ASA Physical Status Determination by General Internists and Impact on Cardiac Risk Assessment.

OBJECTIVES: Estimating cardiac risk is important for preoperative evaluation, and several risk calculators incorporate the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score. The purpose of this study was to determine the concordance of ASA scores assigned by general internists and anesthesiologists and assess whether discrepancies affected cardiac risk estimation. METHODS: This observational study included military veterans evaluated in a preoperative evaluation clinic at a single center during a 12-month period. ASA scores were recorded by General Internal Medicine residents under the supervision of a General Internal Medicine attending, performing a preoperative medical consultation, and were compared with ASA scores assigned by an anesthesiologist on the day of surgery. ASA scores and Gupta Cardiac Risk Scores incorporating each ASA score were compared. RESULTS: Data were collected on 206 patients, 163 of whom had surgery within 90 days and were included. ASA scores were concordant in 60 patients (37.3%), whereas the ASA scores were rated lower by the general internist in 101 (62.0%) and higher in 2 (1.2%). Interrater reliability was low (κ = 0.08), and general internist scores were significantly lower than anesthesiologist scores (P < 0.01). Gupta Cardiac Risk Scores were calculated for 160 patients, and they exceeded 1% in 14 patients using the anesthesiologist ASA score, compared with 5 patients using the general internist score. CONCLUSIONS: ASA scores assigned by general internists in this study were significantly lower than those assigned by anesthesiologists, and these discrepancies in the ASA score can lead to substantially different conclusions about cardiac risk.

Psychosocial Determinants of Readmission After Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life and psychosocial determinants of health, such as health literacy and social support, are associated with increased health care utilization and adverse outcomes in medical populations. However, the effect on surgical health care utilization is less understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the effect of patient-reported quality of life and psychosocial determinants of health on unplanned hospital readmissions in a surgical population. RESEARCH DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study using patient interviews at the time of hospital discharge from a Veterans Affairs hospital. SUBJECTS: We include Veterans undergoing elective inpatient general, vascular, or thoracic surgery (August 1, 2015-June 30, 2017). MEASURES: We assessed unplanned readmission to any medical facility within 30 days of hospital discharge. RESULTS: A total of 736 patients completed the 30-day postoperative follow-up, and 16.3% experienced readmission. Lower patient-reported physical and mental health, inadequate health literacy, and discharge home with help after surgery or to a skilled nursing or rehabilitation facility were associated with an increased incidence of readmission. Classification regression identified the patient-reported Veterans Short Form 12 (SF12) Mental Component Score <31 as the most important psychosocial determinant of readmission after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health concerns, inadequate health literacy, and lower social support after hospital discharge are significant predictors of increased unplanned readmissions after major general, vascular, or thoracic surgery. These elements should be incorporated into routinely collected electronic health record data. Also, discharge plans should accommodate varying levels of health literacy and consider how the patient's mental health and social support needs will affect recovery.

The Association of Enhanced Recovery Pathway and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury is associated with increased postoperative length of hospital stay and increases the risk of postoperative mortality. The association between the development of postoperative acute kidney injury and the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the relationship between the implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway and the development of postoperative acute kidney injury. DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery pathway were compared to a hospital historical National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colorectal registry of patients. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 1052 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery from 2012 through 2016 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The development of postoperative acute kidney injury was the primary outcome measured. RESULTS: Patients undergoing an enhanced recovery pathway had significantly greater rates of postoperative acute kidney injury than patients not undergoing an enhanced recovery pathway (13.64% vs 7.08%; p < 0.01). Our adjusted model indicated that patients who underwent an enhanced recovery pathway (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.48-3.59; p < 0.01) had an increased risk of acute kidney injury. Patients who developed acute kidney injury in the enhanced recovery cohort had a significantly longer median length of stay than those who did not (median 4 (interquartile range, 4-9) vs 3 (interquartile range, 2-5) days; p=0.04). LIMITATIONS: This study did not utilize urine output as a modality for detecting acute kidney injury. Data are limited to a sample of patients from a large academic medical center participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Interventions or programs in place at our institution that aimed at infection reduction or other initiatives with the goal of improving quality were not accounted for in this study. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is independently associated with the development of postoperative acute kidney injury.See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B69. LA ASOCIACIÓN DE VÍA DE RECUPERACIÓN MEJORADA Y LESIÓN RENAL AGUDA EN PACIENTES DE CIRUGÍA COLORRECTAL: La lesión renal aguda se asocia con una mayor duración en la estancia hospitalaria y aumenta el riesgo de la mortalidad postoperatoria. La asociación entre el desarrollo de la lesión renal aguda postoperatoria y la implementación de un protocolo de Recuperación Mejorada después de la cirugía, sigue sin ser clara.Examinar la relación entre la implementación de una vía de Recuperación Mejorada y el desarrollo de lesión renal aguda postoperatoria.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo, de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente, de pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía colorrectal electiva, en una vía de Recuperación Mejorada, se comparó con el registro histórico de los pacientes colorrectales del Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica.Universidad de Alabama en Birmingham, un centro de referencia terciario.Un total de 1052 pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal electiva desde 2012 hasta 2016.Desarrollo de lesión renal aguda postoperatoria.Los pacientes sometidos a una vía de Recuperación Mejorada, tuvieron tasas significativamente mayores de lesiones renales agudas postoperatorias, en comparación con los pacientes de Recuperación no Mejorada (13.64% vs 7.08%; p < 0.01). Nuestro modelo ajustado indicó que los pacientes que se sometieron a una vía de Recuperación Mejorada (OR, 2.31; IC, 1.48-3.59; p < 0.01) tuvieron un mayor riesgo de lesión renal aguda. Los pacientes que desarrollaron daño renal agudo en la cohorte de Recuperación Mejorada, tuvieron una estadía mediana significativamente más larga en comparación con aquellos que no [mediana 4 (rango intercuartil (RIC) 4-9) versus 3 (RIC 2-5) días; p = 0.04].Este estudio no utilizó la producción de orina como una modalidad para detectar daño renal agudo. Los datos se limitan a una muestra de pacientes de un gran centro médico académico, que participa en el Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica. Las intervenciones o programas implementados en nuestra institución, destinados a la reducción de infecciones u otras iniciativas, con el objetivo de mejorar la calidad, no se tomaron en cuenta para este estudio.La implementación de una Recuperación Mejorada después del protocolo de cirugía, se asocia independientemente con el desarrollo de lesión renal aguda postoperatoria.Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B69. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz-Healy).

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Eliminates Racial Disparities in Postoperative Length of Stay After Colorectal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on racial disparities in postoperative length of stay (pLOS) after colorectal surgery. BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in surgical outcomes exist. We hypothesized that ERAS would reduce disparities in pLOS between black and white patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing ERAS in 2015 were 1:1 matched by race/ethnicity, age, sex, and procedure to a pre-ERAS group from 2010 to 2014. After stratification by race/ethnicity, expected pLOS was calculated using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Risk Calculator. Primary outcome was the observed pLOS and observed-to-expected difference in pLOS. Secondary outcomes were National Surgical Quality Improvement Project postoperative complications including 30-day readmissions and mortality. Adjusted sensitivity analyses on pLOS were also performed. RESULTS: Of 420 patients (210 ERAS and 210 pre-ERAS) examined, 28.3% were black. Black and white patients were similar in age, body mass index, sex, American Anesthesia Association class, and minimally invasive approaches. Within the pre-ERAS group, black patients stayed a mean of 2.7 days longer than expected compared with white patients (P < 0.05). Overall, ERAS patients had a significantly shorter pLOS (5.7 vs 8 days) and observed-to-expected difference (-0.7 vs 1.4 days) compared with pre-ERAS patients (P < 0.01). In the ERAS group, disparities in pLOS were reduced with no differences in readmissions or mortality between black and white patients. On sensitivity analyses, race/ethnicity remained a significant predictor of pLOS among pre-ERAS patients, but not for ERAS patients. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS eliminated racial differences in pLOS between black and white patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Reduced pLOS occurred without increases in mortality, readmissions, and most postoperative complications. ERAS may provide a practical approach to reducing disparities in surgical outcomes.

The Obese Colorectal Surgery Patient: Surgical Site Infection and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Obese patients undergoing colorectal surgery are at increased risk for adverse outcomes. It remains unclear whether these risks can be further defined with more discriminatory stratifications of obesity. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to understand the association between BMI and 30-day postoperative outcomes, including surgical site infection, among patients undergoing colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: The 2011-2013 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used. PATIENTS: Patients included those undergoing elective colorectal surgery in 2011-2013 who were assessed by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BMI was categorized into World Health Organization categories. Primary outcome was 30-day postoperative surgical site infection. Secondary outcomes included all American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-assessed 30-day postoperative complications. RESULTS: Our cohort included 74,891 patients with 4.4% underweight (BMI <18.5), 29.0% normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), 33.0% overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9), 19.8% obesity class I (BMI 30.0-34.9), 8.4% obesity class II (BMI 35.0-39.9), and 5.5% obesity class III (BMI ≥40.0). Compared with normal-weight patients, obese patients experienced incremental odds of surgical site infection from class I to class III (I: OR = 1.5 (95% CI, 1.4-1.6); II: OR = 1.9 (95% CI, 1.7-2.0); III: OR = 2.1 (95% CI, 1.9-2.3)). Obesity class III patients were most likely to experience wound disruption, sepsis, respiratory or renal complication, and urinary tract infection. Mortality was highest among underweight patients (OR = 1.3 (95% CI, 1.0-1.8)) and lowest among overweight (OR = 0.8 (95% CI, 0.6-0.9)) and obesity class I patients (OR = 0.8 (95% CI, 0.6-1.0)). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals may not represent patients outside of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and cannot assign causation or account for interventions to improve surgical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with increasing BMI showed an incremental and independent risk for adverse 30-day postoperative outcomes, especially surgical site infections. Strategies to address obesity preoperatively should be considered to improve surgical outcomes among this population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A607.

The Fifth Vital Sign: Postoperative Pain Predicts 30-day Readmissions and Subsequent Emergency Department Visits.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that inpatient postoperative pain trajectories are associated with 30-day inpatient readmission and emergency department (ED) visits. BACKGROUND: Surgical readmissions have few known modifiable predictors. Pain experienced by patients may reflect surgical complications and/or inadequate or difficult symptom management. METHODS: National Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement data on inpatient general, vascular, and orthopedic surgery from 2008 to 2014 were merged with laboratory, vital sign, health care utilization, and postoperative complications data. Six distinct postoperative inpatient patient-reported pain trajectories were identified: (1) persistently low, (2) mild, (3) moderate or (4) high trajectories, and (5) mild-to-low or (6) moderate-to-low trajectories based on postoperative pain scores. Regression models estimated the association between pain trajectories and postdischarge utilization while controlling for important patient and clinical variables. RESULTS: Our sample included 211,231 surgeries-45.4% orthopedics, 37.0% general, and 17.6% vascular. Overall, the 30-day unplanned readmission rate was 10.8%, and 30-day ED utilization rate was 14.2%. Patients in the high pain trajectories had the highest rates of postdischarge readmissions and ED visits (14.4% and 16.3%, respectively, P < 0.001). In multivariable models, compared with the persistently low pain trajectory, there was a dose-dependent increase in postdischarge ED visits and readmission for pain-related diagnoses, but not postdischarge complications (χ trend P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative pain trajectories identify populations at risk for 30-day readmissions and ED visits, and do not seem to be mediated by postdischarge complications. Addressing pain control expectations before discharge may help reduce surgical readmissions in high pain categories.

Reduced disparities and improved surgical outcomes for Asian Americans with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest Asian Americans may have improved oncologic outcomes compared with other ethnicities. We hypothesized that Asian Americans with colorectal cancer would have improved surgical outcomes in mortality, postoperative complications (POCs), length of stay (LOS), and readmissions compared with other racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: We queried the 2011-2014 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer and stratified patients by race. Primary outcome was 30-d mortality with secondary outcomes including POCs, LOS, and 30-d readmission. Stepwise backward logistic regression analyses and incident rate ratio calculations were performed to identify risk factors for disparate outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 28,283 patients undergoing colorectal surgery for malignancy, racial/ethnic groups were divided into Caucasian American (84%), African American (12%), or Asian American (4%). On unadjusted analyses, compared with other racial/ethnic groups, Asian Americans were more likely to have normal weight, not smoke, and had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 1 or 2 (P < 0.001). Postoperatively, Asian Americans had the shortest LOS and the lowest rates of complications due to ileus, respiratory, and renal complications (P < 0.001). There were no racial differences in 30-d mortality or readmission. On adjusted analyses, Asian American race was independently associated with less postoperative ileus (odds ratio 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.98, P < 0.001) and decreased LOS by 13% and 4% compared with African American and Caucasian American patients, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Asian Americans undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer have shorter LOS and fewer POCs when compared with other racial/ethnic groups without differences in 30-d mortality or readmissions. The mechanism(s) underlying these disparities will require further study, but may be a result of patient, provider, and healthcare system differences.

Racial disparities in length-of-stay persist even with no postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND: To determine the contribution of race to postoperative length-of-stay in elective colorectal surgery without complications. METHODS: The 2012-2013 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Colectomy-Targeted Database was queried for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery without complications. After stratifying by race, univariate/bivariate comparisons were made. On adjusted comparison, predictors of postoperative length-of-stay were identified along with incident rate ratios and Least Squares Means for predicted length-of-stays. RESULTS: Of 28,480 elective colorectal surgeries, 19,898 patients had no postoperative complications. Patients stratified to white (84%), black (8%), Hispanic (3%), and Asian (3%). Overall mean postoperative length-of-stay was 4.8 d, with black patients having the longest at 5.3 d (P < 0.05). After covariate adjustment, black race increased postoperative length-of-stay by 9%, 7%, and 6% compared to white, Hispanic, and Asian patients, respectively (P < 0.05). No statistical difference existed in postoperative length-of-stay for Hispanic and Asian patients versus white patients. Adjusted postoperative length-of-stay was 5.1 d for black patients compared to 4.7, 4.8, and 4.8 d for white, Hispanic, and Asian patients, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Black patients have significantly longer postoperative length-of-stay after elective colorectal surgery even if no postoperative complications occur. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanism(s) for these disparities.

Emotional intelligence in surgery is associated with resident job satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Emotional intelligence (EI) has been associated with improved work performance and job satisfaction in several industries. We evaluated whether EI was associated with higher measures of work performance and job satisfaction in surgical residents. METHODS: We distributed the validated Trait EI Questionnaire and job satisfaction survey to all general surgery residents at a single institution in 2015. EI and job satisfaction scores were compared with resident performance using faculty evaluations of clinical competency-based surgical milestones and standardized test scores including the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE). Statistical comparison was made using Pearson correlation and simple linear regression adjusting for postgraduate year level. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 68.9% with 31 resident participants. Global EI was associated with scores on USMLE Step 2 (r = 0.46, P = 0.01) and Step 3 (r = 0.54, P = 0.01) but not ABSITE percentile scores (r = 0.06, P = 0.77). None of the 16 surgical milestone scores were significantly associated with global EI or EI factors before or after adjustment for postgraduate level. Global EI was associated with overall job satisfaction (r = 0.37, P = 0.04). Of the facets of job satisfaction, global EI was significantly associated with views of supervision (r = 0.42, P = 0.02) and nature of work (r = 0.41, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: EI was associated with job satisfaction and USMLE performance but not ACGME competency-based milestones or ABSITE scores. EI may be an important factor for fulfillment in surgical training that is not currently captured with traditional in-training performance measures.

Postoperative 30-day Readmission: Time to Focus on What Happens Outside the Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to understand the relative contribution of preoperative patient factors, operative characteristics, and postoperative hospital course on 30-day postoperative readmissions. BACKGROUND: Determining the risk of readmission after surgery is difficult. Understanding the most important contributing factors is important to improving prediction of and reducing postoperative readmission risk. METHODS: National Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program data on inpatient general, vascular, and orthopedic surgery from 2008 to 2014 were merged with laboratory, vital signs, prior healthcare utilization, and postoperative complications data. Variables were categorized as preoperative, operative, postoperative/predischarge, and postdischarge. Logistic models predicting 30-day readmission were compared using adjusted R and c-statistics with cross-validation to estimate predictive discrimination. RESULTS: Our study sample included 237,441 surgeries: 43% orthopedic, 39% general, and 18% vascular. Overall 30-day unplanned readmission rate was 11.1%, differing by surgical specialty (vascular 15.4%, general 12.9%, and orthopedic 7.6%, P < 0.001). Most common readmission reasons were wound complications (30.7%), gastrointestinal (16.1%), bleeding (4.9%), and fluid/electrolyte (7.5%) complications. Models using information available at the time of discharge explained 10.4% of the variability in readmissions. Of these, preoperative patient-level factors contributed the most to predictive models (R 7.0% [c-statistic 0.67]); prediction was improved by inclusion of intraoperative (R 9.0%, c-statistic 0.69) and postoperative variables (R 10.4%, c-statistic 0.71). Including postdischarge complications improved predictive ability, explaining 19.6% of the variation (R 19.6%, c-statistic 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative readmissions are difficult to predict at the time of discharge, and of information available at that time, preoperative factors are the most important.

Readmission rates after lower extremity bypass vary significantly by surgical indication.

OBJECTIVE: Readmission rates after vascular surgery are among the highest within surgical specialties, and lower extremity bypass has the highest readmission rate of vascular surgery procedures. We analyzed how 30-day readmissions and risk factors for readmissions vary by indication for lower extremity bypass. METHODS: We queried the 2012-2014 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program procedure-targeted vascular cohort to identify all patients who underwent lower extremity bypass. Emergent procedures and planned readmissions were excluded. Patients were stratified by surgical indication: claudication, critical limb ischemia rest pain (CLI RP), critical limb ischemia tissue loss (CLI TL), and other. The χ2 and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to test the differences between categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for predictors of readmission adjusted for preoperative factors that were selected a priori. RESULTS: The overall 30-day readmission rate among the 6112 patients who underwent lower extremity bypass was 14.8%. Readmission rates varied significantly on the basis of the indication for surgery. In unadjusted comparisons, 18.8% of patients with CLI TL were readmitted compared with 16.5% with CLI RP, 9.4% with claudication, and 8.2% with other indications (P < .001). After adjustment for preoperative factors, 30-day readmissions were higher for patients with CLI TL (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-2.06) and CLI RP (odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.09) compared with patients with claudication. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day readmission rates after lower extremity bypass vary significantly by surgical indication. Because lower extremity bypasses are performed for multiple indications, if readmission rates are publically reported and hospitals can be penalized for higher than expected readmission rates, the expected readmission rates should be adjusted for surgical indication.

Oral Antibiotic Bowel Preparation Significantly Reduces Surgical Site Infection Rates and Readmission Rates in Elective Colorectal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between oral antibiotic bowel preparation (OABP) and surgical site infection (SSI) rates in a national colectomy cohort. BACKGROUND: OABP for elective colorectal surgery has fallen out of favor. Large cohort studies show that OABP is associated with a 50% reduction in SSI after colectomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy cohort from 2011 to 2012 was performed to examine the association between use of OABP and outcomes of SSI, length of stay (LOS), and readmission after elective colectomy. Univariate and multivariable analyses for SSI were performed. RESULTS: The cohort included 8415 colorectal operations of which 5291 (62.9%) had a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach. Overall, 25.6% had no bowel preparation, 44.9% had mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) only, and 29.5% received OABP. The SSI rate was 11.1%, and it varied by preparation type: 14.9% no preparation, 12.0% MBP, and 6.5% OABP (P < 0.001). OABP group had significantly shorter hospital LOS: (median = 4, interquartile range: 3-6) versus other preparations (median LOS = 5) (P < 0.001). Readmission rates were lowest in OABP (8.1%) and highest in the no preparation group (11.8%). Multivariable logistic regressions found OABP associated with lower SSI [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-0.59]. Stratified models found OABP protective for SSI for both open procedures (ORadj = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.30-0.53) and MIS procedures (ORadj = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.36-0.65). CONCLUSIONS: OABP is associated with reduced SSI rates, shorter LOS, and fewer readmissions. Adoption of OABP before elective colectomy would reduce SSI without effecting LOS. The practice of MBP alone should be abandoned.

Higher Pain Catastrophizing and Preoperative Pain is Associated with Increased Risk for Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged postoperative opioid use (PPOU) is considered an unfavorable post-surgical outcome. Demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors have been associated with PPOU, but methods to prospectively identify patients at increased risk are lacking. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine whether an individual or a combination of several psychological factors could identify a subset of patients at increased risk for PPOU. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study with prospective baseline data collection and passive outcomes data collection. SETTING: A single VA medical center in the United States. METHODS: Patients were recruited from a preoperative anesthesia clinic where they were undergoing evaluation prior to elective surgery, and they completed a survey before surgery. The primary outcome was PPOU, defined as outpatient receipt of a prescribed opioid 31 to 90 days after surgery as determined from pharmacy records. Primary covariates of interest were pain catastrophizing, self-efficacy, and optimism. Additional covariates included social and demographic factors, pain severity, medication use, depression, anxiety, and surgical fear. RESULTS: Of 123 patients included in the final analyses, 30 (24.4%) had PPOU. In bivariate analyses, preoperative opioid use and preoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use were significantly associated with PPOU. The combination of high pain catastrophizing and high preoperative pain (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.41 - 7.79) was associated with higher odds of PPOU than either alone, and the association remained significant after adjusting for preoperative opioid use (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.04 - 6.29). LIMITATIONS: Patients were recruited from a single site, and the sample was not large enough to include potentially important variables such as procedure type. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of high pain catastrophizing and high preoperative pain has the potential to be a clinically useful means of identifying patients at elevated risk of PPOU.

Racial disparities in postoperative outcomes persist for patients with inflammatory bowel disease under a colorectal enhanced recovery program.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) reduce racial disparities in surgical outcomes for general colorectal surgery populations. It is unclear, however, if disparities in IBD populations are impacted by ERPs. METHODS: Retrospective study comparing IBD patients undergoing major elective colorectal operations before (2006-2014) and after (2015-2021) ERP implementation using ACS-NSQIP data. The primary outcome of length of stay (LOS) was analyzed by negative binomial regression, and secondary outcomes (complications and readmissions) by logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 466 IBD patients, 47% were pre-ERP and 53% were ERP patients. In multivariable analysis stratified by ERP period, Black race was associated with increased odds of complications in the pre-ERP (OR 3.6, 95%CI 1.4-9.3) and ERP groups (OR 3.1 95%CI 1.3-7.6). Race was not a predictor of LOS or readmission in either group. High social vulnerability was associated with increased odds of readmission pre-ERP (OR 15.1, 95%CI 2.1-136.3), but this disparity was mitigated under ERPs (OR 1.4, 95%CI 0.4-5.6). CONCLUSION: While ERPs mitigated some disparities by social vulnerability, racial disparities persist in IBD populations even under ERPs. Further work is needed to achieve surgical equity for IBD patients.

Challenging weekend discharges associated with excess length of stay in surgical patients at Veterans Affairs hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Challenging discharges can lead to prolonged hospital stays. We hypothesized that surgical patients discharged from Veterans Affairs hospitals on weekdays have longer hospital stays and greater excess length of stay. METHODS: We identified inpatient general and vascular procedures at Veterans Affairs hospitals from 2007 to 2014. Expected length of stay was calculated using a stratified negative binomial model adjusted for patient/operative characteristics. Excess length of stay was defined as the difference between observed and expected length of stay. RESULTS: We identified 135,875 patients (80.4% weekday discharges, 19.6% weekend discharges). The average length of stay was 7.5 days. Patients with weekday discharges spent on average 2.5 more days in the hospital compared with patients discharged on weekends (8.0 vs. 5.5 days, P < .001); 28.5% of patients with weekday discharges had an observed length of stay at least 1 day longer than expected, compared with 16.4% of patients with weekend discharges (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Surgical patients are less frequently discharged from Veterans Affairs hospitals on the weekends than during the week, and this corresponds to an increased excess length of stay for patients ultimately discharged on weekdays. Exploring the opportunity to coordinate safe weekend discharges may improve efficiency of post-surgery hospital care and reduce healthcare costs.

Characterizing the impact of verbal communication and health literacy in the patient-surgeon encounter.

BACKGROUND: Patients with limited health literacy (HL) have difficulty understanding written/verbal information. The quality of verbal communication is not well understood. Therefore, our aim was to characterize patient-surgeon conversations and identify opportunities for improvement. METHODS: New colorectal patient-surgeon encounters were audio-recorded and transcribed. HL was measured. Primary outcomes were rates-of-speech, understandability of words, patient-reported understanding, and usage of medical jargon/statistics. Secondary outcomes included length-of-visit (LOV), conversation possession time, patient-surgeon exchanges, and speech interruptions. RESULTS: Significant variations existed between surgeons in rates-of-speech and understandability of words (p < 0.05). Faster rates-of-speech were associated with significantly less understandable words (p < 0.05). Patient-reported understanding varied by HL and by surgeon. Conversation possession time and usage of medical jargon/statistics varied significantly by surgeon (p < 0.05) in addition to patient-surgeon exchanges and interruptions. Patients with limited HL had shorter LOV. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variations exist in how surgeons talk to patients. Opportunities to improve verbal communication include slowing speech and using more understandable words.

The association of health literacy and postoperative complications after colorectal surgery: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Health literacy is a determinant of health. Few studies characterize its association with surgical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery 2015-2020. Health literacy assessed using Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool. Outcomes were postoperative complications, LOS, readmissions, mortality. RESULTS: Of 552 patients, 46 (8.3%) had limited health literacy, 506 (91.7%) non-limited. Median age 57.7 years, 305 (55.1%) patients were female, 148 (26.8%) were Black. Limited patients had higher rates of overall complications (43.5% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.004), especially surgical site infections (21.7% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.04). Limited patients had longer LOS (5 vs 3.5 days, p = 0.006). Readmissions and mortality did not differ. On multivariable analysis, limited health literacy was independently associated with increased risk of complications (OR 2.03, p = 0.046), not LOS (IRR 1.05, p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: Limited health literacy is associated with increased likelihood of complications after colorectal surgery. Opportunities exist for health literate surgical care to improve outcomes for limited health literacy patients.