Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 20(11): 60, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27671799

RESUMO

Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for the treatment of chronic pain has become an increasingly important field in the arena of neuromodulation, given the ongoing advances in electrical neuromodulation technology since 1999 permitting minimally invasive approaches using an percutaneous approach as opposed to implantable systems. Our review aims to provide clinicians with the recent advances and studies in the field, with specific emphasis on clinical data and indications that have been accumulated over the last several years. In addition, we aim to address key basic science studies to further emphasize the importance of translational research outcomes driving clinical management.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Neuralgia/terapia , Nervos Periféricos/fisiopatologia , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea , Dor Crônica/fisiopatologia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Humanos , Manejo da Dor , Nervos Periféricos/fisiologia , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/métodos
3.
Pain Pract ; 14(2): 185-95, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23692187

RESUMO

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a musculoskeletal condition characterized by regional pain and muscle tenderness associated with the presence of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs). The last decade has seen an exponential increase in the use of botulinum toxin (BTX) to treat MPS. To understand the medical evidence substantiating the role of therapeutic BTX injections and to provide useful information for the medical practitioner, we applied the principles of evidence-based medicine to the treatment for cervico-thoracic MPS. A search was conducted through MEDLINE (PubMed, OVID, MDConsult), EMBASE, SCOPUS and the Cochrane database for the period 1966 to 2012 using the following keywords: myofascial pain, muscle pain, botulinum toxin, trigger points, and injections. A total of 7 trials satisfied our inclusion criteria and were evaluated in this review. Although the majority of studies found negative results, our analysis identified Gobel et al.'s as the highest quality study among these prospectively randomized investigations. This was due to appropriate identification of diagnostic criteria, excellent study design and objective endpoints. The 6 other identified studies had significant failings due to deficiencies in 1 or more major criteria. We conclude that higher quality, rigorously standardized studies are needed to more appropriately investigate this promising treatment modality.


Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Síndromes da Dor Miofascial/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapêutico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/efeitos adversos , Vértebras Cervicais , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Cervicalgia/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Neuromusculares/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Vértebras Torácicas
4.
Disabil Health J ; 9(4): 559-66, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27522302

RESUMO

There is a need for additional strategies for performing systematic reviews (SRs) to improve translation of findings into practice and to influence health policy. SRs critically appraise research methodology and determine level of evidence of research findings. The standard type of SR identifies randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as providing the most valid data and highest level of evidence. RCTs are not among the most frequently used research design in disability and health research. RCTs usually measure impairments for the primary research outcome rather than improved function, participation or societal integration. It forces a choice between "validity" and "utility/relevance." Other approaches have effectively been used to assess the validity of alternative research designs, whose outcomes focus on function and patient-reported outcomes. We propose that utilizing existing evaluation tools that measure knowledge, dissemination and utility of findings, may help improve the translation of findings into practice and health policy.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pesquisa de Reabilitação , Projetos de Pesquisa , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
5.
Pain Manag ; 3(1): 67-79, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24645933

RESUMO

SUMMARY The objective of this article was to perform a narrative review regarding the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome and to provide clinicians with treatment recommendations. This paper reviews the efficacy of various myofascial pain syndrome treatment modalities, including pharmacological therapy, injection-based therapies and physical therapy interventions. Outcomes evaluated included pain (visual analog scale), pain pressure threshold and range of motion. The evidence found significant benefit with multiple treatments, including diclofenac patch, thiocolchicoside and lidocaine patches. Trigger point injections, ischemic compression therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, spray and stretch, and myofascial release were also efficacious. The authors recommend focusing on treating underlying pathologies, including spinal conditions, postural abnormalities and underlying behavioral issues. To achieve maximum pain reduction and improve function, we recommend physicians approach myofascial pain syndrome with a multimodal plan, which includes a combination of pharmacologic therapies, various physical therapeutic modalities and injection therapies.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA