Validation of 2 Novel and Complementary Training Platforms for Small Joint Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: We developed 2 complementary low-fidelity models to be used to create the tool skills needed to perform small joint arthroscopy. The purpose of the study was to establish the face and construct validity of the 2 models. METHODS: The "foundation model" was constructed from lemon and radish sections, and the "advanced model" was constructed from a chicken knee. Using both models, novice, intermediate, and experienced participants were asked to perform specific tasks and were timed and scored on their performance. The experienced surgeons were given a 16-item survey to rate how closely each model emulated reality to determine face validity. RESULTS: For the foundation model, the mean total time for the completion of tasks was 1,138 seconds for novices, 1,059 seconds for intermediates, and 631 seconds for experienced, with significant differences between the groups for time to complete 2 of the tasks. With a maximum possible score of 50 points for the correct performance of all tasks, the mean total performance score was 23 for novices, 31.8 for intermediates, and 42.2 for experienced operators. For the advanced model, the mean total time for completion was 266 seconds for novices, 147 seconds for intermediates, and 72 seconds for experienced participants. With a maximum possible score of 31 points for the correct performance of all tasks, the mean total performance score was 1.9 for novices, 15.0 for intermediates, and 24.3 for experienced participants. The average scores for the face validity surveys using a 5-point Likert scale were 4.2 and 4.5 of 5 possible points for the foundation and advanced models, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Experienced operators completed the tasks more quickly and had higher performance scores than the operators in other groups. This correlation between experience and performance suggests that both models have construct validity. The face validity scores were on the upper end of the scale, suggesting that both models emulate reality for experienced operators. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These novel models provide low-cost, available and valid simulations conducive to high-repetition training.

A graphic guide to the percutaneous tripod acetabular reconstruction for metastatic cancer.

Symptomatic peri-acetabular metastatic lesions are often treated with open surgery such as modified Harrington procedures. In an effort to avoid surgical complications inherently associated with open surgical approaches, we developed and recently reported a novel Tripod percutaneous screw technique. The tripod technique is minimally invasive and was found to yield excellent outcomes regarding both pain control and functionality. The procedure is performed in a standard operative theater using fluoroscopic guided percutaneous screws. Despite the simplicity of intraoperative set-up and instrumentation, it is technically demanding. Obtaining the correct fluoroscopic views and troubleshooting intraoperative hurdles can be challenging for even an experienced orthopedic surgeon. The technique and bony conduits were previously described in the trauma literature, however, there are key points of difference in the setting of metastatic disease. Here we provide a compilation of a stepwise graphic guide for the tripod model in the setting of metastatic peri-acetabular lesions, as well as the tips and tricks based on our own experience. These encompass preoperative preparation, operating room settings, intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance, postoperative care, and subsequent conversion to a cemented total hip arthroplasty, if needed.

Increased 90-Day Mortality and Morbidity Among Patients Recovering From Elective Primary Arthroplasty During the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City.

All elective procedures were stopped in March 2020 because of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We report the 90-day mortality and complications of patients who underwent primary arthroplasty before the stopping of elective procedures at a single academic medical center. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including patients who underwent elective primary arthroplasty between December 2019 and mid-March 2020. Their 90-day postoperative mortality and medical complications were statistically compared with those of a historical cohort from the same operative period in 2019. The 2020 and 2019 cohorts included 372 and 410 patients, respectively. Except for the prevalence of diabetes, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts regarding baseline characteristics or preoperative health. The 2020 cohort had statistically significant higher rates of pneumonia (2.7% vs 0.7%; P=.03), readmission (9.1% vs 5.4%; P=.04), pulmonary embolism (1.6% vs 0.2%; P=.04), and 90-day mortality (1.1% vs 0%; P=.04). The 2020 cohort also had a trend for increased rates of deep venous thrombosis (1.1% vs 0.7%; P=.7) and cardiac complications (1.9% vs 0.5%; P=.07) and no change in emergency department visits (14.0% vs 11.7%; P=.3). There were 7 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the 2020 cohort and 1 death. This study demonstrates that patients who underwent primary arthroplasty procedures at our institution close to the time of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic experienced a statistically significant increase in mortality, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and readmission compared with a historical cohort. As elective procedures have resumed during the ongoing pandemic, providers and patients should be aware of these increased risks. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].