RESUMO
The impact of COVID-19 vaccination on clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients remains unclear. This systematic review and network meta-analysis sought to assess the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in SOT recipients. We searched 6 databases from inception to March 1, 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating different COVID-19 vaccination strategies in SOT recipients. Based on patient-important outcomes, we performed frequentist random-effects pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses, separating RCTs and nonrandomized evidence, and used the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to assess our certainty in the evidence. We included 6 RCTs (N = 814) and 43 observational studies (N = 125 199). Overall, there is a paucity of randomized evidence evaluating COVID-19 vaccines in SOT recipients. The nonrandomized evidence evaluating COVID-19 vaccination strategies patient-important outcomes, including COVID-19 infection, mortality, hospitalization, ICU admission, and rejection, demonstrated low to very low certainty due to the included studies' risk of bias. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians and SOT recipients worked with minimal, very low-quality evidence in relation to COVID-19 vaccines in this population. In the instance of future public health emergencies, clinicians and researchers should collaborate closely with patient partners to ensure there is sufficient evidence in the transplant population on patient-important outcomes.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess clinical mental and physical health outcomes of siblings of children with chronic health condition(s) compared with siblings of healthy children or normative data. STUDY DESIGN: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and CINAHL through August 9, 2021. We included English-language studies that reported clinically diagnosable mental or physical health outcomes among siblings of children (<18 years old) with a chronic health condition, included a comparison group, and used an experimental or observational study design. Two reviewers extracted data and independently assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Of 9899 screened studies, 34 were included; 28 studies reported on mental health, 3 reported on physical health, and 3 reported on mortality. Siblings of children with chronic conditions had greater depression rating scale scores than their comparison groups (standardized mean difference = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.38-0.68; P < .001 [6 studies]), whereas anxiety scores were not substantially increased (standardized mean difference = 0.21; 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.43; P = .07 [7 studies]). The effects for confirmed psychiatric diagnoses (7 studies), mortality (3 studies), or physical health outcomes (3 studies) could not be meta-analyzed given the limited number of studies and between-study heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Siblings of children with chronic health conditions may be at an increased risk of depression. Our findings suggest the need for targeted interventions to support the psychological well-being of siblings of children with chronic health conditions.