Therapeutic Targets in Advanced Penile Cancer: From Bench to Bedside.

Discovery of effective systemic therapies for patients with advanced penile cancer has been slow to occur. Comprehensive genomic profiling from several studies shed light on the molecular oncogenesis of penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) and differences between HPV-related and unrelated tumors. While these two subsets of PSCC appear distinct in their biology, there are not yet specific treatment strategies recommended on that basis. Cell surface proteins have been identified that may potentially serve as drug targets for monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors. Here, we review some of the new biological insights regarding PSCC that could lead to improved therapies, as well as the related clinical trials recently completed or in progress. We conclude that antibody-drug conjugates are especially promising, as are the combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with other types of drugs.

A real-world experience of pembrolizumab monotherapy in microsatellite instability-high and/or tumor mutation burden-high metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: outcome analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients (mCRPC) when stratified by MSI-H and/or TMB-H is poorly defined. Additionally, outcomes based on sequencing source (i.e., tissue or liquid biopsy) have not been well described. We sought to assess outcomes of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with mCRPC and compare efficacy based on MSI-H and/or TMB-H when identified by tissue or liquid biopsy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of mCRPC patients treated at Mayo Clinic with pembrolizumab monotherapy between 2018 and 2023. Objective response rates (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and overall survival (mOS), were determined by RECIST v1.1 criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with mCRPC received pembrolizumab monotherapy for at least 3 cycles for a MSI-H or TMB-H indication. All patients had next generation sequencing (NGS) performed via tissue (n = 11) or liquid (n = 10) biopsy source. The ORR was 50% (27.3% complete response and 22.7% had partial response). The mPFS for TMB 10-14.9 mut/Mb (n = 4), TMB 15-24.9 mut/Mb (n = 6), and TMB ≥ 25 mut/Mb (n = 10) was 2.1, not reached (NR), and NR, respectively (p = 0.0003). The mOS for these same groups was 5.1 months, 20.5 months, and not reached, respectively. Among patients with TMB-H without co-occurring MSI-H or CDK12 (n = 6), none experienced a response and only one patient had stable disease compared to patients with MSI-H (n = 12) for whom the ORR was 75%. Immunotherapy responsive alterations such as ATRX and PTCH1 mutations were frequently noticed among patients who had complete response (CR). CONCLUSIONS: Our hypothesis-generating study suggests that MSI-H drives the efficacy of pembrolizumab in mCRPC with better survival outcomes as TMB increases. Clinicians should consider alternative treatment strategies for advanced prostate cancer when TMB-H is present without co-occurring MSI-H or CDK12.

Genomic attributes of prostate cancer across primary and metastatic noncastrate and castrate resistant disease states: a next generation sequencing study of 183 patients.

Primary prostatic adenocarcinoma (pPC) undergoes genomic evolution secondary to therapy-related selection pressures as it transitions to metastatic noncastrate (mNC-PC) and castrate resistant (mCR-PC) disease. Next generation sequencing results were evaluated for pPC (n = 97), locally advanced disease (involving urinary bladder/rectum, n = 12), mNC-PC (n = 21), and mCR-PC (n = 54). We identified enrichment of TP53 alterations in high-grade pPC, TP53/RB1 alterations in HGNE disease, and AR alterations in metastatic and castrate resistant disease. Actionable alterations (MSI-H phenotype and HRR genes) were identified in approximately a fifth of all cases. These results help elucidate the landscape of genomic alterations across the clinical spectrum of prostate cancer.

Comparison of a modified staging system with 8th edition AJCC criteria in a North American cohort of pT2/pT3 HPV-negative penile squamous cell carcinoma.

The staging for pT2/pT3 penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) has undergone major changes. Some authors proposed criteria wherein the distinction between pT2/pT3 was made using the same histopathological variables that are currently utilized to differentiate pT1a/pT1b. In this single-institution, North American study, we focused on (HPV-negative) pT2/3 pSCCs (i.e., tumors invading corpus spongiosum/corpus cavernosum), and compared the prognostic ability of the following systems: (i) AJCC (8th edition) criteria; (ii) modified staging criteria proposed by Sali et al. (Am J Surg Pathol. 2020; 44:1112-7). In the proposed system, pT2 tumors were defined as those devoid of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or perineural invasion (PNI), and were not poorly differentiated; whereas pT3 showed one or more of the following: LVI, PNI, and/or grade 3. 48 pT2/pT3 cases were included (AJCC, pT2: 27 and pT3: 21; Proposed, pT2: 22 and pT3: 26). The disease-free survival (DFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ between pT2 and pT3, following the current AJCC definitions (p = 0.19 and p = 0.10, respectively). When the pT2/3 stages were reconstructed using the modified criteria, however, a statistically significant difference was present in both DFS and PFS between pT2 and pT3 (p = 0.004 and p = 0.003, respectively). The proposed staging system has the potential to improve the prognostication of pT2/pT3 tumors in pSCC. Each of these histopathologic variables has been shown to have a significant association with outcomes in pSCC, which is an advantage. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the utility of this modified staging system in patient populations from other geographic regions.

High-risk human papilloma virus status & outcomes for penile squamous cell carcinoma: A single institution experience.

OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of data on North American cohorts of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC). Herein, we aimed to assess the sensitivity of various modalities to identify human papillomavirus (HPV) status, determine the prevalence of high-risk HPV-positivity, and evaluate the prognostic impact of relevant clinicopathologic variables. METHODS: Patients with pSCC (n = 121) consecutively treated with partial/total penectomy (2000-2022) at a single institution were included. HPV status (based on immunohistochemistry [IHC], in situ hybridization [ISH], and panviral metagenomic sequencing [PMS]), histologic features, and outcomes were reviewed. Outcome events included death due to disease and progression. RESULTS: The majority of patients were white (105/121, 86.8%). Thirty-seven (30.6%) were high-risk HPV-positive, and morphologic evaluation had a sensitivity of 97.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.2-99.5) for predicting high-risk HPV status compared to IHC/ISH/PMS. Disease progression was more common among high-risk HPV-negative compared to high-risk HPV-positive patients (HR 2.74, CI 1.12-8.23, P = 0.03). Moreover, among high-risk HPV-negative patients, those with moderate-poorly differentiated tumors had increased disease-specific mortality (32.6%, CI 17.1-48.1) compared to those with well-differentiated tumors (0%). Among high-risk HPV-positive patients, those with basaloid morphology had lower disease-specific mortality (0% vs 14.4%, CI 0.0-33.1). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate high-risk HPV-positivity in approximately one-third of patients with pSCC. Morphologic evaluation alone had a high sensitivity in correctly determining HPV status. Our results suggest that high-risk HPV status and morphologic features (differentiation in high-risk HPV-negative, and basaloid subtype in high-risk HPV-positive pSCC) may have prognostic value.