Agreement Between Rectosigmoidoscopy and Colonoscopy Analyses of Disease Activity and Healing in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopy limited to the rectosigmoid colon is the standard technique used to measure endoscopic healing in ulcerative colitis (UC) clinical trials. We evaluated whether rectosigmoidoscopy adequately measures UC activity in the more proximal colon. METHODS: We analyzed data from a phase 2, placebo-controlled study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of etrolizumab in patients with moderate to severely active UC who had not responded to standard therapy. Central readers determined Mayo Clinic endoscopic subscores (MCSe) and ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS) scores from the rectosigmoid and proximal colon in videos of 331 examinations performed at baseline, week 6, and week 10. Rates of endoscopic healing (MCSe ≤ 1, MCSe = 0) and scores from rectosigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy analyses were compared among 239 examinations with endoscopic assessment proximal to the rectosigmoid colon. RESULTS: There was a high degree of correlation between findings from rectosigmoidoscopy vs colonoscopy in assessment of disease activity based on MCSe of 2 or higher (r = 0.84) or MCSe of 1 or higher (r = 0.96), or the UCEIS score (r = 0.92). In 230 of 239 videos, findings from rectosigmoidoscopy agreed with those from colonoscopy in the detection of active disease (MCSe ≥ 2; n = 205) or healing (MCSe ≤ 1; n = 25). In 9 videos (2 taken at baseline, 7 taken after treatment), colonoscopy found proximal disease activity not detected by rectosigmoidoscopy. Post-treatment discordance was more frequent in the placebo group, affecting assessment of efficacy at week 10. When endoscopic healing was defined as MCSe of 0, there were discordant findings from only 1 video. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high degree of correlation in assessments of UC activity made by rectosigmoidoscopy vs colonoscopy. For detection of endoscopic healing (MCSe ≤ 1), colonoscopy found persistent proximal lesions in the placebo group, which affected efficacy analyses. When endoscopic healing was defined as MCSe of 0, the concordance between rectosigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy was nearly perfect.

Association Between Response to Etrolizumab and Expression of Integrin αE and Granzyme A in Colon Biopsies of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Etrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against the ß7 integrin subunit that has shown efficacy vs placebo in patients with moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients with colon tissues that expressed high levels of the integrin αE gene (ITGAE) appeared to have the best response. We compared differences in colonic expression of ITGAE and other genes between patients who achieved clinical remission with etrolizumab vs those who did. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data collected from 110 patients with UC who participated in a phase 2 placebo-controlled trial of etrolizumab, as well as from 21 patients with UC or without inflammatory bowel disease (controls) enrolled in an observational study at a separate site. Colon biopsies were collected from patients in both studies and analyzed by immunohistochemistry and gene expression profiling. Mononuclear cells were isolated and analyzed by flow cytometry. We identified biomarkers associated with response to etrolizumab. In the placebo-controlled trial, clinical remission was defined as total Mayo Clinic Score ≤2, with no individual subscore >1, and mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic score ≤1. RESULTS: Colon tissues collected at baseline from patients who had a clinical response to etrolizumab expressed higher levels of T-cell-associated genes than patients who did not respond (P < .05). Colonic CD4(+) integrin αE(+) cells from patients with UC expressed higher levels of granzyme A messenger RNA (GZMA mRNA) than CD4(+) αE(-) cells (P < .0001); granzyme A and integrin αE protein were detected in the same cells. Of patients receiving 100 mg etrolizumab, a higher proportion of those with high levels of GZMA mRNA (41%) or ITGAE mRNA (38%) than those with low levels of GZMA (6%) or ITGAE mRNA (13%) achieved clinical remission (P < .05) and mucosal healing (41% GZMA(high) vs 19% GZMA(low) and 44% ITGAE(high) vs 19% ITGAE(low)). Compared with ITGAE(low) and GZMA(low) patients, patients with ITGAE(high) and GZMA(high) had higher baseline numbers of epithelial crypt-associated integrin αE(+) cells (P < .01 for both), but a smaller number of crypt-associated integrin αE(+) cells after etrolizumab treatment (P < .05 for both). After 10 weeks of etrolizumab treatment, expression of genes associated with T-cell activation and genes encoding inflammatory cytokines decreased by 40%-80% from baseline (P < .05) in patients with colon tissues expressing high levels of GZMA at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of GZMA and ITGAE mRNAs in colon tissues can identify patients with UC who are most likely to benefit from etrolizumab; expression levels decrease with etrolizumab administration in biomarker(high) patients. Larger, prospective studies of markers are needed to assess their clinical value.

Etrolizumab as induction therapy for ulcerative colitis: a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Etrolizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody that selectively binds the ß7 subunit of the heterodimeric integrins α4ß7 and αEß7. We aimed to assess etrolizumab in patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 study, patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis who had not responded to conventional therapy were recruited from 40 referral centres in 11 countries. Eligible patients (aged 18-75 years; Mayo Clinic Score [MCS] of 5 of higher [or ≥6 in USA]; and disease extending 25 cm or more from anal verge) were randomised (1:1:1) to one of two dose levels of subcutaneous etrolizumab (100 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 8, with placebo at week 2; or 420 mg loading dose [LD] at week 0 followed by 300 mg at weeks 2, 4, and 8), or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was clinical remission at week 10, defined as MCS of 2 or less (with no individual subscore of >1), analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (mITT; all randomly assigned patients who had received at least one dose of study drug, had at least one post-baseline disease-activity assessment, and had a centrally read screening endoscopic subscore of ≥2). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01336465. FINDINGS: Between Sept 2, 2011, and July 11, 2012, 124 patients were randomly assigned, of whom five had a endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 and were excluded from the mITT population, leaving 39 patients in the etrolizumab 100 mg group, 39 in the etrolizumab 300 mg plus LD group, and 41 in the placebo group for the primary analyses. No patients in the placebo group had clinical remission at week 10, compared with eight (21% [95% CI 7-36]) patients in the etrolizumab 100 mg group (p=0·0040) and four (10% [0·2-24]) patients in the 300 mg plus LD group (p=0·048). Adverse events occurred in 25 (61%) of 41 patients in the etrolizumab 100 mg group (five [12%] of which were regarded as serious), 19 (48%) of 40 patients in the etrolizumab 300 mg plus LD group (two [5%] serious), and 31 (72%) of 43 patients in the placebo group (five [12%] serious). INTERPRETATION: Etrolizumab was more likely to lead to clinical remission at week 10 than was placebo. Therefore, blockade of both α4ß7 and αEß7 might provide a unique therapeutic approach for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, and phase 3 studies have been planned. FUNDING: Genentech.

A randomised phase I study of etrolizumab (rhuMAb ß7) in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE: Etrolizumab (rhuMAb ß7, anti-ß7, PRO145223) is a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting the ß7 subunit of the heterodimeric integrins α4ß7 and αEß7, which are implicated in leucocyte migration and retention in ulcerative colitis (UC). This randomised phase I study evaluated the safety and pharmacology of etrolizumab in patients with moderate to severe UC. DESIGN: In the single ascending dose (SAD) stage, etrolizumab (0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10 mg/kg intravenous, 3.0 mg/kg subcutaneous (SC) or placebo) was administered 4:1 (n=25) in each cohort. In the multiple dose (MD) stage, new patients received monthly etrolizumab (0.5 mg/kg SC (n=4), 1.5 mg/kg SC (n=5), 3.0 mg/kg SC (n=4), 4.0 mg/kg intravenous (n=5)) or placebo (n=5). The pharmacokinetics was studied and Mayo Clinic Score evaluated at baseline, day 29 (SAD), and days 43 and 71 (MD). RESULTS: In the SAD stage, there were no dose limiting toxicities, infusion or injection site reactions. Two impaired wound healing serious adverse events occurred in two patients receiving etrolizumab. In the MD stage, there were no dose limiting toxicities, and no infusion or injection site reactions. Headache was the most common adverse event, occurring more often in etrolizumab patients. Antietrolizumab antibodies were detected in two subjects. The duration of ß7 receptor full occupancy was dose related. A clinical response was observed in 12/18 patients, and clinical remission in 3/18 patients treated with etrolizumab in the MD stage, compared with 4/5 and 1/5 placebo patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Etrolizumab is well tolerated in moderate to severe UC. Further investigation is warranted.

EMerging BiomARKers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (EMBARK) study identifies fecal calprotectin, serum MMP9, and serum IL-22 as a novel combination of biomarkers for Crohn's disease activity: role of cross-sectional imaging.

OBJECTIVES: In Crohn's disease (CD), clinical symptoms correspond poorly to inflammatory disease activity. Biomarkers reflective of mucosal and bowel wall inflammation would be useful to monitor disease activity. The EMBARK study evaluated disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and CD, and used endoscopy with or without cross-sectional imaging for biomarker discovery. METHODS: UC (n=107) and CD (n=157) patients were characterized and underwent ileocolonoscopy (ICO). A subset of CD patients (n=66) also underwent computed tomography enterography (CTE). ICO and CTE were scored by a gastroenterologist and radiologist who incorporated findings of inflammation into a single score (ICO-CTE) for patients that underwent both procedures. Serum and fecal biomarkers were evaluated for association with the Mayo Clinic endoscopy score in UC patients and with ICO alone or ICO-CTE in CD patients. Individual biomarkers with a moderate degree of correlation (P≤0.3) were evaluated using multivariate analysis with model selection using a stepwise procedure. RESULTS: In UC, ordinal logistic regression using Mayo Clinic endoscopy subscore selected the combination of fecal calprotectin and serum matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9; pseudo R(2)=0.353). In CD, we found that use of the ICO-CTE increased specificity of known biomarkers. Using ICO-CTE as the dependent variable for biomarker discovery, the selected biomarkers were the combination of fecal calprotectin, serum MMP9, and serum IL-22 (r=0.699). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of both ICO and CTE into a single measure increased biomarker performance in CD. Combinations of fecal calprotectin and serum MMP9 for UC, and combinations of fecal calprotectin, serum MMP9, and serum interleukin-22 in CD, demonstrated the strongest association with imaging/endoscopy-defined inflammation.

Sustained Clinical Remission With Vedolizumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Sustaining clinical remission is an important treatment goal in moderate-to-severe UC. This post hoc exploratory analysis assessed the long-term efficacy of vedolizumab in the subset of patients with UC in the GEMINI 1 study who were in clinical remission by week 14 after 3 induction doses, administered at weeks 0, 2, and 6. METHODS: Sustained clinical remission (primary endpoint) was evaluated using 2 definitions: (1) a partial Mayo Score (pMS) of ≤2 with no subscore >1 and (2) a rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) of 0 throughout weeks 14, 26, 38, and 52. RESULTS: The proportion of patients in clinical remission at week 14 was significantly higher in patients receiving vedolizumab (n = 620) compared with placebo (n = 149) (pMS: 32.7% vs 20.1% [percentage-point difference (∆) 12.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-20.0]; RBS: 47.3% vs 28.9% [∆18.4%; 95% CI, 10.1-26.7]). Of patients in clinical remission at week 14, a significantly higher proportion of vedolizumab-treated patients achieved sustained clinical remission compared with placebo (pMS: 66.5% vs 26.7%; ∆39.8%; 95% CI, 22.7-56.9; RBS: 56.7% vs 20.9%; ∆35.7%; 95% CI, 22.3-49.1). Findings were consistent in tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist-naive and antagonist-failure patients. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, 35%-40% more patients receiving a full induction course of vedolizumab had sustained clinical remission after 52 weeks of therapy. This result was observed irrespective of TNF antagonist treatment history. Clinical remission at week 14 may therefore be a predictor for sustained clinical remission with vedolizumab.

Gut-Selective Integrin-Targeted Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Integrins are cell surface receptors with bidirectional signalling capabilities that can bind to adhesion molecules in order to mediate homing of leukocytes to peripheral tissues. Gut-selective leukocyte homing is facilitated by interactions between α4ß7 and its ligand, mucosal addressin cellular adhesion molecule-1 [MAdCAM-1], while retention of lymphocytes in mucosal tissues is mediated by αEß7 binding to its ligand E-cadherin. Therapies targeting gut-selective trafficking have shown efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], confirming the importance of leukocyte trafficking in disease pathobiology. This review will provide an overview of integrin structure, function and signalling, and highlight the role that these molecules play in leukocyte homing and retention. Anti-integrin therapeutics, including gut-selective antibodies against the ß7 integrin subunit [etrolizumab] and the α4ß7 integrin heterodimer [vedolizumab and abrilumab], and the non-gut selective anti-α4 integrin [natalizumab], will be discussed, as well as novel targeting approaches using small molecules.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Serum Etrolizumab and Circulating ß7 Receptor Occupancy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

Etrolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, specifically binds to the ß7 subunit of the heterodimeric integrins α4ß7 and αEß7. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data were collected from an etrolizumab phase 1 trial in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). We developed a mechanism-based model to simultaneously describe the kinetics of serum etrolizumab concentration and free ß7 receptors on circulating intestinal-homing CD4+ T lymphocytes. Included in the analysis were 38 phase 1 UC patients who received single or 3 monthly doses of etrolizumab intravenously or subcutaneously across a dose range of 0.3 to 10 mg/kg. A quasi-steady-state target-mediated drug disposition model was developed to describe the dynamic interaction between serum etrolizumab concentration and free ß7 receptors on intestinal-homing CD4+ T lymphocytes in UC patients. The time profiles of serum etrolizumab and absolute counts of ß7+ lymphocytes (expressed as percentage of baseline level) were well described by the quasi-steady-state target-mediated drug disposition model. The model was able to characterize the maximum drug occupancy of ß7 receptors on intestinal-homing CD4+ T lymphocytes and the concentration-dependent duration of occupancy. The 90% effective concentration for etrolizumab to saturate the ß7 receptors on intestinal homing CD4+ T cells was 1.3 µg/mL. PK and PD profiles predicted by the model were consistent with observations from a subsequent phase 2 study. In conclusion, an integrated PK/PD model developed in this analysis reasonably described serum etrolizumab PK profiles and the relationship between PK and PD (free ß7 receptors on circulating intestinal-homing CD4+ T lymphocytes) in UC patients.

αEß7 Integrin Identifies Subsets of Pro-Inflammatory Colonic CD4+ T Lymphocytes in Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The αEß7 integrin is crucial for retention of T lymphocytes at mucosal surfaces through its interaction with E-cadherin. Pathogenic or protective functions of these cells during human intestinal inflammation, such as ulcerative colitis [UC], have not previously been defined, with understanding largely derived from animal model data. Defining this phenotype in human samples is important for understanding UC pathogenesis and is of translational importance for therapeutic targeting of αEß7-E-cadherin interactions. METHODS: αEß7+ and αEß7- colonic T cell localization, inflammatory cytokine production and expression of regulatory T cell-associated markers were evaluated in cohorts of control subjects and patients with active UC by immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry and real-time PCR of FACS-purified cell populations. RESULTS: CD4+αEß7+ T lymphocytes from both healthy controls and UC patients had lower expression of regulatory T cell-associated genes, including FOXP3, IL-10, CTLA-4 and ICOS in comparison with CD4+αEß7- T lymphocytes. In UC, CD4+αEß7+ lymphocytes expressed higher levels of IFNγ and TNFα in comparison with CD4+αEß7- lymphocytes. Additionally the CD4+αEß7+ subset was enriched for Th17 cells and the recently described Th17/Th1 subset co-expressing both IL-17A and IFNγ, both of which were found at higher frequencies in UC compared to control. CONCLUSION: αEß7 integrin expression on human colonic CD4+ T cells was associated with increased production of pro-inflammatory Th1, Th17 and Th17/Th1 cytokines, with reduced expression of regulatory T cell-associated markers. These data suggest colonic CD4+αEß7+ T cells are pro-inflammatory and may play a role in UC pathobiology.

Discovery of Biomarkers of Response in Early Drug Development.

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease have traditionally been managed by incrementally stepping up within a hierarchy of therapeutic classes consequent to failing a given therapeutic─necessitated by the notion that any type of therapeutic will only induce clinical response and remission in a fraction of, but not all, patients. Hence, the selection of therapies approximates stage of disease rather than patient-specific characteristics that would allow selection of a specific mechanism of action for therapeutic intervention. Development of prognostic biomarkers [to identify patients with more aggressive disease and a worse prognosis], as well as predictive biomarkers [to predict response or non-response to a particular therapy], has been identified as a key requirement for attainment of better overall response rates or to improve the response of the most severely ill patient subgroup. Since the state of biomarker development is early and the process in inflammatory bowel disease appears more complex than in other therapeutic areas such as oncology, profiling of potential biomarkers across broad populations of undifferentiated patients will be important in refining current hypotheses and progressing their study and validation.

The effects and metabolic fate of nitroflurbiprofen in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Nitric oxide-donating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NO-NSAIDs) are a new class of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors. To investigate whether these drugs actually release nitric oxide (NO), we labeled the nitroxy group of nitroflurbiprofen with nitrogen 15 to determine the metabolic fate of this compound in humans. METHOD: Six healthy volunteers who fasted were given an oral dose of 15 N-nitroflurbiprofen (100 mg). Samples of blood, urine, and gastric headspace gas were taken over a 24-hour period to determine the levels of nitroflurbiprofen, flurbiprofen, total nitrate/nitrite, 15 N-nitrate/nitrite, COX activity, and gastric NO. In a crossover study (1 week apart), a further 6 healthy volunteers who fasted were given an oral dose of nitroflurbiprofen (100 mg) or flurbiprofen (65 mg) and levels of gastric NO were determined. RESULTS: Nitroflurbiprofen was undetectable in the systemic circulation. Levels of 15 N-nitrate/nitrite (5.2% +/- 1.5% enrichment) and flurbiprofen (2.4 +/- 0.7 microg/mL) peaked at 4 hours in the plasma and gradually decreased thereafter. In unstimulated blood, the plasma levels of thromboxane B 2 (COX-1 activity) were 2 to 3 ng/mL, and after calcium ionophore stimulation, large amounts of thromboxane B 2 were produced (112 +/- 31 ng/mL). Prostaglandin E 2 was undetectable in unstimulated blood. After lipopolysaccharide stimulation, the plasma levels of prostaglandin E 2 increased to 15 +/- 4 ng/mL. The metabolite flurbiprofen inhibited plasma COX-1 activity for the duration of the study period (maximum inhibition at 4 hours), whereas COX-2 activity recovered after 6 hours. In the crossover study, levels of gastric NO were higher in subjects given nitroflurbiprofen, when compared with those given flurbiprofen. (The area under the curve for gastric NO was 435 +/- 107 ppm . h versus 305 +/- 94 ppm . h [95% confidence interval of the difference, 89-172 ppm . h; P < .001]). CONCLUSION: Nitroflurbiprofen was undetectable in the systemic circulation, suggesting metabolism to 15 N-nitrate/nitrite and flurbiprofen in the presystemic circulation. Levels of gastric NO were significantly higher after ingestion of nitroflurbiprofen than flurbiprofen.