Lung Cancer Screening Registry Reveals Low-dose CT Screening Remains Heavily Underutilized.

BACKGROUND: Since 2013, the United States Preventive Services Task Force has recommended annual screening for lung cancer in high-risk patients with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Current literature has provided estimates of the lung cancer screening rate and only prior to appropriate insurance coverage for LDCTs. The aim of this study was to use newly established registry data to assess the lung cancer screening rate across the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from the Lung Cancer Screening Registry provided by the American College of Radiology in 2016, we collected the total number of LDCT screens performed from all 1962 accredited radiographic screening sites. The 2015 National Health Interview Survey was used to estimate screening eligible smokers per United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria. These data were compared to calculate screening rate. RESULTS: In 2016, 2.0% of 7.6 million eligible smokers were screened. Rates varied by region from 1.1% in the West to 3.9% in the Northeast. The South consisted of 40.4% of eligible smokers and the most accredited screening sites (37%); however, their screening rate was among the lowest (1.7%) in the nation. Smoking cessation counseling was offered to 84% of screened current smokers prior to receiving LDCTs. CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer screening remains heavily underutilized despite guideline recommendation since 2013, insurance coverage, and its potential to prevent thousands of lung cancer deaths annually.

NSCLC patient "migration" for treatment: A retrospective analysis of patient characteristics, travel patterns, and survival differences.

PURPOSE: Every year a significant population exists of those diagnosed with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who do not receive initial treatment upon diagnosis and then "migrate" to additional hospital before ultimately getting treatment. Migration to different hospitals may play a role in the decision to treat or not-to-treat, and we aimed to evaluate the potential factors that lead to treatment. METHODS: A retrospective review of 6212 patients with NSCLC from 29 Kentucky hospital registries from 2012 to 2014 was performed. Variables collected included hospital accreditation status, age at diagnosis, stage, overall survival (OS), and insurance status. Hospital records were matched to Kentucky Cancer Registry records to determine the number of hospitals visited for treatment. RESULTS: Most patients were treated at their initial hospital (73%). Of the remaining patients, 36% migrated to a different hospital where most received treatment (93%). Migrating to another hospital was associated with Stage I-III disease, younger age (66.4 vs 72.2 years), and longer OS (561 vs 157 days). Notably, migration was also associated with private insurance status and missing treatment modalities at the initial hospital. Treatment after migrating was associated with Stage I-II disease, younger age (65.8 vs 72.8 years), and longer OS (595 vs 153 days). After adjusting for confounders, treated migrating patients lived longer than initially treated patients (591 vs 505 days), especially among those with stage III (563 vs 495 days) and IV (379 vs 300 days) disease. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates a survival benefit for initially untreated patients with advanced disease who migrate to another hospital for treatment. Migration was associated with having private insurance, thus making it noteworthy of the relationship between NSCLC survival benefit and insurance status.

Timing of treatment in small-cell lung cancer.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with poor survival and rapid doubling time. Current practice is to treat SCLC as soon as possible but evidence on appropriate timing of treatment from diagnosis (TTD) is lacking. This is a retrospective analysis of SCLC patients from the 2012 to 2015 Kentucky Cancer Registry. Data collected included age at diagnosis, stage, gender, race, insurance and treatment. Factors and survival associated with TTD were identified with logistic regression analyses and Cox proportional hazards models. Among the 2992 SCLC patients, 2371 (79%) of SCLC patients were treated with one or more treatment modalities. Among treated patients, 93% received chemotherapy ± radiation with the mean TTD of 18 days. Most patients (80%) have TTD of ≤ 4 weeks with 33% treated within 1 week, 20% 1-2 weeks, and 27% 2-4 weeks from diagnosis. Delay in treatment (TTD > 4 weeks) was less in stage III and IV disease (odds ratio: 0.33 and 0.27 respectively, p < 0.01) but not significantly associated with age, race, gender, and insurance. One and two-year survival of patients with TTD ≤ 4 weeks was significantly worse when compared to > 4 weeks (hazard ratio = 1.43, 95% CI 1.2-1.6, p < 0.01; HR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.3-1.6, p < 0.01 respectively). These results show a trend toward better survival with late treatment of SCLC. Therefore, a general urgency to treat SCLC needs to be re-evaluated with consideration of patients needing more optimization before treatment. Further studies are needed to better clarify the appropriate timing of treatment from diagnosis in SCLC and who will benefit from early versus late treatment.