HSPA8 Chaperone Complex Drives Chaperone-Mediated Autophagy Regulation in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Cell Differentiation.

INTRODUCTION: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a cancer of the hematopoietic system characterized by hyperproliferation of undifferentiated cells of the myeloid lineage. While most of AML therapies are focused toward tumor debulking, all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) induces neutrophil differentiation in the AML subtype acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Macroautophagy has been extensively investigated in the context of various cancers and is often dysregulated in AML where it can have context-dependent pro- or anti-leukemogenic effects. On the contrary, the implications of chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) on the pathophysiology of diseases are still being explored and its role in AML remains elusive. METHODS: We took advantage of human AML primary samples and databases to analyze CMA gene expression and activity. Furthermore, we used ATRA-sensitive (NB4) and -resistant (NB4-R1) APL cells to further dissect a potential function for CMA in ATRA-mediated neutrophil differentiation. NB4-R1 cells are unique in that they do respond to retinoic acid transcriptionally but do not mature in response to retinoid signaling alone unless maturation is triggered by adding cyclic adenosine monophosphate. RESULTS: Here, we report that CMA-related mRNA transcripts are significantly higher expressed in immature hematopoietic cells as compared to neutrophils, contrasting the macroautophagy gene expression patterns. Accordingly, lysosomal degradation of an mCherry-KFERQ CMA reporter decreases during ATRA-induced differentiation of APL cells. On the other hand, using NB4-R1 cells we found that macroautophagy flux primed ATRA-resistant NB4-R1 cells to differentiate upon ATRA treatment but reduced the association of lysosome-associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP-2A) and heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 8 (HSPA8), necessary for complete neutrophil maturation. Accordingly, depletion of HSPA8 attenuated CMA activity and facilitated APL cell differentiation. In contrast, maintaining high CMA activity by ectopic expression of LAMP-2A impeded APL differentiation. CONCLUSION: Overall, our findings suggest that APL neutrophil differentiation requires CMA inactivation and that this pathway predominantly depends on HSPA8 and is possibly assisted by other co-chaperones.

Increased LAMP2A levels correlate with a shorter disease-free survival of HER2 negative breast cancer patients and increased breast cancer cell viability.

Chaperone Mediated Autophagy (CMA) is a selective autophagy pathway deregulated in many cancers. In this study, we were aiming at understanding the importance of CMA in breast cancer. To this end, we examined the expression of the CMA markers HSP8 and LAMP2A in different breast cancer cell lines and found a wide range of LAMP2A expression levels across the cell lines analyzed. Next, we applied a specific immunohistochemical staining protocol to a tissue microarray derived from a cohort of 365 breast cancer patients. Therefore, we were able to find a correlation of high LAMP2A but not HSPA8 (HSC70) with worse disease free survival in patients with HER2 negative tumors (p = 0.026) which was independent prognostic parameter from pT category, pN category and grading in a multivariate model (HR = 1.889; 95% CI = 1.039-3.421; p = 0.037). In line, low LAMP2A levels decrease proliferation of the breast cancer cell lines T47D and MCF-7 in vitro. Our data suggest that LAMP2A supports a more severe breast cancer cell phenotype.

Cisplatin sensitivity in breast cancer cells is associated with particular DMTF1 splice variant expression.

The cyclin D binding myb-like transcription factor 1 (DMTF1) is a tumor suppressor gene that activates p14ARF transcription and thereby stabilizing the p53 tumor suppressor. The DMTF1 gene locus encodes for three different alternatively spliced isoforms, namely DMTF1α, ß and γ. The oncogenic DMTF1ß isoform negatively interferes with the transcriptional activity of DMTF1α. Increased DMTF1ß is associated with increased cell proliferation in a variety of cancer cell types. In this study, we aimed at identifying the role of DMTF1 isoforms in response to cisplatin treatment in breast cancer cells. First, we used SKBR3 (cisplatin sensitive) and MCF7 (cisplatin resistant) breast cancer cell lines to quantify DMTF1 expression in response to cisplatin treatment. Total DMTF1 mRNA levels increased in a dose dependent manner in both cell lines upon cisplatin treatment. However, the mRNA levels of the isoforms revealed that the sensitive cell line, SKBR3, showed increased levels of both isoforms, whereas the resistant cell, MCF7, only showed increased levels of the oncogenic DMTF1ß isoform. Silencing all DMTF1 isoforms led to increased cell survival upon cisplatin treatment. Furthermore, we found a significant increase in the percentage of quiescent cells in SKBR3 shDMTF1. Together, our data suggest that DMTF1 expression levels are associated with increased cisplatin resistance.

The Multifaceted Functions of Autophagy in Breast Cancer Development and Treatment.

Macroautophagy (herein referred to as autophagy) is a complex catabolic process characterized by the formation of double-membrane vesicles called autophagosomes. During this process, autophagosomes engulf and deliver their intracellular content to lysosomes, where they are degraded by hydrolytic enzymes. Thereby, autophagy provides energy and building blocks to maintain cellular homeostasis and represents a dynamic recycling mechanism. Importantly, the clearance of damaged organelles and aggregated molecules by autophagy in normal cells contributes to cancer prevention. Therefore, the dysfunction of autophagy has a major impact on the cell fate and can contribute to tumorigenesis. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and has the highest mortality rate among all cancers in women worldwide. Breast cancer patients often have a good short-term prognosis, but long-term survivors often experience aggressive recurrence. This phenomenon might be explained by the high heterogeneity of breast cancer tumors rendering mammary tumors difficult to target. This review focuses on the mechanisms of autophagy during breast carcinogenesis and sheds light on the role of autophagy in the traits of aggressive breast cancer cells such as migration, invasion, and therapeutic resistance.