RESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We evaluated a pilot multi-component reintegration intervention to improve women's physical and psychosocial quality of life after genital fistula surgery. METHODS: Twelve women undergoing fistula repair at Mulago Specialized Women and Neonatal Hospital (Kampala, Uganda) anticipated in a 2-week multi-component intervention including health education, psychosocial therapy, physiotherapy, and economic investment. We assessed feasibility through recruitment, retention, and adherence, acceptability through intervention satisfaction, and preliminary effectiveness through reintegration, mental health, physical health, and economic status. We collected quantitative data at enrollment, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. We conducted in-depth interviews with six participants. Quantitative data are presented descriptively, and qualitative data analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Participants had a median age of 34.5 years (25.5-38.0), 50% were married/partnered, 42% were separated, 50$ had completed less than primary education, and 67% were unemployed. Mean number of sessions received was 12 for health education (range 5-15), 8 for counseling (range 8-9), and 6 for physiotherapy (range 4-8). Feasibility was demonstrated by study acceptance among all those eligible (100%); comfort with study measures, data collection frequency and approach; and procedural fidelity. Acceptability was high; all participants reported being very satisfied with the intervention and each of the components. Participant narratives echoed quantitative findings and contributed nuanced perspectives to understanding approach and content. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the intervention and associated research were both feasible and acceptable, and suggested certain modifications to the intervention protocol to reduce participant burden. Further research to determine the effectiveness of the intervention above and beyond surgery alone with regard to the health and well-being of women with fistulas is warranted.
Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Projetos Piloto , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Satisfação do Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Uganda , Fístula Vaginal/cirurgia , Fístula Vaginal/psicologia , Fístula Vesicovaginal/cirurgia , Fístula Vesicovaginal/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Female genital fistula is a traumatic debilitating injury, frequently caused by prolonged obstructed labor, affecting between 500,000-2 million women in lower-resource settings. Vesicovaginal fistula causes urinary incontinence, and other morbidity may occur during fistula development. Women with fistula are stigmatized, limit social and economic engagement, and experience psychiatric morbidity. Improved surgical access has reduced fistula consequences yet post-repair risks impacting quality of life and well-being include fistula repair breakdown or recurrence and ongoing or changing urine leakage or incontinence. Limited evidence on risk factors contributing to adverse outcomes hinders interventions to mitigate adverse events. This study aims to quantify these adverse risks and inform clinical and counseling interventions to optimize women's health and quality of life following fistula repair through: identifying predictors and characteristics of post-repair fistula breakdown and recurrence (Objective 1) and post-repair incontinence (Objective 2), and to identify feasible and acceptable intervention strategies (Objective 3). METHODS: This mixed-methods study incorporates a prospective cohort of women with successful vesicovaginal fistula repair at approximately 12 fistula repair centers in Uganda (Objectives 1-2) followed by qualitative inquiry among key stakeholders (Objective 3). Cohort participants will have a baseline visit at the time of surgery followed by data collection at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and quarterly thereafter for 3 years. Primary predictors to be evaluated include patient-related factors, fistula-related factors, fistula repair-related factors, and post-repair behaviors and exposures, collected via structured questionnaire at all data collection points. Clinical exams will be conducted at baseline, 2 weeks post-surgery, and for outcome confirmation at symptom development. Primary outcomes are fistula repair breakdown or fistula recurrence and post-repair incontinence. In-depth interviews will be conducted with cohort participants (n ~ 40) and other key stakeholders (~ 40 including family, peers, community members and clinical/social service providers) to inform feasibility and acceptability of recommendations. DISCUSSION: Participant recruitment is underway. This study is expected to identify key predictors that can directly improve fistula repair and post-repair programs and women's outcomes, optimizing health and quality of life. Furthermore, our study will create a comprehensive longitudinal dataset capable of supporting broad inquiry into post-fistula repair health. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05437939.
Female genital fistula is a traumatic birth injury which occurs where access to emergency childbirth care is poor. It causes uncontrollable urine leakage and is associated with other physical and psychological symptoms. Due to the urine leakage and its odor, women with fistula are stigmatized which has mental health and economic consequences. Ensuring women's access to fistula surgery and ongoing wellbeing is important for limiting the impact of fistula. After fistula surgery, health risks such as fistula repair breakdown or recurrence or changes to urine leakage can happen, but studies during this time are limited. Our study seeks to measure these health risks and factors influencing these risks quantitatively, and work with patients, community members, and fistula care providers to come up with solutions. We will recruit up to 1000 participants into our study at the time of fistula surgery and follow them for three years. We will collect data on patient sociodemographic characteristics, clinical history, and behavior after fistula repair through patient survey and medical record review. If participants have changes in urine leakage, they will be asked to return to the fistula repair hospital for exam. We will interview about 80 individuals to obtain their ideas for feasible and acceptable intervention options. We expect that this study will help to understand risk factors for poor health following fistula repair and, eventually, improve women's health and quality of life after fistula.
Assuntos
Doenças dos Genitais Femininos , Fístula Vesicovaginal , Feminino , Humanos , Genitália Feminina , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Uganda , Fístula Vesicovaginal/etiologia , Fístula Vesicovaginal/prevenção & controle , Fístula Vesicovaginal/cirurgiaRESUMO
Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a critical issue for patients undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) but has never been assessed in a low-income country. We conducted a cross-sectional mixed methods study with age-matched healthy siblings serving as controls at the Uganda Heart Institute. Methods: One-hundred fifteen CHD pediatric and young adult patients and sibling control participants were recruited. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 in participants ages 5-17 and 36-Item Short Form Survey for young adults aged 18-25. A subset of 27 participants completed face-to-face interviews to supplement quantitative findings. Results: Eighty-six pediatric (age 5-17) sibling and parent pairs completed Peds QOL surveys, and 29 young adult (age 18-25) sibling pairs completed SF-36 surveys. One third of patients had surgery in Uganda. Ventricular septal defects and tetralogy of Fallot were the most common diagnoses. Health-related quality of life scores in patients were lower across all domains compared to control participants in children. Reductions in physical and emotional domains of HRQOL were also statistically significant for young adults. Variables associated with lower HRQOL score on multivariate analysis in pediatric patients were younger age in the physical and emotional domains, greater number of surgeries in the physical domain and surgery outside Uganda in the school domain. The only predictor of lower HRQOL score in young adults was surgery outside Uganda in the social domain. Qualitative interviews identified a number of themes that correlated with survey results including abandonment by family, isolation from peers and community, financial hardship and social stigmatization. Conclusion: Health-related quality of life was lower in Ugandan patients after CHD surgery than siblings. Younger patients and those who had surgery outside of Uganda had lower HRQOL. These data have important implications for patients undergoing CHD surgery in LMIC and have potential to inform interventions.