Water-Based Interventions for People With Neurological Disability, Autism, and Intellectual Disability: A Scoping Review.

The purpose of this study was to produce a descriptive overview of the types of water-based interventions for people with neurological disability, autism, and intellectual disability and to determine how outcomes have been evaluated. Literature was searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid Emcare, SPORTDiscus, Google Scholar, and Google. One hundred fifty-three papers met the inclusion criteria, 115 hydrotherapy, 62 swimming, 18 SCUBA (self-contained underwater breathing apparatus), and 18 other water-based interventions. Common conditions included cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease, and intellectual disability. Fifty-four papers explored physical outcomes, 36 psychosocial outcomes, and 24 both physical and psychosocial outcomes, with 180 different outcome measures reported. Overall, there is a lack of high-quality evidence for all intervention types. This review provides a broad picture of water-based interventions and associated research. Future research, guided by this scoping review, will allow a greater understanding of the potential benefits for people with neurological disability, autism, and intellectual disability.

Investigating the impact of multidisciplinary prehabilitation on deconditioning in patients eligible for haematopoietic allogenic stem cell transplantation: protocol for a feasibility trial.

BACKGROUND: Assessing multidisciplinary prehabilitation strategies becomes crucial to pre-emptively counter the physical, psychological and social negative impacts experienced during an allogenic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) among acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. Current evidence is restricted to studies during induction chemotherapy, omitting rehabilitation interventions and predominantly using exercise-only approaches without a multidisciplinary framework. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of multidisciplinary prehabilitation in adults offered allo-HSCT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This 8-week single-group pre-post feasibility study aims to pilot a multidisciplinary prehabilitation intervention for participants undergoing allo-HSCT, with a focus on feasibility and safety. Participants, aged 18 or older, diagnosed with AML or MDS, and offered allo-HSCT, will be recruited between June 2023 and July 2024. The multidisciplinary prehabilitation intervention, conducted by the cancer allied health team at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, includes exercise physiology, physiotherapy, dietetics, social work, occupational therapy and psychology interventions. Consistent with a multidisciplinary treatment approach, each component is tailored to address different aspects of patient care, and adherence calculations will assess patient engagement and compliance. In addition, participants will continue to receive usual care from cancer allied health staff. The primary outcome of the study is to assess the feasibility of a multidisciplinary prehabilitation intervention by evaluating intervention uptake, retention, adherence, acceptability and safety. Secondary outcomes are leg strength, upper-body strength, aerobic fitness, falls risk, anthropometry, nutritional status, quality of life, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy for coping with cancer and distress. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for this study has been provided by the Central Adelaide Local Health Network (HREC 2022/HRE00284). Recruitment for the study commenced in June 2023 and will continue until July 2024. The methods have been designed and are reported according to the SPIRIT and CONSORT-pilot study checklist. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12623000052639.

What are the effects of scuba diving-based interventions for clients with neurological disability, autism or intellectual disability? A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Recreational scuba diving has existed for over 70 years with organisations emerging that teach individuals with disabilities to dive. It is unclear what the physical and psychosocial effects of scuba interventions might be. This systematic review explores evidence for the effects of scuba diving in individuals with neurological disability, intellectual disability and autism. METHODS: The databases Medline, EMBASE, Ovid Emcare, and SportDiscus were searched. Included papers described a scuba-based intervention for clients with a neurological disability, intellectual disability and autism, with physical or psychosocial outcomes explored in the paper. Quality of the included papers was assessed using the McMaster Appraisal Tools, with descriptive data synthesis completed to explore the physical and psychosocial effects of the interventions. RESULTS: Four papers met the inclusion criteria: a cross-sectional investigation, a phenomenological study, a case-control study and a multiple case study. The quality of the papers was low to moderate. Papers addressed the psychosocial effects of scuba diving, including motivation to participate, participant experiences, the effect on cognition and physical self-concept. One study reported an increase in self-concept for the majority of participants. An increase in understanding instructions and in visual attention was reported in another. Enjoyment of the activity was reported and motivators to be involved in scuba diving for people with disabilities included fun and excitement. No papers addressed functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst scuba diving interventions appear to enhance physical self-concept and are enjoyable, conclusive evidence regarding effectiveness could not be determined. Research in this area is extremely limited.