RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recent clinical trials have reported improved disease-free survival rates of patients with stage pT3-4/ypT2-4 or pN + upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) on adjuvant nivolumab therapy. However, the appropriateness of the patient selection criteria used in clinical practice remains uncertain. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 895 patients who underwent nephroureterectomy to treat UTUC. The patients were divided into two groups: grade pT3-4 and/or pN + without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or grade ypT2-4 and/or ypN + on NAC (adjuvant immunotherapy candidates) and others (not candidates for adjuvant immunotherapy). Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn to assess the oncological outcomes, including recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify significant prognostic factors for oncological outcomes. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed notably inferior RFS, CSS, and OS of patients who were candidates for adjuvant immunotherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that pathological T and N grade and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) status were independent risk factors for poor RFS, CSS, and OS. CONCLUSION: In total, 44.8% of patients were candidates for adjuvant immunotherapy. In addition to pathological T and N status, LVI was a significant predictor of survival, and may thus play a pivotal role in the selection of patients eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Nefroureterectomia/métodos , Prognóstico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the oncologic efficacy of combining docetaxel (DOC) versus abiraterone (ABI) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), with a focus on the efficacy of sequential therapy, in a real-world clinical practice setting. METHODS: The records of 336 patients who harbored de novo high-risk mHSPC, based on the LATITUDE criteria, and had received ADT with either DOC (n = 109) or ABI (n = 227) were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), including time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), time to 2nd-line progression (PFS2), and 2nd- and 3rd-line PFS, were compared. We used one-to-two propensity score matching to minimize the confounders. The differential efficacy of 2nd-line therapy based on agents in each arm was evaluated using the unmatched cohort as an additional interest. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 86 patients treated with DOC + ADT and 172 with ABI + ADT were available for analyses. The 3-year OS and CSS for DOC versus ABI were 76.2% versus 75.1% (p = 0.8) and 78.2% versus 78.6% (p = 1), respectively. There was no difference in the median PFS2 (49 vs. 43 months, p = 0.39), while the median time to CRPC in patients treated with ABI was significantly longer compared to those treated with DOC (42 vs. 22 months; p = 0.006). The median 2nd-line PFS (14 vs. 4 months, p < 0.001) and 3rd-line PFS (4 vs. 2 months, p = 0.012) were significantly better in the DOC group than in the ABI group. Among the unmatched cohort, after ABI for mHSPC, the median 2nd-line PFS did not differ between the patients treated with DOC and those treated with enzalutamide as 2nd-line therapy (both 3 months, p = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: ADT with DOC or ABI has comparable oncologic outcomes in terms of OS, CSS, and PFS2 in patients with de novo high-risk mHSPC. Compared to DOC, ABI resulted in longer time to CRPC but worse 2nd and 3rd-line PFS. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal sequence of therapy in the upfront intensive treatment era.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Docetaxel/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Hormônios/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the oncologic efficacy of combining docetaxel with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus nonsteroidal antiandrogen (NSAA) with ADT in patients with high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) with focus on the effect of sequential therapy in a real-world clinical practice setting. METHODS: The records of 382 patients who harbored high-volume mHSPC, based on the CHAARTED criteria, and had received ADT with either docetaxel (n = 92) or NSAA (bicalutamide) (n = 290) were retrospectively analyzed. The cohorts were matched by one-to-one propensity scores based on patient demographics. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), including time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and time to second-line progression (PFS2) were compared. 2nd-line PFS defined as the time from CRPC diagnosis to progression after second-line therapy was also compared. RESULTS: After matching, a total of 170 patients were retained: 85 patients treated with docetaxel + ADT and 85 patients treated with NSAA + ADT. The median OS and CSS for docetaxel + ADT versus NSAA + ADT were not reached (NR) vs. 49 months (p = 0.02) and NR vs. 55 months (p = 0.02), respectively. Median time to CRPC and PFS2 in patients treated with docetaxel + ADT was significantly longer compared to those treated with NSAA (22 vs. 12 months; p = 0.003 and, NR vs. 28 months; p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in 2nd-line PFS between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggested that ADT with docetaxel significantly prolonged OS and CSS owing to a better time to CRPC and PFS2 in comparison to NSAA + ADT in high-volume mHSPC.
Assuntos
Drogas Antiandrogênicas não Esteroides , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Docetaxel/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Drogas Antiandrogênicas não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pontuação de Propensão , Resultado do Tratamento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma compared with surgery alone. However, no clinical trial has established the superiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of perioperative outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis encompassing 164 upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy and received perioperative chemotherapy. Of these patients, 65 (39.6%) and 99 (60.4%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. Recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, we conducted Cox regression analyses to evaluate the risk factors for recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: Pathological downstaging was seen in 37% of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. However, no pathological complete response was observed in this cohort. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significantly lower recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a marked association with inferior recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSION: Our study has suggested that neoadjuvant chemotherapy would be more effective in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients compared with adjuvant chemotherapy.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias Ureterais , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Ureterais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ureterais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Ureterais/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although brachytherapy is a standard treatment option for patients with high-risk prostate cancer, only a few studies have compared low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). We applied propensity score-based inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to compare oncological outcomes for LDR-BT and HDR-BT. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed prognosis in 392 patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer who had undergone brachytherapy plus external beam radiation. IPTW was applied to adjust the Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, with the goal of minimizing bias from patient background. RESULTS: The IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed no statistically significant differences for time to biochemical recurrence, clinical progression, castration-resistant prostate cancer, or death from any cause. The IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analyses also showed that the modality of brachytherapy was not an independent factor in these oncological outcomes. Notably, the two groups differed regarding complications; LDR-BT was associated with a higher rate of acute grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity, and late grade 3 toxicity was noted only in HDR-BT. CONCLUSION: Our analysis of long-term outcomes in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer shows no significant differences in oncological outcomes between LDR-BT and HDR-BT, but some differences in toxicity, and offers patients and clinicians useful information in deciding management strategies for high-risk localized prostate cancer.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , PrognósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We have analyzed the long-term follow-up data of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The objective was to determine the optimal time for cessation of PSA monitoring after HDR-BT. METHODS: We included 309 patients with clinical stage T1c-T4 N0-1 M0 PCa who received HDR-BT and EBRT combined with long-term ADT between 2005 and 2018. We stratified the patients based on their prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and identified the factors associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and clinical progression (CP). RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 98 months (range: 31-207 months). Among the 306 patients, 76 developed BCR and 47 developed CP subsequently. We found that the PSA levels at 3, 5, and 8 years significantly correlated with the oncological outcomes of brachytherapy. No patient with a PSA level ≤ 0.2 ng/mL at 8 years later developed BCR or CP. CONCLUSION: Our long-term data suggest that in the presence of a PSA level ≤ 0.2 ng/mL at 8 years later, PSA monitoring may be safely discontinued due to the extremely low risk of subsequent oncological events. The data presented in this study will assist clinicians in determining the optimal management strategy for patients with PCa following HDR-BT and EBRT combined with long-term ADT.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Risco , Dosagem RadioterapêuticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesized that women with significant pelvic organ prolapse (POP), particularly of the anterior vaginal wall, may have voiding dysfunction (VD). Although the VD mechanism due to cystocele is not fully understood, different vaginal compartments have rarely been closely examined. This study attempted to further elucidate the correlation between POP and VD through a new subgroup classification using cystoscopy. METHODS: This study reviewed clinical records of 49 women who underwent cystocele repair. All patients were scheduled for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, preoperatively underwent uroflowmetry and postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) measurement, and completed pelvic floor function questionnaires. Bladder examination by cystoscopy was additionally performed using the lithotomy position with the Valsalva maneuver. RESULTS: Subjects were divided into four groups according to hernia orifice presence determined by cystoscopy, which included the trigone type, posterior wall type, trigone and urethra type, and trigone and posterior wall type. The posterior wall type had statistically higher PVR values versus the trigone and posterior wall type (P = 0.013). The posterior wall type had statistically lower values for average urine flow rate versus the urethra and trigone type (P = 0.020). There were no significant differences noted in the pelvic floor function questionnaires among the four groups. CONCLUSIONS: A new bladder defect classification based upon hernia orifice location was associated with lower urinary tract function. Posterior wall hernia presence caused significant voiding function deterioration. This new subgroup classification, which can more clearly identify and indicate bladder function, is also comparable among patients.
Assuntos
Cistocele , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Cistocele/complicações , Cistocele/cirurgia , Feminino , Hérnia/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/complicações , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Projetos Piloto , Bexiga UrináriaRESUMO
A 77-year-old man complaining of gross hematuria was referred to our hospital for further examination and treatment. The contrast-enhanced computed tomographic (CT) scan revealed a left ureteral tumor, multiple bladder tumors, para-aortic lymph node metastasis, left supraclavicular lymph node metastasis, multiple liver metastases, and multiple lung metastases. Transurethral resection was performed. One of the multiple bladder tumors, located at the bladder neck, was pathologically diagnosed as urothelial carcinoma, pT1, high grade, G2ï¼We diagnosed the patient with metastatic ureteral cancer (T4N2M1, stage IV). We stated gemcitabine, cisplatin (GC) therapy, but stopped after the first course due to gemcitabine drug eruption. We changed the regimen to methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) therapy and the cycle was completed without complications. However, CT scan showed disease progression. After palliative irradiation of the primary lesion, we administered pembrolizumab. Although he was asymptomatic, we diagnosed him with ocular myasthenia gravis because of a high level of serum anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies and a temporary ptosis in his past history. In spite of the possibility of relapse of myasthenia gravis, treatment with pembrolizumab was continued with his consent since there were no other treatment options. After two courses of pembrolizumab, he was hospitalized due to disease progression and died about three weeks after admission. Myasthenia gravis is a possible immune-related adverse event of pembrolizumab, However, there have been few reports on the successful treatment with this agent in patients with previously diagnosed myasthenia gravis. We report, here, a case of metastatic ureteral carcinoma safely treated with pembrolizumab without relapse of ocular myasthenia gravis.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Miastenia Gravis , Neoplasias Ureterais , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Neoplasias Ureterais/tratamento farmacológico , Cisplatino , Metástase Linfática , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Miastenia Gravis/tratamento farmacológico , Miastenia Gravis/diagnóstico , Progressão da DoençaRESUMO
Background: An earlier systematic review and meta-analysis found that patients with a certain histological variant of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) exhibited more advanced disease and poorer survival than those with pure UTUC. A difference in the clinicopathological UTUC characteristics of Caucasian and Japanese patients has been reported, but few studies have investigated the clinical impact of the variant histology in Japanese UTUC patients. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 824 Japanese patients with pTa-4N0-1M0 UTUCs who underwent radical nephroureterectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Subsequently, we explored the effects of the variant histology on disease aggressiveness and the oncological outcomes. We used Cox's proportional hazards models to identify significant predictors of oncological outcomes, specifically intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 824 UTUC patients, 32 (3.9%) exhibited a variant histology that correlated significantly with a higher pathological T stage and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Univariate analysis revealed that the variant histology was an independent risk factor for suboptimal RFS, CSS, and OS. However, significance was lost on multivariate analyses. Conclusions: The variant histology does not add to the prognostic information imparted by the pathological findings after radical nephroureterectomy, particularly in Japanese UTUC patients.
RESUMO
Introduction: Here, we present a rare case of eosinophilic cystitis coexisting with bladder cancer, which appeared to be an invasive carcinoma on imaging. Case presentation: A 46-year-old man presented with urinary urgency. Computed tomography revealed an irregular and thickly enhanced bladder wall, which seemed to be invasive bladder cancer. Cystoscopy revealed a raspberry-like mass lesion on the entire bladder circumference. Pathological diagnosis after transurethral resection was pathological T1 urothelial carcinoma. After a thorough discussion of treatment options, the patient elected to receive intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Three months after Bacillus Calmette-Guérin administration, no residual disease was confirmed by transurethral biopsy, and no recurrence was observed over 2 years. As peripheral eosinophilia and submucosa eosinophil infiltration were identified, the patient was diagnosed with coexisting eosinophilic cystitis and urothelial carcinoma. Conclusion: Clinicians should consider the possibility of eosinophilic cystitis with superficial bladder cancer coexistence in patients who present with an irregular and thick bladder wall.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate differential clinical outcomes in patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) vs. percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) for cT1b renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 119 patients who had undergone PN (n = 90) or PCA (n = 29) for cT1b renal tumors. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used for balancing patient demographics, including renal function and tumor complexity. Perioperative complications, renal function preservation rates, and oncological outcomes such as local recurrence-free, metastasis-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were compared using IPW-adjusted restricted mean survival times (RMSTs). RESULTS: PCA was more likely to be selected for octogenarians (odds ratio: 11.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.33-45.1). During the median follow-up of 43 months in the PCA group and 36.5 months in the PN group, unablated local residue or local recurrence was noted in 6 patients in the PCA group and local recurrence was noted in 4 patients in the PN groups. Of the 6 patients in the PCA group, 4 underwent salvage PCA, and local control had been achieved at the last visit. In the IPW-adjusted population, PCA had significantly worse local recurrence-free survival compared with PN (IPW-adjusted RMST difference: -22.7 months, 95% CI: -45.3 to -0.4, Pâ¯=â¯0.046). IPW-adjusted RMST for metastasis-free survival (Pâ¯=â¯0.23), cancer-specific survival (Pâ¯=â¯0.77), and overall survival (Pâ¯=â¯0.11) did not differ between PCA and PN. In addition, PN was not a predictor for local control failure at the last visit (odds ratio: 0.30, 95%CI: 0.05-1.29). There were no statistically significant differences between PN and PCA in renal function preservation or overall/severe complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cT1b renal tumor, although the local recurrence rate is higher for PCA than for PN, PCA provides comparable distant oncologic outcomes. PCA can be an alternative treatment option for elderly, comorbid patients, even those with cT1b renal tumors.