The association of area-level social class and tobacco use with adverse breast cancer characteristics among white and black women: evidence from Maryland, 1992-2003.

BACKGROUND: In breast cancer, worse disease characteristics are associated with fewer social resources and black race. However, it is unknown whether social gradients have similar impact across race, and whether behaviors, including tobacco use, may explain a portion of the social gradient. METHODS: We modeled relationships between area-level social class, tobacco spending and tumor characteristics, using 50,062 white and black cases diagnosed from 1992-2003 in Maryland, a racially and economically diverse state on the east coast of the United States. Multi-level models estimated the effect of area-level social class and tobacco consumption on tumor grade, size, and stage at diagnosis. RESULTS: Adjusting for race, age and year of diagnosis, higher social class was associated with lower risk for tumors with histological grade 3 or 4 (O.R. 0.96, 95% C.I. 0.94,0.99), those diagnosed at SEER stage 2 or later (O.R. 0.89, 95% C.I. 0.86, 0.91), and tumor size >2 cm (O.R. 0.87, 95% C.I. 0.84, 0.90). Higher tobacco spending was associated with higher risk for higher grade (O.R. 1.01, 1.00, 1.03) and larger tumors (O.R. 1.03, 95% C.I. 1.01, 1.06), but was not statistically significantly related to later stage (O.R. 1.00, 95% C.I. 0.98, 1.02). Social class was less protective for black women, but tobacco effects were not race-specific. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that in one U.S. geographic area, there is a differential protection from social class for black and white women, supporting use of intersectionality theory in breast cancer disparities investigations. Area-level tobacco consumption may capture cases' direct use and second hand smoke exposure, but also may identify neighborhoods with excess cancer-related behavioral or environmental exposures, beyond those measured by social class. Given the growing global burden of both tobacco addiction and aggressive breast cancer, similar investigations across diverse geographic areas are warranted.

Early Sweet Tooth: Juice Introduction During Early Infancy is Related to Toddler Juice Intake.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if 100% fruit juice intake prior to 6 months is associated with juice and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake at 24 months and whether this differs by sociodemographic factors. METHODS: We used longitudinal data from infants enrolled in the control (no obesity intervention) arm of Greenlight, a cluster randomized trial to prevent childhood obesity which included parent-reported child 100% fruit juice intake at all well child checks between 2 and 24 months. We studied the relationship between the age of juice introduction (before vs after 6 months) and juice and SSB intake at 24 months using negative binomial regression while controlling for baseline sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: We report results for 187 participants (43% Hispanic, 39% non-Hispanic Black), more than half (54%) of whom had reported 100% fruit juice intake before 6 months. Average 100% fruit juice intake at 24 months was greater than the recommended amount (of 4 oz) and was 8.2 oz and 5.3 oz for those who had and had not, respectively, been introduced to juice before 6 months. In adjusted models, early introduction of juice was associated with a 43% (95% confidence interval: 5%-96%) increase in juice intake at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: 100% fruit juice intake exceeding recommended levels at 6 and 24 months in this diverse cohort was prevalent. Introducing 100% fruit juice prior to 6 months may put children at greater risk for more juice intake as they age. Further research is necessary to determine if early guidance can reduce juice intake.

The association of neighborhood-level social class and tobacco consumption with adverse lung cancer characteristics in Maryland.

INTRODUCTION: Although both active tobacco use and passive tobacco exposure are well-established as being risk factors for lung cancer, it is challenging to measure tobacco-related exposures at the population level, while considering other factors (gender, race, socioeconomic status) that may modify the relationship between tobacco and lung cancer. Moreover, research to date has focused primarily on relationships between tobacco and endpoints of lung cancer incidence or mortality. Tobacco's role in disease progression, through association with important disease characteristics such as tumor histological type and grade, and stage of disease at diagnosis, has been less well examined. METHODS: This research examines associations between area-level tobacco use and social class, as well as individual gender, race and age, and three adverse disease characteristics (tumor type, grade and stage) among incident cases of lung cancer reported to the Maryland Cancer Registry in 2000. Cases were geocoded by residential address. Multi-level logistic regression models included Census block group-level estimates of per capita tobacco spending, from Consumer Expenditure Survey data, and a 4-item social class index, from Census estimates of rates of high school graduation, employment, white collar occupation, and per capita income. RESULTS: Analyses of 3223 cases found no significant differences by race, however, results differed by gender. Lower block-group social class and higher tobacco spending were associated with squamous and small cell histological types and poorly differentiated or undifferentiated tumor grade. However, for later stage at diagnosis (SEER stages 2-7), both higher social class and greater tobacco spending were protective, especially for women, suggesting women in high tobacco use communities may benefit from early detection. CONCLUSIONS: Results support using area-level behavioral data as tools for identifying high risk communities suitable for more resource-intensive research or interventions. Findings also suggest that area-level social resources are consistent drivers of lung cancer disparities, and merit continued research attention.

Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Smoke-free Policy in Philadelphia Public Housing.

OBJECTIVES: Multi-unit housing environments remain significant sources of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, especially for vulnerable populations in subsidized housing. In Philadelphia, the largest US housing authority to implement smoke-free policies, we measured baseline resident smoking-related behaviors and attitudes, and longitudinal exposures to airborne nicotine, during policy development and implementation. METHODS: In 4 communities, we collected data in 2013, 2014, and 2016, before and after introduction of comprehensive smoke-free policies, interviewing persons in 172 households, and monitoring air-borne nicotine in non-smoking homes and public areas. Average nicotine level differences across years were estimated with multi-level models. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of respondents smoked. Only 37% of households were smoke-free, with another 41% restricting smoking by area or time of day. The number of locations with detectable nicotine did not differ before and after policy implementation, with approximately 20% of non-smoking homes and 70%-80% of public areas having detectable nicotine. However, public area nicotine levels were lower in 2016, after policy implementation, than in 2013 and 2014 (-0.19 µg/m3, p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that initial policy implementation was associated with reduced SHS exposure in Philadelphia. As HUD strengthens smoke-free policies, SHS monitoring can be useful to educate stakeholders and build support for policy enforcement.