Primary Renal Angiosarcoma: Rare Tumour with Lethal Outcomes.

Introduction: Renal haemangioma is a benign tumour, and due to its characteristics, it must be distinguished from malignant diseases. We present a clinical case of primary renal angiosarcoma initially mistaken for haemangioma due to their similarity. Case report: A 58-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with suspicion of pulmonary embolism. The patient complained of pain on the left side. An ultrasound and CT scan of the abdomen showed a tumour mass ~20.5 × 17.2 × 15.4 cm in size in the projection of the left kidney. On CT images, there were data for clear cell renal clear cell carcinoma (ccRCC). A left nephrectomy was performed. However, histological examination revealed renal haemangioma. Three months later, the patient presented to the hospital with abdominal and lumbar pain. A CT scan showed multiple small hypoechoic foci up to 2 cm in size in the liver, lungs, and intra-abdominally, with the most data for carcinosis. Histological re-verification of the left kidney showed a renal vascular tumour with pronounced signs of infarction and necrosis with the majority of the evidence supporting angiosarcoma. Despite treatment, the patient's outcome was fatal. Conclusions: Based on the clinical presentation, radiological images and histological examination data, the tumour was initially misdiagnosed as kidney haemangioma. Due to the rarity of this tumour, there are no established treatment protocols or clinical guidelines for managing primary kidney angiosarcoma.

Benefits and harms of the new prostate cancer grade grouping on the prediction of long-term oncological outcomes in patients after radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the new prostate cancer grade groups model provides significant predictive value and better patient stratification on tumor progression after radical prostatectomy compared with the former Gleason grading models. METHODS: Men treated at a tertiary center by radical prostatectomy between 2005 and 2017 were analyzed. The outcomes of interest were clinical progression-free and cancer-specific survival. Multivariate Cox regression analysis, C-index and decision curve analysis were carried out using three-tier (Gleason score 6, 7 and 8-10), four-tier (Gleason score 6, 7, 8 and 9-10) and new grade groups model. RESULTS: In total, 1759 men were included in the analysis. At a median of 87 months (interquartile range 51-134 months) of follow up, clinical progression was detected in 78 (4.4%) and cancer-related death in 42 (2.4%) patients. The hazard ratio of clinical progression-free was 2.3, 5.7, 5.2 and 29.5; the hazard ratio of cancer-specific survival was 1.7, 3.2, 4.8 and 11.8 in the grade groups 2-5, relative to grade group 1, respectively. The grade groups model had higher C-index in comparison with four- and three-tier grading models for clinical progression-free survival 0.88 versus 0.85 versus 0.83 and for cancer-specific survival 0.82 versus 0.80 versus 0.80, respectively. In the decision curve analysis, the grade groups model shows marginally better net benefit on clinical progression-free and cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: The new model shows better performance in comparison with former Gleason grading models on the prediction of long-term oncological outcomes.

Moral Distress and Intention to Leave the Profession: Lithuanian Nurses in Municipal Hospitals.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the level of moral distress experienced by nurses, situations that most often caused moral distress, and the intentions of the nurses to leave the profession. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional, correlational design was applied in this study. Registered nurses were recruited from five large, urban Lithuanian municipal hospitals representing the five administrative regions in Lithuania. Among the 2,560 registered nurses, from all unit types and specialities (surgical, therapeutic, and intensive care), working in the five participating hospitals, 900 were randomly selected to be recruited for the study. Of the 900 surveys distributed, 612 questionnaires were completed, for a response rate of 68%. Depending on the hospital, the response rate ranged from 61% to 81%. Moral distress was measured using the Moral Distress Scale-Revised (MDS-R). The MDS-R is designed to measure nurses' experiences of moral distress in 21 clinical situations. Each of the 21 items is scored using a Likert scale (0-4) in two dimensions: how often the situation arises (frequency) and how disturbing the situation is when it occurs (intensity). On the Likert scale, 0 correlates to situations that have never been experienced, and 4 correlates to situations that have occurred very often. RESULTS: Among the 612 participants, 206 (32.3%) nurses reported a low level of moral distress (mean score 1.09); 208 (33.9%) a moderate level of distress (mean score 2.53), and 207 (33.8%) a high level of distress (mean score 3.0). The most commonly experienced situations that resulted in moral distress were as follows: "Carrying out physician's orders for what I consider to be unnecessary tests and treatments" (mean score 1.66); "Follow the family's wishes to continue life support even though I believe it is not in the best interest of the patient" (mean score 1.31); and "Follow the physician's request not to discuss the patient's prognosis with the patient or family" (mean score 1.26). Nurses who had a high moral distress level were three times more likely to consider leaving their position compared with respondents who had a medium or low moral distress level (8.7% and 2.9%, respectively; p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide evidence on the association between moral distress and intention to leave the profession. Situations that may lead health professionals to be in moral distress seem to be mainly related to the unethical work environment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study reported that moral distress plays a role in both personal and organizational consequences, including negative emotional impacts upon employees.

Dutasteride for the prevention of prostate cancer in men with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: results of a phase III randomized open-label 3-year trial.

PURPOSE: High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is a potential precursor of prostate cancer (PCa), and patients with HGPIN are at high risk for PCa development. Objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of dutasteride 0.5 mg in PCa prevention among men with isolated HGPIN on biopsy. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, phase III, open-label 3-year trial assessed dutasteride versus active surveillance in patients with HGPIN. Patients were randomized to dutasteride 0.5 mg daily or active surveillance. Per-protocol prostate biopsies were performed at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months until cancer detection or study end. The primary end point was cancer-free survival (CFS). An intention-to-treat analysis was done for patients who underwent at least one per-protocol biopsy. An efficacy analysis was done for patients who completed the study. CFS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis. RESULTS: In total, 220 men were randomized (dutasteride, n = 107; surveillance, n = 113). PCa was detected in 47.6: 49.1 % in the surveillance group and 45.9 % in the treatment group (p = 0.66). The detected PCa differentiation by Gleason score (GS) was GS 6 in 76.9 %, GS 7 in 19.8 %, and GS ≥ 8 in 3.3 %, with no difference between groups. The 3-year PCa-free survival was 43.6 % in the surveillance and 49.6 % in the dutasteride group (log rank p = 0.57). Limitations include a relatively high non-adherence rate, open-label design, and baseline sextant biopsy scheme. CONCLUSIONS: Dutasteride 0.5 mg for 3 years did not lower the PCa detection rate but did not worsen detected PCa characteristics in men with HGPIN.

Dynamics of pelvic floor muscle functional parameters and their correlations with urinary incontinence in men after radical prostatectomy.

AIMS: To evaluate the dynamics of pelvic floor muscle strength, endurance, and urinary incontinence in a 6-month period in men after radical prostatectomy and to determine correlations between pelvic floor muscle strength, endurance, and urinary incontinence. METHODS: Forty-two men with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy participated in the study. Pelvic floor muscles parameters were evaluated using the anal perineometer. An 8-hour pad test was used with the catheter removed. RESULTS: The greatest change in strength occurred during the last 3 months, i.e., from the third to the sixth month following surgery (P ≤ 0.05). The average amount of urinary incontinence on the day of catheter removal was approximately 311 g per 8 hr. Urinary incontinence decreased by 93.6% from the day of catheter removal 6 months later. A strong correlation (P ≤ 0.001) of reverse dependence was determined between pelvic floor muscle strength before surgery and the amount of urinary incontinence 6 months following surgery. CONCLUSION: The greatest change of pelvic floor muscles strength and endurance occurred during the third to the sixth month following surgery. The greatest change in urinary incontinence occurred during the first month following surgery. Pelvic floor muscle strength causes a greater decrease in urinary incontinence than endurance. The greater the pelvic floor muscle strength before surgery, the lower the amount of urinary incontinence. Age also affects pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance; this relation gradually weakens and with age disappears. Neurourol. Urodynam. 36:126-131, 2017. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Effect of Radical Prostatectomy on Survival for Men with High-risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Features Selected According to STAMPEDE Criteria: An EMPaCT Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis of two randomized STAMPEDE platform trials revealed that 3 yr of abiraterone acetate in addition to androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy significantly improved metastasis-free and overall survival (OS) in high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) and should be considered a new standard of care. The aim of our study was to assess long-term cancer-specific survival (CSS) and OS for surgically treated patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic node-negative PCa meeting the STAMPEDE criteria for high risk. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of patients with European Association of Urology (EAU) high-risk PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. CSS was assessed using cumulative incidence curves and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate OS. We used a Fine and Gray model to evaluate the prognostic value of STAMPEDE high-risk factors (SHRFs) for CSS, and a Cox proportional-hazards model to assess the association of SHRFs with OS. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 2994 patients with EAU high-risk PCa were divided into groups with 0, 1, 2, or 3 SHRFs. The 10-yr survival estimates for patients with 0-1 versus 2-3 SHRFs were 95% versus 82% for CSS and 81% versus 64% for OS (both p < 0.0001). In comparison to patients with 0 SHRFs, hazard ratios were 1.2 (p = 0.5), 3.9 (p < 0.0001), and 5.5 (p < 0.0001) for CSS, and 1.1 (p = 0.4), 2.2 (p < 0.0001), and 2.5 (p = 0.0004) for OS for patients with 1, 2, and 3 SHRFs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our results confirm that the STAMPEDE high-risk criteria identify a subgroup of patients with highly aggressive PCa features and adverse long-term oncological outcomes. This population is likely to benefit most from aggressive multimodal treatment. Nevertheless, we have shown for the first time that surgery remains a viable treatment option for patients with STAMPEDE high-risk PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: Prostate cancer that meets the high-risk definitions from the STAMPEDE trial is an aggressive type of cancer. Our results for long-term cancer control outcomes indicate that surgery is a viable option for the subgroup of patients with this type of prostate cancer.

Risk of Cancer-related Death for Men with Biopsy Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer and High-risk Features: A European Multi-institutional Study.

International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 1 (GG 1) prostate cancer (PCa) is generally considered insignificant, with recent suggestions that it should even be considered as "noncancerous". We evaluated outcomes for patients with GG 1 PCa on biopsy (bGG 1) and high-risk features (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >20 ng/ml and/or cT3-4 stage) to challenge the hypothesis that every case of bGG 1 PCa has a benign disease course. We used the multi-institutional EMPaCT database, which includes data for 9508 patients with high-risk PCa undergoing surgery. We included patients with bGG 1 PCa (n = 848) in our analysis and divided them into three groups according to PSA >20 ng/ml, cT3-4 stage, or both. The estimated 10-yr cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate was 96% in the overall population, 88% in the group with both PSA >20 ng/ml and cT3-4 stage, 97% in the group with PSA >20 ng/ml alone, and 98% in the group with cT3-4 stage alone. Similar CSS outcomes were found in subgroups with GG 1 PCa on pathology (n = 502) and with GG 1 on biopsy diagnosed after 2005 (n = 253). Study limitations include the lack of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging and MRI-targeted biopsies. In conclusion, patients with GG 1 and either PSA >20 ng/ml or cT3-4 stage have a low risk of dying from their cancer after surgery. However, patients with GG 1 PCa and both PSA >20 ng/ml and cT3-4 stage are at higher risk of cancer-specific mortality and active treatment should be discussed for this subgroup. Patient summary: We assessed outcomes for patients diagnosed with low-grade prostate cancer on biopsy who also had one or two factors associated with high risk disease. Men with both of those risk factors had a higher risk of dying from their prostate cancer. Active treatment should be discussed for this subgroup of patients.

Comparison of long-term results after nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy in treating 4- to 7-cm renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare long-term oncological outcomes following nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) 4 to 7 cm in diameter. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included patients who underwent RN or NSS for RCC 4 to 7 cm in diameter between 1998 and 2009. The studied groups were compared with respect to the patients' age, sex, physical status according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical classification, histological type, stage, tumor size, grade, duration of the operation, and complications. Survival was established using the Kaplan-Meier method. The risk factors for survival were analyzed using a multivariate Cox regression model. RESULTS: During the study, 351 patients underwent surgery: 317 patients (90.3%) underwent RN, and 34 (9.7%), NSS. The compared groups differed with respect to tumor size (P=0.001) and stage (P=0.006). The overall estimated 12-year survival was 53.7% after RN and 55.2% after NSS (log-rank test P=0.437). The 12-year cancer-specific survival in the RN and NSS groups was 69.6% and 80.6%, respectively (log-rank test P=0.198). Pathological stage and patients' age were the major factors affecting both overall and cancer-specific survival. The type of surgery (NSS or RN) had no effect on survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that nephron-sparing surgery is a safe technique compared with radical nephrectomy that ensures good oncological control in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma measuring 4 to 7 cm and may be proposed as the treatment of choice for renal tumors not only up to 4 cm, but also 4 to 7 cm in size.

Small Renal Masses without Gross Fat: What Is the Role of Contrast-Enhanced MDCT?

Increased detection of small renal masses (SRMs) has encouraged research for non-invasive diagnostic tools capable of adequately differentiating malignant vs. benign SRMs and the type of the tumour. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) has been suggested as an alternative to intervention, therefore, it is important to determine both the capabilities and limitations of MDCT for SRM evaluation. In our study, two abdominal radiologists retrospectively blindly assessed MDCT scan images of 98 patients with incidentally detected lipid-poor SRMs that did not present as definitely aggressive lesions on CT. Radiological conclusions were compared to histopathological findings of materials obtained during surgery that were assumed as the gold standard. The probability (odds ratio (OR)) in regression analyses, sensitivity (SE), and specificity (SP) of predetermined SRM characteristics were calculated. Correct differentiation between malignant vs. benign SRMs was detected in 70.4% of cases, with more accurate identification of malignant (73%) in comparison to benign (65.7%) lesions. The radiological conclusions of SRM type matched histopathological findings in 56.1%. Central scarring (OR 10.6, p = 0.001), diameter of lesion (OR 2.4, p = 0.003), and homogeneous accumulation of contrast medium (OR 3.4, p = 0.03) significantly influenced the accuracy of malignant diagnosis. SE and SP of these parameters varied from 20.6% to 91.3% and 22.9% to 74.3%, respectively. In conclusion, MDCT is able to correctly differentiate malignant versus uncharacteristic benign SRMs in more than 2/3 of cases. However, frequency of the correct histopathological SRM type MDCT identification remains low.

Effect of Clinical Parameters on Risk of Death from Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Background: The study aimed to assess predictors and to identify patients at increased risk of prostate-cancer-specific mortality (CSM) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: A total of 2421 men with localized and locally advanced PCa who underwent RP in 2001−2017 were included in the study. CSM predictors were assessed using multivariate competing risk analysis. Death from other causes was considered a competing event. Cumulative CSM and other-cause mortality (OCM) were calculated in various combinations of predictors. Results: During the median 8 years (interquartile range 4.4−11.7) follow-up, 56 (2.3%) of registered deaths were due to PCa. Cumulative 10 years CSM and OCM was 3.6% (95% CI 2.7−4.7) and 15.9% (95% CI 14.2−17.9), respectively. The strongest predictors of CSM were Grade Group 5 (GG5) (hazard ratio (HR) 19.9, p < 0.0001), lymph node invasion (HR 3.4, p = 0.001), stage pT3b-4 (HR 3.1, p = 0.009), and age (HR 1.1, p = 0.0007). In groups created regarding age, stage, and GG, cumulative 10 years CSM ranged from 0.4−84.9%, whereas OCM varied from 0−43.2%. Conclusions: CSM after RP is related to GGs, pathological stage, age, and combinations of these factors, whereas other-cause mortality is only associated with age. Created CSM and OCM plots can help clinicians identify patients with the most aggressive PCa who could benefit from more intensive or novel multimodal treatment strategies.

The Significance of Prostate Specific Antigen Persistence in Prostate Cancer Risk Groups on Long-Term Oncological Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the significance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence at the first measurement after radical prostatectomy (RP) on long-term outcomes in different prostate cancer risk groups. METHODS: Persistent PSA was defined as ≥0.1 ng/mL at 4-8 weeks after RP. Patients were stratified into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, according to the preoperative PSA, pathological stage, grade group and lymph nodes status. The ten-year cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastases, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) were calculated in patients with undetectable and persistent PSA in different PCa-risk groups. Multivariate regression analyses depicted the significance of PSA persistence on each study endpoint. RESULTS: Of all 1225 men, in 246 (20.1%), PSA persistence was detected. These men had an increased risk of BCR (hazard ratio (HR) 4.2, p < 0.0001), metastases (HR: 2.7, p = 0.002), CRM (HR: 5.5, p = 0.002) and OM (HR: 1.8, p = 0.01) compared to the men with undetectable PSA. The same significance of PSA persistence on each study endpoint was found in the high-risk group (HR: 2.5 to 6.2, p = 0.02 to p < 0.0001). In the intermediate-risk group, PSA persistence was found as a predictor of BCR (HR: 3.9, p < 0.0001), while, in the low-risk group, PSA persistence was not detected as a significant predictor of outcomes after RP. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent PSA could be used as an independent predictor of worse long-term outcomes in high-risk PCa patients, while, in intermediate-risk patients, this parameter significantly predicts only biochemical recurrence and has no impact on the outcomes in low-risk PCa patients.

Impact of Grade Groups on Prostate Cancer-Specific and Other-Cause Mortality: Competing Risk Analysis from a Large Single Institution Series.

Objective: To assess the risk of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) using post-operative International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (GG) model in patients after radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and Methods: Overall 1921 consecutive men who underwent RP during 2001 to 2017 in a single tertiary center were included in the study. Multivariate competing risk regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors and quantify cumulative incidence of CSM and OCM. Time-depending area under the curve (AUC) depicted the performance of GG model on prediction of CSM. Results: Over a median follow-up of 7.9-year (IQR 4.4-11.7) after RP, 235 (12.2%) deaths were registered, and 52 (2.7%) of them were related to PCa. GG model showed high and stable performance (time-dependent AUC 0.88) on prediction of CSM. Cumulative 10-year CSM in GGs 1 to 5 was 0.9%, 2.3%, 7.6%, 14.7%, and 48.6%, respectively; 10-year OCM in GGs was 15.5%, 16.1%, 12.6%, 17.7% and 6.5%, respectively. The ratio between 10-year CSM/OCM in GGs 1 to 5 was 1:17, 1:7, 1:2, 1:1, and 7:1, respectively. Conclusions: Cancer-specific and other-cause mortality differed widely between GGs. Presented findings could aid in personalized clinical decision making for active treatment.

Head-to-Head Comparison of Two Nomograms Predicting Probability of Lymph Node Invasion in Prostate Cancer and the Therapeutic Impact of Higher Nomogram Threshold.

Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare the performance of the 2012 Briganti and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomograms as a predictor for pelvic lymph node invasion (LNI) in men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), to examine their performance and to analyse the therapeutic impact of using 7% nomogram cut-off. Materials and Methods: The study cohort consisted of 807 men with clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent open RP with PLND between 2001 and 2019. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to quantify the accuracy of the 2012 Briganti and MSKCC nomograms to predict LNI. Calibration plots were used to visualise over or underestimation by the models and a decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the net benefit associated with the used nomograms. Results: A total of 97 of 807 patients had LNI (12%). The AUC of 2012 Briganti and MSKCC nomogram was 80.6 and 79.2, respectively. For the Briganti nomogram using the cut-off value of 7% would lead to reduce PLND in 47% (379/807), while missing 3.96% (15/379) cases with LNI. For the MSKCC nomogram using the cut-off value of 7% a PLND would be omitted in 44.5% (359/807), while missing 3.62% (13/359) of cases with LNI. Conclusions: Both analysed nomograms demonstrated high accuracy for prediction of LNI. Using a 7% nomogram cut-off would allow the avoidance up to 47% of PLNDs, while missing less than 4% of patients with LNI.

Male Wolffian adnexal tumor: the first report of long-term follow-up after radical surgical treatment.

The male Wolffian tumor is an extremely rare case in male patients. Here, we report a patient with such malignancy and successful radical surgical treatment at 15-year follow-up. The clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural features are described. The differential diagnosis of this tumor in a male patient is discussed.

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.

Patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with curative intent are at an increased risk of biochemical recurrence, metastatic progression and cancer-related death compared with patients treated for low-risk or intermediate-risk disease. Thus, these patients often need multimodal therapy to achieve complete disease control. Over the past two decades, multiple studies on the use of neoadjuvant treatment have been performed using conventional androgen deprivation therapy, which comprises luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists or antagonists and/or first-line anti-androgens. However, despite results from these studies demonstrating a reduction in positive surgical margins and tumour volume, no benefit has been observed in hard oncological end points, such as cancer-related death. The introduction of potent androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSIs), such as abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide, has led to a renewed interest in using neoadjuvant hormonal treatment in high-risk prostate cancer. The addition of ARSIs to androgen deprivation therapy has demonstrated substantial survival benefits in the metastatic castration-resistant, non-metastatic castration-resistant and metastatic hormone-sensitive settings. Intuitively, a similar survival effect can be expected when applying ARSIs as a neoadjuvant strategy in high-risk prostate cancer. Most studies on neoadjuvant ARSIs use a pathological end point as a surrogate for long-term oncological outcome. However, no consensus yet exists regarding the ideal definition of pathological response following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and pathologists might encounter difficulties in determining pathological response in hormonally treated prostate specimens. The neoadjuvant setting also provides opportunities to gain insight into resistance mechanisms against neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and, consequently, to guide personalized therapy.

Current and emerging therapies for localized high-risk prostate cancer.

Introduction: Despite progress in the field of high-risk localized prostate cancer (HRPCa) treatments, high-risk patients treated with curative intent are at increased risk of biochemical recurrence, metastatic progression and cancer-related death. The optimal treatment strategy remains a topic of debate. This review provides an overview of the current and investigational therapeutic options for HRPCa.Areas covered: A PubMed search was performed for papers on the current perspectives on the multimodality treatment of HRPCa. We focus on both primary local treatment as well as systemic treatment options. Finally, relevant ongoing trials focusing on systemic treatments (including [neo]adjuvant treatments) enrolling at least 50 patients were retrieved, to highlight ongoing research and treatment optimization.Expert opinion: Disease progression in HRPCa patients is driven by local tumor extension and subclinical metastases. Therefore, the main treatment concept is a multimodal approach targeting the primary tumor with extended surgery or RT with long-term ADT and simultaneously targeting micro-metastatic deposits. However, there is still room for optimization. Upcoming clinical trials comparing surgery versus RT as local treatment, trials with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy or androgen receptor signaling inhibitors will likely change the treatment landscape. However, a multimodal treatment strategy will stay as the cornerstone in the treatment of HRPCa.

Significance of operative parameters on outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of this prospective study was to establish the influence of operative parameters on outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this prospective case series study, 89 patients underwent transurethral resection of the prostate. The standardized protocol was used to investigate the impact of operative parameters (resected tissue weight, residual prostate weight, and residual prostatic weight ratio [total prostate volume - resected tissue weight / total prostate volume]) on outcomes after six months following transurethral resection of the prostate. The evaluation of treatment efficacy was done using the criteria of the Second International Consultation on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. All postoperative results were categorized as excellent, good, fair, or none. Treatment was considered effective when the postoperative results were excellent and good, and ineffective when results were fair and none. RESULTS. Treatment was effective for 85.4% and ineffective for 14.6% of the patients. The univariate analysis of operative parameters detected the residual prostatic weight ratio (cutoff value, 0.71; P<0.001; sensitivity, 0.62; specificity, 0.96; OR, 39.47) as the strongest independent predictor of ineffective outcome. Logistic regression analysis revealed two important parameters of unfavorable outcomes: residual prostatic weight ratio (cutoff value, 0.71; P<0.001; OR, 62.16) and residual prostate weight (cutoff value, 26.6 mL; P=0.013; OR, 9.98). When the values of both these parameters were lower than their cutoff values, the probability of an ineffective outcome was reduced to 3%; however, when they were higher, the probability of an unfavorable outcome was increased to 95%. CONCLUSIONS. Residual prostatic weight ratio and residual prostatic weight are significant operative parameters for the prediction of outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate.

The role of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia for biochemical relapse of prostate carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.

UNLABELLED: The objective of the study was to evaluate the relationship between high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed after radical retropubic prostatectomy and the clinical and pathological characteristics of prostate cancer, and to evaluate the time to biochemical relapse of the disease within the groups of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and non-HGPIN patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients, clinically diagnosed with local prostate carcinoma at the Clinic of Urology, Kaunas University of Medicine, during 2003-2007 and treated with radical retropubic prostatectomies, were distributed into two groups according to the HGPIN detected in the postoperative material: HGPIN and non-HGPIN. The two groups were compared in terms of preoperative and postoperative characteristics. The patients who were followed up for at least 12 months were included into the study. The biochemical relapse of prostate cancer was determined if there were two consecutive rises of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level above 0.2 ng/mL or according to the attending physician's opinion, there was a need for adjuvant treatment even with onetime rise of PSA level above 0.2 ng/mL. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the HGPIN and non-HGPIN groups in terms of time to biochemical relapse and frequency of biochemical relapses, time before surgery, the timing of the HGPIN diagnosis, age, or PSA level. After radical prostatectomy, patients in the HGPIN group were found to have significantly more often poorer cancer cell differentiation according to the Gleason score (≥7 vs. <7; P=0.001) and higher TNM stage (T3a,b vs. T2a,b,c; P=0.001). Fewer positive resection margins were diagnosed in the HGPIN group (P=0.05). The groups did not differ in terms of the degree of differentiation according to the Gleason score or perineural invasion (P=0.811 and P=0.282, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: HGPIN was more often associated with the characteristics of the poor prognosis for relapse of prostate cancer: poorer tumor cell differentiation according to the Gleason score and more cases of higher TNM stage. HGPIN did not have any influence on biochemical relapse of the disease during the short-term follow-up.