Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 51
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neuromodulation ; 25(7): 1024-1032, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35760751

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can provide long-term pain relief for various chronic pain conditions, but some patients have no relief with trial stimulation or lose efficacy over time. To "salvage" relief in patients who do not respond or have lost efficacy, alternative stimulation paradigms or anatomical targets can be considered. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) has a different mechanism of action and anatomical target than SCS. OBJECTIVES: We assessed DRG-S salvage therapy outcomes in patients who did not respond to SCS or had lost SCS efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included consecutive patients from 2016 to 2020 who were salvaged with DRG-S after failed SCS trials (<50% pain reduction) or who had lost efficacy after permanent SCS. We compared numerical rating scale (NRS) pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), health-related quality of life (EuroQol five-dimensions five-level), and oral morphine equivalent (OME) opioid requirements before DRG-S salvage and at patients' last follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients who had failed SCS were salvaged with DRG-S. The mean age was 56 ± 12 years, and the most common diagnoses were complex regional pain syndrome (n = 24) and failed back surgery syndrome (n = 24). The most common failed modalities included tonic (n = 32), Burst (n = 18), and high-frequency (n = 10) SCS. The median follow-up duration of salvage DRG-S was 34 months. With DRG-S, NRS decreased (8.7 ± 1.2 to 3.8 ± 2.1), and OME declined (median 23 mg to median 15 mg), whereas EuroQol 5D scores increased (0.40 ± 0.15 to 0.71 ± 0.15), and ODI improved (64 ± 14% to 31 ± 18%) (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DRG-S can be used in patients with chronic pain who have previously failed to receive persistent benefit from SCS.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Estimulação da Medula Espinal , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides , Dor Crônica/terapia , Gânglios Espinais/fisiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Derivados da Morfina , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação , Medula Espinal , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Pain Pract ; 22(5): 522-531, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35429364

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a relatively new neuromodulation modality. Therefore, data on long-term device explantation rates is limited. This investigation aimed to assess DRG-S device explantation rates at long-term follow-up. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed individuals implanted with DRG-S in four pain centers from different continuous periods between April 2016 to September 2020. We recorded patient demographics, diagnoses, duration to explantation or last follow-up, treatment complications, and failure etiologies. RESULTS: A total of 249 patients with 756 leads and a mean 27-month follow-up were included. The mean age was 55 ± 15 years; 148 (63%) were female. Leading diagnoses were CRPS (n = 106, 43%), followed by FBSS (n = 64, 26%), and non-surgical low back pain (n = 23, 9%). The explantation rate was ~2% per year (n = 10 total). At explantation, the average time from implantation was 13 ± 10 months. Six patients were explanted for inadequate pain relief. Two patients were explanted due to device-related complications. One patient was explanted secondary to infection and subsequently reimplanted. Five explanted patients experienced a therapy-related complication before eventual explantation: one transient post-procedural neuritis and pocket site pain, one lead fracture, two lead migrations, and one experienced a fracture, a migration, and pocket site pain. DISCUSSION: This large retrospective study of DRG-S revealed a low therapy-termination rate. The rate of infection leading to explantation was objectively very low at 0.4%. The leading cause of explantation was inadequate pain relief. Explanted patients often had a therapy-related complication. Therefore, minimizing adverse treatment events may reduce ultimate explantation rates.


Assuntos
Dor Lombar , Estimulação da Medula Espinal , Adulto , Idoso , Análise de Dados , Remoção de Dispositivo , Feminino , Gânglios Espinais/fisiologia , Humanos , Dor Lombar/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/efeitos adversos
3.
Brain ; 143(8): 2607-2623, 2020 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32653920

RESUMO

Deep brain stimulation may be an effective therapy for select cases of severe, treatment-refractory Tourette syndrome; however, patient responses are variable, and there are no reliable methods to predict clinical outcomes. The objectives of this retrospective study were to identify the stimulation-dependent structural networks associated with improvements in tics and comorbid obsessive-compulsive behaviour, compare the networks across surgical targets, and determine if connectivity could be used to predict clinical outcomes. Volumes of tissue activated for a large multisite cohort of patients (n = 66) implanted bilaterally in globus pallidus internus (n = 34) or centromedial thalamus (n = 32) were used to generate probabilistic tractography to form a normative structural connectome. The tractography maps were used to identify networks that were correlated with improvement in tics or comorbid obsessive-compulsive behaviour and to predict clinical outcomes across the cohort. The correlated networks were then used to generate 'reverse' tractography to parcellate the total volume of stimulation across all patients to identify local regions to target or avoid. The results showed that for globus pallidus internus, connectivity to limbic networks, associative networks, caudate, thalamus, and cerebellum was positively correlated with improvement in tics; the model predicted clinical improvement scores (P = 0.003) and was robust to cross-validation. Regions near the anteromedial pallidum exhibited higher connectivity to the positively correlated networks than posteroventral pallidum, and volume of tissue activated overlap with this map was significantly correlated with tic improvement (P < 0.017). For centromedial thalamus, connectivity to sensorimotor networks, parietal-temporal-occipital networks, putamen, and cerebellum was positively correlated with tic improvement; the model predicted clinical improvement scores (P = 0.012) and was robust to cross-validation. Regions in the anterior/lateral centromedial thalamus exhibited higher connectivity to the positively correlated networks, but volume of tissue activated overlap with this map did not predict improvement (P > 0.23). For obsessive-compulsive behaviour, both targets showed that connectivity to the prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and cingulate cortex was positively correlated with improvement; however, only the centromedial thalamus maps predicted clinical outcomes across the cohort (P = 0.034), but the model was not robust to cross-validation. Collectively, the results demonstrate that the structural connectivity of the site of stimulation are likely important for mediating symptom improvement, and the networks involved in tic improvement may differ across surgical targets. These networks provide important insight on potential mechanisms and could be used to guide lead placement and stimulation parameter selection, as well as refine targets for neuromodulation therapies for Tourette syndrome.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Rede Nervosa/fisiopatologia , Síndrome de Tourette/terapia , Adulto , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Imagem de Tensor de Difusão , Feminino , Humanos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rede Nervosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síndrome de Tourette/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome de Tourette/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Pain Pract ; 21(8): 859-870, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34145740

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a neuromodulation technique introduced in the last decade with evolving implant methods. Initial prospective research found low incidences of lead migration and lead fracture with DRG-S. However, several recent studies have highlighted high lead migration and lead fracture rates with DRG-S. We investigated the influence of lead anchoring on migrations and fractures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review between 2016 and 2020 of individuals implanted with DRG-S leads by 4 experienced implanters. The implanters independently changed their standard practice regarding lead anchoring over time, with opposing trends (no anchoring > anchoring, anchoring > no anchoring). We compared lead migration and lead fracture rates between anchored and unanchored DRG-S leads in the entire study cohort. Cox regression was performed on lead migration and fracture distributions. RESULTS: We included 756 leads (n = 565 anchored and n = 191 unanchored) from 249 patients. In unanchored leads, migration occurred in 16 leads (8.4%) from 13 patients (21.0%). In anchored leads, migration occurred in 8 leads (1.4%) from 5 patients (2.7%). Fracture in unanchored leads occurred in 6 leads (3.1%) from 6 patients (9.7%). Fractures in anchored leads occurred in 11 leads (1.9%) from 9 patients (4.8%). The migration survival distributions for the anchored and unanchored leads were statistically significantly different (p < 0.01) with decreased survival for unanchored leads (hazard ratio = 5.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2-15.5). DISCUSSION: We found that anchoring DRG-S leads significantly reduces lead migration when compared to leads placed without an anchor. There was no significant difference in fracture rate between anchored and unanchored leads.


Assuntos
Gânglios Espinais , Estimulação da Medula Espinal , Análise de Dados , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Pain Med ; 21(7): 1415-1420, 2020 11 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32034418

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic literature review of brain neurostimulation for pain. DESIGN: Grade the evidence for deep brain neurostimulation (DBS). METHODS: An international, interdisciplinary work group conducted a literature search for brain stimulation. Abstracts were reviewed to select studies for grading. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria were graded by two independent reviewers. General inclusion criteria were prospective trials (RCTs and observational) that were not part of a larger or previously reported group. Excluded studies were retrospective or existed only as abstracts. Studies were graded using the modified Interventional Pain Management Techniques-Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment, the Cochrane Collaborations Risk of Bias assessment, and the United States Preventative Services Task Force level-of-evidence criteria. RESULTS: Two high-quality RCTs and three observational trials supported DBS, resulting in Level II (moderate) evidence. CONCLUSION: Moderate evidence supports DBS to treat chronic pain. Additional Level I RCTs are needed to further the strength of the evidence in this important area of medicine, but the current evidence suggests that DBS should be considered as an option in treating complex pain cases.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Encéfalo , Dor Crônica/terapia , Humanos , Manejo da Dor
6.
Pain Med ; 21(8): 1581-1589, 2020 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32803221

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic literature review of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation for pain. DESIGN: Grade the evidence for DRG stimulation. METHODS: An international, interdisciplinary work group conducted a literature search for DRG stimulation. Abstracts were reviewed to select studies for grading. General inclusion criteria were prospective trials (randomized controlled trials and observational studies) that were not part of a larger or previously reported group. Excluded studies were retrospective, too small, or existed only as abstracts. Studies were graded using the modified Interventional Pain Management Techniques-Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment, the Cochrane Collaborations Risk of Bias assessment, and the US Preventative Services Task Force level-of-evidence criteria. RESULTS: DRG stimulation has Level II evidence (moderate) based upon one high-quality pivotal randomized controlled trial and two lower-quality studies. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-level evidence supports DRG stimulation for treating chronic focal neuropathic pain and complex regional pain syndrome.


Assuntos
Gânglios Espinais , Neuralgia , Humanos , Neuralgia/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 98(2): 110-117, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32101861

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been shown to reliably improve several symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) in appropriately selected patients. Various factors may preclude patients from undergoing DBS and for them, non-invasive lesion-based therapies such as focused ultrasound and Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery may present a safer alternative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on preliminary positive reports of STN GK for PD, we conducted a prospective, open-label, single-center, pilot study in PD patients deemed potential candidates for unilateral DBS based on their disease characteristics, but contraindicated due to age >74, an irreversible bleeding diathesis, or significant comorbid medical disease. Stereotactic MRI-guided GK radiosurgery was performed using a single 110- or 120-Gy dose targeting the STN contralateral to the more symptomatic extremity. Clinical follow-up and imaging assessed the safety and efficacy of the procedure over a 12-month period. RESULTS: Four PD patients with medication-refractory tremors and disabling dyskinesias underwent unilateral STN GK radiosurgery. Contraindications to DBS included high-risk comorbid cardiovas-cular disease in 3 patients and an irreversible bleeding diathesis in 1. There were no immediate post-procedural adverse events. One patient who underwent left STN GK radiosurgery developed right hemiparesis and dysarthria 7 months post-procedure followed by hospitalization at 9 months for bacterial endocarditis and liver failure from which he died. The remaining 3 patients were free of adverse events up to 12 months post-procedure and experienced a reduction in contralateral rigidity, bradykinesia, and tremor. Upon extended follow-up, 2 patients developed subacute worsening of gait. One died at 16 months due to complications of a fall whereas the other saw no change in gait up to 42 months post-procedure. All 3 patients with adverse events demonstrated a hyper-response in the targeted area on follow-up neuroimaging. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Despite the potential for clinical improvement, our results suggest that unilateral STN GK radiosurgery should be approached cautiously in medically frail PD patients who may be at higher risk of GK hyper-response and neurologic complications.


Assuntos
Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/efeitos adversos , Doença de Parkinson/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Núcleo Subtalâmico/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/tendências , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença de Parkinson/diagnóstico por imagem , Projetos Piloto , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiocirurgia/tendências , Núcleo Subtalâmico/diagnóstico por imagem
8.
Neuromodulation ; 23(2): 252-257, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31475769

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation has been established as a therapy in the treatment of chronic pain. Ideal electrode placement is guided by proper identification of the location of the DRG. The location of the S1 DRG is not well delineated and can be variable making ideal location of the electrode placement difficult based on fluoroscopic imaging. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of postoperative programming of S1 DRG leading across two centers. There were 34 lead placements in 24 patients included in this study. Programming parameters and contacts used were evaluated based on the position of the electrode in reference to the sacral border. RESULTS: The majority of the patient programming parameters were recorded at six weeks following the implant. Most commonly, the programming used a simple continuous bipole configuration. Of the 34 leads programmed, 17 (50%) had programming on the sacral border, 14 (41%) were considered posterior, and 3 (9%) were anterior to the sacral border. CONCLUSION: This analysis of S1 DRG programming demonstrates that ideal positioning of the majority of the contacts for the electrode should be posterior and along the sacral border on fluoroscopic imaging. These findings also suggest that the S1 DRG may be located most reproducibly at the border of the intraforaminal and intracanalicular region.


Assuntos
Gânglios Espinais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagem , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/instrumentação , Idoso , Eletrodos Implantados , Feminino , Gânglios Espinais/anatomia & histologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sacro/anatomia & histologia , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/métodos
9.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 90(10): 1078-1090, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31129620

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be an effective therapy for tics and comorbidities in select cases of severe, treatment-refractory Tourette syndrome (TS). Clinical responses remain variable across patients, which may be attributed to differences in the location of the neuroanatomical regions being stimulated. We evaluated active contact locations and regions of stimulation across a large cohort of patients with TS in an effort to guide future targeting. METHODS: We collected retrospective clinical data and imaging from 13 international sites on 123 patients. We assessed the effects of DBS over time in 110 patients who were implanted in the centromedial (CM) thalamus (n=51), globus pallidus internus (GPi) (n=47), nucleus accumbens/anterior limb of the internal capsule (n=4) or a combination of targets (n=8). Contact locations (n=70 patients) and volumes of tissue activated (n=63 patients) were coregistered to create probabilistic stimulation atlases. RESULTS: Tics and obsessive-compulsive behaviour (OCB) significantly improved over time (p<0.01), and there were no significant differences across brain targets (p>0.05). The median time was 13 months to reach a 40% improvement in tics, and there were no significant differences across targets (p=0.84), presence of OCB (p=0.09) or age at implantation (p=0.08). Active contacts were generally clustered near the target nuclei, with some variability that may reflect differences in targeting protocols, lead models and contact configurations. There were regions within and surrounding GPi and CM thalamus that improved tics for some patients but were ineffective for others. Regions within, superior or medial to GPi were associated with a greater improvement in OCB than regions inferior to GPi. CONCLUSION: The results collectively indicate that DBS may improve tics and OCB, the effects may develop over several months, and stimulation locations relative to structural anatomy alone may not predict response. This study was the first to visualise and evaluate the regions of stimulation across a large cohort of patients with TS to generate new hypotheses about potential targets for improving tics and comorbidities.


Assuntos
Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Globo Pálido/diagnóstico por imagem , Cápsula Interna/diagnóstico por imagem , Núcleo Accumbens/diagnóstico por imagem , Tálamo/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome de Tourette/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Atlas como Assunto , Estudos de Coortes , Comportamento Compulsivo/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Núcleos Intralaminares do Tálamo/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Comportamento Obsessivo/psicologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Síndrome de Tourette/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome de Tourette/psicologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
10.
Neuromodulation ; 19(8): 877-881, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27489123

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for deep brain stimulation (DBS) using standard stereotactic coordinates in conjunction with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) generally results in effective symptomatic relief for the cardinal motor features of Parkinson's disease (PD). The angle of approach, however, influences the resultant field of stimulation and can lead to undesired side effects. METHODS: We review a case where symptomatic improvement was accompanied by significant side effects despite reasonable STN stereotactic base coordinates. Revision of the lead using similar base coordinates but a significantly different angle of approach greatly improved the outcome. RESULTS: Stimulation ventromedial to the STN improved tremors but brought about dysarthria and dystonia. Computer-based stimulation field modeling helped understand the regions associated with the side effects and illustrate the difference between pre- and post-revision stimulation fields. CONCLUSION: Lead angle can impact DBS outcome and should be taken into consideration.


Assuntos
Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/efeitos adversos , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Núcleo Subtalâmico/fisiologia , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
11.
Neuromodulation ; 19(8): 857-863, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27730706

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The Implantable Systems Performance Registry (ISPR) was created to monitor the product performance of Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and implanted intrathecal drug infusion systems available in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected on 2605 patients from 44 centers from various geographic regions across the United States implanting and following patients with SCS systems between June 25, 2004 and January 31, 2014. Actuarial life table methods are used to estimate device performance over time. Of the 2605 patients, 1490 (57.2%) were female, 1098 (42.1%) were male and 17 (0.7%) did not provide gender data. The average age at enrollment was 56.3 years (range: 4-97, SD = 14.3) and average follow-up time was 20.1 months (SD = 22.5). RESULTS: Currently the estimates of device survival from neurostimulator-related events exceed 97% for all neurostimulator models across the applicable follow-up time points and all applicable extension models had greater than 95% survival from extension events. The majority of product performance events were lead-related. At 5 years of follow-up, all applicable lead families, with the exception of the Pisces-Quad LZ family, had greater than 75% survival from lead events. CONCLUSIONS: The ISPR is designed to serve as an ongoing source of system and device-related information with a focus on "real-world" safety and product performance. ISPR data continue to be used to guide future product development efforts aimed at improving product reliability and quality.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Eletrodos Implantados , Sistema de Registros , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dor Crônica/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
12.
Mov Disord ; 30(4): 448-71, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25476818

RESUMO

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) may improve disabling tics in severely affected medication and behaviorally resistant Tourette syndrome (TS). Here we review all reported cases of TS DBS and provide updated recommendations for selection, assessment, and management of potential TS DBS cases based on the literature and implantation experience. Candidates should have a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM V) diagnosis of TS with severe motor and vocal tics, which despite exhaustive medical and behavioral treatment trials result in significant impairment. Deep brain stimulation should be offered to patients only by experienced DBS centers after evaluation by a multidisciplinary team. Rigorous preoperative and postoperative outcome measures of tics and associated comorbidities should be used. Tics and comorbid neuropsychiatric conditions should be optimally treated per current expert standards, and tics should be the major cause of disability. Psychogenic tics, embellishment, and malingering should be recognized and addressed. We have removed the previously suggested 25-year-old age limit, with the specification that a multidisciplinary team approach for screening is employed. A local ethics committee or institutional review board should be consulted for consideration of cases involving persons younger than 18 years of age, as well as in cases with urgent indications. Tourette syndrome patients represent a unique and complex population, and studies reveal a higher risk for post-DBS complications. Successes and failures have been reported for multiple brain targets; however, the optimal surgical approach remains unknown. Tourette syndrome DBS, though still evolving, is a promising approach for a subset of medication refractory and severely affected patients.


Assuntos
Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Guias como Assunto , Síndrome de Tourette/terapia , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/tendências , Humanos , Síndrome de Tourette/diagnóstico
13.
Cephalalgia ; 35(4): 344-58, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25078718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent studies evaluated short-term efficacy and safety of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) of the occipital nerves for managing chronic migraine. We present 52-week safety and efficacy results from an open-label extension of a randomized, sham-controlled trial. METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved, randomized, multicenter, double-blinded study, patients were implanted with a neurostimulation system, randomized to an active or control group for 12 weeks, and received open-label treatment for an additional 40 weeks. Outcomes collected included number of headache days, pain intensity, migraine disability assessment (MIDAS), Zung Pain and Distress (PAD), direct patient reports of headache pain relief, quality of life, satisfaction and adverse events. Statistical tests assessed change from baseline to 52 weeks using paired t-tests. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses of all patients (N = 157) and analyses of only patients who met criteria for intractable chronic migraine (ICM; N = 125) were performed. RESULTS: Headache days were significantly reduced by 6.7 (±8.4) days in the ITT population (p < 0.001) and by 7.7 (±8.7) days in the ICM population (p < 0.001). The percentages of patients who achieved a 30% and 50% reduction in headache days and/or pain intensity were 59.5% and 47.8%, respectively. MIDAS and Zung PAD scores were significantly reduced for both populations. Excellent or good headache relief was reported by 65.4% of the ITT population and 67.9% of the ICM population. More than half the patients in both cohorts were satisfied with the headache relief provided by the device. A total of 183 device/procedure-related adverse events occurred during the study, of which 18 (8.6%) required hospitalization and 85 (40.7%) required surgical intervention; 70% of patients experienced an adverse event. CONCLUSION: Our results support the 12-month efficacy of PNS of the occipital nerves for headache pain and disability associated with chronic migraine. More emphasis on adverse event mitigation is needed in future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov (NCT00615342).


Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca/terapia , Nervos Periféricos/fisiologia , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Crânio/inervação , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
14.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 93(4): 231-9, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25998447

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Achieving optimal results following deep brain stimulation (DBS) typically involves several months of programming sessions. The Graphical User Interface for DBS Evaluation (GUIDE) study explored whether a visual programming system could help clinicians accurately predetermine ideal stimulation settings in DBS patients with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: A multicenter prospective, observational study was designed that utilized a blinded Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III examination to prospectively assess whether DBS settings derived using a neuroanatomically based computer model (Model) could provide comparable efficacy to those determined through traditional, monopolar review-based programming (Clinical). We retrospectively compared the neuroanatomical regions of stimulation, power consumption and time spent on programming using both methods. RESULTS: The average improvement in UPDRS-III scores was 10.4 ± 7.8 for the Model settings and 11.7 ± 8.7 for the Clinical settings. The difference between the mean UPDRS-III scores with the Model versus the Clinical settings was 0.26 and not statistically significant (p = 0.9866). Power consumption for the Model settings was 48.7 ± 22 µW versus 76.1 ± 46.5 µW for the Clinical settings. The mean time spent programming using the Model approach was 31 ± 16 s versus 41.4 ± 29.1 min using the Clinical approach. CONCLUSION: The Model-based DBS settings provided similar benefit to the Clinical settings based on UPDRS-III scores and were often arrived at in less time and required less power than the Clinical settings.


Assuntos
Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Modelos Neurológicos , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Núcleo Subtalâmico/fisiopatologia , Terapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Software
15.
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg ; 42: 23-32, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25411143

RESUMO

Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) is a form of neuromodulation therapy aimed at treating intractable headache and craniofacial pain. The therapy utilizes neurostimulating electrodes placed subcutaneously in the occipital region and connected to a permanently implanted programmable pulse generator identical to those used for dorsal column/spinal cord stimulation. The presumed mechanisms of action involve modulation of the trigeminocervical complex, as well as closure of the physiologic pain gate. ONS is a reversible, nondestructive therapy, which can be tailored to a patient's individual needs. Typically, candidates for successful ONS include those patients with migraines, Chiari malformation, or occipital neuralgia. However, recent MRSA infections, unrealistic expectations, and psychiatric comorbidities are generally contraindications. As with any invasive procedure, complications may occur including lead migration, infection, wound erosion, device failure, muscle spasms, and pain. The success of this therapy is dependent on careful patient selection, a preimplantation trial, meticulous implantation technique, programming strategies, and complication avoidance.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Cefaleia/terapia , Medição da Dor , Dor/cirurgia , Nervos Periféricos/fisiopatologia , Nervos Espinhais/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Medição da Dor/métodos
16.
Int J Neurosci ; 124(11): 863-6, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24397497

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Intracranial hypotension is a neurologic syndrome characterized by orthostatic headaches and, radiographically, by dural thickening and enhancement as well as subdural collections. Several of etiologies exist, including surgical dural violations, lumbar puncture, or spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak. Current management includes conservative management consisting of bed rest, caffeine, and hydration. When conservative management fails, open surgical or percutaneous options are considered. Currently, the gold standard in percutaneous management of intracranial hypotension involves the epidural injection of autologous blood. Recently, some therapies for intracranial hypotension have employed the use of epidural fibrin glue. CASE PRESENTATION: Two cases of patients with persistent postdural puncture headaches are presented. Epidural fibrin glue injection alleviated the orthostatic headaches of two patients with intracranial hypotension. CONCLUSION: Although consideration must be afforded for the potential risks of viral transmission and aseptic meningitis, the utilization of epidural fibrin glue injection as an alternative or adjunct to the epidural blood patch in the treatment of intracranial hypotension should be further investigated.


Assuntos
Placa de Sangue Epidural , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina/uso terapêutico , Hemostáticos/uso terapêutico , Hipotensão Intracraniana/terapia , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural/terapia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Hipotensão Intracraniana/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural/complicações
17.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) ; 27(3): 295-302, 2024 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39145662

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the well-established efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's Disease (PD), there remains a subset of patients with only a moderate improvement in symptoms even with appropriate lead placement and optimal programming. In patients with persistent tremor or dyskinesias, one consideration is the addition of a second "rescue lead" to provide dual stimulation to primary and secondary targets to address the refractory component. This study aimed to assess all "rescue lead" cases from our institution and characterize the patients and their outcomes. METHODS: Records of all patients with PD treated at our institution between 2005 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data of all patients treated with a second rescue lead to supplement a positive but inadequate initial DBS response were collected and reviewed. RESULTS: Of 670 patients with PD treated at our institution during the study period, 7 were managed with a rescue lead. All 7 were initially treated with STN DBS with a partial improvement in underlying symptoms, had confirmed appropriate lead placement, and underwent thorough programming. Four patients underwent rescue with a globus pallidus interna lead for persistent dyskinesias, all with subsequent improvement in their dyskinesias. Three patients had persistent tremors that were treated with a rescue ventrointermediate thalamus stimulation with subsequent improvement in tremor scores. There were no operative complications, and all patients tolerated dual stimulation. CONCLUSION: For a small subset of patients with PD with persistent dyskinesias or tremors after STN DBS despite optimized lead parameters and adequate lead placement, rescue lead placement offers an effective treatment option.


Assuntos
Estimulação Encefálica Profunda , Doença de Parkinson , Núcleo Subtalâmico , Humanos , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Eletrodos Implantados , Globo Pálido , Tremor/terapia , Tremor/etiologia
18.
Neuromodulation ; 16(5): 443-7; discussion 447-8, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23682904

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The clinical entity of thoracic radiculopathy following spinal cord stimulator (SCS) placement has not been previously described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively acquired data on 172 patients, having undergone thoracic SCS placement at our institution, was performed. In addition, four patients were implanted at outside institutions, and were referred for revision. We examine our early experience with placement of thoracic SCS in surgically treated patients with chronic pain and 15 associated specific postoperative radicular pain complications along respective thoracic dermatomes. We postulate that preexisting thoracic spinal pathology affords less compliance in the placement of larger paddles, and subsequent radicular pain in a band-like abdominal fashion. RESULTS: A syndrome of thoracic radiculopathy, presenting as intractable lower thoracic or abdominal wall pain occurring in the immediate postoperative period, was identified in 15 patients. These patients subsequently underwent revision surgery, with either a more extensive laminectomy to further decompress the dorsal nerve roots or lead removal, both of which resulted in near immediate relief of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic radiculopathy may occur following SCS paddle lead placement. This clinical syndrome is characterized by its immediate postoperative development, band-like thoracic or abdominal pain pattern, severe pain that both overwhelms the incisional pain and is refractory to medications, and absence of motor deficit. The lateral placement of paddle leads increases the risk of radicular symptoms. Preoperative thoracic spine magnetic resonance imaging may be helpful in identifying patients who may be susceptible to this syndrome.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Radiculopatia/etiologia , Medula Espinal/fisiologia , Eletrodos Implantados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vértebras Torácicas , Tomógrafos Computadorizados
19.
J Neurosurg Spine ; : 1-7, 2022 May 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35561698

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The human myotome is fundamental to the diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders. However, this map was largely constructed decades ago, and its breadth, variability, and reliability remain poorly described, limiting its practical use. METHODS: The authors used a novel method to reconstruct the myotome map in patients (n = 42) undergoing placement of dorsal root ganglion electrodes for the treatment of chronic pain. They electrically stimulated nerve roots (n = 79) in the intervertebral foramina at T12-S1 and measured triggered electromyography responses. RESULTS: L4 and L5 stimulation resulted in quadriceps muscle (62% and 33% of stimulations, respectively) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscle (25% and 67%, respectively) activation, while S1 stimulation resulted in gastrocnemius muscle activation (46%). However, L5 and S1 both resulted in abductor hallucis (AH) muscle activation (17% and 31%), L5 stimulation resulted in gastrocnemius muscle stimulation (42%), and S1 stimulation in TA muscle activation (38%). The authors also mapped the breadth of the myotome in individual patients, finding coactivation of adductor and quadriceps, quadriceps and TA, and TA and gastrocnemius muscles under L3, L4, and both L5 and S1 stimulation, respectively. While the AH muscle was commonly activated by S1 stimulation, this rarely occurred together with TA or gastrocnemius muscle activation. Other less common coactivations were also observed throughout T12-S1 stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The muscular innervation of the lumbosacral nerve roots varies significantly from the classic myotome map and between patients. Furthermore, in individual patients, each nerve root may innervate a broader range of muscles than is commonly assumed. This finding is important to prevent misdiagnosis of radicular pathologies.

20.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 89(2): 65-9, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21293164

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain states is a safe and efficacious technique, being used with increasing frequency. The incidence of hardware-related complications requiring revision remains high. OBJECTIVES: The authors describe a technique of distal to proximal neurostimulator lead revision, which does not require the changing of generators or extension leads, and thus presumably will minimize further device-related complications. METHODS: The authors present a case series of 3 patients where the distal to proximal neurostimulator lead revision technique was utilized. RESULTS: The technique was well tolerated in each instance and all patients reported >50% pain reduction at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The distal to proximal neurostimulator lead revision technique quickly and safely adjusts lead position, including both lead depth and lead tip location, without a need for replacement of components or revision of the entire system.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Cefaleia/terapia , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Manejo da Dor , Nervos Periféricos/fisiologia , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Feminino , Seguimentos , Cefaleia/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/instrumentação , Dor/fisiopatologia , Reoperação , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA