Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Public Health Rep ; 135(4): 428-434, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32579862

RESUMO

Although writing is a valued public health competency, authors face a multitude of barriers (eg, lack of time, lack of mentorship, lack of appropriate instruction) to publication. Few writing courses for applied public health professionals have been documented. In 2017 and 2018, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention partnered to implement a Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Intensive Writing Training course to improve the quality of submissions from applied epidemiologists working at health departments. The course included 3 webinars, expert mentorship from experienced authors, and a 2-day in-person session. As of April 2020, 39 epidemiologists had participated in the course. Twenty-four (62%) of the 39 epidemiologists had submitted manuscripts, 17 (71%) of which were published. The program's evaluation demonstrates the value of mentorship and peer feedback during the publishing process, the importance of case study exercises, and the need to address structural challenges (eg, competing work responsibilities or supervisor support) in the work environment.


Assuntos
Currículo , Educação Médica Continuada/organização & administração , Epidemiologistas/educação , Epidemiologia/educação , Editoração/normas , Redação/normas , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
2.
MMWR Recomm Rep ; 57(RR-4): 1-51, 2008 May 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18509304

RESUMO

In 2005, two tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines were licensed and recommended for use in adults and adolescents in the United States: ADACEL (sanofi pasteur, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania), which is licensed for use in persons aged 11--64 years, and BOOSTRIX (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium), which is licensed for use in persons aged 10-18 years. Both Tdap vaccines are licensed for single-dose use to add protection against pertussis and to replace the next dose of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids vaccine (Td). Available evidence does not address the safety of Tdap for pregnant women, their fetuses, or pregnancy outcomes sufficiently. Available data also do not indicate whether Tdap-induced transplacental maternal antibodies provide early protection against pertussis to infants or interfere with an infant's immune responses to routinely administered pediatric vaccines. Until additional information is available, CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends that pregnant women who were not vaccinated previously with Tdap: 1) receive Tdap in the immediate postpartum period before discharge from hospital or birthing center, 2) may receive Tdap at an interval as short as 2 years since the most recent Td vaccine, 3) receive Td during pregnancy for tetanus and diphtheria protection when indicated, or 4) defer the Td vaccine indicated during pregnancy to substitute Tdap vaccine in the immediate postpartum period if the woman is likely to have sufficient protection against tetanus and diphtheria. Although pregnancy is not a contraindication for receiving Tdap vaccine, health-care providers should weigh the theoretical risks and benefits before choosing to administer Tdap vaccine to a pregnant woman. This report 1) describes the clinical features of pertussis, tetanus, and diphtheria among pregnant and postpartum women and their infants, 2) reviews available evidence of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy as a strategy to prevent infant pertussis, 3) summarizes Tdap vaccination policy in the United States, and 4) presents recommendations for use of Td and Tdap vaccines among pregnant and postpartum women.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Difteria e Tétano/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Difteria/prevenção & controle , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle , Difteria/diagnóstico , Difteria/epidemiologia , Vacina contra Difteria e Tétano/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Tétano/diagnóstico , Tétano/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação , Coqueluche/diagnóstico , Coqueluche/epidemiologia
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 46(3): 395-401, 2008 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18181738

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We present 2 case reports in the United States and investigations of diphtheria-like illness caused by toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans. A fatal case occurred in a 75-year-old male Washington resident who was treated with clindamycin but did not receive equine diphtheria antitoxin. A second, nonfatal case occurred in a 66-year-old female Tennessee resident who received erythromycin and diphtheria antitoxin. METHODS: Both case patients and close human and animal contacts were investigated by their respective state health departments. RESULTS: C. ulcerans isolated from the patient who died was resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin. For both isolates, conventional polymerase chain reaction results were positive for A and B subunits of diphtheria toxin gene tox, and modified Elek tests confirmed toxin production. The source of infection remained undetermined for both cases. Neither patient was up-to-date with diphtheria toxoid vaccination. CONCLUSION: These case reports highlight the importance of early treatment with diphtheria antitoxin, the selection of effective antimicrobial agents, and prevention through up-to-date vaccination.


Assuntos
Infecções por Corynebacterium/epidemiologia , Corynebacterium/isolamento & purificação , Difteria/epidemiologia , Idoso , Infecções por Corynebacterium/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Corynebacterium/microbiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Difteria/microbiologia , Antitoxina Diftérica/uso terapêutico , Toxoide Diftérico/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Evolução Fatal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Am J Prev Med ; 34(1): 46-53, 2008 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18083450

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Routine childhood immunization with pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV7s) began in 2000 in the United States. Despite vaccine shortages, reductions in invasive pneumococcal disease occurred rapidly during 2000-2002. Age-appropriate PCV7 coverage was estimated and characteristics associated with undervaccination were identified for children in the 1998-2002 birth cohorts. METHODS: Data were analyzed for 85,135 children aged 19-35 months in the 2001-2004 National Immunization Surveys. To obtain PCV7 coverage estimates by birth cohorts, a pooled analysis was conducted by combining individual survey years that sampled children with appropriate birth dates. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with age-appropriate vaccination. RESULTS: The proportion of children receiving the primary 3-dose PCV7 series by age 12 months increased from 45.5% (+/-0.6) among children born in 2000 to 62.1% (+/-0.7) among those born in 2002. By age 24 months, an estimated 30.7% (+/-0.6), 38.0% (+/-0.6), and 49.0% (+/-1.1) of children born in 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively, had received all four PCV7 doses; however, only 15.0% (+/-0.4), 16.1% (+/-0.4) and 24.4% (+/-0.6) of children were age-appropriately immunized. Among children born in 1998 and 1999, 10.1% +/-0.5) and 37.6% (+/-0.7), respectively, received one or more catch-up doses during their second year of life. Lower age-appropriate PCV7 coverage was independently associated with black race, Hispanic ethnicity, receiving vaccinations from public health providers, and low household income. CONCLUSIONS: The dramatic reductions in pneumococcal-related diseases from direct and indirect vaccine effects occurred when few children had received the recommended complete vaccine schedule, and there were substantial racial and socioeconomic disparities in coverage.


Assuntos
Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Pré-Escolar , Uso de Medicamentos , Características da Família , Feminino , Vacina Pneumocócica Conjugada Heptavalente , Humanos , Masculino , Vacinas Meningocócicas/provisão & distribuição , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/provisão & distribuição , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , Vacinas Conjugadas
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 44 Suppl 3: S84-101, 2007 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17342672

RESUMO

Gonorrhea, the second most commonly reported notifiable disease, is an important cause of cervicitis, urethritis, and pelvic inflammatory disease. The selection of appropriate therapy for gonorrhea (i.e., safe, highly effective, single dose, and affordable) is complicated by the ability of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to develop resistance to antimicrobial therapies. This article reviews the key questions and data that informed the 2006 gonorrhea treatment recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Key areas addressed include the criteria used to select effective treatment for gonorrhea, the level of antimicrobial resistance at which changing treatment regimens is recommended, the epidemiology of resistance, and the use of quinolones, cephalosporins, and other classes of antimicrobials for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/efeitos dos fármacos , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Cefalosporinas/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Gonorreia/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Quinolonas/farmacologia , Estados Unidos
6.
MMWR Recomm Rep ; 55(RR-3): 1-34, 2006 Mar 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16557217

RESUMO

During spring 2005, two tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) products formulated for use in adolescents (and, for one product, use in adults) were licensed in the United States (BOOSTRIX, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium [licensed May 3, 2005, for use in persons aged 10-18 years], and ADACEL, sanofi pasteur, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [licensed June 10, 2005, for use in persons aged 11-64 years]). Prelicensure studies demonstrated safety and efficacy against tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis when Tdap was administered as a single booster dose to adolescents. To reduce pertussis morbidity in adolescents and maintain the standard of care for tetanus and diphtheria protection, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that: 1) adolescents aged 11-18 years should receive a single dose of Tdap instead of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids vaccine (Td) for booster immunization against tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis if they have completed the recommended childhood diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and whole cell pertussis vaccine (DTP)/ diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) vaccination series (five doses of pediatric DTP/DTaP before the seventh birthday; if the fourth dose was administered on or after the fourth birthday, the fifth dose is not needed) and have not received Td or Tdap. The preferred age for Tdap vaccination is 11-12 years; 2) adolescents aged 11-18 years who received Td, but not Tdap, are encouraged to receive a single dose of Tdap to provide protection against pertussis if they have completed the recommended childhood DTP/DTaP vaccination series. An interval of at least 5 years between Td and Tdap is encouraged to reduce the risk for local and systemic reactions after Tdap vaccination. However, an interval less than 5 years between Td and Tdap can be used; and 3) vaccine providers should administer Tdap and tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (Menactra, sanofi pasteur, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania) to adolescents aged 11-18 years during the same visit if both vaccines are indicated and available. This statement 1) reviews tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis vaccination policy in the United States, with emphasis on adolescents; 2) describes the clinical features and epidemiology of pertussis among adolescents; 3) summarizes the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety data of the two Tdap vaccines licensed for use among adolescents; and 4) presents recommendations for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccination among adolescents aged 11-18 years.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Difteria/prevenção & controle , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/normas , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Difteria/epidemiologia , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Imunização Secundária , Tétano/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Coqueluche/epidemiologia
7.
Ann Intern Med ; 139(3): 178-85, 2003 Aug 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12899585

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For two decades, treatment guidelines for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) have recommended empirical co-treatment for chlamydia when patients are treated for gonorrhea. Because the epidemiology of and diagnostic testing for STDs have changed over time, co-treatment may no longer be needed as a clinical or public health strategy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of chlamydia among patients at STD clinics who are infected with and treated for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and to determine whether co-treatment recommendations are still justified. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from a multisite study. SETTING: Five public STD clinics (Baltimore, Maryland; Denver, Colorado; Long Beach, California; Newark, New Jersey; and San Francisco, California), July 1993 through October 1995. PATIENTS: 3885 heterosexual patients (2184 men and 1701 women) who agreed to participate in a trial of counseling interventions and had conclusive results from diagnostic tests for gonorrhea and chlamydia performed routinely as part of the trial. MEASUREMENTS: Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis as determined by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Chlamydia trachomatis was detected in 20% (95% CI, 16% to 24%) of 411 men and 42% (CI, 35% to 50%) of 151 women with laboratory-confirmed N. gonorrhoeae. Chlamydia trachomatis was detected in 19% (CI, 15% to 22%) of 410 men and 35% (CI, 28% to 43%) of 154 women with treatment indications for gonorrhea who would not otherwise have been treated for chlamydia: chlamydia prevalence among these patients was significantly higher than among patients without treatment indications for either gonorrhea or chlamydia: 7% in men and 9% in women (relative risk, 2.58 [CI, 1.92 to 3.47] and 4.12 [CI, 3.05 to 5.57], respectively). CONCLUSION: The frequent presence of chlamydia among patients at STD clinics who received treatment for gonorrhea, including sex partners of gonorrhea-infected patients, supports continuing current recommendations for co-treatment.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/complicações , Chlamydia trachomatis , Gonorreia/complicações , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Adulto , Infecções por Chlamydia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 38(9): 1304-10, 2004 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15127345

RESUMO

The Internet provides patients, clinicians, teachers, and researchers with immediate access to reliable information, authoritative recommendations, and the latest research findings and statistics, but quickly finding the best sources while avoiding the unreliable and obsolete can be a problem. We searched the Internet for the most useful English-language Web sites on sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), with annotations, in 4 tables: sites for patients, for clinicians and teachers, and for researchers, and sites dedicated to a single STD. In the process, we found that government-sponsored sites tended to have the most reliable information. This held true regardless of the kind of information we were seeking. Several university-sponsored sites contained information that was outdated or erroneous. Commercial and nonprofit sites sometimes evinced a bias that could mislead some readers. Both health care professionals and laypersons seeking information about STDs on the World Wide Web should generally start their search at government-sponsored sites.


Assuntos
Programas Governamentais , Serviços de Informação , Internet , Sistemas On-Line , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Autoria , Recursos em Saúde , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 35(Suppl 2): S191-9, 2002 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12353206

RESUMO

The highest rates of reported gonorrhea infections occur among adolescent females aged 15-19 years. Among the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-recommended single-dose gonorrhea treatment regimens, ciprofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic, is approximately half the cost of other CDC-recommended oral treatment regimens. Fluoroquinolone use in patients aged <18 years has been limited because of irreversible articular cartilage damage demonstrated in large, weight-bearing joints of young animals. We reviewed the medical literature to assess whether the risks of a single 500-mg dose of ciprofloxacin to treat uncomplicated gonorrhea infection in adolescents appears to outweigh the benefits. We found no reports of irreversible cartilage toxicity or age-associated adverse events in 5236 human children and adolescents (aged 5 days-24 years) treated with a total of 5486 courses of fluoroquinolones.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Anti-Infecciosos/efeitos adversos , Ciprofloxacina/efeitos adversos , Gonorreia/economia , Gonorreia/patologia , Humanos , Medição de Risco
10.
BMJ Clin Evid ; 20072007 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19454057

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In the UK, diagnoses rates for gonorrhoea in 2005 were 196/100,000 for 20-24 year old men, and 133/100,000 for 16-19 year old women. Co-infection with Chlamydia trachomatis is reported in 10-40% of people with gonorrhoea in the USA and UK. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments for uncomplicated infections in men and non-pregnant women; and in pregnant women? What are the effects of treatments for disseminated gonococcal infection? What are the effects of dual treatment for gonorrhoea and chlamydia infection? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and other important databases up to July 2006 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We found 21 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: antibiotic regimens (dual treatment, multiple dose, single dose).


Assuntos
Gonorreia , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Administração Oral , Infecções por Chlamydia , Chlamydia trachomatis , Coinfecção , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Humanos , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/efeitos dos fármacos
11.
Pediatrics ; 115(6): 1479-87, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15930207

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A national shortage of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) occurred from September 2001 through May 2003. In December 2001 and January 2002, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued PCV7-shortage recommendations, emphasizing that all health care providers decrease the number of doses for healthy children so that more children could receive some PCV7. OBJECTIVES: We assessed (1) how the PCV7 shortage affected pediatricians, (2) whether children in the public and private sectors were vaccinated differently during the shortage, (3) pediatricians' knowledge of and adherence to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices/AAP recommendations, (4) and what factors were associated with nonadherence to the recommendations. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional mail survey of 2500 US physician-members of the AAP from November 2002 through March 2003; physicians providing childhood immunizations were eligible. We asked about PCV7-shortage experience, assessed recommendation adherence through clinical scenarios, and modeled potential factors associated with reported nonadherence to the recommendation to defer the fourth PCV7 dose. RESULTS: Of 2478 surveys sent to valid addresses, 1412 (57%) completed surveys were received; 946 (67%) of these were from eligible pediatricians. Overall, 79% experienced a PCV7 shortage, 94% reported being aware of the recommendations, and 42% reported barriers to recommendation adherence. Ninety-four percent reported vaccinating 6-month-old infants with private or public insurance in the same manner. As recommended, 91% reported fully vaccinating high-risk patients. Contrary to recommendations, 49% reported sometimes or always administering the fourth PCV7 dose to healthy children 12 to 15 months old; their reasons included recurrent otitis media, childcare attendance, and parental desire. Controlling for other characteristics, pediatricians who had no PCV7 shortage in their practices were significantly more likely to report administering the fourth dose than pediatricians who had a shortage (odds ratio [OR]: 3.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.40-5.63). Other factors associated with nonadherence were being in solo private practice (OR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.26-3.77) or being male (OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.08-2.12). Among pediatricians deferring PCV7, 36% reported having no system to track children for whom PCV7 was deferred. CONCLUSIONS: Many pediatricians, both with and without a PCV7 shortage, administered more PCV7 doses than recommended. Pediatricians without a shortage were less likely to limit use, which suggests that they might have focused on the perceived value of administering the full schedule to their patients in preference to broader public health goals. Providing more information to physicians on the effectiveness of a fewer-dose schedule and the risk of disease when vaccine is deferred and educating parents might increase adherence to recommendations and achieve more equitable coverage during vaccine shortages.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Imunização Secundária , Pediatria , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/provisão & distribuição , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Seguro Saúde , Medicina Interna , Masculino , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Polissacarídeos Bacterianos/administração & dosagem , Polissacarídeos Bacterianos/imunologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Setor Privado , Prática Profissional , Setor Público , Estudos de Amostragem , Justiça Social , Estados Unidos , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA