Rubella outbreak and outbreak management in a school setting, China, 2014.

BACKGROUND: An active response to a rubella outbreak may interrupt disease transmission, and outbreak response immunization (ORI) can increase immunity among persons who might otherwise not be protected. On March 17, 2014, a rubella outbreak was reported in a middle school in Guangzhou city, China. We conducted an investigation to assess impact of a policy of exclusion of cases from school and of ORI. METHODS: Active surveillance was used to find cases of rubella. Investigators interviewed teachers and reviewed the absentee records to determine implementation details of school exclusion. ORI was recommended on 2 occasions during the outbreak, one small-scale and one large-scale. Laboratory confirmation tests included serum IgM and IgG measurements to distinguish between acute infection and immunity. A serological survey in 4 classes was used to determine immunity status and identify symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. RESULTS: From February 17 to May 23, 2014, 162 rubella cases (24 laboratory-confirmed and 138 epidemiologically linked) were detected among 1,621 students. Cases ultimately occurred in 27 classes (72.97%) across 37 classes. In 11 classes in which exclusion from school was delayed by 1 or more days, the secondary attack rate was 12.30%, compared with 2.35% in 15 classes with immediate exclusion. ORI increased vaccine coverage from 25.83 % to 86.92%, and the final case of the epidemic was reported one month later. A serological survey of 91 students in 4 classes identified 15 cases, 6 of which were asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: The outbreak happened in school with low rubella-containing vaccination coverage. Exclusion from school upon rash/fever onset was associated with lowering the secondary attack rate, but school exclusion alone was not able to stop this outbreak - a large ORI was needed. Assuring complete vaccination upon entry to school is likely to be necessary to ensure coverage is above the herd immunity threshold and prevent outbreaks from happening.

Effectiveness of Rubella vaccine in a rubella outbreak in Guangzhou city, China, 2014.

BACKGROUND: WHO recommends the use of rubella-containing vaccine (RCVs) to prevent rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). Most licensed rubella vaccines in use globally are based on RA27/3 strains and have estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) rates of 95-100%. In contrast, China uses a BRD-II strain-based rubella vaccine. Few field studies have been conducted that estimate VE of China's RCV. On March 17, 2014, a rubella outbreak was reported in a middle school in Guangzhou city, China. We conducted an investigation to understand reasons for the outbreak, and we used that investigation to estimate vaccine effectiveness of China's rubella vaccine. METHODS: To identify cases, investigators reviewed records kept by the school doctor and absentee records kept by teachers. Self-administered questionnaires were sent to parents of all students to collect information about the students' symptoms, the results of any physician consultation, and disease history. We obtained demographic information and illness information for all students in the school; vaccination status was determined by inspection of official, parent-held vaccination records. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 13 classes that had secondary cases of rubella. Using the secondary attack rates, we evaluated VE by the number of RCV doses received and age at vaccination. RESULTS: During the period February 17-May 23, 2014, 162 students (50 suspected cases, 88 probable cases, 24 confirmed cases) were diagnosed with rubella, yielding an overall attack rate of 10% (162/1621). Cases occurred in 27 classes (73%) of 37 classrooms. Secondary cases occurred in 13 classes (35%) of 37 classrooms. A total of 1130 students (69.7%) have vaccination certificates; 419 (37%) students were record-confirmed to have received RCV. For those vaccinated using BRD-II strain vaccine, vaccine effectiveness (VE) was 94% (95%CI: 75-98). VE for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine which is based on either BRD-II or RA27/3 strain was 89% (95%CI: 56-97). VE of a single dose of domestic monovalent rubella vaccine that used BRD-II strain vaccine was 93% (95%CI: 73-98). VE for those who received the vaccine between 1 and 2 years of age was 95% (95% CI: 67-99) while the VE was 100% for those vaccinated after 2 years of age. VE among those who received RCV <12 years ago was 100% while VE among those who received RCV ≥12 years ago was 92% (95%CI: 70-98). CONCLUSIONS: The rubella vaccines used in China that are based on the BRD-II rubella vaccine strain have VE of 94%, which is similar to the more commonly used RA27/3-based RCVs. Low vaccination coverage contributed to this outbreak; early reporting of an outbreak is necessary for effective outbreak response immunization.