RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Abortion-related complications remain a main cause of maternal mortality. There is little evidence on the availability and quality of post-abortion care (PAC) in humanitarian settings. We assessed the quality of PAC in two hospitals supported by an international organization in Jigawa State (Nigeria) and Bangui (Central African Republic, CAR). METHODS: We mapped indicators corresponding to the eleven domains of the WHO Maternal and Newborn Health quality-of-care framework to assess inputs, processes (provision and experience of care), and outcomes of PAC. We measured these indicators in four components of a cross-sectional multi-methods study: 1) an assessment of the hospitals' PAC signal functions, 2) a survey of the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and behavior of 140 Nigerian and 84 CAR clinicians providing PAC, 3) a prospective review of the medical records of 520 and 548 women presenting for abortion complications and, 4) a survey of 360 and 362 of these women who were hospitalized in the Nigerian and CAR hospitals, respectively. RESULTS: Among the total 27 PAC signal functions assessed, 25 were available in the Nigerian hospital and 26 in the CAR hospital. In both hospitals, less than 2.5% were treated with dilatation and sharp curettage. Over 80% of women received blood transfusion or curative antibiotics when indicated. However, antibiotics were given to about 30% of patients with no documented indication. Among discharged women in CAR, 99% received contraceptive counseling but only 39% did in Nigeria. Over 80% of women in Nigeria reported positive experiences of respect and preservation of dignity. Conversely, in CAR, 37% reported that their privacy was always respected during examination and 62% reported short or very short waiting time before seeing a health provider. In terms of communication, only 15% felt able to ask questions during treatment in both hospitals. The risk of abortion-near-miss happening ≥ 24h after presentation was 0.2% in Nigeria and 1.1% in CAR. Only 65% of women in the Nigerian hospital and 34% in the CAR hospital reported that the staff provided them best care all the time. CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive assessment identified that these two hospitals in humanitarian settings provided lifesaving PAC. However, hospitals need to strengthen the patient-centered approach engaging patients in their own care and ensuring privacy, short waiting times and quality provider-patient communication. Health professionals would benefit from instituting antibiotic stewardships to prevent antibiotic-resistance.
In humanitarian contexts, abortion complications are a leading cause of maternal mortality. Providing quality post-abortion care (PAC) is therefore an important part of needed services. We assessed the quality of PAC in two hospitals supported by an international organization in Jigawa State (Nigeria) and Bangui (Central African Republic). We measured quality indicators in four components: 1) an assessment of the equipment and human resources available in hospitals, 2) a survey of the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and behavior of clinicians providing PAC, 3) an assessment of the medical care provided by clinicians to women presenting with abortion complications and, 4) a survey of a subgroup of these women who were hospitalized. Both hospitals had almost all the equipment and human resources necessary to provide post-abortion care. Less than 2.5% of women received a non-recommended method to evacuate their uterus in both hospitals. More than 80% of women received a blood transfusion or antibiotics when they needed them. However, 30% of women received antibiotics without written justification and only 15% of women reported being able to ask questions about their treatment. Overall, only 65% of Nigerian women and 34% of Central African women said that the staff provided them with the best care all the time. The fact that less than 2% of women experienced a very severe complication 24 hours or more after their arrival at the two hospitals suggests that the care provided was lifesaving. But they urgently need to adopt a better patient-centered approach as well as to improve the rational management of antibiotics.
Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Gravidez , Aborto Induzido/normas , Recém-Nascido , Adulto , Nigéria , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Saúde do Lactente , Saúde Materna , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Abortion-related complications are one of the five main causes of maternal mortality. However, research about abortion is very limited in fragile and conflict-affected settings. Our study aims to describe the magnitude and severity of abortion-related complications in two referral hospitals supported by Médecins Sans Frontières and located in such settings in northern Nigeria and Central African Republic (CAR). METHODS: We used a methodology similar to the World Health Organization (WHO) near-miss approach adapted in the WHO multi-country study on abortion (WHO-MCS-A). We conducted a cross-sectional study in the two hospitals providing comprehensive emergency obstetric care. We used prospective medical records' reviews of women presenting with abortion-related complications between November 2019 and July 2021. We used descriptive analysis and categorized complications into four mutually exclusive categories of increasing severity. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 520 and 548 women respectively in Nigerian and CAR hospitals. Abortion complications represented 4.2% (Nigerian hospital) and 19.9% (CAR hospital) of all pregnancy-related admissions. The severity of abortion complications was high: 103 (19.8%) and 34 (6.2%) women were classified as having severe maternal outcomes (near-miss cases and deaths), 245 (47.1%) and 244 (44.5%) potentially life-threatening, 39 (7.5%) and 93 (17.0%) moderate, and 133 (25.6%) and 177 (32.3%) mild complications, respectively in Nigerian and CAR hospitals. Severe bleeding/hemorrhage was the main type of complication in both settings (71.9% in the Nigerian hospital, 57.8% in the CAR hospital), followed by infection (18.7% in the Nigerian hospital, 27.0% in the CAR hospital). Among the 146 women (Nigerian hospital) and 231 women (CAR hospital) who did not report severe bleeding or hemorrhage before or during admission, anemia was more frequent in the Nigerian hospital (66.7%) compared to the CAR hospital (37.6%). CONCLUSION: Our data suggests high severity of abortion-related complications in these two referral facilities of fragile and conflict-affected settings. Factors that could contribute to this high severity in these contexts include greater delays in accessing post-abortion care, decreased access to contraceptive and safe abortion care that result in increased unsafe abortions; as well as increased food insecurity leading to iron-deficiencies and chronic anaemia. The results highlight the need for better access to safe abortion care, contraception, and high quality postabortion care to prevent and manage complications of abortion in fragile and conflict-affected settings.
Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Aborto Espontâneo , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Prospectivos , Hospitais , África SubsaarianaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The failure of pregnant women to disclose their HIV serological status to the those around her, especially the father of the unborn child, can be a barrier to preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV. In this context, the present study was designed to determine the proportion of women who failed to disclose their HIV status to their spouses and the factors associated with this non-disclosure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study was conducted from 1 February to 30 May 2017. The study population consisted of all pregnant and non-pregnant HIV-positive women followed in the three main mother and child health services in Bangui. RESULTS: A total of 256 women were recruited, 76 (29.7%) of whom had not disclosed their HIV status to their spouse. The main factors associated with non-disclosure of HIV status were the spouse's young age, precarious employment status, and couples living separately. CONCLUSION: In the light of the results of this study, efforts should be made to ensure more active involvement of partners in sexual and reproductive health programmes in general and PMTCT in particular. The general public also needs to be made aware of the dangers of stigma and the law on the protection of people living with HIV should be enforced.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Revelação da Verdade , Adolescente , Adulto , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , República Centro-Africana , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Cônjuges , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Malaria in pregnancy is a serious public health problem in tropical areas. Frequently, the placenta is infected by accumulation of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes in the intervillous space. Falciparum malaria acts during pregnancy by a range of mechanisms, and chronic or repeated infection and co-infections have insidious effects. The susceptibility of pregnant women to malaria is due to both immunological and humoral changes. Until a malaria vaccine becomes available, the deleterious effects of malaria in pregnancy can be avoided by protection against infection and prompt treatment with safe, effective antimalarial agents; however, concurrent infections such as with HIV and helminths during pregnancy are jeopardizing malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa.