Clinical care given to victims of sexual assault at Kadoma General Hospital, Zimbabwe: a secondary data analysis, 2016.

BACKGROUND: Despite the guidelines for managing sexual assault being in place, victims of sexual assault attended to at Kadoma General Hospital consistently raised complaints related to the quality of care offered. Medicolegal data for sexual assault has been collected at the hospital since 2012. However, no analysis had been done regardless of complaints having been raised. We analysed the dataset to determine the quality of clinical care offered to sexual assault victims. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study based on secondary data was conducted. Epi. Info 7 software was used to analyse data and generate frequencies, measures of central tendency and proportions. RESULTS: We analysed 474 medical affidavits completed between January 2014 and July 2016. Thirty percent of the victims sought care within 72 h of the sexual assault. Baseline HIV testing was done in 23 (22%) and follow-up HIV test done in 2 (2%) of the victims. Post Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV was administered to 18 (51%), emergency contraception 9 (69%) and forensic evidence gathered in six (5%) of victims presenting within the prescribed 72 h of the sexual assault. Prophylactic antibiotics were given to 156 (33%). There were no documented counselling sessions for all victims whilst follow up care was given to 47 (10%) victims. CONCLUSION: Suboptimal clinical care was given to victims of sexual assault during the period 2014-2016. These findings suggest possible delayed presentation by victims of sexual assault as well as suboptimal administration of prophylaxis by health care workers. We recommend adherence to guidelines in managing sexual assault. Further research to determine factors for delayed presentation among sexual assault victims and quality of care provided to them is recommended.

Adverse Event Trends Within a Large-Scale, Routine, Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Program in Zimbabwe, 2014-2019.

BACKGROUND: Between 2008 and 2020, over 22.6 million male circumcisions (MCs) were performed among men ≥10 years in 15 priority countries of East and Southern Africa. Few studies from routine MC programs operating at scale describe trends of adverse events (AEs) or AE rates over time. SETTING: Routine program data from a large MC program in Zimbabwe. METHODS: χ2 compared characteristics of patients with AEs. Univariable and multivariable logistic models examined factors associated with AE severity. Cochran-Armitage trend tests compared AE rate trends by year (2014-2019), age, and MC method (2017-2019). RESULTS: From 2014 to 2019, 469,000 men were circumcised; of the total men circumcised, 38%, 27%, and 35% were conducted among individuals aged 10-14; 15-19; and ≥20 years, respectively. Most MCs (95%) used surgical (dorsal slit or forceps-guided) methods; 5% were device based (PrePex). AEs were reported among 632 (0.13%) MCs; 0.05% were severe. From 2015 to 2019, overall AE rates declined from 34/10,000 to 5/10,000 (P-value <0.001). Severe AE rates also decreased over this period from 12/10,000 to 2/10,000 (P-value <0.001). AE rates among younger clients, aged 10-14 (18/10,000) were higher than among older age men (9/10,000) aged ≥20 years (P < 0.001); however, there was no significant association between age and AE severity. CONCLUSION: AE rates each year and over time were lower than the World Health Organization acceptable maximum (2% AEs). ZAZIC quality assurance activities ensured guideline adherence, mentored clinicians to MC competency, promoted quality client education and counseling, and improved AE reporting over time. Decreases in AE rates are likely attributed to safety gains and increasing provider experience.

Evaluation of the adverse events following immunization surveillance system in Guruve district, Mashonaland Central 2017.

INTRODUCTION: An adverse event following immunisation is any untoward medical occurrence which follows vaccination. Frequency of adverse events ranges from 13% to 34% and they should be reported regardless of severity. From the beginning of 2016 to mid-2017, Guruve district in Zimbabwe did not report any AEFIs. This suggests the surveillance system may be failing to detect adverse events. We therefore evaluated the AEFI surveillance system in Guruve district. METHODS: We conducted a surveillance system evaluation using the updated Centers for Disease Control guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. We interviewed health workers and caregivers of babies under 2 years in Guruve district. We also reviewed all records on AEFI surveillance for the period of January 2016 to November 2017. RESULTS: We recruited 31 health workers and 33 caregivers into the study. Between January 2016 and mid-2017, 39% of the caregivers had children who had suffered AEFIs and 45% of the health workers had encountered AEFIs but none had been notified. The main reasons for failure to report AEFIs included health workers' fear of personal consequences and caregivers thinking that an adverse event was not serious enough to report. Knowledge of the surveillance system was good amongst the majority of health workers. All the resources needed by the surveillance system were available. CONCLUSION: We concluded that health workers in Guruve district were afraid to report adverse events following immunization and caregivers were reluctant to report mild adverse events hence the surveillance system was performing poorly and was not useful. However, the stability of the system and the good knowledge gives a good foundation for improving the surveillance system.