The history of the drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome.

The diagnosis of drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome (DIES), resembling the typical findings of a well-known disease, the food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES), was acknowledged in the first publication on the topic in 2014. Ten cases of DIES have been described so far. Unanswered questions concerning DIES include its pathogenetic mechanism, natural history, the possible presence of predisposing genetic factors, and the potential existence of its atypical forms. DIES is a recently defined and intriguing clinical entity, similar to FPIES but triggered by drugs. It seems well-defined from the clinical point of view, but its pathogenetic mechanisms are not known. DIES deserves more attention among allergists, especially among the professionals who work with children, and all efforts should be conceived to improve its correct recognition and accurate management.

Efficacy and tolerability of the updosing of second-generation non-sedating H1 antihistamines in children with chronic spontaneous urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Chronic urticaria (CU), daily wheals or angioedema that lasts more than 6 weeks, is a common skin disease; CU is classified as spontaneous (no specific eliciting factor involved) or inducible (specific eliciting factor involved). Recent EAACI guidelines for management of CSU recommend second-generation non-sedating H1 antihistamines (sgAH1 s) as initial treatment in children (weight-adjusted) as in adults, followed by increased doses (up to 4 times) if the standard dose is not effective. The efficacy and tolerability of fourfold updosing in adults are known, but there is little documentation regarding updosing in the pediatric population. This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy and tolerability of the updosing of sgAH1 s in children with CSU in a tertiary care pediatric hospital. METHODS: The electronic charts of patients diagnosed with CSU and referred to the Allergy Unit of Meyer Children's University hospital were reviewed during a period of 4 years. For each patient, an examination of demographic characteristics, diagnostic workup, efficacy, and tolerability of the treatment was performed. Disease activity was monitored using UAS7. RESULTS: Sixty-six cases of CSU were identified, and all of them were treated initially with a standard dose of sgAH1 s, followed by increased doses up to fourfold when standard dosing was not effective. 44/66 patients (66.7%) treated with sgAH1 s responded: 25 with a standard dose, 16 with a double, 2 with threefold dose, and 1 with fourfold dose. 12/66 (18.2%) patients began a therapy with omalizumab. As for the remaining patients, 10/66 (15.1%), they are still undergoing therapy with sgAH1 s because of the relapse of the symptoms after the stepped-down dosage. Regarding tolerability, 9/66 (13.6%) patients treated with sgAH1 s experienced side effects: three that required treatment change and six that did not. CONCLUSION: Our data were consistent with the tolerability of updosing of sgAH1 s in children with CSU, although the efficacy appears to be limited to double the standard dose.

Drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome: Similarities and differences compared with food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome.

In 2014, drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome (DIES) was described for the first time. It is still a poorly known disease with symptoms that typically resemble those of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES). To date, six more cases of DIES have been described and new clinical diagnostic criteria have been proposed based on those in the international guidelines for FPIES. In this paper, the authors describe three more cases of DIES. In addition, similarities and differences with FPIES have been deeply analyzed. To date, several unanswered questions need to be addressed, but clinicians must be instructed how to identify DIES, in order to make an allergy workup and give definite therapeutic indications to patients, especially in children where DIES seems to be more frequent.

Managing food allergy immunotherapy in children during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Food allergy immunotherapy is a promising allergen-specific approach to manage food allergy in children, although it is not exempt from adverse events, even severe. The adverse events are not predictable and furthermore cofactors can play a role in triggering them. During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients on food allergy immunotherapy should be provided with suggestions on how to proceed in the event of COVID-19 infection occurring or is suspected. These recommendations would be of support to clinical practitioners dealing with patients on food allergy immunotherapy since there is little data in the literature on the topic.

Frequency of positive oral food challenges and their outcomes in the allergy unit of a tertiary-care pediatric hospital.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The oral food challenge (OFC) is the gold standard to diagnose food allergy (FA); however, it is not a procedure free from the risk of having significant allergic reactions, even life-threatening.The aims of our study were to evaluate the frequency of positive OFCs performed in children with a suspected diagnosis of IgE- and non-IgE-mediated (food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES)) FA and how the failed challenges were managed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was done on all children who have had OFCs in a tertiary-care pediatric allergy unit from 2017 to 2019. RESULTS: 682 patients were enrolled and 2206 challenges were performed: 2058 (93%) for IgE-mediated FA and 148 (7%) for FPIES. There were 262 (11.8%) challenge failures. The transfer to the emergency department was required 3 times (1.1%). None of the failed challenges resulted in death or hospitalization and 13.3% challenges did not require any treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that food challenges can be performed safely in a specialized setting by well-trained personnel; all food challenge reactions, even the most serious, were reversible, thanks to a prompt recognition and treatment that generally did not worsen over time.

Aetiopathogenesis of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) in children: A 9-year experience in a tertiary care paediatric hospital setting.

BACKGROUND: Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to drugs including as follows: Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) and Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP). Incidence, triggers and management of SCARs have not been investigated in large-scale epidemiological studies on children. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to collect epidemiological, clinical and aetiological data from children with SCARs referred to our tertiary care paediatric hospital of Florence. METHODS: From 2010 to 2018 charts of children with diagnosis of SCAR were reviewed, and data collected during the acute phase and/or the subsequent allergy evaluation. Patients underwent patch tests, intradermal tests and lymphocyte transformation tests. All children were investigated for infectious diseases. RESULTS: Incidence of SCARs in hospitalized children was 0.32% over a 9-year period. Fifty-four children were enrolled (31 M; 23 F; median age 6.5 years): 17 cases of DRESS, 30 SJS, 3 TEN, 2 AGEP, 1 linear immunoglobulin A bullous disease (LABD) and 1 pemphigus. Twenty-eight out of 54 patients underwent drug allergy investigations, and 50% of them resulted positive. Combining clinical history and results of allergy work-up, 74% SCARs seem to be caused by drugs, 18.6% by both drugs and infections, 3.7% by infections, and 3.7% remained idiopathic. No deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SCARs incidence is in line with literature data. Drugs were most commonly the leading cause. Management of SCARs requires cooperation among professional figures for an early diagnosis and a prompt treatment. Mortality rate seems to be lower in children.

Epidemiology of rare allergic diseases in children.

Allergic diseases have different frequencies. In particular, allergic rhinitis and asthma have high frequencies of about 20% and 10%, respectively. Other allergic diseases have lower frequencies; for example, food allergy has a frequency of 1%-4%. There are also rare allergic diseases, with a prevalence of 5 cases per 10 000 people in the general population, and they are included in Orphanet. However, other extremely rare allergic diseases still need to be properly known in order to be possibly recognized as rare diseases and cataloged in Orphanet.

Tailored Sublingual Immunotherapy in a Monosensitized Child with Natural Rubber Latex Allergy.

Adverse reactions to natural rubber latex (NRL) represent a group of clinical manifestations that include non-allergic reactions and immediate-type or delayed-type allergic reactions. NRL sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been demonstrated to be an effective and safe practice for latex clinical manifestations with good patient tolerance. A pediatric case of NRL allergy managed with an effective tailored SLIT is described. This case is compelling because the girl, who did not have an atopic background, suffered from NRL allergy with high reactivity and unique monosensitization. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case with this characteristic described to date. Moreover, the SLIT follow-up time reported was unusually long, extending from childhood to adulthood. The case described highlights several problems of real-life management, and it demonstrates how the pediatric allergist plays a key role in the management of all these issues in order to succeed in guiding the patient through the immunotherapy process with a personalized approach, in line with the precision medicine principles. However, further long-term clinical studies are needed to better define the natural history of NRL allergy and find new potential biomarkers of response to NRL immunotherapy.

Kounis Syndrome: a pediatric perspective.

Kounis Syndrome is defined as a hypersensitivity coronary disorder constituted by the association of an acute coronary syndrome with a hypersensitivity, allergic, anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reaction, in a pathophysiologic context involving mast-cells, platelets, eosinophils and various interacting inflammatory cells. Currently, Kounis Syndrome is established in the literature, as accompanied by a plethora of clinical case reports that further elucidate its aspects. To the best of our knowledge, a specific analysis regarding the pediatric data of Kounis Syndrome has never been performed. The aim of this review was to reveal all the pediatric Kounis Syndrome cases in the literature, in an attempt to define its clinical implications in children. Moreover, based on the data of this analysis, a new classification for Kounis Syndrome is proposed, focusing mainly in the presence or the absence of allergic myocardial infarction, as the central clinical feature for the stratification of the patients' clinical manifestations.

Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-Mediated Food Allergy in Children: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management.

A food allergy is an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated hypersensitive reaction to food, which consists in the appearance of allergic symptoms; it can vary from common urticaria to even fatal anaphylaxis. The prevalence of food allergies has been increasing in the past twenty years and it represents a major public health problem in industrialized countries. The mechanism that leads to food allergies is the lack of immunologic and clinical tolerance to food allergens. The diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergies is based on the combined use of a detailed medical history, in-vivo, and in-vitro research of specific IgE, the elimination diet, and the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge. The only currently available treatment for allergies is the strict elimination diet. This type of attitude, which we could define as "passive", does not overcome the risk of accidental reactions due to involuntary intake of the culprit food. For food allergy management, an "active" approach is urgently needed, such as specific allergen immunotherapy, which is currently under development and only used for research purposes. This article aims to give an updated review of IgE-mediated food allergies in pediatric populations in terms of epidemiology, pathogenesis, prevention, diagnosis, and management.

The Diagnosis of Ceftriaxone Hypersensitivity in a Paediatric Population.

INTRODUCTION: Penicillins and cephalosporins are the most frequent causes of hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) to drugs in children. Among cephalosporins for intravenous use, ceftriaxone (CT) is the most frequently prescribed in Italy. The aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic methods for CT hypersensitivity in a population of children with suspected HRs to this drug and their tolerance toward amoxi-cillin/clavulanic acid (AMX/CLV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2012 to 2018, 90 children were investigated for suspected HRs to CT according to the European Academy of Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) guidelines. RESULTS: Ninety children had a history of reaction to CT. The majority (79/90; 77.8%) had a history of immediate reactions (IRs). CT hypersensitivity was confirmed in 26/90 patients (28.9%). In case of IRs, skin tests can be useful (24% of positive CT intradermal tests - IDTs) particularly in cases of anaphylaxis (81.8% of positive CT IDTs). Only 5 out of 28 drug provocation tests were positive. Serum-specific IgE (sIgE) determination for CT correlated with positivity upon skin/drug provocation tests (high specificity 95.6%) but had a low sensitivity; sIgE for AMX had a very low positive predictive value (14.3%), advocating against its use. In case of non-IRs, only 7/11 patients reached a confident diagnosis, but the low number of children does not enable proper conclusions. Only 2 children showed cross- and/or co-allergy (2.2%) between CT and AMX/CLV. CONCLUSION: IDTs seem to be useful for diagnosing CT IRs. Hypersensitivity to CT is confirmed in 28.9% of children, although a large fraction of parents refused an intravenous rechallenge (45.6%). It remains unknown whether this is due to the fact this was intravenous rather than a rechallenge with the culprit, but it reflects a clinical reality. Otherwise, cross- and/or co-allergy between CT and AMX/CLV is a rare event.

Low-Dose Oral Food Challenge with Hazelnut: Efficacy and Tolerability in Children.

BACKGROUND: Hazelnut allergy (HA) is one of the more common food allergies (FAs) in Europe with a prevalence of 0.2%. The gold standard for diagnosing FA is oral food challenge (OFC) with the culprit food. Another purpose of OFC is to identify the "threshold level" of food as the dose that elicits symptoms. In this way it is possible to avoid a strict elimination diet and to determine the minimal quantity of the culprit food tolerated by the patient. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of hazelnut low-dose OFC (H-LDOFC) in children with HA. METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2016, we retrospectively analyzed the charts of patients referred to Allergy Unit of Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy for a history of HA. Prick by prick (PbP) and specific serum IgE (s-IgE) to hazelnut were performed. We proposed conducting an H-LDOFC to parents of children with HA. The H-LDOFC was considered completed when a cumulative dose of 2.5 g of hazelnut was reached. We divided the patients who underwent the H-LDOFC into an asymptomatic and a symptomatic group. For statistics we used SPSS for Windows version 16.0 and conducted a t test for comparing the averages, considering a p value of < 0.05 significant. RESULTS: Forty-three out of 70 patients (61.4%) with HA underwent an H-LDOFC. The PbP to hazelnut (mean ± SD) was 7.2 ± 2.9 mm and the s-IgE to hazelnut 25.3 ± 32.5 kU/L. Twenty-eight out of the 43 patients (65.1%) who underwent H-LDOFC reached the cumulative dose of 2.5 g of hazelnut. During the H-LDOFC, 20/43 patients (46.5%) had no reactions and 23/43 patients had a total of 55 reactions: 34 (61.8%) oral allergy syndrome, 8 (14.5%) rash, 6 (10.9%) abdominal pain, 2 (3.6%) urticaria, 2 (3.6%) angioedema, and 3 (5.4%) dyspnea. Atopic dermatitis was found to present the only statistically significant difference (p = 0.002) in patients with symptoms compared to asymptomatic patients during H-LDOFC. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this was the first study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of H-LDOFC in a pediatric population. Our study suggests that in children with HA, H-LDOFC is well accepted and safe because adverse reactions are mild and the majority are represented by localized symptoms (oral allergy syndrome) and efficient, especially in terms of improvement of quality of life. For these reasons it could be more extensively used in the treatment of HA.

Oral Immunotherapy (OIT): A Personalized Medicine.

Oral Immunotherapy (OIT), a promising allergen-specific approach in the management of Food Allergies (FA), is based on the administration of increasing doses of the culprit food until reaching a maintenance dose. Each step should be adapted to the patient, and OIT should be considered an individualized treatment. Recent studies focused on the standardization and identification of novel biomarkers in order to correlate endotypes with phenotypes in the field of FA.

Anaphylaxis to Over-the-Counter Flurbiprofen in a Child.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are suspected to cause drug hypersensitivity very frequently in paediatric patients. In this article, we describe the first case of anaphylaxis to flurbiprofen in a child and provide insight into the possibility of severe reactions and even anaphylaxis to over-the-counter flurbiprofen. Finally, the importance of a rigorous allergy work-up in reaching a confident diagnosis and providing the patient with a safe alternative is shown.

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome caused by fish and/or shellfish in Italy.

BACKGROUND: The study describes the demographic features, culprit foods, clinical features and outcomes for children presenting with acute fish and/or shellfish food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) in four Italian paediatric allergy centres. METHODS: A retrospective/prospective study was undertaken. All children diagnosed with fish or shellfish FPIES were enrolled. The diagnosis of FPIES was based on Sicherer's or Miceli Sopo clinical criteria. Skin prick tests (SPT) were performed in all patients, at the time of diagnosis and prior to OFC. RESULTS: Seventy children were enrolled. Mean age at first episode was 14 months (range 6-46 months); mean age at diagnosis was 34 months (range 6-164 months). Sole and cod were the fish most commonly implicated. Fifty-seven of 70 (81%) children had FPIES exclusively to fish, 37 of 57 (65%) children had single-fish FPIES, 20 of 57 (35%) multiple-fish FPIES, nine of 70 (13%) presented adverse reactions exclusively to shellfish, and four of 70 (6%) presented adverse reactions to both fish and shellfish. Only four (5.7%) children presented episodes of acute FPIES with different foods (2 to cow's milk, 1 to egg, 1 to beef); in all cases, onset was prior to that of fish or shellfish FPIES. Fifteen of 70 (21%) children tolerated fish other than the offending fish. Twenty-four of 70 (34%) children achieved tolerance (age range 24-102 months). CONCLUSIONS: The chief peculiarities of acute fish and shellfish FPIES, compared to more frequent cow's milk or soy FPIES, are (i) later age of onset, (ii) longer persistence and (iii) possibility of tolerating fish other than the offending fish. Adverse reactions with shellfish are possible.