A comparative study of sedo-analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine with ketamine in postoperative mechanically ventilated patients.

Background and Aims: To compare the sedoanalgesic effects of dexmedetomidine alone or with combination of ketamine. Material and Methods: After getting ethical approval and informed patient consent, 60 adult surgical patients, were randomly divided into two groups. Group KD (n = 30); received dexmedotomidine 0.5 µg/kg/h mixed with ketamine 0.5 µg/kg/h and Group DEX (n = 30); received dexmedotomidine at 0.5 mg/kg/h infusion only. In both the groups, study drugs were titrated (dexmedetomidine- 0.2-0.7 µg/kg/h and ketamine 0.2-0.7 mg/kg/h) to achieve target sedation. Hemodynamic variables, pain scores, sedation scores, and patient satisfaction were recorded. Qualitative and Quantitative data were analyzed with Pearson Chi-squared test and analysis of variance test, respectively. All analyses were done by using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. Results: Pain scores were higher in group DEX than in group KD at 2 h and 4 h which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At the end of 2 h, sedation scores were higher in group KD than in group DEX and was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Length of intensive care unit stay was almost comparable in both groups, and the time to tracheal extubation was lesser in ketamine-dexmedetomidine group as compared to the dexmedetomidine alone group. However the difference was statistically non-significant. Conclusions: By combining dexmedetomidine with ketamine we observed lower incidence of hypotension and bradycardia. Dexmedetomidine with ketamine combination therapy could be used safely and effectively as sedo-analgesic agent.

Injectable midazolam as oral premedicant in pediatric neurosurgery.

In a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study; the acceptability, efficacy and safety of injectable midazolam as oral premedicant in children was evaluated. One hundred children (ASA 1,2) aged 6 months to 6 years, undergoing elective neurosurgical operations, like meningomyelocele, meningo-encephalocele, ventriculo peritoneal and other shunts and craniotomies for tumour decompression etc., were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups (A, B, C, D) receiving respectively saline or 0.50, 0.75 and 1.0 mg/kg midazolam in honey, 45 min before separation from parents. All received identical general anesthesia (GA). Age, sex, weight, heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, saturation (SaO2), reaction to parent's separation, sedation score and duration of anesthesia, recovery conditions and side effects were noted. We found no difference in age, sex, weight, patient acceptability vomiting after ingestion and duration of anesthesia between groups. Even though many children resisted the placement of premedicant in the mouth, only three children spat it out and none vomited after swallowing. The reaction to separation from parents was better after midazolam premedication. However, on reaching the operating room, 24% children (placebo-60%) were found anxious after 0.50 mg/kg, but 12% were deeply sedated after a dose of 1.0 mg/kg. Recovery was similar in groups A, B and C except that more (48%) patients were anxious in group A. Recovery, however was delayed in 16% patients of group D. Though, fewer complications were reported during recovery after midazolam than placebo premedication, they were minimal in the 0.75 mg/kg group. We concluded that giving injectable midazolam orally as premedication in pediatric age group scheduled for neurosurgical operations is acceptable, effective and safe in 0.75 mg/kg dose. While 0.50 mg/kg is less effective, 1.0 mg/kg does not offer any additional benefit over 0.75 mg/kg but does delay recovery and may compromise safety.

Buprenorphine-soaked absorbable gelatin sponge: an alternative method for postlaminectomy pain relief.

There have been several reports of instillation of buprenorphine in the intact epidural space in an attempt to control postoperative pain, but none in which an absorbable gelatin sponge soaked with buprenorphine is placed directly in the epidural space. In the present study, carried out on 30 patients (study group) undergoing noncervical laminectomies, 0.3 mg buprenorphine diluted to 5 mL with normal saline soaked into an absorbable gelatin sponge was placed in the epidural space under direct vision. In 30 other patients (control group) undergoing laminectomies, absorbable gelatin sponge soaked with 5 mL normal saline was placed in the epidural space. Pulse rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, pain score by visual analog scale, duration of analgesia, and adverse effects, if any, were noted preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours. The presence of any neurologic symptoms was also assessed at these time intervals as well as on the seventh postoperative day. The authors observed that changes in pulse rate, mean arterial pressure, and respiratory rate were not statistically significant between the control and the study groups. The pain relief score, duration of pain relief (14.8 +/- 0.77 hours in the study group vs. 0.66 +/- 0.15 hours in the control group), and sedation were significantly better in the study group. No patient demonstrated any respiratory depression (respiratory rate <12/min), bradycardia, pruritus, or neurologic pressure symptoms, although the incidence of nausea was higher in the study group.