Magnetic resonance imaging as a noninvasive adjunct to conventional assessment of functional differences between kidneys in vivo and during ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion.

Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is increasingly considered for pretransplant kidney quality assessment. However, fundamental questions about differences between in vivo and ex vivo renal function, as well as the impact of ischemic injury on ex vivo physiology, remain unanswered. This study utilized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), alongside conventional parameters to explore differences between in vivo and ex vivo renal function and the impact of warm ischemia on a kidney's behavior ex vivo. Renal MRI scans and samples were obtained from living pigs (n = 30) in vivo. Next, kidney pairs were procured and exposed to minimal, or 75 minutes of warm ischemia, followed by 6 hours of hypothermic machine perfusion. Both kidneys simultaneously underwent 6-hour ex vivo perfusion in MRI-compatible NMP circuits to obtain multiparametric MRI data. Ischemically injured ex vivo kidneys showed a significantly altered regional blood flow distribution compared to in vivo and minimally damaged organs. Both ex vivo groups showed diffusion restriction relative to in vivo. Our findings underscore the differences between in vivo and ex vivo MRI-based renal characteristics. Therefore, when assessing organ viability during NMP, it should be considered to incorporate parameters beyond the conventional functional markers that are common in vivo.

Prolonged Controlled Oxygenated Rewarming Improves Immediate Tubular Function and Energetic Recovery of Porcine Kidneys During Normothermic Machine Perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is typically performed after a period of hypothermic preservation, which exposes the kidney to an abrupt increase in temperature and intravascular pressure. The resultant rewarming injury could be alleviated by gradual rewarming using controlled oxygenated rewarming (COR). This study aimed to establish which rewarming rate during COR results in the best protective effect on renal rewarming injury during subsequent NMP. METHODS: Twenty-eight viable porcine kidneys (n = 7/group) were obtained from a slaughterhouse. After these kidneys had sustained 30 min of warm ischemia and 24 h of oxygenated HMP, they were either rewarmed abruptly from 4-8 °C to 37 °C by directly initiating NMP or gradually throughout 30, 60, or 120 min of COR (rate of increase in kidney temperature of 4.46%/min, 2.20%/min, or 1.10%/min) before NMP. RESULTS: Kidneys that were rewarmed during the course of 120 min (COR-120) had significantly lower fractional excretion of sodium and glucose at the start of NMP compared with rewarming durations of 30 min (COR-30) and 60 min (COR-60). Although COR-120 kidneys showed superior immediate tubular function at the start of normothermic perfusion, this difference disappeared during NMP. Furthermore, energetic recovery was significantly improved in COR-30 and COR-120 kidneys compared with abruptly rewarmed and COR-60 kidneys. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a rewarming rate of 1.10%/min during COR-120 could result in superior immediate tubular function and energetic recovery during NMP. Therefore, it may provide the best protective effect against rewarming injury.

Imatinib in patients with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The major complication of COVID-19 is hypoxaemic respiratory failure from capillary leak and alveolar oedema. Experimental and early clinical data suggest that the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor imatinib reverses pulmonary capillary leak. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial was done at 13 academic and non-academic teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Hospitalised patients (aged ≥18 years) with COVID-19, as confirmed by an RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, requiring supplemental oxygen to maintain a peripheral oxygen saturation of greater than 94% were eligible. Patients were excluded if they had severe pre-existing pulmonary disease, had pre-existing heart failure, had undergone active treatment of a haematological or non-haematological malignancy in the previous 12 months, had cytopenia, or were receiving concomitant treatment with medication known to strongly interact with imatinib. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral imatinib, given as a loading dose of 800 mg on day 0 followed by 400 mg daily on days 1-9, or placebo. Randomisation was done with a computer-based clinical data management platform with variable block sizes (containing two, four, or six patients), stratified by study site. The primary outcome was time to discontinuation of mechanical ventilation and supplemental oxygen for more than 48 consecutive hours, while being alive during a 28-day period. Secondary outcomes included safety, mortality at 28 days, and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. All efficacy and safety analyses were done in all randomised patients who had received at least one dose of study medication (modified intention-to-treat population). This study is registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2020-001236-10). FINDINGS: Between March 31, 2020, and Jan 4, 2021, 805 patients were screened, of whom 400 were eligible and randomly assigned to the imatinib group (n=204) or the placebo group (n=196). A total of 385 (96%) patients (median age 64 years [IQR 56-73]) received at least one dose of study medication and were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. Time to discontinuation of ventilation and supplemental oxygen for more than 48 h was not significantly different between the two groups (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·95 [95% CI 0·76-1·20]). At day 28, 15 (8%) of 197 patients had died in the imatinib group compared with 27 (14%) of 188 patients in the placebo group (unadjusted HR 0·51 [0·27-0·95]). After adjusting for baseline imbalances between the two groups (sex, obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease) the HR for mortality was 0·52 (95% CI 0·26-1·05). The HR for mechanical ventilation in the imatinib group compared with the placebo group was 1·07 (0·63-1·80; p=0·81). The median duration of invasive mechanical ventilation was 7 days (IQR 3-13) in the imatinib group compared with 12 days (6-20) in the placebo group (p=0·0080). 91 (46%) of 197 patients in the imatinib group and 82 (44%) of 188 patients in the placebo group had at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event. The safety evaluation revealed no imatinib-associated adverse events. INTERPRETATION: The study failed to meet its primary outcome, as imatinib did not reduce the time to discontinuation of ventilation and supplemental oxygen for more than 48 consecutive hours in patients with COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen. The observed effects on survival (although attenuated after adjustment for baseline imbalances) and duration of mechanical ventilation suggest that imatinib might confer clinical benefit in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, but further studies are required to validate these findings. FUNDING: Amsterdam Medical Center Foundation, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek/ZonMW, and the European Union Innovative Medicines Initiative 2.