Effect of sacubitril-valsartan on the incidence of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Sacubitril/valsartan reduces all-cause mortality in heart failure (HF) patients compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). ACEIs/ARBs have been shown to decrease the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized sacubitril-valsartan decreases the incidence of AF compared to ACEis/ARBs. METHODS: Clinicaltrials.gov was searched for trials by terms sacubitril/valsartan, entresto, sacubitril, valsartan. Randomized controlled human trials of sacubitril/valsartan reporting AF were included. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Data was pooled using a random effect model. Publication bias was evaluated by funnel plots. RESULTS: A total of 11 trials including 11,458 patients on sacubitril/valsartan and 10,128 patients on ACEI/ARBs were identified. A total of 284 AF events were reported in the sacubitril/valsartan group compared to 256 AF events in ACEIs/ARBs. Patients on sacubitril/valsartan were as likely as patients on ACEIs/ARBs to develop AF (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 1.091, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.917-1.298, p = .324). Six atrial flutter (AFl) events were reported in six trials; 48 out of 9165 patients in the sacubitril/valsartan group developed AFl compared to 46 out of 8759 in ACEi/ARBs group. There was no difference in AFl risk between the two groups (pooled OR = 1.028, 95% CI = 0.681-1.553, p = .894). Finally, sacubitril/valsartan did not reduce the risk of atrial arrhythmias (AF + AFl) compared to ACEi/ARBs (pooled OR = 1.081, 95% CI = 0.922-1.269, p = .337). CONCLUSION: Although sacubitril/valsartan reduces mortality compared to ACEIs/ARBs in HF patients, they do not reduce AF risk compared to these drugs.

Unusual case of pernicious anaemia masquerading as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in the setting of multiple normal vitamin B12 deficiency parameters: preventing anchoring and overdiagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Pseudo-thrombotic microangiopathy (pseudo- thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)) is a rare presentation of B12 deficiency. Overlapping features like elevated LDH/total bilirubin with low haemoglobin/haptoglobin/platelets could deceivingly suggest thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) resulting in avoidable procedures/treatments. CASE PRESENTATION: A 36-year-old female with hypothyroidism initially presented to clinic with fatigue, palpitations, lightheadedness, and dyspnoea over a 3-month duration and was found to have a haemoglobin of 5.7 g/dL. She received two packed red blood cell units in the emergency room and subsequently discharged with outpatient follow-up and empiric oral iron. During her follow-up visit, she was found to have easy bruisability, gum bleeding, and generalized weakness from hemolytic anaemia (mean corpuscular volume (MCV) 90 fL, haptoglobin <8 mg/dL, LDH >4,000 U/L and schistocytosis on CBC) and thrombocytopenia of 52 K/uL. Due to PLASMIC score of 6 and suspicion for TTP, she was transferred to our facility and tr eated with three cycles of plasma exchange and prednisone but were discontinued when ADAMTS13 levels returned normal. While the patient had normal B12 levels, further testing revealed positive intrinsic factor antibodies (IF-Ab) and an elevated MMA level of 1.56 umol/L. Replacement with cobalamin led to normalization of labs and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Timely diagnosis of pseudo-TMA was exceptionally challenging due to several overlapping features with TTP including normal B12 and normal MCV. B12 levels may falsely appear normal in pernicious anemia due to IF-Ab interference with chemiluminescent immunoassay. Schistocytes lower the MCV in automated cell counters. Lower reticulocyte index (<2%), presence of immature/large platelets and teardrop cells, elevated MMA and a higher LDH (>2500) are indicative of B12 deficiency.

Lung Cancer Patient Perceptions of the Value of an Outreach Thoracic Surgical Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Although specialty outreach clinics have been associated with improved outcomes and access to care, their role for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been described. We sought to characterize perceptions of the utility of a specialty outreach clinic among patients with suspected NSCLC. METHODS: Surveys were administered to patients who were suspected to have NSCLC and were seen at an outreach thoracic surgery clinic (2016 to 2017). The clinic was located approximately 20 miles from the academic cancer center. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients completed surveys. The median distance traveled to the clinic was 43.5 miles (interquartile range: 5.0 to 111.3 miles). Among patients traveling 50 miles or more, the overwhelming majority (27 of 32 patients, 84.4%) cited physician expertise as the primary benefit of treatment at the clinic. Moreover, compared with patients living in closer proximity, they were more willing to travel 100 miles or more to have surgery (71.0% versus 26.7%, p = 0.001) or to consult with a surgeon (71.0% versus 25.8%, p < 0.001). Patients for whom it was very important to receive care close to home (33 of 68 patients, 48.5%) were less willing to travel 100 miles or more for consultation (surgeon: 33.3% versus 65.6%, p = 0.011; medical oncologist: 33.3% versus 65.6%, p = 0.011; radiation oncologist: 33.3% versus 64.5%, p = 0.015) and for treatment (surgery: 33.3% versus 65.6%, p = 0.011; chemotherapy: 36.7% versus 60.7%, p = 0.067; radiotherapy: 33.3% versus 64.3%, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients value receiving oncologic care close to home and are sensitive to distance required to travel for care. Thoracic surgical outreach clinics may provide a benefit for patients with lung cancer in the settings of initial consultation, preoperative care, and postoperative care.