Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 97
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 2024 Jun 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914160

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of MRI-guided cryoablation of prostate cancer metastatic lymph nodes(LN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with prostate cancer who underwent MRI guided lymph node (LN) ablation from September 2013 to June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 6 patients were excluded because adequate ablation margins (3-5mm) could not be achieved secondary to adjacent structures. The remaining 46 patients (mean age, 70±7 years) underwent 55 MRI-guided cryoablation procedures of metastatic LN (25 in pelvic side wall, 20 within pelvic region and 10 in the abdomen) with procedural intent of complete ablation. Locoregional tumor control (i.e. technical success in the target LN) was evaluated on initial follow-up PET scans at mean of 4±2 months. Pre- and post-ablation prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels were recorded. Imaging follow-up continued until a median of 27.5 months (3-108 months). RESULTS: Ninety-five percent (52/55) of treated LN demonstrated no considerable activity on PET scans at initial follow-up at 4±2 months. PSA decreased to undetectable level of <0.1ng/mL after cryoablation in 14/46 patients (30.4%) with corresponding lack of activity in 13/46 (28.2%) patients on continued PET imaging follow-up. Only 6/55 (10.9%) patients had transient adverse events which all resolved with no long term sequalae. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided percutaneous cryoablation of metastatic LN is a safe and technically effective technique for treating metastatic prostate cancer in LN.

2.
Lancet Oncol ; 23(7): 910-918, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35714666

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Men with grade group 2 or 3 prostate cancer are often considered ineligible for active surveillance; some patients with grade group 2 prostate cancer who are managed with active surveillance will have early disease progression requiring radical therapy. This study aimed to investigate whether MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy can safely reduce treatment burden for patients with localised grade group 2 or 3 intermediate-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: In this single-arm, multicentre, phase 2b study conducted at eight health-care centres in the USA, we recruited men aged 50 years and older with unilateral, MRI-visible, primary, intermediate-risk, previously untreated prostate adenocarcinoma (prostate-specific antigen ≤20 ng/mL, grade group 2 or 3; tumour classification ≤T2) confirmed on combined biopsy (combining MRI-targeted and systematic biopsies). MRI-guided focused ultrasound energy, sequentially titrated to temperatures sufficient for tissue ablation (about 60-70°C), was delivered to the index lesion and a planned margin of 5 mm or more of normal tissue, using real-time magnetic resonance thermometry for intraoperative monitoring. Co-primary outcomes were oncological outcomes (absence of grade group 2 and higher cancer in the treated area at 6-month and 24-month combined biopsy; when 24-month biopsy data were not available and grade group 2 or higher cancer had occurred in the treated area at 6 months, the 6-month biopsy results were included in the final analysis) and safety (adverse events up to 24 months) in all patients enrolled in the study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01657942, and is no longer recruiting. FINDINGS: Between May 4, 2017, and Dec 21, 2018, we assessed 194 patients for eligibility and treated 101 patients with MRI-guided focused ultrasound. Median age was 63 years (IQR 58-67) and median concentration of prostate-specific antigen was 5·7 ng/mL (IQR 4·2-7·5). Most cancers were grade group 2 (79 [78%] of 101). At 24 months, 78 (88% [95% CI 79-94]) of 89 men had no evidence of grade group 2 or higher prostate cancer in the treated area. No grade 4 or grade 5 treatment-related adverse events were reported, and only one grade 3 adverse event (urinary tract infection) was reported. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: 24-month biopsy outcomes show that MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy is safe and effectively treats grade group 2 or 3 prostate cancer. These results support focal therapy for select patients and its use in comparative trials to determine if a tissue-preserving approach is effective in delaying or eliminating the need for radical whole-gland treatment in the long term. FUNDING: Insightec and the National Cancer Institute.


Assuntos
Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata , Idoso , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia
3.
J Urol ; 207(5): 1038-1047, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34981952

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Our goal was to evaluate the long-term prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging of the prostatectomy bed in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy who were studied by prostatectomy bed magnetic resonance imaging for suspected local recurrence were retrospectively evaluated. Locally recurrent tumors were noted and measured from imaging reports. Patients with nodal/bone lesions at the time of imaging were excluded. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess systemic progression-free and prostate cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: A total of 896 men were enrolled and the imaging positive and negative groups for local recurrent tumor consisted of 441 and 455 men, respectively. On univariate analysis, preoperative prostate specific antigen (p=0.02), clinical tumor stage (p=0.006), pathological Gleason score from prostatectomy (p=0.02), subsequent salvage radiotherapy (p <0.001), biochemical recurrence to magnetic resonance imaging time interval (p <0.001), age at magnetic resonance imaging (p=0.047) and prostate specific antigen at magnetic resonance imaging (p <0.001) were significantly different between magnetic resonance imaging positive and negative groups. Patients with negative magnetic resonance imaging results had worse systemic progression-free survival rates (p=0.025) and better prostate cancer-specific survival (p=0.016) than those with recurrence. Larger lesion size significantly increased risk of prostate cancer death (hazard ratio: 1.07; p <0.001). On multivariable analysis, pathological Gleason scores ≥7 were independent prognostic factors of systemic progression (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Prostatectomy bed magnetic resonance imaging provides long-term prognostic information for the evaluation of patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy. Post-prostatectomy patients with recurrent lesions on imaging had longer progression-free survival but shorter prostate cancer-specific survival compared to those without lesions. Additionally, those with larger lesions were associated with poorer cancer-specific survival.


Assuntos
Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
N Engl J Med ; 378(19): 1767-1777, 2018 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29552975

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without targeted biopsy, is an alternative to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy for prostate-cancer detection in men with a raised prostate-specific antigen level who have not undergone biopsy. However, comparative evidence is limited. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, we assigned men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who had not undergone biopsy previously to undergo MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, or standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. Men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group underwent a targeted biopsy (without standard biopsy cores) if the MRI was suggestive of prostate cancer; men whose MRI results were not suggestive of prostate cancer were not offered biopsy. Standard biopsy was a 10-to-12-core, transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. The primary outcome was the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer. RESULTS: A total of 500 men underwent randomization. In the MRI-targeted biopsy group, 71 of 252 men (28%) had MRI results that were not suggestive of prostate cancer, so they did not undergo biopsy. Clinically significant cancer was detected in 95 men (38%) in the MRI-targeted biopsy group, as compared with 64 of 248 (26%) in the standard-biopsy group (adjusted difference, 12 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4 to 20; P=0.005). MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, was noninferior to standard biopsy, and the 95% confidence interval indicated the superiority of this strategy over standard biopsy. Fewer men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group than in the standard-biopsy group received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer (adjusted difference, -13 percentage points; 95% CI, -19 to -7; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of risk assessment with MRI before biopsy and MRI-targeted biopsy was superior to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in men at clinical risk for prostate cancer who had not undergone biopsy previously. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research and the European Association of Urology Research Foundation; PRECISION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02380027 .).


Assuntos
Biópsia/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Biópsia/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Controle de Qualidade , Qualidade de Vida , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
5.
J Urol ; 206(3): 715-724, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33872051

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We present final 5-year outcomes of the multicenter randomized sham-controlled trial of a water vapor therapy (Rezum™) for treatment of moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 197 subjects >50 years of age with International Prostate Symptom Score ≥13, maximum flow rate ≤15 ml/second and prostate volume 30 to 80 cc were randomized and followed for 5 years. From the control arm of 61 subjects, a subset of 53 subjects requalified and after 3 months received treatment as part of the crossover group and were also followed for 5 years. The total number of vapor treatments to each lobe of the prostate was determined by length of prostatic urethra and included middle lobe treatment per physician discretion. RESULTS: Significant improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms was observed at <3 months post-thermal therapy, remaining durable through 5 years in the treatment group (International Prostate Symptom Score reduced 48%, quality of life increased 45%, maximum flow rate improved 44%, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index decreased 48%). Surgical re-treatment rate was 4.4% with no reports of device or procedure related sexual dysfunction or sustained de novo erectile dysfunction. Results within the crossover group were similar through 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive treatment with water vapor thermal therapy provides significant and durable symptom relief as well as flow rate improvements through 5 years, with low surgical re-treatment rates and without impacting sexual function. It is a versatile therapy, providing successful treatment to obstructive lateral and middle lobes.


Assuntos
Hipertermia Induzida/métodos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/terapia , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Idoso , Estudos Cross-Over , Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipertermia Induzida/efeitos adversos , Hipertermia Induzida/estatística & dados numéricos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/diagnóstico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Qualidade de Vida , Retratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/epidemiologia , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/etiologia , Vapor , Estados Unidos
6.
Curr Opin Urol ; 31(3): 188-193, 2021 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33660620

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize the latest evidence for the use of salvage ablation of localized prostate cancer recurrences after primary therapy radiotherapy or prostatectomy. RECENT FINDINGS: Savage ablation represents a treatment option in select patients with localized recurrences following primary therapy of prostate cancer. Following radiotherapy, salvage cryotherapy and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) demonstrate encouraging oncologic outcomes. Biochemical recurrence-free survival ranged from 71% at 2 years to 44.2% at 10 years for cryotherapy and from 51% at 5 years to 28.7% at 10 years for HIFU. Rates of adverse effects appear to be more favorable with ablation compared to salvage surgery. Focal salvage ablation may offer a further balance between oncologic control and adverse effects. Following radical prostatectomy, recent data on the use of salvage ablation of local recurrences are less robust with only a few small studies published in the last 2 years. SUMMARY: Salvage ablation is an option for localized disease recurrences following primary treatment. Its role is most established for postradiation recurrence. It can also be utilized in postprostatectomy recurrence, although published data is more limited. Future studies are needed to further explore the role of ablation in both cohorts.


Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Crioterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Terapia de Salvação , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 32(5): 721-728.e2, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33663924

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate cryoneedle heating risks during magnetic resonance (MR)-guided cryoablation and potential strategies to mitigate these risks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ex vivo experiments were performed on a 1.5-Tesla (T) MR scanner using an MR conditional cryoablation system on porcine tissue phantoms. Cryoneedles were placed inside the tissue phantom either with or without an angiocatheter. Typical cryoneedle geometric configurations (including gas supply line) encountered in clinical procedures with low to high expected heating risks were investigated. Up to 4 fiber optic temperature sensors were attached to the cryoneedle/angiocatheter to measure the MR-induced cryoneedle heating at different locations during MR with different estimated specific absorption rates (SARs). The impact of cryoneedle heating on cryoablation treatment was studied by comparing temperature changes during 10-min freeze-thaw cycles with and without MR. RESULTS: Rapid temperature increases of >100 °C in < 2 minutes were observed during MR with a SAR of 2.1 W/kg. The temperature changes during a typical freeze-thaw cycle were also affected by cryoneedle heating when MR was used to monitor the ice-ball evolution. The observed cryoneedle heating was affected by multiple factors; including cryoneedle geometric configurations, sequence SAR, whether an angiocatheter was used, and whether the cryoneedle was connected to the rest of the cryoablation system. CONCLUSIONS: The ex vivo experiments demonstrated that MR could induce significant cryoneedle heating risks. Furthermore, MR-induced cryoneedle heating can affect temperatures in the ice-ball evolution during the freeze-thaw cycle. Several practical strategies to reduce the cryoneedle heating have been proposed.


Assuntos
Criocirurgia/instrumentação , Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista , Agulhas , Temperatura , Animais , Catéteres , Criocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Carne de Porco , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Sus scrofa , Fatores de Tempo
8.
Radiographics ; 41(6): 1785-1801, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34597216

RESUMO

Clinical use of MRI for guidance during interventional procedures emerged shortly after the introduction of clinical diagnostic MRI in the late 1980s. However, early applications of interventional MRI (iMRI) were limited owing to the lack of dedicated iMRI magnets, pulse sequences, and equipment. During the 3 decades that followed, technologic advancements in iMRI magnets that balance bore access and field strength, combined with the development of rapid MRI pulse sequences, surface coils, and commercially available MR-conditional devices, led to the rapid expansion of clinical iMRI applications, particularly in the field of body iMRI. iMRI offers several advantages, including superior soft-tissue resolution, ease of multiplanar imaging, lack of ionizing radiation, and capability to re-image the same section. Disadvantages include longer examination times, lack of MR-conditional equipment, less operator familiarity, and increased cost. Nonetheless, MRI guidance is particularly advantageous when the disease is best visualized with MRI and/or when superior soft-tissue contrast is needed for treatment monitoring. Safety in the iMRI environment is paramount and requires close collaboration among interventional radiologists, MR physicists, and all other iMRI team members. The implementation of risk-limiting measures for personnel and equipment in MR zones III and IV is key. Various commercially available MR-conditional needles, wires, and biopsy and ablation devices are now available throughout the world, depending on the local regulatory status. As such, there has been tremendous growth in the clinical applications of body iMRI, including localization of difficult lesions, biopsy, sclerotherapy, and cryoablation and thermal ablation of malignant and nonmalignant soft-tissue neoplasms. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.


Assuntos
Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista , Biópsia , Previsões , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Radiologistas
9.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 17(5): 506-513, 2019 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31085758

RESUMO

Prostate cancer (PCa) represents a significant source of morbidity and mortality for men in the United States, with approximately 1 in 9 being diagnosed with PCa in their lifetime. The role of imaging in the evaluation of men with PCa has evolved and currently plays a central role in diagnosis, treatment planning, and evaluation of recurrence. Appropriate use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and MRI-guided transrectal ultrasound (MR-TRUS) biopsy increases the detection of clinically significant PCa while decreasing the detection of clinically insignificant PCa. This process may help patients with clinically insignificant PCa avoid the adverse effects of unnecessary therapy. In the setting of a known PCa, patients with low-grade disease can be observed using active surveillance, which often includes a combination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, serial mpMRI, and, if indicated, follow-up systematic and targeted TRUS-guided tissue sampling. mpMRI can provide important information in the posttreatment setting, but PET/CT is creating a paradigm shift in imaging standards for patients with locally recurrent and metastatic PCa. This article examines the strengths and limitations of mpMRI for initial PCa diagnosis, active surveillance, recurrent disease evaluation, and image-guided biopsies, and the use of PET/CT imaging in men with recurrent PCa. The goal of this review is to provide a rational basis for current NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for PCa as they pertain to the use of these advanced imaging modalities.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos
10.
J Urol ; 199(3): 726-733, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28916273

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We describe anatomical sites of recurrence in patients with prostate cancer who had biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy and who received radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy postoperatively. We performed 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were evaluated by 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to determine recurrence patterns and clinicopathological features. Recurrent sites were described as local only (seminal vesicle bed/prostate fossa, vesicourethral anastomosis and bladder neck) or distant metastatic disease. Features associated with the identification of any distant metastatic disease were evaluated by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 550 patients were identified. Treatment included androgen deprivation therapy in 108, radiotherapy in 201, and androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy in 241. Median prostate specific antigen at evaluation was 3.9, 3.6 and 2.8 ng/ml in patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy, radiotherapy and a combination, respectively. Recurrence developed locally in 77 patients (14%), as distant metastasis only in 411 (75%), and as local and distant metastatic disease in 62 (11%). On multivariable analysis treatment with radiotherapy (OR 7.18, 95% CI 2.92-17.65), and radiotherapy and hormonal therapy (OR 9.23, 95% CI 3.90-21.87, all p <0.01) was associated with increased odds of distant failure at evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging successfully identified patterns of recurrence after postoperative radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy at a median prostate specific antigen of less than 4 ng/ml. Half of this cohort had local only recurrence and/or a low disease burden limited to pelvic lymph nodes. These patients may benefit from additional local therapy. These data and this analysis may facilitate the evaluation of such patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Imagem Multimodal , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Pelve/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Idoso , Colina/farmacologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos
11.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1096: 159-184, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30324353

RESUMO

In 2018, the American Cancer Society (ACS) estimates that 164,690 new cases of prostate cancer will be diagnosed and 29,430 will die due to the prostate cancer in the United States (Siegel et al., CA Cancer J Clin 67:7-30, 2018). Many men with prostate cancer are often managed with aggressive therapy including radiotherapy or surgery. No matter how expertly done, these therapies carry significant risk and morbidity to the patient's health related quality of life with impact on sexual, urinary and bowel function (Potosky et al., J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1358-1367, 2004). A recent meta-analysis of 19 studies reviewing the use of surgery and radiation for prostate cancer demonstrated patients who received radiation were more likely to die from their disease as compared to surgery (Wallis et al., Eur Urol 70:21-30, 2016). Furthermore, screening programs using prostatic specific antigen (PSA) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided systematic biopsy have identified increasing numbers of low risk, low grade "localized" prostate cancer. This indolent nature of many prostate cancers presents a difficult decision of when to intervene given the possible comorbidities of aggressive treatment. Active surveillance has been increasingly instituted in order to balance cancer control versus treatment side effects (Jemal et al., CA Cancer J Clin 56:106-130, 2006). Although active debate continues on the suitability of focal or regional therapy for these low or intermediate risk prostate cancer patients, many unresolved issues remain which complicate this approach of management. Some of the largest unresolved issues are: prostate cancer multifocality, limitations of current biopsy strategies, suboptimal staging by accepted imaging modalities, less than robust prediction models for indolent prostate cancers and whether established curative therapies can be safely and effectively used following focal therapy for prostate cancer. In spite of these restrictions focal therapy continues to confront the current paradigm of therapy for low and even intermediate risk disease (Onik, Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 10:149-158, 2017). It has been proposed that early detection and proper characterization may play a role in preventing the development of metastatic disease (Vickers et al., BMJ 346:f2023, 2013). There is Level 1 evidence supporting detection and subsequent aggressive treatment of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer (Bill-Axelson et al., N Engl J Med 370:932-942, 2014). Therefore accurate assessment of cancer risk (i.e. grade and stage) using imaging and targeted biopsy is critical. Advances in prostate imaging with MRI have been accompanied with advances in MR guided therapy propelling prostate treatment solutions forward faster than ever.


Assuntos
Biópsia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Humanos , Masculino
13.
J Urol ; 197(1): 129-134, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27449262

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We identify sites and patterns of cancer recurrence in patients with post-prostatectomy biochemical relapse using 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography and endorectal coil multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and June 2015, 2,466 men underwent choline positron emission tomography for suspected prostate cancer relapse at our institution. Of these men 202 did not receive hormone or radiation therapy, underwent imaging with choline positron emission tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and were found to have disease recurrence. Overall patterns of recurrence were described, and factors associated with local only recurrence were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Median prostate specific antigen at positive scan was 2.3 ng/ml (IQR 1.4-5.5) with a median time from prostate specific antigen relapse to lesion visualization of 15 months (IQR 4.8-34.2). Of these 202 men 68 (33%) exhibited local only, 45 (22%) local plus metastatic and 89 (45%) metastatic only relapse. Pelvic node only relapse was observed in 39 (19%) men. Median prostate specific antigen at positive imaging for patients with local only, metastatic only and local plus metastatic relapse was 2.3, 2.7 and 2.2 ng/ml (p=0.46), with a median interval from biochemical recurrence to positive scan of 33.5, 7.0 and 15.0 months, respectively (p <0.001). On multivariable analysis time from biochemical recurrence to positive imaging was independently associated with local only recurrence (OR 1.10 for every 6-month increase, p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Combined choline positron emission tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy reveals an anatomically diverse pattern of recurrence. These findings have implications for optimizing the salvage treatment of patients with prostate cancer with relapse following surgery.


Assuntos
Radioisótopos de Carbono , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Biópsia por Agulha , Colina , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem Multimodal/métodos , Análise Multivariada , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Prognóstico , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Análise de Sobrevida
14.
J Urol ; 197(6): 1507-1516, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27993667

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We report 2-year outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial plus 1-year results of a crossover trial after treatment with convective radiofrequency water vapor thermal energy for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 197 men at least 50 years old with I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) 13 or greater, maximum flow rate 15 ml per second or less and prostate size 30 to 80 cc were randomized 2:1 to thermal therapy with the Rezum® System or a control group. Rigid cystoscopy with simulated active treatment sounds served as the control procedure. After unblinding at 3 months control subjects could requalify for crossover study. Convectively delivered radiofrequency thermal energy was delivered into obstructive prostate tissue, including the median lobe as needed. The primary efficacy end point was a change in severity of symptom scores. RESULTS: Convective radiofrequency thermal therapy improved urinary symptoms significantly over controls at 3 months and provided a sustained 51% reduction from baseline at 24 months (p <0.0001). This produced a 5 and 8-point or greater score decrease in 84% and 74% of subjects, respectively, at 24 months. Crossover subject symptoms, flow rate and quality of life measures were markedly improved after thermal therapy compared to after the control procedure (p = 0.024 to <0.0001). No de novo erectile dysfunction was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Convective radiofrequency water vapor thermal therapy is a minimally invasive office or outpatient procedure that provides early effective symptom relief that remains durable for 2 years and is applicable to the median lobe.


Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/terapia , Terapia por Radiofrequência , Convecção , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Terapia por Radiofrequência/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Eur Radiol ; 27(8): 3326-3332, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27975149

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to examine the safety and diagnostic utility of transgluteal CT-guided prostate biopsy for prostate sampling in patients without rectal access. METHODS: Seventy-three biopsies were performed in 65 patients over a 13-year period (2002-2015). Mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at biopsy was 7.8 ng/mL (range 0.37-31.5). Electronic medical records were reviewed for procedural details and complications. Mean PSA and number of cores in malignant and benign cohorts were compared with Student's t test. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 97.3% (71/73; mean cores 8, range 3-28). Of these, 43.6% (31/71) yielded malignancy (mean Gleason score 7, range 6-10) and 56.3% (40/71) yielded benign tissue. The only complication was an asymptomatic periprostatic hematoma (1/73; 1.4%). In 14 patients who underwent surgery, Gleason scores were concordant in 71.4% (10/14) and discordant in 28.6% (4/14; Gleason 6 on biopsy but Gleason 7 on surgical specimen). Mean effective radiation dose was 18.5 mSv (median 15.0, range 4.4-86.2). There was no significant difference in either mean PSA (p = 0.06) or number of core specimens (p = 0.33) between malignant and benign cohorts. CONCLUSION: CT-guided transgluteal prostate biopsy is highly safe and reliable for the detection of prostate cancer in men without rectal access. KEY POINTS: • Prostate cancer detection in men without rectal access is challenging. • CT-guided transgluteal prostate biopsy is safe and effective in these patients. • CT-guided biopsy may be particularly effective in diagnosing high-grade prostate cancer. • Unilateral CT-guided biopsy may be effective in patients with focal lesions. • The radiation exposure with this technique is acceptable.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Nádegas , Contraindicações de Procedimentos , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Próstata/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Radiografia Intervencionista/métodos , Reto
16.
J Urol ; 195(5): 1529-1538, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26614889

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This report reveals the results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled study using transurethral prostate convective water vapor thermal energy to treat lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men 50 years old or older with an International Prostate Symptom Score of 13 or greater, maximum flow rate of 15 ml per second or less and prostate size 30 to 80 cc were randomized 2:1 between thermal therapy with the Rezum® System and control. Thermal water vapor was injected into the transition zone and median lobe as needed. The control procedure was rigid cystoscopy with simulated active treatment sounds. The primary end point compared International Prostate Symptom Score reduction at 3 months. Treatment subjects were followed for 12 months. RESULTS: There were 197 men randomized (active 136, control 61). Thermal therapy and control International Prostate Symptom Score was reduced by 11.2 ± 7.6 and 4.3 ± 6.9 respectively (p <0.0001). Treatment subject baseline International Prostate Symptom Score of 22 decreased at 2 weeks (18.6, p=0.0006) and by 50% or greater at 3, 6 and 12 months, p <0.0001. The peak flow rate increased by 6.2 ml per second at 3 months and was sustained throughout 12 months (p <0.0001). No de novo erectile dysfunction was reported. Adverse events were mild to moderate and resolved quickly. CONCLUSIONS: Convective water vapor thermal therapy provides rapid and durable improvements in benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms and preserves erectile and ejaculatory function. Treatment can be delivered in an office or hospital setting using oral pain medication and is applicable to all prostate zones including the median lobe.


Assuntos
Hipertermia Induzida/métodos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Urodinâmica/fisiologia , Cistoscopia , Método Duplo-Cego , Seguimentos , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Vapor , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
J Sex Med ; 13(6): 924-33, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27129767

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Most surgical treatments for male lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia affect erectile and ejaculatory functions negatively, leading to patient dissatisfaction. AIM: To determine whether water vapor thermal therapy, when conducted in a randomized controlled trial, would significantly improve lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia and urinary flow rate while preserving erectile and ejaculatory functions. METHODS: Men at least 50 years old with International Prostate Symptom Scores of at least 13, a peak flow rate of at least 5 to no higher than 15 mL/s, and prostate volume of 30 to 80 cm(3) were randomized 2:1 between Rezum System thermal therapy and control. Thermal water vapor (103°C) was injected into lateral and median lobes as required for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The control procedure entailed rigid cystoscopy with simulated active treatment sounds. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blinded group (active = 136, control = 61) comparison occurred at 3 months and the active arm was followed to 12 months for International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, and sexual function using the International Index of Erectile Function and the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Function. The minimal clinically important difference in erectile function perceived by subjects as beneficial was determined for each erectile function severity category. Subjects not sexually active were censored from sexual function analysis. RESULTS: No treatment- or device-related de novo erectile dysfunction occurred after thermal therapy. International Index of Erectile Function and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Function scores were not different from the control group at 3 months or from baseline at 1 year. Ejaculatory bother score improved 31% over baseline (P = .0011). Also, 32% of subjects achieved minimal clinically important differences in erectile function scores at 3 months, and 27% at 1 year, including those with moderate to severe erectile dysfunction. International Prostate Symptom Score and peak flow rate were significantly superior to controls at 3 months and throughout 1 year (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Convective water vapor thermal therapy provides sustainable improvements for 12 months to lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary flow while preserving erectile and ejaculatory functions.


Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/terapia , Ereção Peniana , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cistoscopia , Método Duplo-Cego , Ejaculação , Disfunção Erétil/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vapor , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
J Urol ; 193(1): 111-6, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25150640

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We report salvage lymph node dissections for prostate cancer nodal recurrence detected by (11)C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in the setting of increasing prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent salvage lymph node dissection for prostate cancer nodal recurrence. Only patients previously treated with radical prostatectomy were included in the study and those with evidence of local recurrence were excluded from analysis. Primary end points included biochemical recurrence, systemic progression and cancer specific mortality. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2013, 52 men underwent salvage lymph node dissection. Before salvage lymph node dissection 78.8% (41 of 52) had some form of therapy after radical prostatectomy. Median age at salvage lymph node dissection was 60 years and median prostate specific antigen was 2.2 ng/ml (IQR 1.4-3.7). The median number of lymph nodes dissected was 21.5 (IQR 16-30) and the median number of positive nodes was 3.5 (IQR 1.2-6.5). Since salvage lymph node dissection 46.2% of the men (24 of 52) have had no further treatment, 34.6% (18 of 52) are on hormonal therapy and 19.2% (10 of 52) have received multiple different treatments. At the last followup at a median of 20 months (IQR 8-33), 57.7% (30 of 52) had prostate specific antigen remain less than 0.2 ng/ml, 75% (39 of 52) remained free of systemic progression and 96.2% of the men (50 of 52) were alive. Two patients died of prostate cancer. Three-year biochemical recurrence-free, systemic progression-free and cancer specific survival was 45.5%, 46.9% and 92.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This represents the largest U.S. series of salvage lymph node dissection in the setting of lymph node metastatic prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Although followup was short and the study lacked a randomized control group, salvage lymph node dissection may represent a valid treatment option.


Assuntos
Radioisótopos de Carbono , Colina , Excisão de Linfonodo , Imagem Multimodal , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Idoso , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação
20.
BJU Int ; 115(2): 295-9, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24552209

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate short-term outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and chronic urinary retention (CUR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients with CUR who underwent HoLEP or PVP at our institution over a 3-year period. CUR was defined as a persistent post-void residual urine volume (PVR) of >300 mL or refractory urinary retention requiring catheterisation. RESULTS: We identified 72 patients with CUR who underwent HoLEP and 31 who underwent PVP. Preoperative parameters including median catheterisation duration (3 vs 5 months, P = 0.71), American Urological Association Symptom Index score (AUASI; 18 vs 21, P = 0.24), and PVR (555 vs 473 mL, P = 0.096) were similar between the HoLEP and PVP groups. The HoLEP group had a larger prostate volume (88.5 vs 49 mL, P < 0.001) and higher PSA concentration (4.5 vs 2.4 ng/mL, P = 0.001). At median 6-month follow-up, 71 (99%) HoLEP patients and 23 (74%) PVP patients were catheter-free (P < 0.001). Of the voiding patients, postoperative AUASI (3 vs 4, P = 0.06), maximum urinary flow rate (23 vs 18 mL/s, P = 0.28) and PVR (56.5 vs 54 mL, P = 1.0) were improved in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both HoLEP and PVP are effective at improving urinary parameters in men with CUR. Despite larger prostate volumes, HoLEP had a 99% successful deobstruction rate, thus rendering patients catheter-free.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Retenção Urinária/cirurgia , Humanos , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hiperplasia Prostática/fisiopatologia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Micção
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA