Economic analysis of a new four-panel rapid screening test in antenatal care in Kenya, Rwanda, and Uganda.

BACKGROUND: We performed an economic analysis of a new technology used in antenatal care (ANC) clinics, the ANC panel. Introduced in 2019-2020 in five Rwandan districts, the ANC panel screens for four infections [hepatitis B virus (HBV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), malaria, and syphilis] using blood from a single fingerstick. It increases the scope and sensitivity of screening over conventional testing. METHODS: We developed and applied an Excel-based economic and epidemiologic model to perform cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of this technology in Kenya, Rwanda, and Uganda. Costs include the ANC panel itself, its administration, and follow-up treatment. Effectiveness models predicted impacts on maternal and infant mortality and other outcomes. Key parameters are the baseline prevalence of each infection and the effectiveness of early treatment using observations from the Rwanda pilot, national and international literature, and expert opinion. For each parameter, we found the best estimate (with 95% confidence bound). RESULTS: The ANC panel averted 92 (69-115) disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per 1,000 pregnant women in ANC in Kenya, 54 (52-57) in Rwanda, and 258 (156-360) in Uganda. Net healthcare costs per woman ranged from $0.53 ($0.02-$4.21) in Kenya, $1.77 ($1.23-$5.60) in Rwanda, and negative $5.01 (-$6.45 to $0.48) in Uganda. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in dollars per DALY averted were $5.76 (-$3.50-$11.13) in Kenya, $32.62 ($17.54-$46.70) in Rwanda, and negative $19.40 (-$24.18 to -$15.42) in Uganda. Benefit-cost ratios were $17.48 ($15.90-$23.71) in Kenya, $6.20 ($5.91-$6.45) in Rwanda, and $25.36 ($16.88-$33.14) in Uganda. All results appear very favorable and cost-saving in Uganda. CONCLUSION: Though subject to uncertainty, even our lowest estimates were still favorable. By combining field data and literature, the ANC model could be applied to other countries.

Before and after implementation of group antenatal care in Rwanda: a qualitative study of women's experiences.

BACKGROUND: The Preterm Birth Initiative-Rwanda is conducting a 36-cluster randomized controlled trial of group antenatal and postnatal care. In the context of this trial, we collected qualitative data before and after implementation. The purpose was two-fold. First, to inform the design of the group care program before implementation and second, to document women's experiences of group care at the mid-point of the trial to make ongoing programmatic adjustments and improvements. METHODS: We completed 8 focus group discussions among women of reproductive age before group care implementation and 6 focus group discussions among women who participated in group antenatal care and/or postnatal care at 18 health centers that introduced the model, approximately 9 months after implementation. RESULTS: Before implementation, focus group participants reported both enthusiasm for the potential for support and insight from a group of peers and concern about the risk of sharing private information with peers who may judge, mock, or gossip. After implementation, group care participants reported benefits including increased knowledge, peer support, and more satisfying relationships with providers. When asked about barriers to group care participation, none of them cited concern about privacy but instead cited lack of financial resources, lack of cooperation from a male partner, and long distances to the health center. Finally, women stated that the group care experience would be improved if all participants and providers arrived on time and remained focused on the group care visit throughout. DISCUSSION: These results are consistent with other published reports of women's perceptions of group antenatal care, especially increased pregnancy- and parenting-related knowledge, peer support, and improved relationships with health care providers. Some results were unexpected, especially the consequences of staff allocation patterns that resulted in providers arriving late for group visits or having to leave during group visits to attend to other facility services, which diminished women's experiences of care. CONCLUSION: Group antenatal and postnatal care provide compelling benefits to women and families. If the model requires the addition of human resources at the health center, intensive reminder communications, and large-scale community outreach to benefit the largest number of pregnant and postnatal mothers, those additional resources required must be factored into any future decision to scale a group care model. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03154177 .

Cost-Effectiveness of Expanding Access to Primary Health Care in Rural Rwanda by Adding Laboratory-Equipped Health Posts: A Prospective, Controlled Study.

To improve access to affordable primary health care and preventive services, in 2019 Rwanda's Ministry of Health inaugurated eight laboratory-equipped second-generation health posts (SGHPs) in the Bugesera District. Patient fees through Rwanda's insurance system (mutuelles) funded most operational costs through a public-private partnership. This prospective, controlled trial evaluated the posts' impact and cost-effectiveness. Our evaluation matched the rural cells containing these posts to eight control cells in Bugesera without formal health posts. We assessed costs using 2 years of financial data; accessed use statistics at SGHPs, health centers, and in the international literature; interviewed 1,952 randomly selected residents; conducted eight focus groups; and performed difference-in-differences regressions and survival analyses. Second-generation health posts increased primary care use by 1.83 outpatient visits per person per year (P < 0.0001). Of the 10 prevention indicators compared with trends, two improved significantly with SGHPs (two showed nonsignificant improvements), and one indicator experienced a significant deterioration. Second-generation health posts generated health improvements at a low cost and achieved a small, but favorable, 5% margin of revenues over financial costs. Second-generation health posts produced a very favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of only $101 per disability-adjusted life year averted-only 13% of Rwanda's per-capita gross national income. In conclusion, SGHPs improved substantially the quantity of affordable outpatient care per person. However, net impacts on quality and completeness of care and prevention, although favorable, were small. For further improvements in access and quality of care, Rwanda's health authorities may wish to incentivize quality and strengthen coordination with other health system components.

Strengths and Weaknesses of Strategic Health Purchasing for Universal Health Coverage in Rwanda.

In the context of scarce resources and increasing health care costs, strategic purchasing is viewed as a key mechanism to spur countries' progress toward universal health coverage (UHC), by using limited resources more effectively. We applied the Strategic Health Purchasing Progress Tracking Framework to examine the health purchasing arrangements in three health financing schemes in Rwanda-the Community Based Health Insurance (CBHI) scheme, the Rwanda Social Security Board (RSSB) medical scheme, and performance-based financing (PBF). Data were collected from secondary and primary sources between September 2020 and March 2021.The objective of the study was to identify areas of progress in strategic purchasing that can be built on, and to identify areas of overlap, duplication, or conflict that limit progress in strategic purchasing to advance UHC goals. This study found that Rwanda has made progress in many areas of strategic purchasing and has a strong foundation for building further. However, some overlaps and duplication of functions weaken the power of purchasers to improve resource allocation, incentives for providers, and accountability. In addition, some of the policies within the purchasing functions could be made more strategic. In particular, open-ended fee-for-service payment in the CBHI scheme not only threatens the scheme's financial sustainability but also imposes a high administrative burden. Better alignment and integration of contracting, incentives, and information system design to provide timely and relevant information for purchasing decisions would contribute to more strategic health purchasing and ensure that Rwanda's health sector achievements are sustained and expanded.

Assessing the impact of group antenatal care on gestational length in Rwanda: A cluster-randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Research on group antenatal care in low- and middle-income contexts suggests high acceptability and preliminary implementation success. METHODS: We studied the effect of group antenatal care on gestational age at birth among women in Rwanda, hypothesizing that participation would increase mean gestational length. For this unblinded cluster randomized trial, 36 health centers were pair-matched and randomized; half continued individual antenatal care (control), half implemented group antenatal care (intervention). Women who initiated antenatal care between May 2017 and December 2018 were invited to participate, and included in analyses if they presented before 24 weeks gestation, attended at least two visits, and their birth outcome was obtained. We used a generalized estimating equations model for analysis. FINDINGS: In total, 4091 women in 18 control clusters and 4752 women in 18 intervention clusters were included in the analysis. On average, women attended three total antenatal care visits. Gestational length was equivalent in the intervention and control groups (39.3 weeks (SD 1.6) and 39.3 weeks (SD 1.5)). There were no significant differences between groups in secondary outcomes except that more women in control sites attended postnatal care visits (40.1% versus 29.7%, p = 0.003) and more women in intervention sites attended at least three total antenatal care visits (80.7% versus 71.7%, p = 0.003). No harms were observed. INTERPRETATION: Group antenatal care did not result in a difference in gestational length between groups. This may be due to the low intervention dose. We suggest studies of both the effectiveness and costs of higher doses of group antenatal care among women at higher risk of preterm birth. We observed threats to group care due to facility staff shortages; we recommend studies in which antenatal care providers are exclusively allocated to group antenatal care during visits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03154177.

Postnatal care in Rwanda: facilitators and barriers to postnatal care attendance and recommendations to improve participation.

BACKGROUND: Sub-Saharan Africa has the highest rates of neonatal mortality in the world with an estimated 1.2 million deaths within the first 28 days of life. Postnatal care (PNC) can contribute to reductions in morbidity and mortality in mothers and newborns through vital support that identifies danger signs and establishes valuable practices and referral processes. METHODS: This qualitative data was collected as a part the East Africa Preterm Birth Initiative (PTBi-EA) to guide development of a group antenatal (ANC) and PNC model in Rwanda. Key-informant in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in four districts. Sixteen FGDs with 180 participants and 22 IDIs were completed at the time of thematic saturation. RESULTS: Four themes highlighted facilitators and barriers to PNC attendance and recommendations to improve participation: 1) There is little awareness in the community of what the PNC package is; PNC 4 in particular is not well understood; 2) PNC visits by community health workers (CHWs) are well accepted and valued; 3) Providers perceive PNC 4 as an added burden to an already high workload; 4) Community structures exist to better disseminate key messages about PNC, but have not yet been effectively utilized. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative work provides evidence that the PNC package was not initially well understood. Regardless, PNC service delivery performed by CHWs in Rwanda is well accepted and appreciated by the population, providing assurance that the full package has potential to be well utilized and valued by the population.

Use of a Facilitated Group Process to Design and Implement a Group Antenatal and Postnatal Care Program in Rwanda.

INTRODUCTION: The government of Rwanda is exploring strategies that may reduce the incidence of prematurity and low birth weight. Large-scale implementation of group antenatal care (ANC) and postnatal care (PNC) within the context of the Rwanda national health care system is under consideration. To launch a cluster randomized controlled trial of group ANC and PNC in 5 districts in Rwanda, the implementation team needed a customized group care model for this context and trained health care workers to deliver the program. PROCESS: Adapting the group ANC and group PNC model for the Rwandan context was accomplished through a group process identical to that which is fundamental to group care. A technical working group composed of 10 Rwandan maternal-child health stakeholders met 3 times over the course of 3 months, for 4 to 8 hours each time. Their objectives were to consider the evidence on group ANC, agree on the priorities and constraints of their ANC delivery system, and ultimately define the content and structure of a combined group ANC and PNC model for implementation in Rwanda. The same group process was employed to train health care workers to act as group ANC facilitators. OUTCOMES: A customized group ANC and PNC model and guidelines for its introduction were developed in the context of a cluster randomized controlled trial in 36 health centers. Descriptions of this model and the implementation plan are included in this article. DISCUSSION: Our experience suggests that the group process fundamental to successful group ANC and PNC is an effective method to customize and implement this innovative health services delivery model in a new context and is instrumental in achieving local ownership.

The health system cost of post-abortion care in Rwanda.

Based on research conducted in 2012, we estimate the cost to the Rwandan health-care system of providing post-abortion care (PAC) due to unsafe abortions, a subject of policy importance not studied before at the national level. Thirty-nine public and private health facilities representing three levels of health care were randomly selected for data collection from key care providers and administrators for all five regions. Using an ingredients approach to costing, data were gathered on drugs, supplies, material, personnel time and hospitalization. Additionally, direct non-medical costs such as overhead and capital costs were also measured. We found that the average annual PAC cost per client, across five types of abortion complications, was $93. The total cost of PAC nationally was estimated to be $1.7 million per year, 49% of which was expended on direct non-medical costs. Satisfying all demands for PAC would raise the national cost to $2.5 million per year. PAC comprises a significant share of total expenditure in reproductive health in Rwanda. Investing more resources in provision of contraceptive services to prevent unwanted or mistimed pregnancies would likely reduce health systems costs.