Safety of perioperative ketorolac administration in pediatric appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies in adults undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries show an increased rate of complications with the use of ketorolac. This calls into question the safety of ketorolac in certain procedures. We sought to evaluate the impact of perioperative ketorolac administration on outcomes in pediatric appendectomy. METHODS: The Pediatric Health Information System database was queried for patients aged 5-17 y with a primary diagnosis of appendicitis and a primary procedure of appendectomy during the period 2010-2014. Patients with procedures suggesting incidental appendectomy, those records with data quality issues, deaths, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were excluded. Variables recorded included age, sex, race, ethnicity, discharge year, complex chronic conditions, geographic region, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and whether appendicitis was coded as complicated. The exposure variable was ketorolac administration on the day of or day after operation. The primary outcomes of interest were any surgical complications during the initial encounter, postoperative length of stay (LOS), total cost for the initial visit, any readmission to ambulatory, observation, or inpatient status within 30 d, and readmission with a diagnosis of peritoneal abscess or other postoperative infection or with transabdominal drainage performed. RESULTS: A total of 78,926 patients were included in the analysis cohort. Mean age was 11.4 y (standard deviation 3.3 y), the majority were males (61%), White (70%), and non-Hispanic (65%). Few had a complex chronic condition (3%) or required mechanical ventilation (2%) or an intensive care unit admission (1%). Patients with complicated appendicitis comprised 28% of the cohort. Most (73%) received ketorolac on postoperative day 0-1; those with complicated appendicitis were more likely to receive ketorolac. In all, 2.6% of the cohort had a surgical complication during the index visit, 4.3% were readmitted within 30 d, and 2% had a postoperative infection or transabdominal drainage (1% in the uncomplicated group and 5% in the complicated group). Median postoperative LOS was 1 d and mean cost was $9811 ± $9509. On bivariate analysis, ketorolac administration was associated with a decrease in same-visit surgical complications (P = 0.004) and cost ($459 decrease, P < 0.001) but was not associated with readmission, postoperative LOS, or postoperative infection. On multivariate analysis, ketorolac administration was associated with a significant decrease in any complication (adjusted odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.80-0.99) and cost (analysis of variance P < 0.001) but was not associated with readmission, postoperative LOS, or postoperative infection. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a large, contemporary data set from children's hospitals, ketorolac administration in the immediate postoperative period after appendectomy for appendicitis is common and was not associated with an increase in postoperative LOS, postoperative infection, or any-cause 30-d readmission. Ketorolac was, however, independently associated with a lower overall rate of postoperative complications and cost in this population.

Intensive care unit admission predicts hospital readmission in pediatric trauma.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmission in adult trauma is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization. In this study, we examine pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission as a risk factor for hospital readmission in pediatric trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 1 through 19 y in the Pediatric Health Information System database discharged with a trauma diagnosis. Patient and clinical variables included demographics, payer status, length of stay, chronic comorbid conditions, presence of mechanical ventilation, all-patient refined diagnosis-related group and calculated severity of illness, and discharge disposition. The main outcome variable was hospital readmission within 30 d of discharge. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated in both univariate and multivariate analyses with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: During the 5-year study period, 90,467 patients were admitted with a trauma diagnosis, of which 16,279 (18.0%) were admitted to the PICU. Hospital readmissions occurred in 3.1% of patients. On univariate analysis, patients admitted to the PICU on the first day of hospital admission (direct PICU admission), and those first admitted to the PICU after the day of hospital admission (delayed PICU admission), had 2-3 times the risk of hospital readmission compared with those never admitted to the PICU (4.8% versus 7.2% versus 2.7%, respectively, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, controlling for demographic and clinical variables, the adjusted ORs for hospital readmission in patients with direct and delayed PICU admission were 1.34 (95% CI 1.20-1.50) and 1.88 (95% CI 1.50-2.35) versus no PICU admission, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PICU admission, either direct or delayed, during hospitalization for trauma care is an independent risk factor for hospital readmission within 30 d of discharge. Further risk stratification may help focus resources on high-risk patients to improve clinical outcomes and reduce readmissions.

Incidence of nonaccidental head trauma in infants: a call to revisit prevention strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury is a major sequela of nonaccidental trauma (NAT) that disproportionately affects young children and can have lasting sequelae. Considering the potentially devastating effects, many hospitals develop parent education programs to prevent NAT. Despite these efforts, NAT is still common in Western New York. The authors studied the incidence of NAT following the implementation of the Western New York Shaken Baby Syndrome Education Program in 1998. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective chart review of children admitted to our pediatric hospital between 1999 and 2016 with ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes for types of child abuse and intracranial hemorrhage. Data were also provided by the Safe Babies New York program, which tracks NAT in Western New York. Children with a diagnosis of abuse at 0-24 months old were included in the study. Children who suffered a genuine accidental trauma or those with insufficient corroborating evidence to support the NAT diagnosis were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 107 children were included in the study. There was a statistically significant rise in both the incidence of NAT (p = 0.0086) and the incidence rate of NAT (p = 0.0235) during the study period. There was no significant difference in trendlines for annual NAT incidence between sexes (y-intercept p = 0.5270, slope p = 0.5263). When stratified by age and sex, each age group had a distinct and statistically significant incidence of NAT (y-intercept p = 0.0069, slope p = 0.0374). CONCLUSIONS: Despite educational interventions targeted at preventing NAT, there is a significant rise in the trend of newly reported cases of NAT, indicating a great need for better injury prevention programming.

Risk factors for venous thromboembolic events in pediatric surgical patients: Defining indications for prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric surgical patients is a rare event. The risk factors for VTE in pediatric general surgery patients undergoing abdominopelvic procedures are unknown. STUDY DESIGN: The American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-P) database (2012-2015) was queried for patients with VTE after abdominopelvic general surgery procedures. Patient and operative variables were assessed to identify risk factors associated with VTE and develop a pediatric risk score. RESULTS: From 2012-2015, 68 of 34,813 (0.20%) patients who underwent abdominopelvic general surgery procedures were diagnosed with VTE. On multivariate analysis, there was no increased risk of VTE based on concomitant malignancy, chemotherapy, inflammatory bowel disease, or laparoscopic surgical approach, while a higher rate of VTE was identified among female patients. The odds of experiencing VTE were increased on stepwise regression for patients older than 15 years and those with preexisting renal failure or a diagnosis of septic shock, patients with American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) classification ≥ 2, and for anesthesia time longer than 2 h. The combination of age > 15 years, ASA classification ≥ 2, anesthesia time > 2 h, renal failure, and septic shock was included in a model for predicting risk of VTE (AUC = 0.907, sensitivity 84.4%, specificity 88.2%). CONCLUSION: VTE is rare in pediatric patients, but prediction modeling may help identify those patients at heightened risk. Additional studies are needed to validate the factors identified in this study in a risk assessment model as well as to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis methods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.