Does mitomycin-C concentration have any influence on XEN45 gel stent outcomes in a real-world setting?

BACKGROUND: To compare the effectiveness and safety of XEN45 implanted with mitomycin-C (MMC) 0.01% versus (vs) XEN45 implanted with MMC 0.02%. METHODS: Retrospective and single-center study conducted on consecutive patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who underwent XEN45-implant, either alone or in combination with cataract surgery. The primary end-point was the mean change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline to the last follow-up visit. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (63 eyes) were included. Thirty-seven (58.7%) eyes underwent surgery with MMC 0.01% and 26 (41.3%) ones with MMC 0.02%. In the overall study sample, the mean (standard error) IOP was significantly lowered from 17.6 (0.7) mm Hg at baseline to 12.6 (0.3) mm Hg at month 12. The IOP was significantly lowered from 17.3 (15.4 to 19.2) mm Hg and 17.9 (16.1 to 17.8) mm Hg at baseline to 12.3 (11.3 to 13.3) mm Hg and 13.1 (12.3 to 13.9) mm Hg at month 12 in the MMC 0.01% and MMC 0.02% groups, respectively; p < 0.0001 each. The mean number of ocular-hypotensive medications significantly decreased from 2.1 (1.9 to 2.3) at baseline to 0.2 (0.04 to 0.3) at month 12, p < 0.0001, with no significant differences between MMC 0.01% and MMC 0.02% groups, p = 0.5181. At month 12, 50 (80.6%) eyes had functioning blebs. Regarding safety, 18 (28.6%) eyes have experience adverse events. CONCLUSION: XEN45, either alone or in combination with cataract surgery, showed a good effectiveness and safety profile. MMC dose had no influence on the IOP lowering, which may support the use of the lowest dose.

XEN Gel Stent Versus Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy in Ocular Hypertension and Open Angle Glaucoma Patients.

PRCIS: XEN gel stent and nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy, both either alone or in combination with cataract surgery, significantly lowered the intraocular pressure (IOP) and reduced the number of antiglaucoma medications in patients with open angle glaucoma, with no significant differences between them. PURPOSE: To compare the surgical outcomes of XEN45 implant and nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS), either alone or in combination with cataract surgery, in patients with ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma (OAG). A retrospective and single-center cohort study was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent a XEN45 implant or an NPDS, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification. The primary endpoint was the mean change in IOP from the baseline to the last follow-up visit. One hundred twenty-eight eyes, 65 (50.8%) eyes in the NPDS group and 63 (49.2%) eyes in the XEN group, were included in the study. The mean preoperative IOP was significantly lowered from 17.6±5.3 mm Hg and 17.8±6.2 mm Hg to 12.6±2.6 mm Hg and 13.8±2.8 mm Hg at month 12 in the XEN and NPDS groups, respectively; P <0.0001 each. At month 12, 70 (54.7%) eyes were classified as a success, with no significant differences between XEN (57.1%; 36/63 eyes) and NPDS (52.3%; 34/65 eyes) (mean difference: 4.8%; 95% CI: -30.5% to 20.8%; P =0.7115). The number of ocular hypotensive medications was significantly reduced in the XEN (from 2.1±0.7-0.2±0.5, P <0.0001) and in the NPDS (from 2.0±0.8 to 0.3±0.6, P <0.0001) groups, with no significant differences between them ( P =0.2629). The incidence of postoperative adverse events in the overall study population was 12.5%, with no significant differences between groups ( P =0.1275). Seven (11.1%) eyes underwent needling (XEN group) and 10 (15.4%) goniopuncture (NPDS group); P =0.4753. CONCLUSIONS: XEN45 implant and the NPDS, either alone or in combination with cataract surgery, significantly lowered IOP and reduced the number of ocular hypotensive medications in ocular hypertension and patients with open angle glaucoma.

Impact of Primary Needling on the XEN Implant Clinical Outcomes: A Real-Life Retrospective Study.

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness and safety of primary-needling in eyes who underwent a XEN45 implant. Methods: Retrospective and single center study. Consecutive patients with early-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension, who underwent XEN45 surgery, either alone or combined with phacoemulsification, and had at least a valid 12-month post-operative visit, were included in the study. Primary needling was performed by using a 30-gauge needle without viscoelastic. Subjects were divided in two groups: Eyes who underwent XEN+primary-needling (needling) and those who underwent XEN without primary-needling (no-needling). The primary end-point was the mean change in IOP from baseline to the last follow-up visit. Results: Sixty-three eyes, 19 (30.2%) in the needling group and 44 (69.8%) in the no-needling one, were included in the study. There were not significant differences in mean IOP lowering between needling and no-needling groups at month-12 (mean difference -2.5±5.3 mm Hg, p=0.0926). No significant differences in mean reduction of ocular-hypotensive medications were observed between needling and no-needling groups, p=0.8690. At month-12, 50 (80.6%) had blebs considered as functioning, with no difference between groups, p = 0.5631. At month-12, 59 (93.7%) eyes were classified as success, with no significant differences between needling (17/19) and no-needling (42/44) groups, p=0.3754. Secondary needling was performed in 8 (12.7%) eyes, without differences between groups (p=0.6333). Conclusion: Primary needling, at the time of surgery, was a safe procedure in OAG patients who underwent a XEN implant, although it was not associated with a lower postoperative IOP or less ocular hypotensive medications.