Direct care nurses on the shared governance journey towards positive patient outcomes.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe shared governance in action through the example of one paediatric institution's decision to institute daily chlorhexidine bathing. BACKGROUND: Shared governance processes are discussed extensively in the literature; however, implementation of the processes can be challenging. Recently nurses at one paediatric hospital were involved in a hospital-wide practice change where the theoretical approach of shared governance was actualised. Several questions arose from direct care nurses about unwarranted variations in bathing practices across settings and whether bathing standardisation could address the recent increase in central line-associated bloodstream infections. Shared governance council members identified daily chlorhexidine bathing as a potential intervention to standardise bathing across the hospital and to decrease infection rates. At this time, chlorhexidine bathing had been widely adopted in adult hospitals but was less commonly practiced in paediatric institutions. DESIGN: This is a position paper describing the use of shared governance to make a house-wide practice decision and positively impact patient outcomes. METHOD: Inquiry Council members conducted a systematic evidence search on best practices around chlorhexidine bathing. This evidence was used in Practice Council discussions to standardise house-wide practice. Once consensus was achieved, council members collaborated with Education Council to ensure understanding, competency, and the adoption and sustainment of the practice change. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with central lines are at decreased risk for acquiring a central line-associated blood stream infection due, in part, to the change in nursing practice to include daily chlorhexidine bathing. The shared governance structure was the vehicle through which this practice was vetted and instituted. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This paper provides a real-life example of leveraging shared governance structures and the direct care nurse leaders within the councils when an organisation faces critical needs in patient care.

The Phenotype of a Bone Marrow Transplant Nurse: Survival of the Fittest.

There is a need for proficient nursing practice in specialized critical care settings, such as a pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) Unit. The staffing crisis continues to be problematic for areas around the country. Nursing tenure has been positively correlated with improving patient outcomes and confidence in giving care, so efforts must be made to retain pediatric BMT nurses. The purpose of this study was to investigate factors of resilience and how it pertains to the retention of pediatric BMT nurses through (1) Understanding current BMT nursing turnover and trend why nurses are leaving; (2) Measure resilience throughout BMT nursing cohort, covering all tenure of nurses; and (3) Interview senior nurses within the cohort to identify themes relating to retention and resilience using grounded theory methodology. This research was carried out in the Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) Unit at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC). The study spanned from 2014 to 2019, during which researchers gathered extensive data to evaluate the turnover risk among BMT nurses. A detailed follow-up was conducted in 2019 to further assess this risk. To measure resilience levels, a group of 115 nurses in the unit completed the Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Additionally, in-depth interviews were conducted with 9 senior nurses in the cohort, continuing until theoretical saturation was reached, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing nurse turnover in the unit. Researchers looked retrospectively at nursing turnover from 2014 to 2019. Investigators determined the risk of new nurses leaving was between 22 and 24 months (HR 0.025). Further, follow-up was conducted for data points between 2019-present time, which showed a drastic change in the hazard rate curvature. However, the risk remained relatively the same at 22 to 24 months (HR 0.03). There was no statistical significance found between CD-RISC results and age (P = .465), gender (P = .725), working experience (P = .15), or education (P = .14). Through a constant comparative process, several themes were identified as positive, negative, and ambiguous contributions to the retention of nurses. The risk of nurses leaving after 2 years decreases significantly; therefore, we determined that a nurse with a commitment to pediatric BMT occurs with 2 years' experience. Although our initial hypothesis was that senior nurses had greater resilience than less tenured nurses, there was no statistical significance as the effect of resilience is small. However, we identified several additional factors pertinent to the pediatric BMT field which may be associated with nursing retention.