Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(4): 409-416, 2024 Mar 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38196028

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate the mean glandular dose (MGD), to assess the potential for optimization, and to propose diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). MGD was estimated from air kerma measurements and patient information collected during mammography examinations. The 75th percentile values were determined as the third quartile of the median MGD values for all hospitals, and DRLs set as 75th percentile of MGD values. The estimated median values of MGD ranged from 1.5 to 3.9 mGy for craniocaudal projection for median range of 15-59 mm compressed breast thickness (CBT). For a CBT range of 15-63 mm, the median MGD value was 1.5-5.1 mGy for medio-lateral oblique projection. Comparison with other studies showed that the MGD values obtained in this study were relatively high. The magnitude and wide variation of the exposure parameters suggest existing potential for optimization. The training of radiology staff was identified as a top priority.


Assuntos
Mama , Mamografia , Humanos , Tanzânia , Doses de Radiação , Mama/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 185(2): 208-214, 2019 Dec 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30624741

RESUMO

The objectives of this paper were to evaluate the occupational radiation exposure data from 2011 to 2017 and to compare the results with status in 1996-2010 periods. The evaluation was performed in terms of annual collective effective dose, the average annual effective dose, the individual dose distribution ratio and the annual collective effective dose distribution ratio. Irrespective of work category, the results indicate that the average effective dose ranged from 0.64 to 1.55 mSv and broadly comparable to data in the previous analysis. Over seven year period, the maximum annual individual dose was 4 mSv and therefore below the dose limit of 20 mSv y-1. The impact of radiological practice on the exposed population was <1.1 person.Sv. The results demonstrate satisfactory radiation protection conditions at workplaces, a situation which is mainly explained by the existing effective regulatory enforcement and improved workers' awareness.


Assuntos
Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Monitoramento de Radiação/métodos , Proteção Radiológica/métodos , Radiação Ionizante , Humanos , Incidência , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doses de Radiação , Lesões por Radiação/epidemiologia , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Tanzânia/epidemiologia
3.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 7(3): 80-94, 2006 Aug 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17533338

RESUMO

Although the use of computed tomography (CT) in medical diagnosis delivers relatively higher radiation doses to patients than other radiological procedures, lack of optimized protocols could be an additional source of increased dose in developing countries. The aim of this study was to determine the magnitude of radiation doses received by selected radiosensitive organs of patients from CT examinations. The study was further carried out in order to assess the influence of existing CT scanning protocols on patient organ doses. In order to achieve these objectives, patient organ doses from five common CT examinations were obtained from eight hospitals in Tanzania. The patient organ doses were estimated using measurements of CTDI, exposure-related parameters and the NRPB conversion factors. Large variation of mean organ doses among hospitals was observed for similar CT examinations. These variations were largely originated from different CT scanning protocols employed in different hospitals and scanner type. The mean organ doses in this study for the lens of the eyes (for head), thyroid (for chest), breast (for chest), stomach (for abdomen), and ovary (for pelvis), were 63.9 mGy, 12.3 mGy, 26.1 mGy, 35.6 mGy, and 24.0 mGy, respectively. These values were mostly comparable and slightly higher than the values of organ doses reported from literature for the UK, Japan, Germany, Norway and the Netherlands. It was concluded that patient organ doses could substantially minimized through careful selection of scanning parameters based on clinical indications of study, patient size, and body region being examined. Additional dose reduction to superficial organs would require the use of shielding materials.


Assuntos
Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Radiometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Tanzânia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA