Influence of Infarct Morphology and Patterns on Cognitive Outcomes After Endovascular Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: To assess the association of qualitative and quantitative infarct characteristics and 3 cognitive outcome tests, namely the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for mild cognitive impairment, the Boston Naming Test for visual confrontation naming, and the Sunnybrook Neglect Assessment Procedure for neglect, in large vessel occlusion stroke. METHODS: Secondary observational cohort study using data from the randomized-controlled ESCAPE-NA1 trial (Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke), in which patients with large vessel occlusion undergoing endovascular treatment were randomized to receive either intravenous Nerinetide or placebo. MOCA, Sunnybrook Neglect Assessment Procedure, and 15-item Boston Naming Test were obtained at 90 days. Total infarct volume, gray matter, and white matter infarct volumes were manually measured on 24-hour follow-up imaging. Infarcts were also visually classified as either involving the gray matter only or both the gray and white matter and scattered versus territorial. Associations of infarct variables and cognitive outcomes were analyzed using multivariable ordinal or binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 1105 patients enrolled in ESCAPE-NA1, 1026 patients with visible infarcts on 24-hour follow-up imaging were included. MOCA and Sunnybrook Neglect Assessment Procedure were available for 706 (68.8%) patients and the 15-item Boston Naming Test was available for 682 (66.5%) patients. Total infarct volume was associated with worse MOCA scores (adjusted common odds ratio per 10 mL increase, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.04-1.06]). After adjusting for baseline variables and total infarct volume, mixed gray and white matter involvement (versus gray matter-only adjusted common odds ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.37-2.69]), white matter infarct volume (adjusted common odds ratio per 10 mL increase 1.36 [95% CI, 1.18-1.58]) and territorial (versus scattered) infarct pattern (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.15-2.38]) were associated with worse MOCA scores. Results for Sunnybrook Neglect Assessment Procedure and 15-item Boston Naming Test were similar, except for the territorial infarct pattern, which did not reach statistical significance in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Besides total infarct volume, infarcts that involve the white matter and that show a territorial distribution were associated with worse cognitive outcomes, even after adjusting for total infarct volume.

Challenges to Widespread Implementation of Stroke Thrombectomy.

Endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke is one of the most efficacious and effective treatments in medicine, yet globally, its implementation remains limited. Patterns of EVT underutilization exist in virtually any health care system and range from a complete lack of access to selective undertreatment of certain patient subgroups. In this review, we outline different patterns of EVT underutilization and possible causes. We discuss common challenges and bottlenecks that are encountered by physicians, patients, and other stakeholders when trying to establish and expand EVT services in different scenarios and possible pathways to overcome these challenges. Lastly, we discuss the importance of implementation research studies, strategic partnerships, and advocacy efforts to mitigate EVT underutilization.

Endovascular Treatment for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Applying Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Arterial Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare but severely disabling form of stroke. Acute treatment mainly consists of medical management, since there is no robust evidence suggesting the benefit of endovascular treatment for CVT. Given the relative lack of data to guide acute treatment decision-making, CVT treatment decisions are mostly made on a case-by-case basis. In some ways, the current status quo of endovascular treatment for CVT resembles the state of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke before the wave of major positive large vessel occlusion endovascular treatment trials in 2015. SUMMARY: The current state of evidence with regard to endovascular CVT treatment is summarized, parallels to acute ischemic stroke are drawn, and it is discussed how the lessons learned from the evolution of acute ischemic stroke endovascular treatment (EVT) trials could be applied to designing a trial of endovascular treatment for CVT. The review ends by outlining possible scenarios for the future of endovascular CVT treatment. KEY MESSAGES: CVT is a serious disease, affecting young patients and their families, and harbors a considerable social and economic burden. Working toward high-level evidence for the best possible treatment strategy and exploring a possible role for EVT to improve outcomes in CVT needs to remain a high priority in stroke research.

Cost-Effectiveness of Late Endovascular Thrombectomy vs. Best Medical Management in a Clinical Trial Setting and Real-World Setting.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess cost-effectiveness of late time-window endovascular treatment (EVT) in a clinical trial setting and a "real-world" setting. METHODS: Data are from the randomized ESCAPE trial and a prospective cohort study (ESCAPE-LATE). Anterior circulation large vessel occlusion patients presenting > 6 hours from last-known-well were included, whereby collateral status was an inclusion criterion for ESCAPE but not ESCAPE-LATE. A Markov state transition model was built to estimate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for EVT in addition to best medical care vs. best medical care only in a clinical trial setting (comparing ESCAPE-EVT to ESCAPE control arm patients) and a "real-world" setting (comparing ESCAPE-LATE to ESCAPE control arm patients). We performed an unadjusted analysis, using 90-day modified Rankin Scale(mRS) scores as model input and analysis adjusted for baseline factors. Acceptability of EVT was calculated using upper/lower willingness-to-pay thresholds of 100,000 USD/50,000 USD/QALY. RESULTS: Two-hundred and forty-nine patients were included (ESCAPE-LATE:n = 200, ESCAPE EVT-arm:n = 29, ESCAPE control-arm:n = 20). Late EVT in addition to best medical care was cost effective in the unadjusted analysis both in the clinical trial and real-world setting, with acceptability 96.6%-99.0%. After adjusting for differences in baseline variables between the groups, late EVT was marginally cost effective in the clinical trial setting (acceptability:49.9%-61.6%), but not the "real-world" setting (acceptability:32.9%-42.6%). CONCLUSION: EVT for LVO-patients presenting beyond 6 hours was cost effective in the clinical trial setting and "real-world" setting, although this was largely related to baseline patient differences favoring the "real-world" EVT group. After adjusting for these, EVT benefit was reduced in the trial setting, and absent in the real-world setting.

Infarcts in a New Territory: Insights From the ESCAPE-NA1 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Infarct in a new territory (INT) is a known complication of endovascular stroke therapy. We assessed the incidence of INT, outcomes after INT, and the impact of concurrent treatments with intravenous thrombolysis and nerinetide. METHODS: Data are from ESCAPE-NA1 trial (Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide [NA-1] in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke), a multicenter, international randomized study that assessed the efficacy of intravenous nerinetide in subjects with acute ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular thrombectomy within 12 hours from onset. Concurrent treatment and outcomes were collected as part of the trial protocol. INTs were identified on core lab imaging review of follow-up brain imaging and defined by the presence of infarct in a new vascular territory, outside the baseline target occlusion(s) on follow-up brain imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). INTs were classified by maximum diameter (<2, 2-20, and >20 mm), number, and location. The association between INT and clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale and death) was assessed using standard descriptive techniques and adjusted estimates of effect were derived from Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Among 1092 patients, 103 had INT (9.3%, median age 69.5 years, 49.5% females). There were no differences in baseline characteristics between those with versus without INT. Most INTs (91/103, 88.3%) were not associated with visible occlusions on angiography and 39 out of 103 (37.8%) were >20 mm in maximal diameter. The most common INT territory was the anterior cerebral artery (27.8%). Almost half of the INTs were multiple (46 subjects, 43.5%, range, 2-12). INT was associated with poorer outcomes as compared to no INT on the primary outcome of modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at 90 days (adjusted risk ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.57-0.89]). Infarct volume in those with INT was greater by a median of 21 cc compared with those without, and there was a greater risk of death as compared to patients with no INT (adjusted risk ratio, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.48-3.13]). CONCLUSIONS: Infarcts in a new territory are common in individuals undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke and are associated with poorer outcomes. Optimal therapeutic approaches, including technical strategies, to reduce INT represent a new target for incremental quality improvement of endovascular thrombectomy. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02930018.

Cost-effectiveness of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Stroke with Large Infarct: A United States Perspective.

Background The health economic benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) in addition to best medical management for acute ischemic stroke with large ischemic core is uncertain. Purpose To assess the cost-effectiveness of EVT plus best medical management versus best medical management alone in treating acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion and a baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) 3-5. Materials and Methods This is a secondary analysis of the randomized RESCUE-Japan LIMIT (Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolism-Japan Large Ischemic Core Trial), with enrollment November 2018 to September 2021, in which the primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Participants with a baseline ASPECTS 3-5 (on the basis of noncontrast CT and diffusion-weighted imaging) were randomized 1:1 to receive EVT plus best medical management (n = 100) or best medical management alone (n = 102). The primary outcome of the current study was cost-effectiveness, determined according to the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A decision model consisting of a short-term component (cycle length of 3 months) and a long-term Markov state transition component (cycle length of 1 year) was used to estimate expected lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from health care and societal perspectives in the United States. Upper and lower willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds were set at $100 000 and $50 000 per QALY, respectively. A deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis to determine the impact of participant age and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of parameter uncertainty were conducted. Results A total of 202 participants were included in the study (mean age, 76 years ± 10 [SD]; 112 male). EVT plus best medical management resulted in ICERs of $15 743 (health care perspective) and $19 492 (societal perspective). At the lower and upper WTP thresholds, EVT was cost-effective up to 85 and 90 years (health care perspective) and 84 and 89 years (societal perspective) of age, respectively. When analyzing participants with the largest infarcts (ASPECTS 3) separately, EVT was not cost-effective (ICER, $337 072 [health care perspective] and $383 628 [societal perspective]). Conclusion EVT was cost-effective for participants with an ASPECTS 4-5, but not for those with an ASPECTS 3. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT03702413 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Widjaja in this issue.

Secondary Medium Vessel Occlusions: When Clots Move North.

Medium vessel occlusions (MeVOs, ie, M2, M3, A2, A3, P2, and P3 segment occlusions) are increasingly recognized as a target for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke. It is important to note that not all MeVOs are equal. Primary MeVOs occur de novo with the underlying mechanisms being very similar to large vessel occlusion strokes. Secondary MeVOs arise from large vessel occlusions through clot migration or fragmentation, either spontaneously or following treatment with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular treatment. Currently, there are little data on the prevalence, management, and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke due to secondary MeVOs. This type of stroke is, however, likely to become more relevant in the future as indications for endovascular treatment continue to broaden. In this article, we describe different types of secondary MeVOs, imaging findings associated with them, challenges related to the diagnosis of secondary MeVOs, and their potential implications for treatment strategies and clinical outcomes.

Challenges of Outcome Prediction for Acute Stroke Treatment Decisions.

Physicians often base their decisions to offer acute stroke therapies to patients around the question of whether the patient will benefit from treatment. This has led to a plethora of attempts at accurate outcome prediction for acute ischemic stroke treatment, which have evolved in complexity over the years. In theory, physicians could eventually use such models to make a prediction about the treatment outcome for a given patient by plugging in a combination of demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging variables. In this article, we highlight the importance of considering the limits and nuances of outcome prediction models and their applicability in the clinical setting. From the clinical perspective of decision-making about acute treatment, we argue that it is important to consider 4 main questions about a given prediction model: (1) what outcome is being predicted, (2) what patients contributed to the model, (3) what variables are in the model (considering their quantifiability, knowability at the time of decision-making, and modifiability), and (4) what is the intended purpose of the model? We discuss relevant aspects of these questions, accompanied by clinically relevant examples. By acknowledging the limits of outcome prediction for acute stroke therapies, we can incorporate them into our decision-making more meaningfully, critically examining their contents, outcomes, and intentions before heeding their predictions. By rigorously identifying and optimizing modifiable variables in such models, we can be empowered rather than paralyzed by them.

Iatrogenic Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Lesions: What Is Their Impact and How Can It Be Measured?

Infarct volume in acute ischemic stroke is closely linked with clinical outcome, with larger infarct volumes being associated with a worse prognosis. Small iatrogenic infarcts, which can occur as a result of surgical or endovascular procedures, are often only seen on diffusion-weighted MR imaging. They often do not lead to any overtly appreciable clinical deficits, hence the term covert or silent infarcts. There is relative paucity of data on the clinical impact of periprocedural hyperintense diffusion-weighted MR imaging lesions, partly because they commonly remain undiagnosed. Clearly, a better understanding of iatrogenic periprocedural diffusion-weighted MR imaging lesions and their clinical significance is needed. In this article, we describe the current limitations of our understanding of the significance of iatrogenic diffusion-weighted MR imaging lesions using exemplary data from the ENACT trial (Safety and Efficacy of NA-1 in Patients With Iatrogenic Stroke After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair) and outline a framework for how to investigate their clinical impact.

Rethinking Consent for Stroke Trials in Time-Sensitive Situations: Insights From the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Informed consent is a key concept to ensure patient autonomy in clinical trials and routine care. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has complicated informed consent processes, due to physical distancing precautions and increased physician workload. As such, obtaining timely and adequate patient consent has become a bottleneck for many clinical trials. However, this challenging situation might also present an opportunity to rethink and reappraise our approach to consent in clinical trials. This viewpoint discusses the challenges related to informed consent during the COVID-19 pandemic, whether it could be acceptable to alter current consent processes under these circumstances, and outlines a possible framework with predefined criteria and a system of checks and balances that could allow for alterations of existing consent processes to maximize patient benefit under exceptional circumstances such as the COVID-19 pandemic without undermining patient autonomy.

Comparing the Prognostic Impact of Age and Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in Acute Stroke due to Large Vessel Occlusion.

Background and Purpose: Little is known about the combined effect of age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) in endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion, and it is not clear how the effects of baseline age and NIHSS on outcome compare to each other. The previously described Stroke Prognostication Using Age and NIHSS (SPAN) index adds up NIHSS and age to a 1:1 combined prognostic index. We added a weighting factor to the NIHSS/age SPAN index to compare the relative prognostic impact of NIHSS and age and assessed EVT effect based on weighted age and NIHSS. Methods: We performed adjusted logistic regression with good outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0­2) as primary outcome. From this model, the coefficients for NIHSS and age were obtained. The ratio between the NIHSS and age coefficients was calculated to determine a weighted SPAN index. We obtained adjusted effect size estimates for EVT in patient subgroups defined by weighted SPAN increments of 3, to evaluate potential changes in treatment effect. Results: We included 1750/1766 patients from the HERMES collaboration (Highly Effective Reperfusion Using Multiple Endovascular Devices) with available age and NIHSS data. Median NIHSS was 17 (interquartile range, 13­21), and median age was 68 (interquartile range, 57­76). Good outcome was achieved by 682/1743 (39%) patients. The NIHSS/age effect coefficient ratio was ([−0.0032]/[−0.111])=3.4, which was rounded to 3, resulting in a weighted SPAN index defined as ([3×NIHSS]+age). Cumulative EVT effect size estimates across weighted SPAN subgroups consistently favored EVT, with a number needed to treat ranging from 5.3 to 8.7. Conclusions: The impact on chance of good outcome of a 1-point increase in NIHSS roughly corresponded to a 3-year increase in patient age. EVT was beneficial across all weighted age/NIHSS subgroups.

A DELPHI consensus statement on antiplatelet management for intracranial stenting due to underlying atherosclerosis in the setting of mechanical thrombectomy.

PURPOSE: There is little data and lack of consensus regarding antiplatelet management for intracranial stenting due to underlying intracranial atherosclerosis in the setting of endovascular treatment (EVT). In this DELPHI study, we aimed to assess whether consensus on antiplatelet management in this situation among experienced experts can be achieved, and what this consensus would be. METHODS: We used a modified DELPHI approach to address unanswered questions in antiplatelet management for intracranial stenting due to underlying atherosclerosis in the setting of EVT. An expert-panel (19 neurointerventionalists from 8 countries) answered structured, anonymized on-line questionnaires with iterative feedback-loops. Panel-consensus was defined as agreement ≥ 70% for binary closed-ended questions/≥ 50% for closed-ended questions with > 2 response options. RESULTS: Panel members answered a total of 5 survey rounds. They acknowledged that there is insufficient data for evidence-based recommendations in many aspects of antiplatelet management for intracranial stenting due to underlying atherosclerosis in the setting of EVT. They believed that antiplatelet management should follow a standardized regimen, irrespective of imaging findings and reperfusion quality. There was no consensus on the timing of antiplatelet-therapy initiation. Aspirin was the preferred antiplatelet agent for the peri-procedural period, and oral Aspirin in combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor was the favored postprocedural regimen. CONCLUSION: Data on antiplatelet management for intracranial stenting due to underlying atherosclerosis in the setting of EVT are limited. Panel-members in this study achieved consensus on postprocedural antiplatelet management but did not agree upon a preprocedural and intraprocedural antiplatelet regimen. Further prospective studies to optimize antiplatelet regimens are needed.

Improving Stroke Care in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic Through Simulation: Practice Your Protocols!

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, infectious disease control is of utmost importance in acute stroke treatment. This is a new situation for most stroke teams that often leads to uncertainty among physicians, nurses, and technicians who are in immediate contact with patients. The situation is made even more complicated by numerous new regulations and protocols that are released in rapid succession. Herein, we are describing our experience with simulation training for COVID-19 stroke treatment protocols. One week of simulation training allowed us to identify numerous latent safety threats and to adjust our institution-specific protocols to mitigate them. It also helped our physicians and nurses to practice relevant tasks and behavioral patterns (eg, proper donning and doffing PPE, where to dispose potentially contaminated equipment) to minimize their infectious exposure and to adapt to the new situation. We therefore strongly encourage other hospitals to adopt simulation training to prepare their medical teams for code strokes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Endovascular treatment decision-making in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion and low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: insights from UNMASK EVT, an international multidisciplinary survey.

PURPOSE: Many stroke patients with large vessel occlusion present with a low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). There is currently no level 1A recommendation for endovascular treatment (EVT) for this patient subgroup. From a physician's standpoint, the deficits might only be slight, but they are often devastating from a patient perspective. Furthermore, early neurologic deterioration is common. The purpose of this study was to explore endovascular treatment attitudes of physicians in acute ischemic stroke patients presenting with low admission NIHSS. METHODS: In an international cross-sectional survey among stroke physicians, participants were presented the scenario of a 76-year-old stroke patient with an admission NIHSS of 2. Survey participants were then asked how they would treat the patient (A) given their current local resources, and (B) under assumed ideal conditions, i.e., without external (monetary or infrastructural) constraints. Overall, country-specific and specialty-specific decision rates were calculated and clustered multivariable logistic regression performed to provide adjusted measures of effect size. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-five participants (150 neurologists, 84 interventional neuroradiologists, 30 neurosurgeons, 11 affiliated to other specialties) from 33 countries provided their treatment approach to this case scenario. Most physicians favored an endovascular treatment approach, either combined with intravenous alteplase (55.3% under assumed ideal and 52.0% under current working conditions) or as single treatment (11.3% under assumed ideal and 8.4% under current conditions). CONCLUSION: Despite the limited evidence for endovascular therapy in acute stroke patients with low NIHSS, most physicians in this survey decided to proceed with endovascular therapy. A randomized controlled trial seems warranted.

Endovascular Treatment Decision Making in Patients with Low Baseline ASPECTS: Insights from UNMASK EVT, an International Multidisciplinary Study.

BACKGROUND: Current stroke treatment guidelines restrict level 1A recommendations for endovascular therapy to patients with baseline ASPECTS score > 5. However, a recent meta-analysis from the HERMES-group showed treatment benefit in patients with ASPECTS ≤ 5. We aimed to explore how physicians across different specialties and countries approach endovascular treatment decision-making in acute ischemic stroke patients with low baseline ASPECTS. METHODS: In a multidisciplinary survey, 607 stroke physicians were randomly assigned 10 out of a pool of 22 case-scenarios, 3 of which involved patients with low baseline ASPECTS (A:40-year old with ASPECTS 4, B:33-year old with ASPECTS 2 C:72-year old with ASPECTS 3), otherwise fulfilling all EVT-eligibility criteria. Participants were asked how they would treat the patient A) under their current local resources and B) under assumed ideal conditions, without any external (monetary, policy-related or infrastructural) restraints. Overall and scenario-specific decision rates were calculated. Clustered multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association of baseline ASPECTS with endovascular treatment-decision. RESULTS: Baseline ASPECTS score was significantly associated with current (OR:1.09, CI 1.05-1.13) and ideal endovascular treatment-decision (OR:1.12, CI 1.08-1.16). Overall current and ideal treatment decision-rates for the low ASPECTS scenarios were 57.1% and 57.6%. Current and ideal rates for the two younger patients were higher (scenario A:69.9/60.4%, scenario B:60.0/61.5%) compared to the 72-year old patient (41.3/40.2%). CONCLUSION: Most physicians decided to proceed with endovascular treatment despite low baseline ASPECTS, particularly in younger patients. This may have implications on the design and execution of low ASPECTS randomized trials.

Symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease: current challenges and opportunities for diagnosis and treatment.

Symptomatic non-stenotic carotid plaques (SyNC) are an under-researched and under-recognized source of stroke. Various imaging markers of non-stenotic carotid plaques that are associated with stroke risk have been identified, but these causal relationships need to be confirmed in additional prospective studies. Currently, there exists neither a standardized SyNC definition nor a dedicated set of imaging protocols, although researchers have started to address these shortcomings. Moreover, many neuroradiologists are still unaware of the condition, and hence do not comment on high-risk plaque features other than stenosis in their reports. Regarding SyNC treatment, scant data exist as to whether and to what extent medical, interventional and surgical treatments could influence the course of the disease; the relative lack of data on the 'natural' history of untreated SyNC makes treatment comparisons difficult. In our opinion, endovascular SyNC treatment represents the most promising treatment option for SyNC, since it allows for targeted elimination of the embolic source, with few systemic side effects and without the need for general anesthesia. However, currently available carotid devices are designed to treat stenotic lesions, and thus are not optimally designed for SyNC. Developing a device specifically tailored to SyNC could be an important step towards establishing endovascular SyNC treatment in clinical practice. In this review, we provide an overview of the current state of evidence with regard to epidemiological, clinical and imaging features of SyNC, propose a SyNC definition based on imaging and clinical features, and outline a possible pathway towards evidence-based SyNC therapies, with a special focus on endovascular SyNC treatment.