Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence chatbots as public sources of information on endodontics.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the validity and reliability of responses provided by GPT-3.5, Google Bard, and Bing to frequently asked questions (FAQs) in the field of endodontics. METHODOLOGY: FAQs were formulated by expert endodontists (n = 10) and collected through GPT-3.5 queries (n = 10), with every question posed to each chatbot three times. Responses (N = 180) were independently evaluated by two board-certified endodontists using a modified Global Quality Score (GQS) on a 5-point Likert scale (5: strongly agree; 4: agree; 3: neutral; 2: disagree; 1: strongly disagree). Disagreements on scoring were resolved through evidence-based discussions. The validity of responses was analysed by categorizing scores into valid or invalid at two thresholds: The low threshold was set at score ≥4 for all three responses whilst the high threshold was set at score 5 for all three responses. Fisher's exact test was conducted to compare the validity of responses between chatbots. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess the reliability by assessing the consistency of repeated responses for each chatbot. RESULTS: All three chatbots provided answers to all questions. Using the low-threshold validity test (GPT-3.5: 95%; Google Bard: 85%; Bing: 75%), there was no significant difference between the platforms (p > .05). When using the high-threshold validity test, the chatbot scores were substantially lower (GPT-3.5: 60%; Google Bard: 15%; Bing: 15%). The validity of GPT-3.5 responses was significantly higher than Google Bard and Bing (p = .008). All three chatbots achieved an acceptable level of reliability (Cronbach's alpha >0.7). CONCLUSIONS: GPT-3.5 provided more credible information on topics related to endodontics compared to Google Bard and Bing.

Artificial intelligence in endodontics: Fundamental principles, workflow, and tasks.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has seen significant advancements, particularly in areas requiring image interpretation. Endodontics, a specialty within dentistry, stands to benefit immensely from AI applications, especially in interpreting radiographic images. However, there is a knowledge gap among endodontists regarding the fundamentals of machine learning and deep learning, hindering the full utilization of AI in this field. This narrative review aims to: (A) elaborate on the basic principles of machine learning and deep learning and present the basics of neural network architectures; (B) explain the workflow for developing AI solutions, from data collection through clinical integration; (C) discuss specific AI tasks and applications relevant to endodontic diagnosis and treatment. The article shows that AI offers diverse practical applications in endodontics. Computer vision methods help analyse images while natural language processing extracts insights from text. With robust validation, these techniques can enhance diagnosis, treatment planning, education, and patient care. In conclusion, AI holds significant potential to benefit endodontic research, practice, and education. Successful integration requires an evolving partnership between clinicians, computer scientists, and industry.

Artificial intelligence in endodontics: Data preparation, clinical applications, ethical considerations, limitations, and future directions.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative technology in healthcare, including endodontics. A gap in knowledge exists in understanding AI's applications and limitations among endodontic experts. This comprehensive review aims to (A) elaborate on technical and ethical aspects of using data to implement AI models in endodontics; (B) elaborate on evaluation metrics; (C) review the current applications of AI in endodontics; and (D) review the limitations and barriers to real-world implementation of AI in the field of endodontics and its future potentials/directions. The article shows that AI techniques have been applied in endodontics for critical tasks such as detection of radiolucent lesions, analysis of root canal morphology, prediction of treatment outcome and post-operative pain and more. Deep learning models like convolutional neural networks demonstrate high accuracy in these applications. However, challenges remain regarding model interpretability, generalizability, and adoption into clinical practice. When thoughtfully implemented, AI has great potential to aid with diagnostics, treatment planning, clinical interventions, and education in the field of endodontics. However, concerted efforts are still needed to address limitations and to facilitate integration into clinical workflows.

Artificial intelligence for classification and detection of oral mucosa lesions on photographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review and synthesize studies using artificial intelligence (AI) for classifying, detecting, or segmenting oral mucosal lesions on photographs. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Inclusion criteria were (1) studies employing AI to (2) classify, detect, or segment oral mucosa lesions, (3) on oral photographs of human subjects. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). A PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, IEEE, arXiv, medRxiv, and grey literature (Google Scholar) search was conducted until June 2023, without language limitation. RESULTS: After initial searching, 36 eligible studies (from 8734 identified records) were included. Based on QUADAS-2, only 7% of studies were at low risk of bias for all domains. Studies employed different AI models and reported a wide range of outcomes and metrics. The accuracy of AI for detecting oral mucosal lesions ranged from 74 to 100%, while that for clinicians un-aided by AI ranged from 61 to 98%. Pooled diagnostic odds ratio for studies which evaluated AI for diagnosing or discriminating potentially malignant lesions was 155 (95% confidence interval 23-1019), while that for cancerous lesions was 114 (59-221). CONCLUSIONS: AI may assist in oral mucosa lesion screening while the expected accuracy gains or further health benefits remain unclear so far. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Artificial intelligence assists oral mucosa lesion screening and may foster more targeted testing and referral in the hands of non-specialist providers, for example. So far, it remains unclear if accuracy gains compared with specialized can be realized.

Deep learning for temporomandibular joint arthropathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The accurate diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders continues to be a challenge, despite the existence of internationally agreed-upon diagnostic criteria. The purpose of this study is to review applications of deep learning models in the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint arthropathies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, IEEE, arXiv, and medRxiv up to June 2023. Studies that reported the efficacy (outcome) of prediction, object detection or classification of TMJ arthropathies by deep learning models (intervention) of human joint-based or arthrogenous TMDs (population) in comparison to reference standard (comparison) were included. To evaluate the risk of bias, included studies were critically analysed using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). Diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were calculated. Forrest plot and funnel plot were created using STATA 17 and MetaDiSc. RESULTS: Full text review was performed on 46 out of the 1056 identified studies and 21 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. Four studies were graded as having a low risk of bias for all domains of QUADAS-2. The accuracy of all included studies ranged from 74% to 100%. Sensitivity ranged from 54% to 100%, specificity: 85%-100%, Dice coefficient: 85%-98%, and AUC: 77%-99%. The datasets were then pooled based on the sensitivity, specificity, and dataset size of seven studies that qualified for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity was 95% (85%-99%), specificity: 92% (86%-96%), and AUC: 97% (96%-98%). DORs were 232 (74-729). According to Deek's funnel plot and statistical evaluation (p =.49), publication bias was not present. CONCLUSION: Deep learning models can detect TMJ arthropathies high sensitivity and specificity. Clinicians, and especially those not specialized in orofacial pain, may benefit from this methodology for assessing TMD as it facilitates a rigorous and evidence-based framework, objective measurements, and advanced analysis techniques, ultimately enhancing diagnostic accuracy.

Deep learning for determining the difficulty of endodontic treatment: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: To develop and validate a deep learning model for automated assessment of endodontic case difficulty from periapical radiographs. METHODS: A dataset of 1,386 periapical radiographs was compiled from two clinical sites. Two dentists and two endodontists annotated the radiographs for difficulty using the "simple assessment" criteria from the American Association of Endodontists' case difficulty assessment form in the Endocase application. A classification task labeled cases as "easy" or "hard", while regression predicted overall difficulty scores. Convolutional neural networks (i.e. VGG16, ResNet18, ResNet50, ResNext50, and Inception v2) were used, with a baseline model trained via transfer learning from ImageNet weights. Other models was pre-trained using self-supervised contrastive learning (i.e. BYOL, SimCLR, MoCo, and DINO) on 20,295 unlabeled dental radiographs to learn representation without manual labels. Both models were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, with performance compared to seven human examiners (three general dentists and four endodontists) on a hold-out test set. RESULTS: The baseline VGG16 model attained 87.62% accuracy in classifying difficulty. Self-supervised pretraining did not improve performance. Regression predicted scores with ± 3.21 score error. All models outperformed human raters, with poor inter-examiner reliability. CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of automated endodontic difficulty assessment via deep learning models.

Deep learning in periodontology and oral implantology: A scoping review.

Deep learning (DL) has been employed for a wide range of tasks in dentistry. We aimed to systematically review studies employing DL for periodontal and implantological purposes. A systematic electronic search was conducted on four databases (Medline via PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase) and a repository (ArXiv) for publications after 2010, without any limitation on language. In the present review, we included studies that reported deep learning models' performance on periodontal or oral implantological tasks. Given the heterogeneities in the included studies, no meta-analysis was performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. We included 47 studies: focusing on imaging data (n = 20) and non-imaging data in periodontology (n = 12), or dental implantology (n = 15). The detection of periodontitis and gingivitis or periodontal bone loss, the classification of dental implant systems, or the prediction of treatment outcomes in periodontology and implantology were major use cases. The performance of the models was generally high. However, it varied given the employed methods (which includes various types of convolutional neural networks (CNN) and multi-layered perceptron (MLP)), the variety in specific modeling tasks, as well as the chosen and reported outcomes, outcome measures and outcome level. Only a few studies (n = 7) showed a low risk of bias across all assessed domains. A growing number of studies evaluated DL for periodontal or implantological objectives. Heterogeneity in study design, poor reporting and a high risk of bias severely limit the comparability of studies and the robustness of the overall evidence.

Effect of mesenchymal stem cells with platelet-rich plasma carriers on bone formation after rapid maxillary expansion: An Animal Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) with or without platelet-rich plasma (PRP) carriers on sutural new bone formation after rapid palatal expansion (RPE). SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Sixty male Wistar rats were used in this study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All samples were subjected to 50cN of palatal expansion force for 7 days followed by 3 weeks of the retention period. The experimental groups received a single-dose injection of the specified solution at the time of retainer placement (BMSCs, PRP, BMSCs+PRP, normal saline). BMSCs used in this study were marked with the green fluorescent protein (GFP). New bone formation (NBF) in the sutural area was evaluated by µCT and occlusal radiography. In addition, semi-quantitative analyses were performed on histology images to analyse the quality of sutural bone, connective tissue and vascularization. Immunohistochemistry analyses were conducted for osteocalcin and collagen type I proteins. RESULTS: After the 21-day retention period, limited GFP marked cells were detected around the sutural area. Samples treated with BMSCs + PRP had the highest NBF and showed higher expression of collagen type I and osteocalcin. CONCLUSION: Injecting BMSCs + PRP may increase sutural bone density significantly. However, injecting BMSCs or PRP carriers alone did not affect sutural bone density.

Machine learning and orthodontics, current trends and the future opportunities: A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied in various ways in medicine and dentistry. Advancements in AI technology show promising results in the practice of orthodontics. This scoping review aimed to investigate the effectiveness of AI-based models employed in orthodontic landmark detection, diagnosis, and treatment planning. METHODS: A precise search of electronic databases was conducted, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase (English publications from January 2010 to July 2020). Quality Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Tool 2 (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the quality of the articles included in this review. RESULTS: After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 49 articles were included in the final review. AI technology has achieved state-of-the-art results in various orthodontic applications, including automated landmark detection on lateral cephalograms and photography images, cervical vertebra maturation degree determination, skeletal classification, orthodontic tooth extraction decisions, predicting the need for orthodontic treatment or orthognathic surgery, and facial attractiveness. Most of the AI models used in these applications are based on artificial neural networks. CONCLUSIONS: AI can help orthodontists save time and provide accuracy comparable to the trained dentists in diagnostic assessments and prognostic predictions. These systems aim to boost performance and enhance the quality of care in orthodontics. However, based on current studies, the most promising application was cephalometry landmark detection, skeletal classification, and decision making on tooth extractions.

Expression and function of long non-coding RNAs in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

No longer regarded as junk DNA, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are considered as master regulators of cancer development and metastasis nowadays. Among the recently appreciated roles of these transcripts is their fundamental contribution in the pathogenesis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Notably, lncRNAs may have interactions with some environmental risk factors for this type of cancer. Moreover, a number of studies have verified diagnostic and prognostic values of lncRNAs in HNSCC. Emerging evidences from functional studies point to the possibility of design of lncRNA-targeted therapies in HNSCC. In the current review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms for participation of lncRNAs in the pathogenesis of HNSCC, their potential application in cancer diagnosis and most importantly in the development of personalized methods for treatment of HNSCC.

The role of long non-coding RNAs in the pathogenesis of thyroid cancer.

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) as prominent regulators of gene expression are involved in different layers of expression regulation. These transcripts participate in carcinogenesis of several human malignancies including thyroid cancer. Availability of high throughput techniques such as RNA sequencing and microarray has facilitated identification of lncRNAs whose dysregulation affect tumorigenesis process. Moreover, assessment of differentially expressed lncRNAs between resistant and sensitive cells has led to recognition of biomarkers for therapeutic response. One elucidated aspect of lncRNAs functions is their role in sponging miRNAs. Several miRNA-lncRNA-mRNA triplets have been recognized till now. Any of these triplets is a putative target of interfering with the evolution of cancer. In the current study, we have summarized recent data in the fields of biology of lncRNAs, their role in thyroid cancer and their potential as biomarker or treatment target.

Correction to: Comparison of the effect of activated or non-activated PRP in various concentrations on osteoblast and fibroblast cell line proliferation.

In the original publication of this article, the affiliation of the corresponding author has been published incorrectly. Now the correct affiliation has been provided in this erratum.

Comparison of the effect of activated or non-activated PRP in various concentrations on osteoblast and fibroblast cell line proliferation.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) contains growth factors which positively affect cell proliferation, cell differentiation, chemotaxis and intracellular matrix synthesis. All these processes are involved in wound healing and tissue regeneration; thus, PRP as a source of growth factors can be used in periodontal regenerative therapies. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of various concentrations of activated and non-activated PRP on proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts in vitro. PRP was obtained from three healthy volunteers. 75, 50, 25, and 10% concentrations of f PRP were prepared by dilution in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. In activated PRP groups, PRP concentrations were activated by adding calcium gluconate. Human gingival fibroblast (HGF) cell line and MG-63 (osteosarcoma) human osteoblast-like cell line were used in the study. The MTT proliferation assay was used to assess the effect of different types of PRP concentrates on proliferation of HGF and MG-63 cells, in 24, 48 and 72 h. After 24, 48, and 72 h, the proliferation rate of both cell lines was higher in the positive control group, except in 72 h in HGF cell lines, that 10% non-activated PRP group and 10 and 25% activated PRP groups has higher proliferation rate than the positive control group, which it was not significant. Proliferation rate in cells with 10% activated PRP was highest among samples containing PRP. The current study failed to show the significant effect of activated or non-activated PRP on proliferation of HGFs or MG-63 osteoblast-like cells. However, our results showed that activated PRP had a greater effect than non-activated PRP.

Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Pediatric Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: To systematically evaluate artificial intelligence applications for diagnostic and treatment planning possibilities in pediatric dentistry. Methods: PubMed®, EMBASE®, Scopus, Web of Science™, IEEE, medRxiv, arXiv, and Google Scholar were searched using specific search queries. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist was used to assess the risk of bias assessment of the included studies. Results: Based on the initial screening, 33 eligible studies were included (among 3,542). Eleven studies appeared to have low bias risk across all QUADAS-2 domains. Most applications focused on early childhood caries diagnosis and prediction, tooth identification, oral health evaluation, and supernumerary tooth identification. Six studies evaluated AI tools for mesiodens or supernumerary tooth identification on radigraphs, four for primary tooth identification and/or numbering, seven studies to detect caries on radiographs, and 12 to predict early childhood caries. For these four tasks, the reported accuracy of AI varied from 60 percent to 99 percent, sensitivity was from 20 percent to 100 percent, specificity was from 49 percent to 100 percent, F1-score was from 60 percent to 97 percent, and the area-under-the-curve varied from 87 percent to 100 percent. Conclusions: The overall body of evidence regarding artificial intelligence applications in pediatric dentistry does not allow for firm conclusions. For a wide range of applications, AI shows promising accuracy. Future studies should focus on a comparison of AI against the standard of care and employ a set of standardized outcomes and metrics to allow comparison across studies.

Accuracy and consistency of chatbots versus clinicians for answering pediatric dentistry questions: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Artificial Intelligence has applications such as Large Language Models (LLMs), which simulate human-like conversations. The potential of LLMs in healthcare is not fully evaluated. This pilot study assessed the accuracy and consistency of chatbots and clinicians in answering common questions in pediatric dentistry. METHODS: Two expert pediatric dentists developed thirty true or false questions involving different aspects of pediatric dentistry. Publicly accessible chatbots (Google Bard, ChatGPT4, ChatGPT 3.5, Llama, Sage, Claude 2 100k, Claude-instant, Claude-instant-100k, and Google Palm) were employed to answer the questions (3 independent new conversations). Three groups of clinicians (general dentists, pediatric specialists, and students; n = 20/group) also answered. Responses were graded by two pediatric dentistry faculty members, along with a third independent pediatric dentist. Resulting accuracies (percentage of correct responses) were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and post-hoc pairwise group comparisons were corrected using Tukey's HSD method. ACronbach's alpha was calculated to determine consistency. RESULTS: Pediatric dentists were significantly more accurate (mean±SD 96.67 %± 4.3 %) than other clinicians and chatbots (p < 0.001). General dentists (88.0 % ± 6.1 %) also demonstrated significantly higher accuracy than chatbots (p < 0.001), followed by students (80.8 %±6.9 %). ChatGPT showed the highest accuracy (78 %±3 %) among chatbots. All chatbots except ChatGPT3.5 showed acceptable consistency (Cronbach alpha>0.7). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Based on this pilot study, chatbots may be valuable adjuncts for educational purposes and for distributing information to patients. However, they are not yet ready to serve as substitutes for human clinicians in diagnostic decision-making. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, chatbots showed lower accuracy than dentists. Chatbots may not yet be recommended for clinical pediatric dentistry.

Evaluation of AI-generated responses by different artificial intelligence chatbots to the clinical decision-making case-based questions in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the correctness of the generated answers by Google Bard, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude-Instant, and Bing chatbots to decision-making clinical questions in the oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) area. STUDY DESIGN: A group of 3 board-certified oral and maxillofacial surgeons designed a questionnaire with 50 case-based questions in multiple-choice and open-ended formats. Answers of chatbots to multiple-choice questions were examined against the chosen option by 3 referees. The chatbots' answers to the open-ended questions were evaluated based on the modified global quality scale. A P-value under .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Bard, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude-Instant, and Bing answered 34%, 36%, 38%, 38%, and 26% of the questions correctly, respectively. In open-ended questions, GPT-4 scored the most answers evaluated as grades "4" or "5," and Bing scored the most answers evaluated as grades "1" or "2." There were no statistically significant differences between the 5 chatbots in responding to the open-ended (P = .275) and multiple-choice (P = .699) questions. CONCLUSION: Considering the major inaccuracies in the responses of chatbots, despite their relatively good performance in answering open-ended questions, this technology yet cannot be trusted as a consultant for clinicians in decision-making situations.

Artificial Intelligence for Detection of External Cervical Resorption Using Label-Efficient Self-Supervised Learning Method.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to leverage label-efficient self-supervised learning (SSL) to train a model that can detect ECR and differentiate it from caries. METHODS: Periapical (PA) radiographs of teeth with ECR defects were collected. Two board-certified endodontists reviewed PA radiographs and cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images independently to determine presence of ECR (ground truth). Radiographic data were divided into 3 regions of interest (ROIs): healthy teeth, teeth with ECR, and teeth with caries. Nine contrastive SSL models (SimCLR v2, MoCo v2, BYOL, DINO, NNCLR, SwAV, MSN, Barlow Twins, and SimSiam) were implemented in the assessment alongside 7 baseline deep learning models (ResNet-18, ResNet-50, VGG16, DenseNet, MobileNetV2, ResNeXt-50, and InceptionV3). A 10-fold cross-validation strategy and a hold-out test set were employed for model evaluation. Model performance was assessed via various metrics including classification accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. RESULTS: Included were 190 PA radiographs, composed of 470 ROIs. Results from 10-fold cross-validation demonstrated that most SSL models outperformed the transfer learning baseline models, with DINO achieving the highest mean accuracy (85.64 ± 4.56), significantly outperforming 13 other models (P < .05). DINO reached the highest test set (ie, 3 ROIs) accuracy (84.09%) while MoCo v2 exhibited the highest recall and F1-score (77.37% and 82.93%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that AI can assist clinicians in detecting ECR and differentiating it from caries. Additionally, it introduced the application of SSL in detecting ECR, emphasizing that SSL-based models can outperform transfer learning baselines and reduce reliance on large, labeled datasets.

Deep learning for diagnosis of head and neck cancers through radiographic data: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aims to review deep learning applications for detecting head and neck cancer (HNC) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiographic data. METHODS: Through January 2023, a PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, IEEE, and arXiv search were carried out. The inclusion criteria were implementing head and neck medical images (computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), MRI, Planar scans, and panoramic X-ray) of human subjects with segmentation, object detection, and classification deep learning models for head and neck cancers. The risk of bias was rated with the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool. For the meta-analysis diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was calculated. Deeks' funnel plot was used to assess publication bias. MIDAS and Metandi packages were used to analyze diagnostic test accuracy in STATA. RESULTS: From 1967 studies, 32 were found eligible after the search and screening procedures. According to the QUADAS-2 tool, 7 included studies had a low risk of bias for all domains. According to the results of all included studies, the accuracy varied from 82.6 to 100%. Additionally, specificity ranged from 66.6 to 90.1%, sensitivity from 74 to 99.68%. Fourteen studies that provided sufficient data were included for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity was 90% (95% CI 0.820.94), and the pooled specificity was 92% (CI 95% 0.87-0.96). The DORs were 103 (27-251). Publication bias was not detected based on the p-value of 0.75 in the meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: With a head and neck screening deep learning model, detectable screening processes can be enhanced with high specificity and sensitivity.

Artificial Intelligence in Endodontic Education.

AIMS: The future dental and endodontic education must adapt to the current digitalized healthcare system in a hyper-connected world. The purpose of this scoping review was to investigate the ways an endodontic education curriculum could benefit from the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) and overcome the limitations of this technology in the delivery of healthcare to patients. METHODS: An electronic search was carried out up to December 2023 using MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and a manual search of reference literature. Grey literature, ongoing clinical trials were also searched using ClinicalTrials.gov. RESULTS: The search identified 251 records, of which 35 were deemed relevant to artificial intelligence (AI) and Endodontic education. Areas in which AI might aid students with their didactic and clinical endodontic education were identified as follows: 1) radiographic interpretation; 2) differential diagnosis; 3) treatment planning and decision-making; 4) case difficulty assessment; 5) preclinical training; 6) advanced clinical simulation and case-based training, 7) real-time clinical guidance; 8) autonomous systems and robotics; 9) progress evaluation and personalized education; 10) calibration and standardization. CONCLUSIONS: AI in endodontic education will support clinical and didactic teaching through individualized feedback; enhanced, augmented, and virtually generated training aids; automated detection and diagnosis; treatment planning and decision support; and AI-based student progress evaluation, and personalized education. Its implementation will inarguably change the current concept of teaching Endodontics. Dental educators would benefit from introducing AI in clinical and didactic pedagogy; however, they must be aware of AI's limitations and challenges to overcome.

Deep learning for tooth identification and numbering on dental radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Improved tools based on deep learning can be used to accurately number and identify teeth. This study aims to review the use of deep learning in tooth numbering and identification. METHODS: An electronic search was performed through October 2023 on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Google Scholar, IEEE, arXiv, and medRxiv. Studies that used deep learning models with segmentation, object detection, or classification tasks for teeth identification and numbering of human dental radiographs were included. For risk of bias assessment, included studies were critically analysed using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). To generate plots for meta-analysis, MetaDiSc and STATA 17 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) were used. Pooled outcome diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were determined through calculation. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 1618 studies, of which 29 were eligible based on the inclusion criteria. Five studies were found to have low bias across all domains of the QUADAS-2 tool. Deep learning has been reported to have an accuracy range of 81.8%-99% in tooth identification and numbering and a precision range of 84.5%-99.94%. Furthermore, sensitivity was reported as 82.7%-98% and F1-scores ranged from 87% to 98%. Sensitivity was 75.5%-98% and specificity was 79.9%-99%. Only 6 studies found the deep learning model to be less than 90% accurate. The average DOR of the pooled data set was 1612, the sensitivity was 89%, the specificity was 99%, and the area under the curve was 96%. CONCLUSION: Deep learning models successfully can detect, identify, and number teeth on dental radiographs. Deep learning-powered tooth numbering systems can enhance complex automated processes, such as accurately reporting which teeth have caries, thus aiding clinicians in making informed decisions during clinical practice.