 cancers per 1000 visits) were diagnosed. Only one was diagnosed in a woman with an abnormal CBE, suggesting that the cancer detection rate of CBE in women undergoing regular screening is very low (0.5 per 1000 visits). In women under the screening age (45), 3 cancers (0.4 per 1000 visits) were diagnosed; all were visualized on mammography, one had an abnormal CBE. CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of CBE to cancer detection in women undergoing routine screening and in women under the screening age is rare.

Lobular neoplasia occult on conventional imaging and diagnosed on MRI-guided biopsy: can we estimate upgrade on surgical pathology?

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to evaluate the frequency and imaging features of lobular neoplasia (LN) diagnosed on MRI-guided biopsy, determine the upgrade rate to malignancy, and assess for any features that may be associated with an upgrade on surgical excision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Research ethical board approved the review of consecutive patients with MRI-detected LN between January 2009 and December 2018 with differentiation between pure LN and LN with associated other high-risk lesions. The final outcome was determined by final pathology results from surgical excision or 24 months of follow-up. Appropriate statistical tests were used. RESULTS: Out of 1250 MRI-guided biopsies performed, 76 lesions (6%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and formed the study cohort. Of the 76 lesions, 54 (71%) were pure LN while the rest had coexistent high-risk lesion. Non-mass enhancement (NME) was the most common lesion type (62, 82%). Fifty-nine lesions (78%) were surgically excised, the other 17 had benign follow-up. Overall, 8 lesions (11%) were upgraded to malignancy on final pathology. Malignant outcome was associated with larger lesion size (5.5 versus 1.9 cm, P < 0.001) and a clumped NME pattern (75% versus 24%, P = 0.006). Lesion size and clumped NME remained significantly associated with upgrade on sub-analysis of the pure LN group. CONCLUSION: Larger lesion size and clumped NME are imaging findings associated with upgrade of LN diagnosed by MRI-guided biopsy. This may influence patient management in this clinical setting. Additional larger studies are needed to consolidate our results and to potentially detect additional factors associated with upgrade.

Can breast MRI accurately exclude malignancy in mammographic architectural distortion?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of problem-solving breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in excluding malignancy in a cohort of patients diagnosed with mammographic architectural distortion (MAD). METHODS: The Institutional Review Board approved the study. Imaging database with 40,245 breast MRIs done between January 2008 and September 2018 was retrospectively reviewed. The study included all exams considered problem-solving MRI for MAD. Two radiologists reviewed the imaging data. Outcome was determined by the pathology results of biopsy/surgical excision or at least 1 year of clinical and radiological follow-up. Predictors for malignancy were examined, and appropriate statistical tests were applied. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five patients (median age 53 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and formed the study cohort. No cancers were diagnosed in 106 patients with a negative MRI. Out of 69 women with positive MRI findings, 48 (70%) had benign outcome defined either by pathology result or by negative follow-up, and 21 (30%) yielded malignancy. Malignancy was significantly associated with positive MRI (p < 0.001) and older age (p = 0.014). Falsely positive MRIs were frequently found in women with radial scars. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and overall accuracy of breast MRI were 100% (95% CI 84 to 100%), 68% (CI 61 to 76%), 100% (CI 95 to 100%), 30% (CI 26 to 36%), and 73% (95% CI 66-79), respectively. CONCLUSION: A negative breast MRI in patients with MAD was reliable in excluding malignancy in this cohort and may have a role as a precision medicine tool for avoiding unnecessary interventions. KEY POINTS: • MRI shows a high negative predictive value in MAD cases. • MRI displays low accuracy in differentiating malignancy from RS. • MRI is a reliable non-invasive method to exclude malignancy in women with mammographic architectural distortion, potentially avoiding unnecessary biopsies and surgeries.

Yield of surveillance magnetic resonance imaging after bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: There are no evidence-based guidelines for surveillance of women after bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction. Several societies recommend against routine breast imaging in this setting. Despite these recommendations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used to follow these women. We sought to examine the findings on MRI studies done in this setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive MRI exams done after bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction between January 2010 and April 2018. Data collected included demographic information, family history, BRCA status, indication for bilateral mastectomy, type of reconstruction, findings on MRI, and work-up of MRI findings. Cancer detection rate and interval cancer rates were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine women had 415 surveillance MRI exams. Most (372, 90%) studies were done in women with implant-based reconstruction. Four hundred and five (98%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 96-99%) of the studies were negative. One breast recurrence was found on MRI (cancer detection rate 2.4 per 1000 MRI exams, 95% CI 0.4-13); however, this woman was simultaneously diagnosed with metastatic disease. The false-positive rate was 90% (95% CI 54-99%). During follow-up three women were diagnosed with local recurrence (interval cancer rate 5 per 1000, 95% CI 1.3-17) and 4 women were diagnosed with metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: The yield of surveillance MRI in women with bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction is very low. As most of the cohort had retro-pectoral implant-based reconstruction, it appears safe to recommend against surveillance MRI in this setting regardless of the indication for mastectomy.

Second primary breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: 10-year cumulative incidence in the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

BReast CAncer genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2) mutation carriers diagnosed with breast cancer are at increased risk of developing a second primary breast cancer. Data from high-risk clinics may be subject to different biases which can cause both over and underestimation of this risk. Using data from a large multi-institutional family registry we estimated the 10-year cumulative risk of second primary breast cancer including more complete testing information on family members. We prospectively followed 800 women diagnosed with breast cancer from the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR) who were carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic mutation or a variant of unknown clinical significance. In order to limit survival and ascertainment bias, cases were limited to those diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer from 1994 to 2001 and enrolled in the BCFR within 3 years after their cancer diagnosis. We excluded women enrolled after being diagnosed with a second breast cancer. We calculated 10-year incidence of second primary breast cancers. The 10-year incidence of a second primary breast cancer was highest in BRCA1 mutation carriers (17 %; 95 % CI 11-25 %), with even higher estimates in those first diagnosed under the age of 40 (21 %; 95 % CI 13-34 %). Lower rates were found in BRCA2 mutation carriers (7 %; 95 % CI 3-15 %) and women with a variant of unknown clinical significance (6 %; 95 % CI 4-9 %). Whereas the cumulative 10-year incidence of second primary breast cancer is high in BRCA1 mutation carriers, the estimates in BRCA2 mutation carriers and women with variants of unknown clinical significance are similar to those reported in women with sporadic breast cancer.

Beyond the Needle: Understanding Tissue Marker Migration in Breast MRI-Guided Biopsies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency and factors associated with clip migration in MRI-guided breast biopsies. METHODS: This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board and was compliant with HIPAA. We retrospectively evaluated all MRI-guided biopsies performed between January 2013 and December 2020 in our institution for clip migration. Only patients with follow-up breast MRI showing the clip were included in the study. Migration was defined as movement of the clip of 10 mm or more from the target lesion. Migration frequency and directions were recorded. Factors associated with clip migration were analyzed using statistical tests as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 291 biopsies in 268 women were included in the study with 31 migration events recorded (11%; 95% CI, 7%-15%). All migrations occurred along the biopsy tract; 97% (30/31) of them displaced distal to the needle entry site. More than 50% regional fat (around the target lesion) was the strongest factor associated with migration, seen in 21/141 women (15%), compared to 10/150 (7%) with 50% or less local fat (P = .023). Global fatty breast was more loosely associated with migration, showing borderline significance (P = .06). Other factors did not correlate with clip migration, including lesion size, depth, or location; pathology result; breast thickness; or biopsy approach. CONCLUSION: Although clip migration after breast MRI-guided biopsy is an uncommon event, it occurs more often when the target lesion is surrounded by fat, with the clip usually displaced away from the needle entry site.

Pushing the envelope in breast conserving surgery - is multiple-wire localization (3 or more wires) associated with increased risk of compromised margins and long-term recurrence?

INTRODUCTION: In the last two decades there has been a paradigm shift with breast conserving surgery (BCS) being applied to larger and more extensive breast malignancies. The aim of this study is to examine the success of BCS being performed in patients with extensive breast malignancies requiring at least 3 wires for localization, and to assess possible risk factors for failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective single center review of 232 patients who underwent BCS between 2010 and 2020 requiring at least 3 wires for localization, thus comprising the multi-wire group (MWG). The cohort included a control group of 232 single-wire BCS patients (SWG) chronologically matched with the MWG. Patients with either invasive malignancy or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were included in the study. Clinical, radiological, and pathological data was collected. Proportions of positive surgical margins, re-lumpectomies and conversion to mastectomy were calculated. Survival analysis for locoregional and distant recurrence was performed. RESULTS: Women in the MWG were younger (mean age 57 vs. 63.1, P < 0.001), had larger tumor size (mean size 5.1 cm vs. 1.3 cm, p < 0.001), a higher prevalence of calcifications on mammograms (72 % vs. 17 %, P < 0.001), a higher proportion of positive lymph nodes (75 % vs. 45 %, P = 0.019), and an elevated incidence of a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) component (72 % vs. 38 %, P < 0.001). Positive surgical margins were higher in the MWG (13 % vs 7 %, P = 0.03), which lead to higher proportions of re-lumpectomies or conversion to mastectomies (7 % vs 4 %, P = 0.17). On multivariate analysis of the entire cohort, patients with positive margins were more likely to have a DCIS component (77 % vs 53 %, P = 0.001), an infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC) component (15 % vs 9 %, P = 0.013), and positive ER hormonal status (94 % vs 85 %, p = 0.05). The number of wires was not an independent predictor of positive margins. On long-term analysis, the locoregional disease-free survival was similar between the SWG and MWG (P = 0.1). However, the MWG showed higher rates of distant metastasis (12 % vs 4 %, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: BCS requiring 3 or more wires is associated with a slightly higher proportion of positive margins. The increased risk of positive margins appears to be related to the type of tumor (DCIS component, ILC component and ER status) rather than to the number of wires. The number of wires does not significantly impact locoregional disease-free survival.

Incidental Axillary Lymphadenopathy Found on Radiation Planning Computed Tomography.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of axillary node-positive disease in patients with early breast cancer who had a suspicious axillary lymph node on radiation planning computed tomography (CT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records of all patients with breast cancer who were referred for axillary ultrasound from the radiation unit to the breast imaging unit at the Meirav Breast Center, Sheba Medical Center, from 2012 to 2022. Ethics approval was obtained. Only the records of patients who were referred due to an abnormal axillary lymph node seen on radiation planning CT were further evaluated. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 21 patients were referred to the breast imaging unit for evaluation of suspicious nodes seen on radiation planning CT. Of these, 3 cases were excluded. A total of 15 out of the 18 (83%) patients included had an abnormal lymph node in the ultrasound, and an ultrasound-guided biopsy was recommended (BI-RADS 4). Of these, 3 (out of 15, 20%) had a positive biopsy for tumor cells from the axillary lymph node. Two were cases after primary systemic therapy without complete pathologic response. Thickening of the lymph node cortex and complete loss of the central fatty hilum were associated with pathologic lymph node. CONCLUSION: Sonar had limited ability to differentiate reactive nodes from involved nodes. The presence of lymph nodes with loss of cortical-hilum differentiation on ultrasound together with clinical features are parameters that can help guide the need of further biopsy. Histopathology evaluation is important to make the diagnosis of residual axillary disease. Future studies and guidelines are needed to improve the diagnostic abilities and reduce the number of patients who are undergoing biopsy for noninvolved nodes.

Characterization of patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer and melanoma: genetic susceptibility or increased surveillance?

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer diagnosis had been linked to an increased risk of melanoma in several reports. The aim of the current study was to assess the role of genetics, increased surveillance, and radiation treatment in patients with a dual diagnosis of breast cancer and melanoma (DBM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients treated at Sheba Medical Center between 2007 and 2021 with DBM were included in the cohort. Data on family history, genetic tests, characteristics, and treatment of both cancers were collected. The proportion of patients with a pathogenic variant (PV) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes was compared to a control group of patients with breast cancer. The proportion of patients presenting with in-situ disease was compared to the national registry data. RESULTS: The cohort included 222 DBM patients of whom 114 had documentation of genetic testing. Twenty patients tested positive for PVs of which 13 (11%) were in BRCA genes. This was comparable to the proportion in patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer (736; 19%). The proportion of melanoma diagnosed at stage 0 was comparable to the national proportion ( N = 40; 30% vs. 28%, respectively). In comparison to the national registry, a larger proportion of breast cancers were ductal carcinoma in situ or lobular carcinoma in situ [10% in the registry vs. 19% (22) in the cohort; P < 0.003]. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with DBM we did not find an increased proportion of PVs in BRCA genes. Our findings suggest that the increased standardized incidence ratio of the dual diagnosis may be partially explained by increased surveillance and detection of earlier-stage cancers.

Patient Satisfaction and Surgical Outcome After Oncoplastic Reconstruction following Radical Lumpectomy Versus Standard Lumpectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: Oncoplastic reconstruction (OR) enables widening of the indications for breast conserving therapy (BCT) and is redefining the limits of breast conservation. We examined the outcome and satisfaction of patients undergoing OR after radical lumpectomy (excision of more than 25% of the breast volume) and compared it to the outcome of women undergoing OR after standard lumpectomy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, cohort study, including all patients undergoing OR after BCT between 2009 and 2018, was conducted. The ratio of volume of excision to breast volume was calculated using imaging studies. The study group included women that had more than 25% of their breast volume removed. The remainder formed the control group. Demographic characteristics, oncological treatment, and operation properties were collected. We compared post-operative complications, margin status and need for further surgery, as well as patient satisfaction, evaluated using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire. Results: One hundred and fifty women were included, of whom 24 (16%) comprised the study group with a mean breast volume reduction of 39%, while the remainder (mean volume reduction 8%) served as controls. Patient, tumor characteristics and treatment were comparable. There was a non-significant higher proportion of women in the radical group that underwent a second operation due to complications or positive margins [4/24 (16.7%) vs. 14/126 (11%), p = 0.4). Physical well-being was similar but satisfaction with breasts and with outcome was slightly lower for the study group. These differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Surgical outcome and patient satisfaction in women undergoing very extensive breast resections with OR are comparable to standard resections.

Time to Cancer Diagnosis in Young Women Presenting to Surgeons with Breast-Related Symptoms: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Background: Delay in diagnosis may be a contributing factor to the observed correlation between young age and advanced disease. We examined time to cancer diagnosis in young women presenting to surgeons with breast-related complaints. Materials and Methods: This population-based cohort study included all women aged 18-44 presenting to a surgeon with breast-related complaints between 2005 and 2015 in a large health care plan (n = 157,264). Data included demographics, diagnosis codes, and workup. Cancer diagnosis was ascertained from the national cancer registry. Time to breast imaging and biopsy was compared between the different age groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between age and delay to biopsy while adjusting for possible confounders. Results: During the 1st year after the visit, 45,434 (29%) women had breast imaging; 5,766 (3.7%) women had a breast biopsy; and 676 (0.43%) were diagnosed with breast cancer. Overall, time to first breast imaging and biopsy did not differ significantly between the age groups. But nonspecific visit codes (other than breast mass) were associated with delays to imaging and biopsy. Among, women diagnosed with breast cancer, age under 40 years (odds ratio [OR]: 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-3.9), being postpartum (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.1-5.9), and a nonspecific visit code (OR: 8.3, 95% CI: 4.9-14.2) were associated with delay. Conclusions: Symptomatic women with lower a-priori likelihood of malignancy (younger age, postpartum, or nonspecific visit code) are at significantly greater risk of delayed diagnosis of cancer. Physicians should be aware of the diagnostic challenge in young women presenting with nonspecific symptoms.

Node positive breast cancer: Concordance between baseline PET/CT and sentinel node assessment after neoadjuvant therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Sentinel node biopsy for axillary staging in node positive patients after neoadjuvant treatment is controversial, mainly due to high false negative rates. We examined the concordance between the location of the hot nodes identified on PET-CT at presentation with the location of the sentinel nodes. MATERAILS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment between January 2013 and September 2018 who had positive regional lymph nodes on PET/CT, and a SPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphy completed before sentinel node biopsy were included. Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics were collected. Images of PET/CT were compared to images of SPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphy post treatment and concordance between location of the hot nodes on PET/CT with the sentinel nodes visualized on SPECT/CT was assessed. Association between patient, tumor and treatment characteristics and concordance between the sentinel node and the hot nodes was determined. RESULTS: Sentinel nodes were identified in 53 (91%) of the cases in surgery. In 25 (43%) patients, axillary nodes were positive after treatment. In 16 (28%; 95% CI 18, 40) the sentinel node was not one of the hot nodes seen on PET/CT at presentation. Twenty-three (40%) patients had excision of additional axillary nodes. In two patients with non-concordant sentinel nodes, the sentinel node was falsely negative. CONCLUSIONS: In node positive patients who undergo neoadjuvant treatment, the sentinel node visualized on lymphatic mapping is not necessarily one of the hot nodes identified on PET/CT at presentation. These findings underline the importance of marking the pathologically proven lymph node and excising it as well as the sentinel nodes after treatment.

Atypical ductal hyperplasia at margin of breast biopsy--is re-excision indicated?

BACKGROUND: Atypical duct hyperplasia (ADH) observed during core needle biopsy is associated with a high rate of cancer upon excision. Controversy exists regarding the need to re-excise ADH involving a margin. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of residual pathology in patients that underwent re-excision for ADH involving the margin. METHODS: In a retrospective review of the pathology database from 1 January 2000 to 1 June 2006, we identified 44 lumpectomy specimens with ADH involving the margin; 24 patients (55%) had a re-excision. Slides were reviewed to verify the diagnosis of ADH near the margin and the presence of residual disease on re-excision associated with the biopsy cavity. RESULTS: Patients had pure ADH (15, 63%), ADH and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (7, 29%) or ADH with invasive carcinoma (2, 8%). Residual ADH or cancer was found in 14 of 24 patients (58%). Of 15 patients with pure ADH, 6 (40%) had residual pathology: ADH (2), DCIS (2) and invasive carcinoma (2). In this group, 27% of patients were reassessed as having DCIS or invasive carcinoma. Of the 9 patients with cancer, 8 (89%) had residual disease in the form of ADH (4) or DCIS (4). CONCLUSIONS: ADH found at the margin of a lumpectomy specimen is associated with a high rate of residual ADH and cancer. Over one quarter of the patients with an initial diagnosis of ADH were reassessed as having DCIS or invasive carcinoma. Re-excision in all patients with ADH involving the margin is recommended.

Follow-up of patients undergoing oncoplastic surgery - more palpable masses and benign biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic reconstruction is increasingly used in the management of women undergoing breast conserving surgery. We examined the findings on breast exam and imaging of patients who underwent breast conservation with or without oncoplastic reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction would present with more palpable and imaging abnormalities compared to lumpectomy alone and undergo therefore more biopsies. METHODS: All patients undergoing breast conservation with oncoplastic reconstruction for breast cancer between 2009 and 2014 were included in the study group. The control group was created by matching 4 women that underwent lumpectomy alone during the same week to each patient in the study group. The two groups were compared regarding demographics, tumor characteristics, post-operative complaints, breast exam, imaging and biopsies done during follow-up. RESULTS: The study group included 67 women who had lumpectomy and immediate oncoplastic reconstruction and 268 women that underwent lumpectomy alone.Patients undergoing immediate oncoplastic reconstruction had more advanced disease; larger mean tumor size (3.1 cm versus 1.9 cm, P < 0.001), higher rate of involved lymph nodes (48% versus 26%; P < 0.001) and use of neoadjuvant treatment (39% versus 15%; P < 0.001).After oncoplastic reconstruction, new lumps (18% versus 5%; P = 0.004) were found more frequently, and there was a higher rate of women undergoing biopsies (31% versus 11%; P < 0.001). This finding remained significant after controlling for age, type of tumor, use of neoadjuvant treatment and volume of tissue removed. Over ninety percent of biopsies in the oncoplastic group were benign, most commonly-fat necrosis (N = 15, 60% of the biopsies). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate oncoplastic reconstruction is associated with increased palpable masses and imaging abnormalities, requiring biopsies. Patients and clinicians should be aware of the benign nature of most of these findings.

Altered lymphatic drainage after breast-conserving surgery and axillary node dissection: local recurrence with contralateral intramammary nodal metastases.

A review of the literature shows that lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy are feasible in patients with previous breast and axillary surgery and could be especially warranted because in these patients, lymphatic drainage might not include the axillary basin. We report a case of a woman with recurrent breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. The patient was found to have metastases in the contralateral intramammary lymph nodes. Demonstrating that such patterns do occur after previous treatment for breast cancer carries implications for the staging and management of these patients.