Diagnosis of Basal Cell Carcinoma with Ex-vivo Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy in a Real-life Setting.

Ex-vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy provides a rapid alternative to routine histological processing using haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. Previous studies suggest high diagnostic accuracy in basal cell carcinoma. This study investigates the diagnostic accuracy of confocal laser scanning microscopy reporting of basal cell carcinoma in a real-life setting and compares reporting by dermatopathologists inexperienced in use of confocal laser scanning microscopy with reporting by an expert in confocal laser scanning microscopy. A total of 334 confocal laser scanning microscopy scans were diagnosed by 2 dermatopathologists inexperienced in the diagnosis of confocal laser scanning microscopy as well as an experienced examiner of confocal laser scanning microscopy scans. The inexperienced examiners achieved a sensitivity of 59.5/71.1% and specificity of 94.8/89.8%. The experienced examiner achieved a sensitivity of 78.5% and specificity of 84.8%. Detection of tumour remnants in margin controls showed insufficient values among inexperienced (30.1/33.3%) and experienced (41.7%) investigators. The results of this study, of real-life setting basal cell carcinoma reporting with confocal laser scanning microscopy, found a lower diagnostic accuracy than published data regarding artificial settings. A poor accuracy in tumour margin control is clinically relevant and could restrict the use of confocal laser scanning microscopy in clinical routine. Prior knowledge of haematoxylin and eosin trained pathologists can be partially transferred to the reporting of confocal laser scanning microscopy scans; however, specific training is recommended.

A Feasibility Study for Immediate Histological Assessment of Various Skin Biopsies Using Ex Vivo Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.

BACKGROUND: Digitally stained ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) scans are a possible alternative to formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stained slides. This study explores the diagnostic accuracy of digitally-stained CLSM scans in comparison to H&E-stained slides in various dermatologic diseases in a real-life setting. METHODS: Samples of patients out of one selected dermatologic office were primarily scanned via CLSM; a diagnosis was made afterwards using FFPE- and H&E-stained slides by two experienced dermatopathologists. Primary outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis in digitally stained CLSM scans in three separate diagnostic groups. RESULTS: CLSM evaluation of epithelial tumors (n = 132) demonstrated a sensitivity of 64.3%/83.9% and a specificity of 84.2%/71.1%. Diagnosis of melanocytic tumors (n = 86) showed a sensitivity of 19.1%/85.1% and a specificity of 96.3%/66.7%. In the diagnosis of other tumors/cysts and inflammatory dermatoses (n = 42), a sensitivity of 96.4%/96.8% and a specificity of 57.1%/45.5% was reached. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the possibilities and limitations of a broad use of CLSM. Because of a partly low diagnostic accuracy, such an application does not seem to be recommendable at present for every indication.