Contemporary experience of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair technology in patients with mitral annular calcification.

BACKGROUND: Mitral annular calcification (MAC) has been an exclusion for many of the earlier pivotal trials that were instrumental in gaining device approval and indications for mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER). AIMS: To evaluate the impact of MAC on the procedural durability and success of newer generation MitraClip® systems (G3 and G4 systems). METHODS: Data were collected from Northwell TEER registry. Patients that underwent M-TEER with third or fourth generation MitraClip device were included. Patients were divided into -MAC (none-mild) and +MAC (moderate-severe) groups. Procedural success was defined as ≤ grade 2 + mitral regurgitation (MR) postprocedure, and durability was defined as ≤ grade 2 + MR retention at 1 month and 1 year. Univariate analysis compared outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Of 260 M-TEER patients, 160 were -MAC and 100 were +MAC. Procedural success was comparable; however, there were three patients who required conversion to cardiac surgery during the index hospitalization in the +MAC group versus none in the -MAC group (though this was not statistically significant). At 1-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in MR severity. At 1-year follow-up, +MAC had higher moderate-severe MR (22.1% vs. 7.5%; p = 0.002) and higher mean transmitral gradients (5.3 vs. 4.0 mmHg; p = 0.001) with no differences in mortality, New York Heart Association functional class or ejection fraction. CONCLUSION: In selective patients with high burden of MAC, contemporary M-TEER is safe, and procedural success is similar to patients with none-mild MAC. However, a loss of procedural durability was seen in +MAC group at 1-year follow-up. Further studies with longer follow-ups are required to assess newer mTEER devices and their potential clinical implications in patients with a high burden of MAC.

In Their Own Words: Patient Narratives of Breast Cancer Surgery and Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer's global burden prompts a comprehensive understanding of patient experiences surrounding surgical interventions. Social media platforms serve as a new potential avenue for analysis, reflecting patients' coping mechanisms and support-seeking behaviors. OBJECTIVE: This study's objective is to further understand patient experiences regarding breast cancer interventions via social media to improve physician-patient dialogue. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted of Instagram and TikTok posts surrounding breast cancer surgeries using procedure-related hashtags. Content was categorized to prevalent themes related to Breast-Q foci and was subsequently analyzed. RESULTS: Data from 1,028 individuals were analyzed. Posts encompassed double mastectomy (39%), single mastectomy (22%), and combined deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, latissimus dorsi flap, and transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap reconstruction (39%). Frequently identified themes included 'Raising Awareness' (86.87%), 'Spreading Positivity' (53.11%), 'Resiliency' (31.03%), 'Online Support' (24.61%), 'Update of Appearance' (20.82%), 'Recovery/Rehab' (19.94%), and 'Scientific Explanation' (19.75%). Instagram posts more likely encompassed positivity (p < 0.001), resiliency (p = 0.001), and mental health (p = 0.011). TikTok posts more likely (p = 0.001) discussed scientific explanations, decision-making, and symptoms (p < 0.001). Preoperative posts more likely (p < 0.001) surrounded scientific explanations, decision-making, and fear. Postoperative posts more likely (p < 0.001) highlighted appearance updates, recovery/rehab, and positivity (p = 0.012). Experiences with mastectomy and reconstruction differed: recovery/rehab (p < 0.001), scientific explanations (p = 0.015), treatment process (p = 0.003), range of motion (p < 0.001), self-esteem (p = 0.017), and wound management (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Concerns of patients online reflect Breast-Q measures. Understanding these nuanced patient discussions can provide novel insights for providers. Tailoring interactions through these insights may facilitate enhanced support, discussions, and experiences throughout the treatment journey. Main Points Social media offers a unique insight into personal patient experiences Online breast surgery patient perspectives reflect Breast-Q measures Outlooks from shared online posts may facilitate physician-patient dialogue LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Patient and Caregiver Perception of Adenoidectomies: A Non-Real-World Social Media Analysis.

Objective: To survey the social media outlets Twitter and Instagram for public posts related to adenoidectomy surgery. This study aims to investigate the attitudes and perceptions of patients and caregivers on social media, through thematic content-analysis of social media posts regarding adenoidectomy. Study Design: Non-real world qualitative study. Setting: Twitter and Instagram social media platforms. Methods: Public posts uploaded between February, 2021 and February, 2023 using the hashtags "#adenoidectomy," and "#adenoidectomyrecovery" were searched. Posts were excluded if they were unrelated to adenoidectomy or were in a non-English language. Relevant posts were stratified demographically as patient or caregiver and pre- or postoperative, and categorized into relevant themes for analysis. Outcomes were measured as the total number of posts. Results: A total of 394 relevant posts were analyzed. A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was used. Patients posted significantly more posts regarding procedure pain (P = 0.002) and concern for appearance (P = 0.048) compared to caregivers. Caregivers posted significantly (P < 0.001) more posts regarding condition awareness and were significantly (P < 0.001) more likely to spread positivity in their posts compared to patients themselves. Posts made by female caregivers were more likely to reference fear, while those made by male caregivers were more likely to provide education (P = 0.002). Conclusion: Patients may worry about appearance and mental health while caregivers are more likely to spread information and positivity. Male and female caregivers may also use social media differently. A better understanding of patient and caregiver concerns may optimize physician interaction and involvement.

Usefulness and Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions for Neurosurgical Procedures.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Internet has become a primary source of health information, leading patients to seek answers online before consulting health care providers. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) in neurosurgery by assessing the accuracy and helpfulness of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated responses to common postsurgical questions. METHODS: A list of 60 commonly asked questions regarding neurosurgical procedures was developed. ChatGPT-3.0, ChatGPT-3.5, and ChatGPT-4.0 responses to these questions were recorded and graded by numerous practitioners for accuracy and helpfulness. The understandability and actionability of the answers were assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool. Readability analysis was conducted using established scales. RESULTS: A total of 1080 responses were evaluated, equally divided among ChatGPT-3.0, 3.5, and 4.0, each contributing 360 responses. The mean helpfulness score across the 3 subsections was 3.511 ± 0.647 while the accuracy score was 4.165 ± 0.567. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool analysis revealed that the AI-generated responses had higher actionability scores than understandability. This indicates that the answers provided practical guidance and recommendations that patients could apply effectively. On the other hand, the mean Flesch Reading Ease score was 33.5, suggesting that the readability level of the responses was relatively complex. The Raygor Readability Estimate scores ranged within the graduate level, with an average score of the 15th grade. CONCLUSION: The artificial intelligence chatbot's responses, although factually accurate, were not rated highly beneficial, with only marginal differences in perceived helpfulness and accuracy between ChatGPT-3.0 and ChatGPT-3.5 versions. Despite this, the responses from ChatGPT-4.0 showed a notable improvement in understandability, indicating enhanced readability over earlier versions.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair for Multiple Valvular Heart Disease: Outcomes and Insights on Combined Aortic Insufficiency and Mitral Regurgitation.

The presence of concomitant aortic insufficiency (AI) and mitral regurgitation (MR) is common and may further accelerate cardiac dysfunction. However, there exists no United States regulatory approved transcatheter device for the treatment AI. The effectiveness of isolated transcatheter mitral therapy in this population is not well understood, thus we aimed to evaluate outcomes for patients with combined AI and MR in comparison to isolated MR that underwent mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (m-TEER). Retrospective data were obtained from Northwell m-TEER registry. A total of 587 patients that underwent m-TEER at four high volume TAVR/TEER centers within the Northwell Health system were included. All patients had severe MR and were divided into two groups: Group 1 with ≥ 3+ AI (AI+) and the Group 2 with <3+ AI (AI-). Echocardiographic outcomes were evaluated at 1 month. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at one month and 1 year. The primary endpoint was death or re-hospitalization at 1 year. 587 patients were included in the study, 92 in the AI+ group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Approximately two-thirds of patients in the AI+ group demonstrated an improvement in AI severity after isolated mitral therapy. There was no difference in the primary outcome at 1 month or 1 year. There was also no significant difference in NYHA functional class at 1 month between groups. In conclusion, patients that underwent m-TEER with combined MR and AI (AI+) fared well in comparison to isolated mitral valve dysfunction (AI-), with no discernible differences in survival, NYHA class, or re-hospitalization rates at 1 month or 1 year. Hence, isolated m-TEER is a reasonable treatment approach in patients with a high surgical risk with combined AI and MR.