Immobilization of Penicillin G Acylase on Vinyl Sulfone-Agarose: An Unexpected Effect of the Ionic Strength on the Performance of the Immobilization Process.

Penicillin G acylase (PGA) from Escherichia coli was immobilized on vinyl sulfone (VS) agarose. The immobilization of the enzyme failed at all pH values using 50 mM of buffer, while the progressive increase of ionic strength permitted its rapid immobilization under all studied pH values. This suggests that the moderate hydrophobicity of VS groups is enough to transform the VS-agarose in a heterofunctional support, that is, a support bearing hydrophobic features (able to adsorb the proteins) and chemical reactivity (able to give covalent bonds). Once PGA was immobilized on this support, the PGA immobilization on VS-agarose was optimized with the purpose of obtaining a stable and active biocatalyst, optimizing the immobilization, incubation and blocking steps characteristics of this immobilization protocol. Optimal conditions were immobilization in 1 M of sodium sulfate at pH 7.0, incubation at pH 10.0 for 3 h in the presence of glycerol and phenyl acetic acid, and final blocking with glycine or ethanolamine. This produced biocatalysts with stabilities similar to that of the glyoxyl-PGA (the most stable biocatalyst of this enzyme described in literature), although presenting just over 55% of the initially offered enzyme activity versus the 80% that is recovered using the glyoxyl-PGA. This heterofuncionality of agarose VS beads opens new possibilities for enzyme immobilization on this support.

Enzyme co-immobilization: Always the biocatalyst designers' choice or not?

The increasing relevance of cascade reactions in biocatalysis has sparked a great interest for enzyme co-immobilization. Enzyme co-immobilization allows access to some kinetic advantages that in some instances are necessary to get the desired product, avoiding side-reactions. However, the kinetic effect is very relevant mainly at the initial reaction rates, while it may be less relevant in the whole reaction course, depending on the kinetic parameters of the involved enzymes. This review not only critically discusses the advantages but also the drawbacks of enzymes co-immobilization: immobilization on the same support and surface, under similar conditions, discarding the whole biocatalyst when one of the co-immobilized enzymes is inactivated. We will discuss when co-immobilization is almost compulsory, when the advantages of co-immobilization may not be enough to compensate their problems and when it should be fully discarded. The co-immobilization of cofactors and enzymes bears special interest, as this can open up the opportunity to the building of artificial cells and extremely complex one-pot transformations. Finally, some recent strategies to overcome some the co-immobilization problems will be presented.