Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of vestibular schwannoma reveals functionally distinct macrophage subsets.

BACKGROUND: Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) remain a challenge due to their anatomical location and propensity to growth. Macrophages are present in VS but their roles in VS pathogenesis remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to assess phenotypic and functional profile of macrophages in VS with single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). METHODS: scRNAseq was carried out in three VS samples to examine characteristics of macrophages in the tumour. RT-qPCR was carried out on 10 VS samples for CD14, CD68 and CD163 and a panel of macrophage-associated molecules. RESULTS: scRNAseq revealed macrophages to be a major constituent of VS microenvironment with three distinct subclusters based on gene expression. The subclusters were also defined by expression of CD163, CD68 and IL-1ß. AREG and PLAUR were expressed in the CD68+CD163+IL-1ß+ subcluster, PLCG2 and NCKAP5 were expressed in CD68+CD163+IL-1ß- subcluster and AUTS2 and SPP1 were expressed in the CD68+CD163-IL-1ß+ subcluster. RT-qPCR showed expression of several macrophage markers in VS of which CD14, ALOX15, Interleukin-1ß, INHBA and Colony Stimulating Factor-1R were found to have a high correlation with tumour volume. CONCLUSIONS: Macrophages form an important component of VS stroma. scRNAseq reveals three distinct subsets of macrophages in the VS tissue which may have differing roles in the pathogenesis of VS.

Outcomes of cochlear implantation in Usher syndrome: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: This study is a systematic review of the literature which seeks to evaluate auditory and quality of life (QOL) outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with Usher syndrome. METHODS: Systematic review of studies indexed in Medline via PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov was performed up to March 9th 2022, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Patient demographics, comorbidity, details of cochlear implantation, auditory, and QOL outcomes were extracted and summarized. RESULTS: 33 studies reported over 217 cochlear implants in 187 patients with Usher syndrome, comprising subtypes 1 (56 patients), 2 (9 patients), 3 (23 patients), and not specified (99 patients). Auditory outcomes included improved sound detection, speech perception, and speech intelligibility. QOL outcomes were reported for 75 patients, with benefit reported in the majority. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with Usher syndrome develop improved auditory outcomes after cochlear implantation with early implantation being an important factor.

Psychosocial outcome measures for conductive and mixed hearing loss treatment: An overview of the relevant literature.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the psychosocial assessments utilized with individuals with conductive and/or mixed hearing loss as part of a broader effort by the Auditory Rehabilitation Outcomes Network (AURONET) group to develop a core set of patient-centred outcome measures. DESIGN: A review of articles published between 2006 and 2016 was completed. Included studies had more than three adult participants, were available in English, and reported a psychosocial outcome from any treatment of mixed and/or conductive hearing loss. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-six articles from seven databases. RESULTS: Sixty-six articles met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Within this set, 15 unique psychosocial or patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) were identified, with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) being the most frequently dispensed. Five of the fifteen were only administered in one study. In-house questionnaires (IHQs) were reported in 19 articles. CONCLUSIONS: Only 66 (22%) of the 300 articles with outcomes contained a PRO. Some of the mostly frequently employed PROs (e.g., APHAB) were judged to include only social items and no psychological items. Lack of PRO standardization and the use of IHQs make psychosocial comparisons across treatments in this population difficult for patients, clinicians and stakeholders.

Hearing outcome measures for conductive and mixed hearing loss treatment in adults: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: Rehabilitation options for conductive and mixed hearing loss are continually expanding, but without standard outcome measures comparison between different treatments is difficult. To meaningfully inform clinicians and patients core outcome sets (COS), determined via a recognised methodology, are needed. Following our previous work that identified hearing, physical, economic and psychosocial as core areas of a future COS, the AURONET group reviewed hearing outcome measures used in existing literature and assigned them into different domains within the hearing core area. DESIGN: Scoping review. STUDY SAMPLE: Literature including hearing outcome measurements for the treatment of conductive and/or mixed hearing loss. RESULTS: The literature search identified 1434 studies, with 278 subsequently selected for inclusion. A total of 837 hearing outcome measures were reported and grouped into nine domains. The largest domain constituted pure-tone threshold measurements accounting for 65% of the total outcome measures extracted, followed by the domains of speech testing (20%) and questionnaires (9%). Studies of hearing implants more commonly included speech tests or hearing questionnaires compared with studies of middle ear surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of outcome measures are currently used, highlighting the importance of developing a COS to inform individual practice and reporting in trials/research.

Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the hearing performance of patients with conductive and mild mixed hearing loss and single-sided sensorineural deafness provided with a new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant (the Baha Attract System) with unaided hearing as well as aided with a sound processor on a softband. Furthermore, to evaluate safety and subjective benefit before and after implantation of the test device. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four adult patients in five participating centres were enrolled in this prospective study. Baseline data were collected during a pre-operative visit, and after a softband trial, all patients were implanted unilaterally. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 10 days, 4, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Free-field hearing thresholds pure-tone average (PTA4 in dB HL; mean threshold at 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz; primary outcome measure). Individual free-field hearing thresholds, speech recognition in quiet and in noise, soft tissue status during follow-up and subjective benefit as measured with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Health Utilities Index (HUI) questionnaires. RESULTS: Implantation of the Baha Attract System resulted in favourable audiological outcomes compared to unaided conditions. On the primary outcome parameter, a statistically significant improvement was observed compared to unaided hearing for the patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss (mean PTA4 difference -20.8 dB HL, SD 9.8; P < 0.0001) and for the patients with single-sided sensorineural deafness (SSD) (mean PTA4 difference -21.6 dB HL, SD 12.2; P < 0.0001). During all audiology tests, the non-test ear was blocked. Statistically significant improvements were also recorded in speech tests in quiet and noise compared to unaided hearing for the conductive/mixed hearing loss group and for speech in quiet in the SSD group. Compared to the pre-operative measurement with softband, no significant differences were recorded in the PTA4 free-field hearing threshold or the other audiological outcomes in either of the groups (P > 0.05). Soft tissue-related issues observed during follow-up included numbness, pain/discomfort at the implant site and to a lesser extent pressure-related skin complications. A declining trend was noted in the rate of these complications during follow-up. Approximately 20% of patients reported some degree of numbness and 38% (slight) pain/discomfort at final follow-up of 6 months. Good results on the subjective benefit questionnaires were observed, with statistically significant improvements on APHAB and SSQ questionnaires, and on the hearing attribute of HUI3. CONCLUSIONS: The Baha Attract System provided a significant improvement in hearing performance and subjective benefit compared to the pre-operative unaided condition (with the non-test ear blocked). Hearing performance of the Baha Attract was similar to a test situation with the same sound processor on a softband. A proportion of the patients reported numbness and pain/discomfort at the implant site during follow-up, especially during the first post-operative weeks. Based on the results of the current multicentre study, the Baha Attract can be considered as a treatment option for patients with the aforementioned hearing losses. Especially in the SSD patients, a careful selection procedure is warranted. Therefore, a pre-operative trial should be part of the decision-making process before fitting a patient with the Baha Attract System.

Implications of X-ray beam profiles on qualitative and quantitative synchrotron micro-focus X-ray fluorescence microscopy.

Synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence microscopy is frequently used to investigate the spatial distribution of elements within a wide range of samples. Interrogation of heterogeneous samples that contain large concentration ranges has the potential to produce image artefacts due to the profile of the X-ray beam. The presence of these artefacts and the distribution of flux within the beam profile can significantly affect qualitative and quantitative analyses. Two distinct correction methods have been generated by referencing the beam profile itself or by employing an adaptive-thresholding procedure. Both methods significantly improve qualitative imaging by removing the artefacts without compromising the low-intensity features. The beam-profile correction method improves quantitative results but requires accurate two-dimensional characterization of the X-ray beam profile.

Outcomes following cochlear implantation with eluting electrodes: A systematic review.

Objectives: To establish audiological and other outcomes following cochlear implantation in humans and animals with eluting electrodes. Methods: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched (April 2023): MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science. Studies reporting outcomes in either humans or animals following cochlear implantation with a drug-eluting electrode were included. No limits were placed on language or year of publication. Risk of bias assessment was performed on all included studies using either the Brazzelli or Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) assessment tools. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Results: Searches identified 146 abstracts and 108 full texts. Of these, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 523 animals (17 studies) and 24 humans (1 study). Eluting electrodes included dexamethasone (16 studies), aracytine (1 study), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (1 study), the growth factors insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (1 study), and neurotrophin-3 (1 study). All included studies compare outcomes following implantation with an eluting electrode with a control non-eluting electrode. In the majority of studies, audiological outcomes (e.g., auditory brainstem response threshold) were superior following implantation with an eluting electrode compared with a standard electrode. Most studies which investigated post-implantation impedance reported lower impedance following implantation with an eluting electrode. The influence of eluting electrodes on other reported outcomes (including post-implantation cochlear fibrosis and the survival of hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons) was more varied across the included studies. Conclusions: Eluting electrodes have shown promise in animal studies in preserving residual hearing following cochlear implantation and in reducing impedance, though data from human studies remain lacking. Further in-human studies will be required to determine the clinical usefulness of drug-eluting cochlear implants as a future treatment for sensorineural hearing loss.

Outcomes of Cochlear implantation in early-deafened patients with Waardenburg syndrome: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Objective: This systematic review aims to establish the expected hearing and speech outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with profound congenital deafness secondary to Waardenburg syndrome (WS). Methods: A systematic review of the literature and narrative synthesis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Databases searched: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits were placed on language or year of publication. Results: Searches identified 186 abstracts and full texts. Of these, 16 studies met inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 179 patients and at least 194 implants. Hearing outcomes of those receiving cochlear implantation were generally good. Five studies included genetic analysis of one or more of the participants. A total of 11 peri/post-operative complications were reported. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, mainly comprising noncontrolled case series with small cohort size. All studies were OCEBM grade III-IV. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation in congenitally deafened children with Waardenburg Syndrome is a well-established intervention as a method of auditory rehabilitation. Due to the uncommon nature of the condition, there is a lack of large-scale high-quality studies examining the use of cochlear implantation in this patient group. However, overall outcomes following implantation are positive with the majority of patients demonstrating improved audiometry, speech perception and speech intelligibility supporting its use in appropriately selected cases.

Fibroblasts Derived From Vestibular Schwannoma Express Protumorogenic Markers.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Vestibular schwannomas (VSs), despite being histologically benign, cause significant morbidity because of their challenging intracranial location and the propensity for growth. The role of the stroma and particularly fibroblasts, in the progression of VS, is not completely understood. This study examines the profile of fibroblasts in VS. METHODS: Seventeen patients undergoing surgical excision of VS were recruited into the study. Reverse transcription with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed on VS tissue samples and fibroblast-associated molecules examined. Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry in VS tissue were used to study the expression of fibroblast markers CD90 and podoplanin in situ. Fibroblast cultures were established from VS, and RT-qPCR analysis was performed on a panel of fibroblast markers on VS and control tissue fibroblasts. RESULTS: Several fibroblast-associated molecules including members of galectin family and matrix metalloproteinases were found to be expressed in VS tissue on RT-qPCR analysis. In situ, expression of CD90 and podoplanin was observed in VS tissue both on immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. RT-qPCR analysis of fibroblasts from VS and control vestibular neuroepithelium (NE) showed a higher expression of several molecules of the galectin and matrix metalloproteinases family on VS fibroblasts compared with NE fibroblasts. CONCLUSION: This work examines fibroblasts from VS and shows qualitative differences from NE fibroblasts on RT-qPCR. Further understanding of the fibroblast function in the progression of VS will potentially unveil new targets to manage VS growth.

Congenital Mastoid Cholesteatoma.

BACKGROUND: Congenital cholesteatomas account for just up to 5% of all cholesteatomas and most commonly arise in the petrous apex and middle ear. Congenital cholesteatomas arising in the mastoid are rare and typically present late. METHODS: In this study, we report a case series of 3 cases managed in our department between 2006 and 2021 and present a summary of the current literature. RESULTS: Congenital cholesteatomas arising in the mastoid is a rare finding and even among reported cases, not all are clearly mastoid in origin. Their location allows for considerable growth before symptoms develop. Pain and localized swelling in the temporal area are the most common presenting symptoms which can lead to diagnostic challenges. Our cases show that although surgery is often appropriate, conservative manage- ment may be suitable in certain situations. CONCLUSION: Congenital cholesteatoma of mastoid origin is rare and can present a diagnostic challenge. Greater awareness is important to facilitate early detection. A high index of suspicion is needed in those presenting with retro-auricular pain and swelling in the context of a normal ontological examination.

Anatomical and audiological considerations in branchiootorenal syndrome: A systematic review.

Objective: Establish anatomical considerations, audiological outcomes, and optimal management in patients with branchiootic/branchiootorenal syndrome (BO/BOR). Methods: Databases reviewed: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical or radiological studies of patients with BOR syndrome describing either the audiological profile or anatomical changes were included. Articles in which BOR syndrome was associated with other syndromes, and those that were focused only on general and genetic aspects of BOR syndrome were excluded. Articles were assessed using Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) grading system and the Brazzelli risk of bias tool for nonrandomized studies. Results: Searches identified 379 articles. Of these, 64 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 482 patients from at least 95 families. In 308 patients, hearing loss was categorized as sensorineural (29%), conductive (20%), and mixed (51%). Hearing outcomes were variable in terms of onset, pattern, and severity; ranging from mild to profound deafness. One hundred sixty-nine patients presented with inner ear anomalies, 145 had middle, and 151 had external ear abnormalities. In 44 studies, 58 ear operations were described. Mixed outcomes were reported in patients managed with hearing aids or middle ear surgery; however, successful cochlear implantation was described in all five cases. Conclusion: The anatomical and audiological profiles of patients with BO/BOR are variable. A range of surgical procedures were described, however lacked objective outcome measures. Given the range of anatomical variants, management decisions should be made on an individual basis including full audiological and radiological assessment. Level of evidence: NA.

Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Patients With Otosclerosis: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation in patients with otosclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched were as follows: MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov . No limits were placed on language or year of publication. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RESULTS: Searches identified 474 abstracts and 180 full texts, with 68 studies meeting the inclusion criteria and reporting outcomes in a minimum of 481 patients with at least 516 implants. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were reported in five studies involving 51 patients. Intraoperative adverse events/surgical approach details and preoperative radiological assessment were reported in 46 and 38 studies, respectively. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, predominantly consisting of case reports and noncontrolled case series with small numbers of patients. Most studies were Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine grade IV. DISCUSSION: Access to good rehabilitation support is essential to achieving the good hearing outcomes and PROMs that can be expected by 12 months after implantation in most cases. There was a significant association between the radiological severity of otosclerosis and an increase in surgical and postoperative complications. Postoperative facial nerve stimulation can occur and may require deactivation of electrodes and subsequent hearing detriment. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing outcomes are typically good, but patients should be counseled on associated surgical complications that may compromise hearing. Modern diagnostic techniques may help to identify potentially difficult cases to aid operative planning and patient counseling. Further work is needed to characterize PROMs in this population.

Cochlear implantation under local anesthetic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: As the population ages and implantation criteria are relaxed, more patients with complex comorbidities are becoming eligible for cochlear implantation (CI). These patients have higher risks associated with general anesthesia. This systematic review assesses outcomes and complications following CI under local anesthetic to examine utility for patients deemed not suitable or at high risk for general anesthesia. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis performed according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched were MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov. There were no limitations on year of publication or language. RESULTS: Then, 132 unique were identified. After screening abstracts and full texts for eligibility criteria a total of 18 articles were included. In the nine studies where audiological data were reported, all patients demonstrated improvement in audiological outcomes following implantation under local anesthetic (LA). Only minor complications of transient vertigo, wound infection, facial nerve paralysis, confusion, and tinnitus were reported but all were transient. Meta-analysis showed surgical time was significantly shorter under LA. CONCLUSIONS: CI under LA is safe for patients with comorbidities which preclude them from general anesthesia, with minimal complications and an improved cost-effectiveness profile. However, larger scale, robust trials are required to assess this further.

Long-term osseointegration of laser-ablated hearing implants in sheep cranial bone.

Osseointegration, the ability for an implant to be anchored in bone tissue with direct bone-implant contact and allowing for continuous adaptive remodelling, is clinically used in different reconstructive fields, such as dentistry, orthopedics and otology. The latter uses a bone conducting sound processor connected to a skin-penetrating abutment that is mounted on a titanium implant placed in the temporal bone, thereby acting as a path for transmission of the vibrations generated by the sound processor. The success of the treatment relies on bone healing and osseointegration, which could be improved by surface modifications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term osseointegration in a sheep skull model and compare a laser-ablated implant surface with a machined implant. Commercially available 4 mm titanium implants, either with a machined (Wide Ponto) or a laser-ablated surface (Ponto BHX, Oticon Medical, Sweden), were used in the current study. The surfaces were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. The implantation was performed with a full soft tissue flap and the osteotomy was prepared using the MIPS drill kit (Oticon Medical, Sweden) prior to installation of the implants in the frontal bone of eight female sheep. After five months, biopsies including the implant and surrounding bone tissue obtained, processed and analysed using histology, histomorphometry, scanning electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy. The animals healed well, without signs of adverse events. Histomorphometry showed a large amount of bone tissue around both implant types, with 75% of the threaded area occupied by bone for both implant types. A large amount of bone-implant contact was observed for both implant types, with 67%-71% of the surface covered by bone. Both implant types were surrounded by mature remodelled lamellar bone with high mineral content, corroborating the histological observations. The current results show that the laser-ablated surface induces healing similar to the well-known clinically used machined surface in ovine cranial bone. In conclusion, the present long-term experimental results indicate that a laser-ablated implant performs equally well as a clinically used implant with a machined surface. This, together with previously reported, improved early biomechanical anchorage, suggests future, safe and efficient clinical potential.

Skin flap thickness and magnet strength in Cochlear implants.

Objectives: The new CI600 series cochlear implants (Nucleus® Profile™ Plus Series; CI) are more MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) compatible. The magnet's attraction force is lower, possibly posing a problem in patients needing a higher strength magnet due to increased skin thickness. This study aims to investigate the relationship between skin thickness and magnet strength in patients undergoing cochlear implantation. Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from 46 patients with cochlear implants. Data collected included age, body mass index, magnet strength used, pre-operative and post-operative imaging and skin thickness. Results: There was a weak, positive correlation between magnet strength and skin thickness, which was not statistically significant (r(46) = 0.149, p = 0.324). There was a weak, positive correlation between magnet strength and body mass index, which was not statistically significant (r(46) = 0.113, p = 0.456). There was a moderate, positive correlation between body mass index and skin thickness, which was statistically significant (r(46) = 0.362, p = 0.012). Discussion: The increased skin thickness in patients with higher body mass indexes, might mean that these patients will require a stronger magnet. Conclusion: There are concerns that the lower attraction force in the CI600 (Nucleus® Profile™ Plus Series) may pose a retention problem for these patients. This might mean that discussions about skin flap reduction surgery are needed.

Hearing loss in inner ear and systemic autoimmune disease: A systematic review of post-cochlear implantation outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To assess outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with hearing loss secondary to primary or secondary autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED). METHODS: A systematic review and narrative synthesis was completed according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits were placed on year of publication or language. RESULTS: A total of 551 studies were identified, of which 29 were included after removal of duplicates, and screening the title, abstract, and full text. All except one study were OCEBM grade IV. 114 of 115 patients displayed improvement in hearing following cochlear implantation. With implant use, roughly a third of these patients had hearing that improved over time, a third improved and plateaued, and a third remained stable. There was no additional risk of perioperative complications found in AIED patients compared what is generally accepted in general cochlear implantation, although two episodes of device failure after 6 months were noted, and four patients with secondary AIED displayed poor initial audiological outcomes. CONCLUSION: CI in both primary and secondary AIED provides marked improvement in hearing. Early CI may be a valid management option, provide long-lasting hearing in patients and reduce the side effects of long-term systemic immunosuppressants. However, patients should be counseled residual hearing may be lost if there is cochlear ossification or fibrosis which may make implant insertion more traumatic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Temporal Bone Trauma: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients following temporal bone trauma. Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits are placed on language or year of publication. The review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Searches identified 223 abstracts and 64 full texts. Of these, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 77 patients with at least 96 implants. Hearing outcomes were generally good with most patients demonstrating improved audiological and functional outcomes. Complications were reported in 14 cases with 10 of these being major. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, predominantly consisting of case reports and non-controlled case series with small numbers of patients. All studies were OCEBM grade IV. Hearing outcomes following CI in temporal bone trauma are good with useful functional improvement demonstrated in the majority of patients. It appears to be an effective method of aural rehabilitation and should be considered in selected cases following hearing loss due to temporal bone fracture.

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Patients with Mitochondrial Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

This study's aim was to establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with mitochondrial disorders associated with deafness. Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched: Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, COCHRANE, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits on language or year of publication. Review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Searches identified 437 abstracts and 37 full text articles, of which 11 studies met the inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in a total of 17 patients. All implants achieved good hearing outcomes, and follow-up ranged between 1 week and 12 months. The methodological quality of the included studies was sufficient, scoring grades 3 to 4 using the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine grading system. All studies were retrospective and consisted of case reviews and case reports. All cases of CI showed positive outcomes in speech perception and detection. There is some qualitative evidence to suggest improvement in quality of life and satisfaction postoperatively. There was very limited information available on secondary outcomes such as surgical complications, quality of life, and method of cochlear implant insertion. The small sample size of our patient cohort and quality of studies suggests a need for large-scale studies with more robust methodology to assess the effectiveness of CI. There is a need for studies that assess other factors to be considered when counseling patients about cochlear implants, such as adverse events, surgical complications, and long-term benefits.