[The German Transplant Registry - An Analysis of Legacy Data 2006-2016]. / Das Deutsche Transplantationsregister ­ eine Analyse der Altdaten 2006­2016.

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, medical transplant data from three institutions were merged to create a German transplant registry. Since June 2021, access to data of the registry has been available. It was planned to analyze the registry data in order to compare special allocation rules with regular allocation for heart, liver, lung, and kidney transplantation. Our approach led to a quality analysis of the registry. METHODS: Upon request, legacy data (2006-2016) of the registry was provided, divided into 61 elements. From these elements, the user had to compile the required dataset. Data checks were performed for completeness, correct allocation of information, and consistency among different sources. Software used for these tasks included R, SQL, and Excel. RESULTS: The initial elements ("waiting list" elements) of the four types of transplantations contained data from a total of 80,259 originally listed patients. However, these patients were only partially present in other elements resulting in complete datasets reflecting waiting time in only 23%, 30%, 50%, and 96%, and for post-transplantation outcomes in 14%, 11%, 38%, and 13% (heart, liver, lung, and kidney transplantation, respectively). The linking of urgency information with clinical data was successful in only a small proportion, with only 6% for heart transplantation. Incorrect and thus implausible allocations in the case of special allocation rules indicated incorrect entries in the registry. Data from different data providers were inconsistent. DISCUSSION: The incompleteness and incorrect data allocation raise doubts about the reliability of scientific studies based on the transplant registry. The complex structure also hinders the compilation of a reliable dataset, which is uncommon internationally. New data (acquisition since 2017) has only been available since December 2023. CONCLUSION: The transplant registry urgently needs restructuring. Competent clinical data management, involving transplant medical expertise, and continuous quality controls are essential in this process.

Charting the Path Forward for Risk Prediction in Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: International Validation of HALTHCC Among 4,089 Patients.

Prognosticating outcomes in liver transplant (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continues to challenge the field. Although Milan Criteria (MC) generalized the practice of LT for HCC and improved outcomes, its predictive character has degraded with increasing candidate and oncological heterogeneity. We sought to validate and recalibrate a previously developed, preoperatively calculated, continuous risk score, the Hazard Associated with Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HALTHCC), in an international cohort. From 2002 to 2014, 4,089 patients (both MC in and out [25.2%]) across 16 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia were included. A continuous risk score using pre-LT levels of alpha-fetoprotein, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium score, and tumor burden score was recalibrated among a randomly selected cohort (n = 1,021) and validated in the remainder (n = 3,068). This study demonstrated significant heterogeneity by site and year, reflecting practice trends over the last decade. On explant pathology, both vascular invasion (VI) and poorly differentiated component (PDC) increased with increasing HALTHCC score. The lowest-risk patients (HALTHCC 0-5) had lower rates of VI and PDC than the highest-risk patients (HALTHCC > 35) (VI, 7.7%[ 1.2-14.2] vs. 70.6% [48.3-92.9] and PDC:4.6% [0.1%-9.8%] vs. 47.1% [22.6-71.5]; P < 0.0001 for both). This trend was robust to MC status. This international study was used to adjust the coefficients in the HALTHCC score. Before recalibration, HALTHCC had the greatest discriminatory ability for overall survival (OS; C-index = 0.61) compared to all previously reported scores. Following recalibration, the prognostic utility increased for both recurrence (C-index = 0.71) and OS (C-index = 0.63). Conclusion: This large international trial validated and refined the role for the continuous risk metric, HALTHCC, in establishing pre-LT risk among candidates with HCC worldwide. Prospective trials introducing HALTHCC into clinical practice are warranted.

Liver transplantation and BCLC classification: Limitations impede optimum treatment.

BACKGROUND: The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system has been endorsed by international guidelines as a staging algorithm of hepatocellular carcinoma. This analysis was performed to assess the outcome of liver transplantation in patients treated against the BCLC recommendations. METHODS: The data of 198 patients who underwent liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma were extracted from a prospectively maintained database to classify the patients according to the BCLC system. RESULTS: BCLC staging was as follows: 0, n = 5; A, n = 77; B, n = 41; C, n = 53; and D, n = 22. Accordingly, liver transplantation was performed in the majority of patients against BCLC recommendations. Surgery (n = 16), radiofrequency ablation (n = 15) and transarterial chemoembolization (n = 151) preceded liver transplantation in 182 patients. Sixteen patients were transplanted without pretreatment. The1-, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 83.8%, 62.4% and 45.9%, and 1-, 5-, and 10-year recurrence rates were 7.7%, 22.7% and 26.7%. The BCLC classification did neither impact survival (P = 0.796) nor recurrence (P = 0.693). In the Cox analysis, RECIST tumor progression and initial alpha fetoprotein were independent predictors of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the oncological nor the functional stratification imposed by the BCLC system was of importance for outcome. Lack of flexibility and disregard of biological parameters hamper its clinical applicability in liver transplantation.

The Intention-to-Treat Effect of Bridging Treatments in the Setting of Milan Criteria-In Patients Waiting for Liver Transplantation.

In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) meeting the Milan criteria (MC), the benefit of locoregional therapies (LRTs) in the context of liver transplantation (LT) is still debated. Initial biases in the selection between treated and untreated patients have yielded conflicting reported results. The study aimed to identify, using a competing risk analysis, risk factors for HCC-dependent LT failure, defined as pretransplant tumor-related delisting or posttransplant recurrence. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (identification number NCT03723304). In order to offset the initial limitations of the investigated population, an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was used: 1083 MC-in patients (no LRT = 182; LRT = 901) were balanced using 8 variables: age, sex, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) value, hepatitis C virus status, hepatitis B virus status, largest lesion diameter, number of nodules, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). All the covariates were available at the first referral. After the IPTW, a pseudo-population of 2019 patients listed for LT was analyzed, comparing 2 homogeneous groups of untreated (n = 1077) and LRT-treated (n = 942) patients. Tumor progression after LRT was the most important independent risk factor for HCC-dependent failure (subhazard ratio [SHR], 5.62; P < 0.001). Other independent risk factors were major tumor diameter, AFP, MELD, patient age, male sex, and period of wait-list registration. One single LRT was protective compared with no treatment (SHR, 0.51; P < 0.001). The positive effect was still observed when 2-3 treatments were performed (SHR, 0.66; P = 0.02), but it was lost in the case of ≥4 LRTs (SHR, 0.80; P = 0.27). In conclusion, for MC-in patients, up to 3 LRTs are beneficial for success in intention-to-treat LT patients, with a 49% to 34% reduction in failure risk compared with untreated patients. This benefit is lost if more LRTs are required. A poor response to LRT is associated with a higher risk for HCC-dependent transplant failure.

Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after acute liver allograft rejection treatment: A multicenter European experience.

BACKGROUND: During the last decades, several risk factors for the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) have been investigated. However, the impact of two important drivers of oncogenesis, namely the immunosuppression and the treatment of acute cellular rejection (ACR) have been marginally addressed. This study aimed at investigating the impact of ACR treatment on the incidence of tumor recurrence in a large European HCC-LT population. METHODS: Seven hundred and eighty-one adult patients transplanted between February 1, 1985 and June 30, 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. After propensity score match, 116 patients treated for ACR using steroid boluses were compared with 115 patients who did not present any ACR or a histologic but clinical irrelevant ACR. RESULTS: Steroid boluses treated patients had a 18-fold higher overall incidence of HCC recurrence than those non-treated patients (16.4% vs. 0.9%; P<0.0001). At multivariate Cox regression analysis, steroid boluses used to treat ACR were an independent risk factor for HCC recurrence (HR=14.2; 95% CI: 1.8-110.4; P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: The decision to treat ACR as well as to reinforce immunosuppression load should be cautiously taken in view of the presented results. Prospective studies are needed to further elucidate the clinical impact of immunosuppression on HCC recurrence after transplantation.

Intention-to-treat survival benefit of liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular cancer.

The debate about the best approach to select patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) waiting for liver transplantation (LT) is still ongoing. This study aims to identify the best variables allowing to discriminate between "high-" and "low-benefit" patients. To do so, the concept of intention-to-treat (ITT) survival benefit of LT has been created. Data of 2,103 adult HCC patients consecutively enlisted during the period 1987-2015 were analyzed. Three rigorous statistical steps were used in order to create the ITT survival benefit of LT: the development of an ITT LT and a non-LT survival model, and the individual prediction of the ITT survival benefit of LT defined as the difference between the median ITT survival with (based on the first model) and without LT (based on the second model) calculated for each enrolled patient. Four variables (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, alpha-fetoprotein, Milan-Criteria status, and radiological response) displayed a high effect in terms of delta benefit. According to these risk factors, four benefit groups were identified. Patients with three to four factors ("no-benefit group"; n = 405 of 2,103; 19.2%) had no benefit of LT compared to alternative treatments. Conversely, patients without any risk factor ("large-benefit group"; n = 108; 5.1%) yielded the highest benefit from LT reaching 60 months. CONCLUSION: The ITT transplant survival benefit presented here allows physicians to better select HCC patients waiting for LT. The obtained stratification may lead to an improved and more equitable method of organ allocation. Patients without benefit should be de-listed, whereas patients with large benefit ratio should be prioritized for LT. (Hepatology 2017;66:1910-1919).

Progression of transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis in donors and recipients after domino liver transplantation-a prospective single-center cohort study.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the first-line therapy in patients with transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis and progressive familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP). Explanted organs from these patients can be used for domino liver transplantation (DLT). After DLT, de novo amyloidosis may develop in domino recipients (DR). Data were collected prospectively in a transplant database. Electroneurography by nerve conduction velocity (NCV), quantitative sensory testing, heart rate variability (HRV), sympathetic skin response, orthostatic reaction (tilt table test), transthoracic echocardiography, cardiac MRI and organ biopsy results were evaluated. The cohort included 24 FAP- (11 Val30Met, 13 nonVal30Met) and 23 DR-patients. DR symptoms referred to post-DLT only, while those of FAP patients were both pre- and post-transplantation. Symptoms of TTR-amyloidosis in Val30Met and Non-Val30Met patients pre- and post-LT were similarly distributed. Biopsy-proven de novo amyloidosis occurred in 4/23 DR after a mean observation of 10 years. Analysis for manifestations of amyloidosis only included patients with available 5-year follow-up data (n = 13 FAP, n = 12 DR). Compared to Val30Met FAP patients pre-LT, Val30Met DR patients had better NCV (P = 0.04) and HRV (P = 0.015). In the Non-Val30Met group no differences were found between DR and FAP patients pre-LT. TTR-amyloidosis symptoms showed no differences in FAP patients pre- and 5 years post-LT, irrespective of Val30Met status. In DR patients, de novo amyloidosis occurred earlier than expected. Therefore, recipients for DLT need to be carefully selected and followed.

Treatment and survival of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is increasing worldwide and a poorly defined subset of patients develops end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Differences in the biological behaviour, tumour characteristics, associated risk factors, treatment outcomes and overall survival of patients with NASH-HCC remain poorly defined. The aim of this study was to determine and analyze these differences in a large clinical cohort to guide treatment decisions. METHODS: 1119 patients with HCC treated in an 11 year period at the University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with NASH-HCC (n = 45) were older (67.6 vs. 65 years), had an increased frequency of the metabolic syndrome and complications with a higher incidence of obesity (31.1% vs. 14.7%), type II diabetes mellitus (66.7% vs. 37.85%), a higher rate of myocardial infarction (13.3% vs. 4.8%) and apoplectic stroke (8.9% vs. 2.1%) (all p < 0.05). Interestingly, liver function was preserved to a higher extent and MELD scores were significantly lower in NASH-HCC. Nonetheless, resection or orthotopic liver transplantation was performed only in 17.8% and 4.4% of NASH-HCC respectively. Overall survival was lower compared to HCC of other aetiologies. Independent of the underlying aetiology BMI exhibited a positive correlation with overall survival. CONCLUSION: Despite retained liver function, patients with NASH-associated HCC showed a decreased overall survival. With regards to the expected increasing prevalence of NASH, it will be necessary to improve screening and surveillance strategies to identify HCC in NASH early and improve survival.

Survival analysis of proposed BCLC-B subgroups in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The BCLC-staging system is used to facilitate treatment decisions in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Owing to the observed clinical heterogeneity of the intermediate stage BCLC-B, a subclassification was proposed taking Child-Pugh score and extended criteria for transplantation into account. Analysis of the prognostic significance of a proposed subclassification of the BCLC-B score in a European cohort of HCC patients. METHODS: Eight hundred and eighty four consecutive HCC patients were retrospectively analysed. Patients with stage BCLC-B were grouped according to the proposed subclassification. Baseline patient and tumour characteristics, therapy and overall survival were analysed. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty four patients with stage BCLC-B were classified as B1/B2/B3 and B4 in 16.1/56.7/7.9 and 19.3%. OS compared between adjacent subgroups (B1 vs. B2, B2 vs. B3, B3 vs. B4) did not reach statistical significance. Groupwise comparison showed significant differences between B1 vs. B3 (P = 0.035), B1 vs. B4 (P = 0.006) and B2 vs. B4 (P < 0.0001). OS was significantly improved in patients undergoing OLT (P < 0.0001). Cox regression showed no significant influence of the BCLC-B substage on survival. CONCLUSIONS: No significant survival differences between subgroups were found in the retrospective analysis. We could not confirm the BCLC-B subclassification to be prognostically meaningful in our cohort. As liver function and therapy influenced survival in this study, a more refined BCLC-B subclassification has the potential to be a useful tool to better stratify treatment decisions. Further studies in larger collectives with homogenous staging and treatment strategies are warranted to confirm the prognostic significance of the proposed subclassifications.

Graft rinse prior to reperfusion in liver transplantation: literature review and online survey within the Eurotransplant community.

Graft rinse prior reperfusion in liver transplantation (LT) is believed to reduce the incidence of postreperfusion syndrome and improve clinical outcome. A MEDLINE search was performed to obtain a comprehensive review of the published literature dealing with graft rinse in LT. Moreover, all thirty-four LT centers in the Eurotransplant (ET) region were invited to participate in an online survey to whether or not graft rinse is performed and whether further research in the field is needed. Seventeen reports have been found to investigate graft rinse protocols in 1894 LT recipients. Eighteen of the thirty centers that participated in the online survey performed graft rinse prior reperfusion in LT. The most commonly used rinse solution was albumin. Nineteen centers stated interest in participating in a multicenter RCT in the field. The published literature does not provide concluding appraisal of the benefit of graft rinse in LT. Graft rinse protocols are not standardized and are based on personal experience. Appropriately designed clinical trials addressing the topic are demanded. The online survey appears to be a helpful tool for the evaluation of clinical practice and future research topics in the transplant community.

Sorafenib perpetuates cellular anticancer effector functions by modulating the crosstalk between macrophages and natural killer cells.

UNLABELLED: Alternatively polarized macrophages (Mϕ) shape the microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and temper anticancer immune responses. We investigated if sorafenib alters the HCC microenvironment by restoring classical macrophage polarization and triggering tumor-directed natural killer (NK) cell responses. In vivo experiments were conducted with sorafenib (25 mg/kg)-treated C57BL/6 wildtype as well as hepatitis B virus (HBV) and lymphotoxin transgenic mice with and without HCC. Monocyte-derived Mϕ or tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) isolated from HCC tissue were treated with sorafenib (0.07-5.0 µg/mL) and cocultured with autologous NK cells. Mϕ and NK cell activation was analyzed by flow cytometry and killing assays, respectively. Cytokine and growth factor release was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Short-term administration of sorafenib triggered activation of hepatic NK cells in wildtype and tumor-bearing mice. In vitro, sorafenib sensitized Mϕ to lipopolysaccharide, reverted alternative Mϕ polarization and enhanced IL12 secretion (P = 0.0133). NK cells activated by sorafenib-treated Mϕ showed increased degranulation (15.3 ± 0.2% versus 32.0 ± 0.9%, P < 0.0001) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) secretion (2.1 ± 0.2% versus 8.0 ± 0.2%, P < 0.0001) upon target cell contact. Sorafenib-triggered NK cell activation was verified by coculture experiments using TAM. Sorafenib-treated Mϕ increased cytolytic NK cell function against K562, Raji, and HepG2 target cells in a dose-dependent manner. Neutralization of interleukin (IL)12 or IL18 as well as inhibition of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway reversed NK cell activation in Mϕ/NK cocultures. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib triggers proinflammatory activity of TAM and subsequently induces antitumor NK cell responses in a cytokine- and NF-κB-dependent fashion. This observation is relevant for HCC therapy, as sorafenib is a compound in clinical use that reverts alternative polarization of TAM in HCC. (HEPATOLOGY 2013;57:2358-2368).

Hepatocellular carcinoma in Child's A cirrhosis: a retrospective analysis of matched pairs following liver transplantation vs. liver resection according to the intention-to-treat principle.

This is the first matched pair analysis on the puzzling clinical problem of whether to perform liver transplantation (LT) or liver resection (LR) for Child's A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. A total of 201 patients diagnosed with HCC and Child's A liver cirrhosis were treated with LT transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or LR between 1998 and 2012. To achieve the most accurate study design, two groups of 57 patients were matched retrospectively according to their tumor characteristics detected by the initial computerized tomography (CT) scan. Sixteen of 57 LT candidates were not transplanted due to tumor progress during pre-treatment (TACE). Nevertheless, the retrospective analysis of the matched pairs according to the intention-to-treat principle resulted in a better five-yr overall survival (OS) rate of 54.3% for the group of LT candidates compared with 35.7% for those receiving LR (p = 0.19). In patients meeting the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, five-yr OS reached 58.4% after LT and 45.1% after LR (p = 0.56). For Milan criteria (MC) patients, LT resulted in 57.9% and LR in 42% five-yr OS rate (p = 0.29). In conclusion, the finding of a better OS rate in LT was not statistically significant. There was also a selection bias in favor of LT, which may have influenced the OS. Therefore, particularly in regard to organ scarcity, LR remains a viable treatment option for respectable HCC in Child's A cirrhosis.

Trends in epidemiology, treatment, and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients between 1998 and 2009: an analysis of 1066 cases of a German HCC Registry.

GOALS: The aim of this study was to analyze clinical presentation, course of disease, and management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a German referral center between 1998 and 2009. BACKGROUND: HCC is a rare tumor in Germany, but its incidence has increased over the last 30 years. New therapies such as chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads, selective internal radiotherapy, and sorafenib were introduced recently; however, the impact on clinical management and overall survival (OS) is unclear. STUDY: In this retrospective analysis, 1066 patients with HCC, separated into two 6-year periods (n=385; 1998 to 2003 and n=681; 2004 to 2009) were evaluated. RESULTS: The number of patients presenting each year (64 vs. 114 per year), with an age over 80 years or with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis increased significantly between periods. The main risk factors were alcoholic liver disease in 51.7%, chronic hepatitis C virus in 28.2%, and chronic hepatitis B virus in 13.4% of patients with liver cirrhosis and HCC. Patients presented with more advanced tumor stages and with worse liver function in period 2. The majority (61.6%) of patients received local treatment over a spectrum of Barcelona Clinic Liver-Cancer (BCLC) stages, whereas systemic therapy was offered to a minority (8.8%) and limited to BCLC stage C patients only. OS decreased in BCLC stage A and D and improved in BCLC stage B and C and decreased for all patients from 16.5 to 15.3 months between periods. CONCLUSIONS: No improvement of OS was observed when comparing time periods, partly because of the more advanced stage of HCC and because of the increasing age in the second time period. Improved and new therapeutic options and the intensification of surveillance programs are likely to increase survival of HCC patients in the future.

Integrative genomic analyses of European intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Novel ROS1 fusion gene and PBX1 as prognostic marker.

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a fatal cancer of the bile duct with a poor prognosis owing to limited therapeutic options. The incidence of intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) is increasing worldwide, and its molecular basis is emerging. Environmental factors may contribute to regional differences in the mutation spectrum of European patients with iCCA, which are underrepresented in systematic genomic and transcriptomic studies of the disease. METHODS: We describe an integrated whole-exome sequencing and transcriptomic study of 37 iCCAs patients in Germany. RESULTS: We observed as most frequently mutated genes ARID1A (14%), IDH1, BAP1, TP53, KRAS, and ATM in 8% of patients. We identified FGFR2::BICC1 fusions in two tumours, and FGFR2::KCTD1 and TMEM106B::ROS1 as novel fusions with potential therapeutic implications in iCCA and confirmed oncogenic properties of TMEM106B::ROS1 in vitro. Using a data integration framework, we identified PBX1 as a novel central regulatory gene in iCCA. We performed extended screening by targeted sequencing of an additional 40 CCAs. In the joint analysis, IDH1 (13%), BAP1 (10%), TP53 (9%), KRAS (7%), ARID1A (7%), NF1 (5%), and ATM (5%) were the most frequently mutated genes, and we found PBX1 to show copy gain in 20% of the tumours. According to other studies, amplifications of PBX1 tend to occur in European iCCAs in contrast to liver fluke-associated Asian iCCAs. CONCLUSIONS: By analyzing an additional European cohort of iCCA patients, we found that PBX1 protein expression was a marker of poor prognosis. Overall, our findings provide insight into key molecular alterations in iCCA, reveal new targetable fusion genes, and suggest that PBX1 is a novel modulator of this disease.

How to decide about liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: size and number of lesions or response to TACE?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver transplantation is a curative treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver cirrhosis. To date, patient selection for transplantation is based on size and number of nodules as assessed by imaging before listing. We hypothesized that changes in tumour features resulting from pre-transplant transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is a superior criterion to predict tumour recurrence. METHODS: 136 patients with HCC in cirrhosis with two or more cycles of pre-transplant TACE were included in this study. According to the surgical specimens, 46 patients exceeded the Milan criteria. RESULTS: Tumour recurrence occurred in 21 patients (15%). Classification of Milan criteria according to the imaging at referral was not predictive for recurrence (p=0.58), whereas the Milan criteria in the imaging immediately before transplantation reflected changes after pre-transplant TACE and were highly predictive (p<0.0001). Of the 99 patients constantly within Milan or downstaged to within Milan, 88% were recurrence-free after 5 years, compared to 55% of the patients exceeding the Milan criteria despite pre-transplant TACE. Five-year absence of recurrence was better predicted by the criterion "Progressive Disease" according to RECIST (p<0.0001). If progression was defined as any progression (including less than 20% of the sum of target lesions or new measurable lesions), predictability of recurrence in the receiver operating characteristic was 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: Imprecise assessment of size and number of tumour lesions limits prognostic importance of initial imaging. Characteristics of tumour response to TACE are reliably recognized and allow identification of suitable patients for transplantation. Future selection criteria for LT in HCC should consider this aspect.

Alpha-fetoprotein and modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors progression after locoregional therapy as predictors of hepatocellular cancer recurrence and death after transplantation.

Locoregional therapy (LRT) is being increasingly used for the management of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) in patients listed for liver transplantation (LT). Although several selection criteria have been developed, stratifications of survival according to the pathology of explanted livers and pre-LT LRT are lacking. Radiological progression according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) behavior was reviewed for 306 patients within the Milan criteria (MC-IN) and 116 patients outside the Milan criteria (MC-OUT) who underwent LRT and LT between January 1999 and March 2010. A prospectively collected database originating from 6 collaborating European centers was used for the study. Sixty-one patients (14.5%) developed HCC recurrence. For both MC-IN and MC-OUT patients, an AFP slope > 15 ng/mL/month and mRECIST progression were unique independent risk factors for HCC recurrence and patient death. When the radiological Milan criteria (MC) status was combined with radiological and biological progression, MC-IN and MC-OUT patients without risk factors had similarly excellent 5-year tumor-free and patient survival rates. MC-IN patients with at least 1 risk factor had worse outcomes, and MC-OUT patients with at least 1 risk factor had the poorest survival (P < 0.001). In conclusion, both radiological and biological modifications permit documentation of the response to LRT in patients waiting for LT. According to these 2 parameters, tumor progression significantly increases the risk of recurrence and patient death not only for MC-OUT patients but also for MC-IN patients. The monitoring of both parameters in combination with the initial radiological MC status is an essential element for further refining the selection criteria for potential liver recipients with HCC.

Liver transplantation: an appraisal of the present situation.

Liver transplantation (LT) is an established approach to treatment of end-stage liver diseases, metabolic diseases and early hepatocellular carcinoma, and the results of this procedure have improved considerably. MELD allocation and the great number of transplant centers had a negative influence on outcome in Germany. Typical surgical issues following transplantation are vascular thrombosis and the development of biliary lesions. Nonanastomotic strictures impact graft survival and cause considerable posttransplant morbidity. Nonsurgical issues in LT are hepatitis C reinfection, selection of appropriate patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and individualized immunosuppression. In hepatitis C the new antiviral drugs (protease and polymerase inhibitors) are promising tools to prevent reinfection. Nephrotoxicity caused by calcineurin inhibitors - which remain the mainstay of immunosuppression - can only partially be avoided. So far, alternative forms of treatment using mycophenolic acid and mTOR inhibitors cannot totally replace calcineurin inhibitors. In view of graft scarcity, we need to think about a benefit-based model of liver allocation which focuses on the optimal use of this resource. Deciding on this form of organ allocation requires an ethical consensus: not the most urgent patient is the first candidate to receive a graft, but rather the patient who is supposed to have the greatest benefit.

Familial amyloid polyneuropathy.

Familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP; also known as familiar amyloidosis and hereditary amyloidosis) is an autosomal dominant inherited disease due to mutations of the transthyretin (TTR) gene coding for the corresponding protein, consisting of 127 amino acids. The gene is located on chromosome 18q. More than 100 different mutations are known. Other mutant precursor proteins produced in the liver, such as apolipoprotein I and II, lysozyme and fibrinogen Aα, may be of etiological importance as well. Amyloidogenic mutations of the TTR gene lead to decreased stability of the corresponding protein and subsequently to extracellular deposition of amyloid in several tissues (peripheral and autonomic nerves, walls of the gastrointestinal tract, heart, etc.). The Val30Met mutation is the most prevalent cause of FAP worldwide. There are endemic regions in Portugal, Sweden and Japan. The onset of symptoms is usually between 25 and 35 years of age, but late-onset families are also known. The most common clinical symptoms are polyneuropathy of the lower limbs, rhythmological disturbances and diarrhea/obstipation. TTR amyloid is predominantly produced in the liver; only as few as 5% are synthesized in the retina and choroid plexus. Therefore, liver transplantation has become widely accepted as the ultimate curative treatment of this disease in order to prevent the ultimately fatal outcome and ameliorate disabling symptoms. Because of shortage of donor grafts, livers of FAP patients are used for domino liver transplantation. Last year, a new therapeutic option was approved by the European Medical Authority (EMA) for therapy of early-stage FAP. The first results of a multicenter-controlled trial have been published and show a benefit in patients with an early stage of disease regarding neurological symptoms as well as modified BMI. There are several other pharmacologic approaches that have been reported in the last years which may lead to stabilization of the TTR tetramer. Therefore, this might be the beginning of new therapeutic options with pharmacological therapies in patients with FAP.

Evaluation of domino liver transplantations in Germany.

A retrospective multicenter study has been conducted to evaluate domino liver transplantations (DLTs) in Germany. The study provides insight into survival and features having an impact on the assessment of neuropathy after DLT. In addition, a neurologic follow-up program with a scheme to estimate the likelihood of de novo amyloidosis is presented. A series of 61 DLTs at seven transplant centers in Germany was enrolled. The mean age of domino recipients at the time of transplantation was 58 years, 46 of them being men, and 15 being women. The median follow-up was 46 months. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival of domino recipients was 81.6%, 70.8% and 68.8%, respectively. Causes of death were primarily not related to familial amyloidosis. The main indication of DLT was hepatocellular carcinoma. Two of the reported domino recipients developed symptoms and signs of de novo amyloidosis within 10 years after transplantation. A total of 30 domino graft recipients (49.18%) presented with diabetes post transplantation. In conclusion, an advanced follow-up program is crucial to evaluate the risk of transmitting familial amyloidosis by DLT and to establish more strict selection criteria for domino recipients.

Metabolic syndrome and its association with fatty liver disease after orthotopic liver transplantation.

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) might contribute to morbidity after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). For this reason, we searched for MetS-associated risk factors and analyzed the link with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in OLT recipients. De novo MetS affected 32.9% of our cohort (n = 170) within 2 years after OLT. Multivariate analysis identified glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≥5% [odds ratio (OR) = 3.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.56-8.13, P = 0.003], diabetes mellitus (OR = 4.31, CI = 1.69-10.99, P = 0.002), and arterial hypertension (OR = 4.59, CI = 1.46-14.49, P = 0.009) as independent risk factors for de novo MetS. MetS incidence correlated with steroid dosage after OLT (5.2 ± 2.4 mg/day vs. 7.1 ± 4.7 mg/day, P = 0.014), and was linked to NAFLD (P = 0.001) via obesity (OR = 4.67, CI = 1.55-14.1, P = 0.006) and dyslipidemia (OR = 4.23, CI = 1.35-13.3, P = 0.013) post-OLT. In conclusion, we were able to identify low threshold HbA1c as a novel risk factor for MetS after OLT and described a link of MetS with NAFLD in transplant organs. This study also indicated that steroid treatment is associated with MetS rates after OLT.