Calciphylaxis epidemiology, risk factors, treatment and survival among French chronic kidney disease patients: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy (CUA) is a rare disease, causing painful skin ulcers in patients with end stage renal disease. Recommendations for CUA management and treatment are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on CUA cases identified in western France, in order to describe its management and outcome in average clinical practices. Selection was based on the Hayashi diagnosis criteria (2013) extended to patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2. Dialyzed CUA cases were compared with 2 controls, matched for age, gender, region of treatment and time period. RESULTS: Eighty-nine CUA cases were identified between 2006 and 2016, including 19 non dialyzed and 70 dialyzed patients. Females with obesity (55.1%) were predominant. Bone mineral disease abnormalities, inflammation and malnutrition (weight loss, serum albumin decrease) preceded CUA onset for 6 months. The multimodal treatment strategy included wound care (98.9%), antibiotherapy (77.5%), discontinuation of Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (70.8%) and intravenous sodium thiosulfate (65.2%). 40.4% of the patients died within the year after lesion onset, mainly under palliative care. Surgical debridement, distal CUA, localization to the lower limbs and non calcium-based phosphate binders were associated with better survival. Risks factors of developing CUA among dialysis patients were obesity, VKA, weight loss, serum albumin decrease or high serum phosphate in the 6 months before lesion onset. CONCLUSION: CUA involved mainly obese patients under VKA. Malnutrition and inflammation preceded the onset of skin lesions and could be warning signs among dialysis patients at risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02854046, registered August 3, 2016.

[When to place a patient on the kidney transplantation waiting list?]. / Quand faut-il inscrire un patient sur la liste d'attente de transplantation rénale?

Practices for enrollment on kidney transplantation waiting lists are variable between geographical areas and centers. Early referral of patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) to a nephrologist, particularly one practicing in a transplantation center, is a prerequisite to early enrollment. Despite improved survival in elderly transplant recipients, being aged over 65 years is still a barrier against enrollment. Furthermore certain comorbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus are often wrongly considered as contraindications for transplantation. If nephrological management is initiated early, enrollment could (should?) be considered before the terminal phase of CRF, with the hope of preemptive transplantation with the known advantages not only for the individual recipient but also for the community in general. Glomerular filtration rate below 20 ml/minute could be a reasonable cutoff for enrollment. Patients referred late to a nephrologist will require dialysis. Dialysis center staff should be well trained in delivering appropriate information on kidney transplantation and initiating evaluation. A consultation with a transplantation specialist should be rapidly scheduled.

[Disturbances of mineral metabolism in a French hemodialysis unit]. / Les anomalies du métabolisme phosphocalcique dans un service d'hémodialyse associatif : DOPPS et recommandations NKF-K/DOQI.

Recent data from DOPPS in the field of the mineral metabolism showed that there is a relative homogeneity between most of the countries and continents studied. In reference to the American recommendations (NKF-K/DOQI 2003) the majority of the patients are apart from the desired targets. Approximately 70% of the patients have a relative biological hypoparathyroidism (PTHi<150 pg/ml) or a hyperparathyroidism (PTHi > 300 pg/ml). Only 4.7-5.5% of the patients are in the standard targets, for the four criteria which are: the calcemia, the phosphatemia, serum calcium-phosphorus product and PTH. Many open questions remained to explain why such an overall homogeneity, and why there is such an important inadequacy with the recommendations. In the present work we compared the data of our hemodialysis patients with data from DOPPS I and DOPPS II.

Mesenteric ischaemia in haemodialysis patients: a case/control study.

BACKGROUND: Mesenteric ischaemia is not uncommon in dialysis patients and seems to have been increasing in the last decade. However, the risk factors for mesenteric ischaemia are unclear and prognosis of patients after this type of ischaemic accident is not well defined. METHODS: From January 1988 to June 1999, 15 haemodialysis patients (0.3% per patient-year) from a single institution presented with mesenteric ischaemia and the clinical, biological and radiological aspects of the ischaemia were described. To identify risk factors for mesenteric ischaemia, each ischaemic patient (case) was matched with two other haemodialysis patients not having ischaemia (controls). Survival curves were then established for the two groups. RESULTS: A marked hypotensive episode was present in seven out of 15 case patients (47%) during dialysis sessions that preceded mesenteric ischaemia. Abdominal pain, guarding, fever and hyperleucocytosis were all present in 13 out of 15 patients (87%). An abdominal computerized tomography scan with opaque enema enabled a rapid diagnosis for six patients. The caecum was the most frequently (47%) affected segment. Twelve patients were surgically treated and the remaining three were given medical support. The two groups (case and control) were not different in cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidity, administered drugs or main haemodialysis characteristics. The median survival of the case group was 600 days, whereas 80% of the control group survived beyond this period (P=0.0132). Eleven case patients survived >3 months after mesenteric ischaemia and had a median survival of 1500 days, which was identical to their matched control patients. CONCLUSIONS: Mesenteric ischaemia should be systematically suspected in patients experiencing abdominal pain during or after dialysis sessions. Prompt diagnosis and treatment usually allow for a favourable prognosis.