Adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies have radically altered the treatment landscape for renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. However, studies have reported negative data regarding adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. Thus, this study aimed to assess the role of adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for both renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Multiple databases were searched for articles published as of February 2023. Studies were deemed eligible if they evaluated disease-free survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma receiving adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. In a network meta-analysis, pembrolizumab was shown to be the most effective regimen for patients with renal cell carcinoma, whereas nivolumab was found to be the most effective regimen for patients with urothelial carcinoma. Additionally, these results were consistently observed in a sub-analysis of the T stage. The present analysis provides findings that support the usefulness of adjuvant nivolumab therapy in urothelial carcinoma and adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy in renal cell carcinoma, in agreement with the currently available guidelines. However, the caveat is that the randomized controlled trials included in this analysis differed in important respects despite being similar in study design. Therefore, with these differences in mind, care needs to be taken when selecting patients for these immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies to maximize their benefits.

Long-term outcomes of radical prostatectomy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Propensity score matched comparison.

PURPOSE: To compare long-term outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) using propensity score-matched analysis in patients with clinically localized, intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Between October 2003 and March 2014, our institution treated 1241 patients with intermediate-risk PCa (RP: n = 531; LDR-BT: n = 710). Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 0.2 ng/ml or greater for RP, and as PSA nadir plus 2 ng/ml or higher (Phoenix definition) for LDR-BT. We calculated propensity scores by multivariate logistic regression based on covariates that included age, pretreatment PSA, biopsy Gleason grade, the percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPBC), and clinical T stage. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 108 months for RP and 99 months for LDR-BT. After propensity score adjustment, a total of 642 (321 each) patients remained for further analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.99). LDR-BT was associated with improved BCR-free survival and salvage therapy-free survival  compared to RP (p < 0.001), and RP was associated with improved metastasis-free survival (MFS, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: BCR cannot be a surrogate for survival comparison, primarily due to differences between treatment modalities in how this term was defined post-therapy. Long-term follow-up showed that RP was associated with lower MFS in intermediate-risk PCa. However, this has not yet translated into superior OS.

Comparison of outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with low-/high-dose-rate brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Although brachytherapy is a standard treatment option for patients with high-risk prostate cancer, only a few studies have compared low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). We applied propensity score-based inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to compare oncological outcomes for LDR-BT and HDR-BT. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed prognosis in 392 patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer who had undergone brachytherapy plus external beam radiation. IPTW was applied to adjust the Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, with the goal of minimizing bias from patient background. RESULTS: The IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed no statistically significant differences for time to biochemical recurrence, clinical progression, castration-resistant prostate cancer, or death from any cause. The IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analyses also showed that the modality of brachytherapy was not an independent factor in these oncological outcomes. Notably, the two groups differed regarding complications; LDR-BT was associated with a higher rate of acute grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity, and late grade 3 toxicity was noted only in HDR-BT. CONCLUSION: Our analysis of long-term outcomes in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer shows no significant differences in oncological outcomes between LDR-BT and HDR-BT, but some differences in toxicity, and offers patients and clinicians useful information in deciding management strategies for high-risk localized prostate cancer.

The prognostic significance of the clinical T stage and Grade Group in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated via high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiation.

BACKGROUND: Although the optimal management of locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear, local definitive therapy, thus combined radiotherapy and androgen deprivation, is one option. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of patients with locally advanced PCa who underwent high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 173 patients with locally advanced PCa (cT3a-4N0-1M0) who underwent HDR-BT and EBRT. We employed Cox's proportional hazards models to identify pre-treatment predictors of oncological outcomes. Treatment outcomes (biochemical recurrence-free survival [BCRFS], clinical progression-free survival [CPFS], and castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival [CRPCFS] were compared according to the combination of the pre-treatment predictors. RESULTS: The 5-year BCRFS, CPFS, and CRPCFS rates were 78.5, 91.7, and 94.4% respectively; there were two PCa deaths. Multivariate analysis revealed that the clinical T stage (cT3b and cT4) and Grade Group (GG) 5 status were independent risk factors for poor BCRFS, CPFS, and CRPCFS. In the GG ≤ 4 group, the Kaplan-Meier curves for BCRFS, CPFS, and CRPCFS revealed excellent outcomes. However, in the GG5 group, patients with cT3b and cT4 PCa evidenced significantly poorer oncological outcomes than those with cT3a PCa. CONCLUSION: The clinical T stage and GG status were significantly prognostic of oncological outcomes in patients with locally advanced PCa. In patients of GG ≤ 4 PCa, HDR-BT was effective even in patients with cT3b or cT4 PCa. However, in patients with GG5 PCa, careful monitoring is essential, particularly of patients with cT3b or cT4 PCa.

Clinical characteristics of secondary bladder cancer developing after low-/high-dose-rate brachytherapy to treat localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: To explore correlations between the clinical attributes of secondary bladder cancer and brachytherapy, we retrospectively reviewed our institutional database on patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) or high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: From October 2003 to December 2014, 2551 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated at our institution. Of these, data on 2163 were available (LDR-BT alone: n = 953; LDR-TB with EBRT: n = 181; HDR-BT with EBRT: n = 283; RP without EBRT: n = 746). The times of secondary bladder cancer development subsequent to radical treatment, and their clinical characteristics, were studied. RESULTS: Age-adjusted Cox's regression analyses indicated that brachytherapy did not significantly impact the incidence of secondary bladder cancer. However, the pathological characteristics of such cancer differed between patients treated via brachytherapy and RP without EBRT; invasive bladder cancer was more common in such patients. CONCLUSION: The risk for secondary bladder cancer was not significantly increased after brachytherapy compared to non-irradiation therapy. However, brachytherapy patients exhibited a higher incidence of invasive bladder cancer. Therefore, meticulous follow-up is crucial for early detection and treatment of bladder cancer in such patients.

Patients with PSA below 0.2 ng/mL at 8 years post high-dose-rate brachytherapy have an extremely low risk of subsequent recurrence.

OBJECTIVES: We have analyzed the long-term follow-up data of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The objective was to determine the optimal time for cessation of PSA monitoring after HDR-BT. METHODS: We included 309 patients with clinical stage T1c-T4 N0-1 M0 PCa who received HDR-BT and EBRT combined with long-term ADT between 2005 and 2018. We stratified the patients based on their prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and identified the factors associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and clinical progression (CP). RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 98 months (range: 31-207 months). Among the 306 patients, 76 developed BCR and 47 developed CP subsequently. We found that the PSA levels at 3, 5, and 8 years significantly correlated with the oncological outcomes of brachytherapy. No patient with a PSA level ≤ 0.2 ng/mL at 8 years later developed BCR or CP. CONCLUSION: Our long-term data suggest that in the presence of a PSA level ≤ 0.2 ng/mL at 8 years later, PSA monitoring may be safely discontinued due to the extremely low risk of subsequent oncological events. The data presented in this study will assist clinicians in determining the optimal management strategy for patients with PCa following HDR-BT and EBRT combined with long-term ADT.

Clinical significance of unfavorable findings in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients for predicting treatment outcomes after contemporary, dose-escalated multimodal radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Few studies have documented the long-term oncological outcomes of favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer patients treated via contemporary high-dose irradiation. We analyzed the ultimate clinical outcomes of such patients using the current risk sub-stratification schema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 693 patients with localized IR prostate cancer treated via low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) with or without external beam radiation (EBRT) and with or without androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in a single institution. Treatment outcomes (biochemical recurrence-free survival [BCRFS] and clinical progression-free survival [CPFS]) were compared according to the numbers of unfavorable findings. RESULTS: Out of the 693 IR patients, 292 (42.1%) exhibited favorable disease; the remaining 401 (57.9%) exhibited unfavorable disease. Compared with favorable IR status, unfavorable IR status was associated with shorter BCRFS and CPFS (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Patients with two to three unfavorable factors experienced the worst oncological outcomes (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Although patients with one or no unfavorable factors responded similarly to LDR-BT monotherapy, this treatment modality was insufficient for preventing biochemical and clinical progression in patients with multiple unfavorable findings. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment outcomes indicate that patients with IR disease scheduled for LDR-BT should undergo multimodal irradiation if they exhibit two or more unfavorable factors at diagnosis.

Prognostic value of PSA bounce after definitive radiotherapy revisited.

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce after definitive radiotherapy has been reported as a predictor of improved biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS). We revisited this phenomenon to confirm its clinical impact on oncological outcomes in patients with long-term follow-up who were free of biochemical recurrence (BCR) at least 3 years after treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 541 patients with localized, intermediate-risk prostate cancer underwent low-dose rate brachytherapy with iodine-125 seeds with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy in combination. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy was administered to 273 patients (50.5%) with a median duration of 3 months (range 1-108 months). PSA bounce was defined as ≥ 0.2 ng/ml increase above the interval PSA nadir, followed by a decrease below that value. RESULTS: The median age was 69 years (range 49-90 years). The median follow-up duration was 102 months (range 36-205 months). One-hundred and fifty patients (27.7%) had PSA bounce with a median magnitude of 0.47 ng/ml (range 0.2-3.19 ng/ml). Age was significantly associated with the occurrence of PSA bounce [age: hazard ratio (HR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-0.98]. It was found to be independently associated with a decreased risk for BCR (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.12-0.69) and clinical progression (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.95-0.98). CONCLUSION: PSA bounce indicated a favorable BCRFS and clinical progression-free survival in patients who had been free of BCR for at least 3 years after definitive radiotherapy.

How long is long enough to secure disease control after low-dose-rate brachytherapy in combination with other modalities in intermediate-risk, localized prostate cancer?

PURPOSE: Previous studies have demonstrated excellent overall outcomes in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) in intermediate-risk, localized prostate cancer (PCa). We thus investigated the appropriate length of time before completing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monitoring after treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2014, 710 localized, intermediate-risk PCa patients underwent LDR-BT with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Data from 567 of those patients was analyzed in this study. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) was administered to 315 patients (55.6 %) and NHT with adjuvant hormonal therapy (AHT) to 59 patients (10.4 %), as per the protocol of a prospective randomized controlled trial (SHIP0804). We stratified patients by posttreatment PSA levels at specific times and assessed the factors for association with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and for clinical progression (CP). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 109 months (range, 60-205 months). Of 529 patients who were BCR-free at 3 years after treatment, 56 subsequently developed BCR, and 47 developed CP. PSA at 3 and 5 years after treatment were significantly correlated with long-term oncological outcomes. No patients with 5-year PSA levels ≤0.1 ng/mL subsequently developed BCR or CP. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of PSA monitoring could be discussed with patients with intermediate-risk PCa as a reasonable option if PSA levels remain ≤0.1 ng/mL at 5 years after LDR-BT, either alone or with other combined modalities, as subsequent recurrences are quite rare.

Trimodal therapy with high-dose-rate brachytherapy and hypofractionated external beam radiation combined with long-term androgen deprivation for unfavorable-risk prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in very-high-risk (VHR) versus high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa), as defined in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria. METHODS: Data from 338 consecutive HR or VHR PCa patients who had undergone this tri-modal therapy between 2005 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free, progression-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival (BCRFS/PFS/OS/CSS) rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Wilcoxon test. Cox regression models were used to evaluate candidate prognostic factors for survival. C­indexes were used to assess model discrimination. RESULTS: Within a median follow-up of 84 months, 68 patients experienced BCR, 58 had disease progression including only 3 with local progression, 27 died of any cause, and 2 died from PCa. The 5­year BCRFS, PFS, OS, and CSS rates were 82.2% (HR 86.5%; VHR 70.0%), 90.0% (HR 94.3%; VHR 77.6%), 95.7% (HR, 97.1%; VHR, 91.8%), and 99.6% (HR, 100%; VHR, 98.0%), respectively. In multivariable analyses that adjusted for standard clinicopathologic features, the risk subclassification was associated both PFS and OS (p = 0.0003 and 0.001, respectively). Adding the risk subclassification improved the accuracy of models in predicting BCRFS, PFS, and OS. CONCLUSION: While the outcome of this trimodal approach appears favorable, VHR PCa patients had significantly worse oncological outcomes than those with HR PCa. The NCCN risk subclassification should be integrated into prognostic tools to guide risk stratification, treatment, and follow-up for unfavorable PCa patients receiving this trimodal therapy.

Blood platelet volume predicts treatment-specific outcomes of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the present guidelines for the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), it is unclear who benefits most from androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARATs) or docetaxel as the first-line treatment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to explore new treatment-specific biomarkers in mCRPC. A total of 211 patients with mCRPC who received either ARAT or docetaxel as first-line treatment were included. Patients were compared for radiographic progression and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the association between pretreatment biomarkers and risk of events. The statistical interaction between biomarkers and clinical outcomes was also evaluated. RESULTS: Of all analyzed biomarkers, multivariable Cox regression models identified MPV [≤ median (9.7 fL)] as an independent prognostic factor of radiographic progression [hazard ratio (HR), 2.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-4.80; P = 0.019] and PSA progression (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.01-3.95; P = 0.048) in patients treated with ARAT, whereas such associations were not observed in those treated with docetaxel. Interaction analyses showed that those initially treated with docetaxel have lower risk of radiographic progression (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.79; P = 0.014) and PSA progression (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-0.98; P = 0.044) than ARAT when MPV was small. CONCLUSIONS: The present study identified pretreatment MPV as a significant treatment-specific prognostic factor of PSA and radiographic progression in patients with mCRPC who received first-line treatment. Furthermore, our results suggested that those with small MPV may better be treated initially with docetaxel than ARAT.

Values of alkaline phosphatase at the diagnosis of castration resistance and response to primary androgen deprivation therapy as predictors of subsequent metastasis in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Among various therapeutic options available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), only apalutamide and enzalutamide have shown evidences of improved metastasis-free survival (MFS) for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). However, there is a paucity of evidence to indicate who may be targeted for aggressive therapy among patients with nmCRPC. The objectives of this retrospective study were to explore predictors of metastasis in patients with nmCRPC and to identify a subpopulation of patients with nmCRPC who may benefit from aggressive therapy. METHODS: A total of 115 patients with CRPC who had no metastasis detected at the time of diagnosis of CRPC were included in this retrospective study. All patients were treated at Jikei University and its affiliated hospitals. The primary outcome measure was MFS from the time of diagnosis of CRPC. Predictors of MFS were also explored with a multivariate Cox hazard model. RESULTS: The median observation period after diagnosis of CRPC was 30 months (range 2-143 months). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a median MFS of 76. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that low alkaline phosphatase (ALP) values at diagnosis of CRPC and favorable response to primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were significant predictors of longer MFS (P = 0.011, and 0.031, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that high ALP values at diagnosis of CRPC and poor response to primary ADT may predict the propensity of metastasis in patients with nmCRPC. Further prospective studies will be required enrolling more patients to confirm our findings.

No survival benefit found after extended treatment with docetaxel for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (DOC) has been widely accepted as a therapeutic option for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Evidence-based clinical guidelines have stipulated its use up to 10 cycles in most health care systems. There has been a paucity of information regarding potential benefits of its use over 10 cycles. The purpose of this study is to re-examine the rationale for the clinical guidelines concerning cycles of DOC in CRPC. METHODS: Between July 2007 and July 2016, a total of 122 CRPC patients received at least five cycles of DOC at Jikei University and its affiliate hospitals. Doses of DOC (75 mg/m 2 ) were administered every 3 to 4 weeks. Clinical outcomes between patients receiving extended cycles of DOC (≥11 cycles, extended [ex]-DOC group) were compared to those receiving fewer (≤10 cycles, short-DOC group). A subgroup of patients who had discontinued DOC owing to adverse events, but whose disease did not progress, were also considered for comparison (adverse events [AE] group). Overall survival from the induction of DOC was the primary outcome measure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to analyze variables associated with overall survival. RESULTS: The ex- and short-DOC groups included 80 and 42 patients, respectively. Most baseline demographics did not differ between groups. However, in the short-DOC group more patients had received abiraterone acetate and/or enzalutamide before chemotherapy, age at DOC induction was younger, and lactate dehydrogenase at DOC induction was higher. Overall survival was significantly longer in the ex-DOC group compared to the short-DOC group (median, 53 and 27 months, respectively; P = .04). A subgroup of 22 patients in AE group was compared to compensate for potential bias. Overall survival from the induction of DOC was comparable between AE group and ex-DOC groups (median, 53 vs 53 months, respectively; P = 0.87). Univariate and multivariate analyses did not show any advantage of extended use of DOC on patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study failed to show the survival benefit of extended use of DOC over 10 cycles in CRPC patients in the era of innovative drugs such as abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and cabazitaxel. Further prospective studies are required to confirm our findings.

Short-term impact of androgen deprivation therapy on bone strength in castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate changes in bone quality and bone mineral density after androgen deprivation therapy in castration-sensitive prostate cancer. METHODS: A total of 32 patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer who were scheduled for androgen deprivation therapy for >12 months were included. The bone mineral density of the femoral neck and lumbar spine was evaluated before, and 6 and 12 months after androgen deprivation therapy. Bone metabolic (serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b and procollagen type I propeptides) and bone quality markers (plasma pentosidine and homocysteine) were measured before, and 3, 6 and 12 months after androgen deprivation therapy. RESULTS: The median patient age was 71 years. A total of 17 patients were treated primarily with androgen deprivation therapy, and 15 were treated with androgen deprivation therapy in combination with definitive radiotherapy. Bone quality markers did not change substantially after androgen deprivation therapy. Bone mineral density decreased significantly after 12 months of androgen deprivation therapy. Serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b levels increased significantly 3 months after androgen deprivation therapy, but procollagen type I propeptides levels stayed unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Bone quality markers do not change substantially after androgen deprivation therapy, whereas bone mineral density decreases significantly. Bone turnover markers might play an important role in monitoring bone health during androgen deprivation therapy.

Does docetaxel prolong survival of patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer?

BACKGROUND: Guidelines define docetaxel as a first-line therapeutic option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, the role of docetaxel in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) has not been fully investigated. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the potential role of docetaxel in nmCRPC. Clinical outcomes including overall survival were compared between CRPC patients who had docetaxel introduced while in nonmetastatic versus metastatic diseases. METHODS: A total of 98 CRPC patients had docetaxel therapy. Of these 46 patients received docetaxel for nmCRPC, and 52 had distant metastases. Clinical outcomes from the time of diagnosis of CRPC were compared retrospectively between groups. RESULTS: The median observation period after the diagnosis of CRPC in these patients was 42 months (range, 3-166). Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the nmCRPC group than in the mCRPC group (not reached vs 52.2 months, respectively, P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis showed that longer time to CRPC, docetaxel use in nmCRPC, and use of abiraterone acetate and/or enzalutamide were significant predictors for improved OS (P = 0.04, 0.019 and 0.002, respectively). The incidence and profile of adverse events did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Earlier induction of docetaxel in nmCRPC patients may prolong OS. Further prospective studies in more patients will be required to confirm our findings.

Earlier use of androgen receptor-axis-targeted drugs may improve overall survival in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of androgen receptor-axis-targeted drugs (ARAT) in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) versus mCRPC. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients (n = 114) with CRPC who had no metastasis at the time of diagnosis were included in this retrospective study. All patients were treated with ARAT at Jikei University and its affiliated hospitals from July 2014 to March 2017. The patients were stratified into nmCRPC (n = 81) and mCRPC (n = 33) groups according to their metastatic status at ARAT induction. The primary outcome measure was difference in overall survival (OS) between groups from the time of CRPC diagnosis. The patients were compared for progression-free survival (PFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. The predictors of OS were explored by a multivariate Cox model. RESULTS: The baseline demographics did not differ significantly between the groups. The median observation period from the diagnosis of CRPC was 24.5 months (range: 3-135) and 20 months (range: 1-66) in nmCRPC and mCRPC groups, respectively. The nmCRPC group demonstrated better OS from the time of diagnosis of CRPC in Kaplan-Meier analysis than mCRPC group (86 months vs 40 months; P = 0.004), with similar results obtained for PFS (P = 0.048) and PSA response (P = 0.0014). Multivariate analysis demonstrated non-metastatic status, low PSA, and long PSA doubling time (PSADT) at ARAT induction as the significant predictors of longer OS (P = 0.044, 0.0001, and 0.026, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Early use of ARAT may improve OS, PFS, and PSA response in CRPC. Larger, prospective studies will be required to confirm our findings.

[A Case of Metachronous Cancer Originating from Five Different Organs].

Advances and improvements in the early detection, diagnosis, and treatment modalities have increased the opportunities to treat multiple primary malignancies. Herein, we report a male patient with five metachronous cancers. The patient had initially undergone partial tongue resection for tongue cancer in 2003 at the age of 57 years and was subsequently diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia, duodenal cancer, prostate cancer, and bladder cancer, over a period of 13 years. The patient underwent androgen deprivation therapy and palliative radiation therapy for the management of metastatic prostate cancer in 2016. The poor prognosis of the patient was thought to be related to be the prostate cancer because the other cancers were either in remission or localized. The occurrence of five metachronous cancers is extremely rare, and this is the fourth case to be reported in the Japanese literature.

Lactate dehydrogenase predicts combined progression-free survival after sequential therapy with abiraterone and enzalutamide for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: An array of clinical issues remains to be resolved for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), including the sequence of drug use and drug cross-resistance. At present, no clear guidelines are available for the optimal sequence of use of novel agents like androgen-receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) agents, particularly enzalutamide, and abiraterone. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed a total of 69 patients with CRPC treated with sequential therapy using enzalutamide followed by abiraterone or vice versa. The primary outcome measure was the comparative combined progression-free survival (PFS) comprising symptomatic and/or radiographic PFS. Patients were also compared for total prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-PFS, overall survival (OS), and PSA response. The predictors of combined PFS and OS were analyzed with a backward-stepwise multivariate Cox model. RESULTS: Of the 69 patients, 46 received enzalutamide first, followed by abiraterone (E-A group), and 23 received abiraterone, followed by enzalutamide (A-E group). The two groups were not significantly different with regard to basic data, except for hemoglobin values. In a comparison with the E-A group, the A-E group was shown to be associated with better combined PFS in Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.043). Similar results were obtained for total PSA-PFS (P = 0.049), while OS did not differ between groups (P = 0.62). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values and age were significant predictors of longer combined PFS (P < 0.05). Likewise, multivariate analysis demonstrated that pretreatment hemoglobin values and performance status were significant predictors of longer OS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggested the A-E sequence had longer combined PSA and total PSA-PFS compared to the E-A sequence in patients with CRPC. LDH values in sequential therapy may serve as a predictor of longer combined PFS.

A comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been suggested to confer several clinical benefits in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing transperineal prostate brachytherapy (TPPB). Unlike gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonists, a GnRH antagonist such as degarelix can achieve castrate levels of testosterone without testosterone flare. However, normalization of serum testosterone levels following completion of neoadjuvant ADT in either form of treatment has never been compared in clinical trials. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled study that will compare the efficacy and safety of degarelix with those of existing GnRH agonists combined with (125)I-TPPB. A total of 56 patients with low/intermediate-risk clinically localized PCa will be enrolled and randomized to one of two treatment groups: the GnRH agonist group and the degarelix group. Patients in the GnRH agonist group will receive leuprorelin acetate or goserelin acetate, and those in the degarelix group will receive the initial dose of 240 mg as 2 subcutaneous injections of 120 mg each, and then 80 mg of maintenance doses every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Those randomly assigned to the 12-week intervention period will subsequently undergo 48-weeks of follow-up after (125)I-TPPB. The primary endpoint is defined as normalization of serum testosterone levels (>50 ng/dL) following completion of neoadjuvant ADT. All patients will be assessed every 4 weeks for the first 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks for the next 36 weeks after administrations of these drugs. Secondary endpoints are the proportion of normalized serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), the percent reduction in prostate specific antigen (PSA) compared with pretreatment levels, the percent reduction in total prostate volume (TPV) during neoadjuvant ADT, the percent increase in TPV after (125)I-TPPB, the percent reduction in hemoglobin, serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), changes in free testosterone and bone mineral content measurement, the proportion of patients who have serum testosterone levels over 50 ng/dL at 12 weeks following completion of neoadjuvant ADT, and the improvement of quality of life (QOL). DISCUSSION: The present study will provide additional insight regarding the benefit and potency of degarelix and will examine its potential as a new option for administration in neoadjuvant ADT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Identification number: UMIN000015519 . Registration date: October 24, 2014.