RESUMO
The article presents results of comparison of two techniques of evaluation of quality of treatment of complications in patients with diabetes mellitus i.e. cohort retrospective analysis and standard report of physicians of office of diabetic foot syndrome. The study demonstrated necessity of development of system of unified analysis of reports of physicians of office of diabetic foot syndrome permitting receiving more precise and reliable data concerning results of treatment of complications of diabetes mellitus and to avoid present decreasing of percentage of patients with positive result of treatment in annual report.
Assuntos
Pé Diabético/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Federação RussaRESUMO
Medicines receiving a conditional marketing authorization through Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs) will be a challenge for payers. The "introduction" of MAPPs is already seen by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) as a fait accompli, with payers not consulted or involved. However, once medicines are approved through MAPPs, they will be evaluated for funding by payers through different activities. These include Health Technology Assessment (HTA) with often immature clinical data and high uncertainty, financial considerations, and negotiations through different types of agreements, which can require monitoring post launch. Payers have experience with new medicines approved through conditional approval, and the fact that MAPPs present additional challenges is a concern from their perspective. There may be some activities where payers can collaborate. The final decisions on whether to reimburse a new medicine via MAPPs will have more variation than for medicines licensed via conventional processes. This is due not only to increasing uncertainty associated with medicines authorized through MAPPs but also differences in legal frameworks between member states. Moreover, if the financial and side-effect burden from the period of conditional approval until granting full marketing authorization is shifted to the post-authorization phase, payers may have to bear such burdens. Collection of robust data during routine clinical use is challenging along with high prices for new medicines during data collection. This paper presents the concept of MAPPs and possible challenges. Concerns and potential ways forward are discussed and a number of recommendations are presented from the perspective of payers.