Clinical impact of del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery: A prospective randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to assess the benefits of del Nido cardioplegia compared with cold blood cardioplegia solution in terms of myocardial protection during adult cardiac surgery. METHODS: A total of 474 adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, heart valve surgery, thoracic aortic surgery, or combined procedures were randomized to the del Nido cardioplegia group (n = 234) or the cold blood cardioplegia solution group (n = 240) after provided informed consent. The primary end points assessed inotropic support requirements, severe cardiovascular events, and troponin trend within the first 48 hours of intensive care unit stay. Reperfusion arrhythmias, aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, and other clinical perioperative variables were considered as secondary end points. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found regarding postoperative inotropic support requirements or the incidence of severe cardiovascular events. The del Nido cardioplegia group showed a higher return to spontaneous sinus rhythm (P< .001), a lower number of defibrillation attempts (P< .001), and an earlier peak troponin value in the postoperative period. Peak blood glucose levels and intravenous insulin requirements were significantly lower in the del Nido cardioplegia group. We found no significant differences regarding aortic crossclamp or cardiopulmonary bypass time. We did observe a lower incidence of postoperative stroke in the del Nido cardioplegia group (2.6% vs 6.7%; P= .035). CONCLUSIONS: del Nido cardioplegia can be used safely and with comparable outcomes compared with traditional cardioplegia solutions. Additional advantages over glycemic control, reperfusion arrhythmias, and its comfortable redosing interval make del Nido an interesting alternative for myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery. A significant decrease in postoperative stroke will require further research to shed light on the results of this study. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Aortic events in pregnant patients with Marfan syndrome. Lessons from a multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy in women with Marfan syndrome (MS) is associated with an increased risk of aortic events. The clinical evidence on pregnant patients with MS is limited and there is no specific consensus on their optimal management. We report our multicenter experience. METHODS: From January 2004 to January 2020, 632 patients with MS underwent periodic monitoring in Marfan units. During this period, we identified all pregnant women with MS and analyzed the incidence of aortic events during pregnancy and puerperium. RESULTS: There were 133 pregnancies in 89 women with MS (8 women with prior aortic surgery). There were no maternal deaths, but 5 women had aortic events during the third trimester and puerperium (type A dissections in 2, type B dissection in 1, and significant [≥ 3mm] aortic growth in 2). The aortic event rate was 3.7%. Pregestational aortic diameter≥ 40mm showed a nonsignificant association with aortic events (P=.058). Fetal mortality was 3% and 37.6% of births were cesarean deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: Women with MS have an increased risk of aortic events during pregnancy, especially in the third trimester and postpartum period. Patients with MS and aortic diameters ≥40mm should be assessed in experienced centers for prophylactic aortic surgery before pregnancy. It is important to provide early diagnosis, prepregnancy study of the aorta, beta-blocker administration, and close monitoring during pregnancy, especially during the last trimester and postpartum.

Countries Response for People With Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background and Objectives: During the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, isolation and prevention measures to reduce COVID-19 contagions are essential for the care of all people; these measures should comply with the principles of inclusion and accessibility for people with disabilities (PWD), with all kinds of deficiencies and levels of dependency. Thereby, the aim of this article is to present the measures adopted for PWD or people with rehabilitation needs, for containment, mitigation, or suppression of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in different countries of all continents and of all income levels. Methods: A narrative approach was used in this article. First, a broad search was carried out in the 193 member states of the UN, and then 98 countries that issued any document, report, or information related to disability and COVID-19 were selected. Finally, 32 countries were included in this article because they presented official information. We considered official sources, the information available in the government, or on the health ministry page of the country. In this way, the countries that presented information which did not correspond to an official source were excluded. The search was conducted in August 2020 and updated in March 2021. Results: First, the non-pharmacological general interventions for PWD included informative measures and general recommendations during the stay at home, isolation, and biosecurity measures, contagion prevention, detection of positive cases, mobilization measures, and measures implemented in institutions or residences of PWD. Second, we identified the economic and social benefits provided to PWD during the pandemic. Finally, we identified the measures taken by countries according to the type of impairment (visual, hearing, physical, mental, and cardiopulmonary impairment) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, only 50% of countries from the five world regions created and implemented specific measures for PWD to containment, mitigation, or suppression of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. There is very little specific information available about the measures to continue with the care of people with rehabilitation needs and the long-term follow-up of PWD, and for the prevention and response to violence, especially for women with disabilities.

Aortic Complications in Marfan Syndrome: Should We Anticipate Preventive Aortic Root Surgery?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the risk of aortic events (death, dissection, or aortic rupture) associated with Marfan syndrome and decide on the optimal timing for preventive surgery on the aortic root. METHODS: From January 2004 to June 2015, 397 patients from Marfan Units were studied by echocardiographic and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of aorta and periodic annual monitoring. Mean follow-up was 5.6 ± 2.7 years. The annual incidence of aortic events was assessed according to aortic diameters for the optimal time for prophylactic surgery to be decided on. RESULTS: Mean age at the first visit was 28.4 ± 14.5 years, with mean sinuses of Valsalva diameter of 37.1 ± 6.6 mm., Eleven aortic events occurred during follow-up: seven deaths and four acute aortic dissections. Mean annual risk of an aortic event was 0.5% (risk of death 0.32% and risk of aortic dissection 0.18%). The increase in aortic diameters was associated with increased risk of 0.2% per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.5) with diameters less than 40 mm, 0.3% per year (95% CI, 0.1 to 1.4) between 40 and 44 mm, 1.3% per year (95% CI, 0.3 to 4.6) between 45 and 49 mm, and 5.2% per year (95% CI, 0.4 to 12.4) with diameters 50 mm or greater. Fifty-six patients underwent elective surgery with no inhospital mortality. Overall survival at 3, 5, and 10 years was 99% ± 5%, 98.6% ± 6%, and 95.5% ± 2.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of aortic events in patients with Marfan syndrome followed at specific units is low, although the risk increases with aortic diameters of 45 mm or greater. These results support current indications, but we consider it reasonable at experienced centers (elective root aortic surgery mortality less than 1%) to indicate an early surgery when the aortic root exceeds 45 mm.

Outcomes in aortic and mitral valve replacement with intervalvular fibrous body reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for intervalvular fibrous body reconstruction in aortic and mitral valve replacement is a complex operation, although mandatory in some circumstances. The long-term result of this operation remains unknown. The objective of this study was to analyze the outcomes of this technique. METHODS: A descriptive and retrospective study was carried out to analyze operative morbidity and mortality in fibrous body reconstruction with the "David technique" and to evaluate the midterm and long-term results regarding durability and survival. RESULTS: A total of 40 consecutive patients underwent the David technique between 1997 and 2014. The mean age was 58 ± 15 years and 62.5% were male. The indications were active endocarditis with paravalvular and fibrous body abscesses in 26 patients (group A) and massive calcification of the intervalvular fibrous body in 14 patients (group B). Mean European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation I predicted risk of mortality was 36 ± 24 and 16 ± 15, respectively. The hospital mortality rate was 15.3% in group A and 7.1% in group B. Survival rate after 1, 5, and 10 years was 65.4%, 57.7%, and 50% for group A and 92.9%, 85.7%, and 78.6% for group B. Freedom from reoperation at 1, 5, and 10 years was 92.3%, 84.6%, and 76.9% for group A and 90.9%, 90.9%, and 90.9% for group B. Mean follow-up was 53 ± 8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although this complex operation is associated with high perioperative mortality, the long-term results are acceptable in patients where there are not suitable alternative procedures.