Comparison of Helicobacter pylori eradication rates between 7 and 14 days of tailored therapy according to clarithromycin resistance test: A randomized, multicenter, non-inferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Recently, a simple tailored therapy based on clarithromycin resistance has been implemented as Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy. Nonetheless, despite the tailored therapy and frequent adverse events, studies on treatment period are lacking. This study aimed to compare the H. pylori eradication rates of 7-day and 14-day tailored therapy regimens according to clarithromycin resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial enrolled H. pylori-positive patients who were randomly assigned to 7-day and 14-day regimen groups, depending on the presence or absence of clarithromycin resistance by 23S rRNA gene point mutations. Standard triple therapy (STT) (20 mg rabeprazole, 1 g amoxicillin, and 500 mg clarithromycin twice daily) or bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) (20 mg rabeprazole twice daily, 500 mg metronidazole thrice daily, 120 mg bismuth four times daily, and 500 mg tetracycline four times daily) was assigned by clarithromycin resistance. Eradication rates and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 314 and 278 patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, respectively; however, 31 patients were lost to follow-up, whereas five patients violated the protocol. Both the 7-day and 14-day regimens showed similar eradication rates in the ITT (7-day vs. 14-day: 78.3% vs. 78.3%, p > 0.99) and PP (87.9% vs. 89.1%, p = 0.851) analyses. Non-inferiority was confirmed (p < 0.025). A subgroup analysis according to clarithromycin resistance (clarithromycin resistance rate: 28.7%) revealed no significant difference in eradication rates between the 7-day and 14-day STT (90.0% vs. 90.1%, p > 0.99) and BQT (82.5% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.757). Furthermore, adverse events did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 7-day triple and quadruple therapy according to clarithromycin resistance showed similar eradication rates, as compared to the 14-day therapy.

Efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg in erosive esophagitis compared to HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective drugs for treating acid-related disorders. However, once-daily dosing with conventional PPIs fail to fully control acid secretion over 24 h. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) and HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE). METHODS: We enrolled 213 patients with EE randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 40 mg HIP1601 (n = 107) or HGP1705 (n = 106) once daily for 4 or 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the EE healing rate, confirmed by endoscopy up to week 8. GERD-related symptoms and treatment-emergent adverse events were compared between both groups. RESULTS: By week 8, the estimated healing rates of EE were 97.8% and 96.8% in the HIP1601 and HGP1705 groups, respectively, with a 95% confidence interval of -4.7 to 7.2. After 4 or 8 weeks of treatment, the EE healing rate at week 4, complete resolution rate of symptoms, time to sustained resolution of symptoms, and number of rescue medications used were similar in both groups. The proportion of heartburn- and acid regurgitation-free nights by week 4 were higher in the HIP1601 group compared to the HGP1705 group, but the difference did not reach clinical significance (87.7% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.514, 87.5% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.774). The number of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of HIP1601 40 mg were comparable to those of HGP1705 40 mg for the treatment of EE and symptomatic improvement of GERD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04080726 ( https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT04080726 ), registration date: 25/10/2018.

Colonoscopy Insertion in Patients with Gastrectomy: Does Position Impact Cecal Intubation Time?

BACKGROUND: A history of abdominal surgery is associated with difficulty in colonoscopy insertion. Few studies have reported effective colonoscopy insertion for patients who underwent abdominal surgery due to stomach cancer. AIM: We aimed to compare the impact of supine position (SP) and left lateral position (LLP) as the starting position of colonoscopy insertion in patients who underwent abdominal surgery due to stomach cancer. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing colonoscopy for screening or post-polypectomy surveillance after gastrectomy due to stomach cancer were enrolled and randomized to the SP or LLP group as the starting position of colonoscopy insertion. All colonoscopic examinations were performed with a transparent cap. The primary outcome was to compare the cecal intubation time between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 224 patients were enrolled. The mean cecal intubation time was not significantly different between the SP and LLP groups (364.5 s versus 306.9 s; p = 0.105). In patients with a lower body mass index (< 21 kg/m2) or who underwent gastrectomy within three years, the mean cecal intubation time of the LLP group was shorter than the SP group. In the multivariate analysis for the factors affecting to increase in the cecal intubation time (> 5 min), the starting position was not an independent factor. CONCLUSION: Either the SP or LLP could serve as a possible starting position of colonoscopy insertion for patients who underwent abdominal surgery due to stomach cancer.

Prediction model for curative endoscopic submucosal dissection of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC); however, its curative resection rate is low for undifferentiated-type EGC. We developed and externally validated a prediction model for curative ESD of undifferentiated-type EGC. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included 448 patients who underwent ESD for undifferentiated-type EGC at 18 hospitals in Korea between 2005 and 2015 in the development cohort and 1342 patients who underwent surgery at two hospitals in the validation cohort. A prediction model was developed using the logistic regression model. RESULTS: Endoscopic tumor size 1-2 cm (odds ratio [OR], 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54-3.73), tumor size > 2 cm (OR, 14.00; 95% CI 6.81-28.77), and proximal tumor location from the lower to upper third of the stomach (OR, 1.45; 95% CI 1.03-2.04) were independent predictors of non-curative ESD. A six-score prediction model was developed by assigning points to endoscopic tumor size > 2 cm (five points), tumor size 1-2 cm (two points), upper third location (two points), and middle third location (one point). The rate of curative ESD ranged from 70.6% (score 0) to 11.6% (score 5) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.720 (95% CI 0.673-0.766). The model also showed good performance in the validation cohort (AUC, 0.775; 95% CI 0.748-0.803). CONCLUSIONS: This six-score prediction model may help in predicting curative ESD and making informed decisions about the treatment selection between ESD and surgery for undifferentiated-type EGC.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection followed by additional surgery after non-curative resection in undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer: a nationwide multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: Undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (UD EGC) shows lower curative resection rates after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Additional surgery is recommended after non-curative resection. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of ESD followed by additional surgery after non-curative resection in UD EGC compared to those for surgery as initial treatment. METHODS: We reviewed 1139 UD EGC patients who underwent ESD at 18 hospitals and 1956 patients who underwent surgery at two hospitals between February 2005 and May 2015. We enrolled 636 patients with non-curative ESD and 1429 surgery subjects beyond the curative ESD criteria. Among them, 133 patients with additional surgery after ESD (ESD + OP group) and 252 patients without additional surgery (ESD-only group) were matched 1:1 using propensity scores to patients with surgery as initial treatment (surgery group). Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared. RESULTS: Signet ring cell carcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA) were observed in 939 and 1126 cases, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the surgery group than in the ESD + OP group, especially for PDA. However, RFS was shorter in the ESD-only group than those in the ESD + OP and surgery groups. RFS did not differ significantly between the ESD + OP and surgery groups. Compared to the surgery group, the ESD-only and ESD + OP groups had an overall hazard ratio for RFS of 3.58 (95% confidence interval 1.44-8.88) and 0.46 (0.10-2.20), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ESD followed by additional surgery after non-curative resection showed comparable cancer-specific outcomes to initial surgery in UD EGC.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for undifferentiated intramucosal early gastric cancer larger than 2 cm.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) for undifferentiated-type (UD) early gastric cancer (EGC), with tumor size > 2 cm as the only non-curative factor. METHODS: From among 1123 patients who underwent ER for UD EGC at 18 tertiary hospitals in Korea between 2005 and 2014, we identified 216 patients with UD intramucosal EGC > 2 cm, which was completely resected, with negative resection margins, and absence of ulceration and lymphovascular invasion. The patients were divided into the additional surgery (n = 40) or observation (n = 176) groups, according to post-ER management and were followed up for a median duration of 59 months for recurrence and 90 months for overall survival. RESULTS: Lymph node (LN) or distant metastasis or cancer-related mortality was not observed in the surgery group. In the observation group, two (1.1%) patients developed LN or distant metastasis with a 5-year cumulative risk of 0.7%, and one (0.6%) patient died of gastric cancer. The 5- and 8-year overall survival rates were 94.1% and 89.9%, respectively, in the observation group and 100.0% and 95.2%, respectively, in the surgery group (log-rank P = 0.159). Cox regression analysis did not reveal an association between the observation group and increased mortality. CONCLUSION: The risk of LN or distant metastasis was not negligible, but as low as 1% for patients undergoing non-curative ER for UD EGC, with tumor size > 2 cm as the only non-curative factor. Close observation may be an alternative to surgery, especially for older patients or those with poor physical status.

Comparison between endoscopic submucosal resection and surgery for the curative resection of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer within expanded indications: a nationwide multi-center study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for undifferentiated early gastric cancer (UD EGC) has debate due to the risk of lymph node metastasis. We investigated the outcomes of ESD compared to those of surgery for the UD EGC within expanded indication. METHODS: We reviewed 971 UD EGC patients performed ESD across 18 hospitals in Korea and 1812 patients who underwent surgical resection in two hospitals between February 2005 and May 2015. Of these cases, we enrolled a curative resected ESD group of 328 patients and surgery group of 383 cases within an expanded indication. Overall outcomes and one-to-one propensity score-matched (218 ESD group vs 218 surgery group cases) outcomes for these two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Over the 75.6 month median follow-up period for the 711 enrolled cases, recurrences occurred in 22 patients (6.7%) in the ESD group but not in the surgery group. Overall survival (OS) was higher in the surgery group (p = 0.0316) in all cases, but there was no significant difference after propensity score matching (p = 0.069). According to the histologic type in propensity score matching, the OS of signet ring cell carcinoma and poorly differentiated carcinoma patients did not differ between the ESD and surgery groups (p = 0.1189 and p = 0.3087, respectively). In the surgery group involving expanded criteria, lymph node metastasis was found in six cases (1.56%). CONCLUSIONS: Although ESD shows comparable outcomes to surgery for the UD EGC within expanded indications, appropriate patient selection is needed for the ESD due to the possibility of lymph node metastasis.

Risk factors of lymph node metastasis after non-curative endoscopic resection of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate risk factors for lymph node (LN) or distant metastasis after non-curative endoscopic resection (ER) of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (EGC). METHODS: Of 1124 patients who underwent ER for undifferentiated-type gastric cancer at 18 tertiary hospitals across six geographic areas in Korea between 2005 and 2014, 634 with non-curative ER beyond the expanded criteria were retrospectively enrolled. According to the treatment after ER, patients were divided into additional surgery (n = 270) and follow-up (n = 364) groups. The median follow-up duration was 59 months for recurrence and 84 months for mortality. RESULTS: LN metastasis was found in 6.7% (18/270) of patients at surgery. Ulcer [odds ratio (OR) 3.83; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-12.13; p = 0.022] and submucosal invasion (OR 10.35; 95% CI 1.35-79.48; p = 0.025) were independent risk factors. In the follow-up group, seven patients (1.9%) developed LN or distant recurrence. Ulcer [hazard ratio (HR) 7.60; 95% CI 1.39-35.74; p = 0.018], LVI (HR 6.80; 95% CI 1.07-42.99; p = 0.042), and positive vertical margin (HR 6.71; 95% CI 1.28-35.19; p = 0.024) were independent risk factors. In the overall cohort, LN metastasis rates were 9.6% in patients with two or more risk factors and 1.2% in those with no or one risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: LVI, ulcer, submucosal invasion, and positive vertical margin are independently associated with LN or distant metastasis after non-curative ER of undifferentiated-type EGC. Surgical resection is strongly recommended for patients with two or more risk factors.

Sex differences between Helicobacter pylori infection and cholesterol levels in an adult health checkup program.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection is suggested to be a risk factor of metabolic syndrome (MS) and lipid abnormalities. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of H pylori infection on MS and lipid abnormalities according to sex differences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed a total of 4551 adults who received health checkups from January 2016 to May 2017. We enrolled participants who did not have a history of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or cancer among those who underwent endoscopy with a rapid urease test. RESULTS: We included a total of 1065 participants, and 663 patients (62.3%) were H pylori-positive. The H pylori infection rate was 59.3% (426/719) in males and 68.5% (237/346) in females. The mean level of total cholesterol (P = .003), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (P = .046), and triglycerides (P = .029) were statistically higher in H pylori-infected males. The mean level of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was statistically lower in H pylori-infected females (P = .032). Multivariate analysis showed that total cholesterol in males (odds ratio [OR], 1.007; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.002-1.011) and HDL cholesterol in females (OR, 0.983; 95% CI, 0.968-0.998) were associated with active H pylori infection. The prevalence of MS was higher in both male and female H pylori-infected groups; however, there was no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: H pylori infection is significantly related to increased total cholesterol in males and to decreased HDL cholesterol in females, which suggests that H pylori could affect lipid profiles and may be different by sex.

Helicobacter pylori eradication rates with concomitant and tailored therapy based on 23S rRNA point mutation: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of tailored therapy based on point mutation presence identified with the dual-priming oligonucleotide (DPO)-based multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method compared with concomitant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned concomitant therapy (amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, and lansoprazole 30 mg twice/day for 14 days) or tailored therapy (amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and lansoprazole 30 mg twice/day for 14 days in point mutation-negative subjects; and amoxicillin 1 g, metronidazole 500 mg, and lansoprazole 30 mg twice/day for 14 days in point mutation-positive subjects). RESULTS: A total of 397 and 352 subjects were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, respectively. Point mutations were identified in 25.9% of the subjects. The overall eradication rate was not significantly different between the groups by ITT (86.2% vs 81.6%, P = .132) and PP analyses (90.2% vs 86.5%, P = .179). There was no significant difference in the eradication rates between the groups in both the point mutation-negative subjects (91.7% vs 87.3%, P = .154) and the point mutation-positive subjects (71.2% vs 64.7%, P = .312). The eradication rates were significantly lower in the point mutation-positive subjects than in the point mutation-negative subjects in both the concomitant and tailored therapy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored therapy based on point mutation presence identified with the DPO-based multiplex PCR method was as effective as concomitant therapy. The eradication rates of both therapy regimens were suboptimal in point mutation-positive subjects.

Online registry for nationwide database of Helicobacter pylori eradication in Korea: Correlation of antibiotic use density with eradication success.

BACKGROUND: The Helicobacter pylori eradication rate has decreased with increasing antibiotic resistance. We conducted a prospective, nationwide, multicenter registry study to monitor the real status of H. pylori eradication therapy and to investigate the association between eradication success and antibiotic use density in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 9318 patients undergoing H. pylori eradication therapy from 37 hospitals through "on-line database registry" from October 2010 to July 2015. Demographic data, detection methods, treatment indications, regimens, durations, compliance, adverse events, and eradication results were collected. The use of all commercially available eradication antibiotics was analyzed through the Korean National Health Insurance data of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. The defined daily dose of antibiotics was used to standardize drug use comparisons. RESULTS: Finally, 6738 patients were analyzed. The overall eradication rate of first-line therapy was 71.8%. The eradication success rates were 71.7%, 86.9%, and 74.0% for standard triple therapy for 7 days, quadruple therapy, and concomitant therapy, respectively. The eradication success rate in naive patients was higher than that in those who previously underwent H. pylori eradication. Eradication success was significantly associated with younger age, female sex, and high compliance. Regional differences in eradication rates were observed. The yearly use density of clarithromycin increased statistically in seven regions across the country from 2010 to 2015. The yearly use density of amoxicillin in the Gyeongsang and Chungcheong areas was significantly increased (P < .01), whereas that of other macrolides was significantly lower in the Gyeonggi area than in other areas (P = .01). The overall use of eradication antibiotics has increased while the eradication rate steadily decreased for 5 years. However, there was no significant correlation between antibiotic use density and eradication. CONCLUSION: There was no relationship between the eradication rate and antibiotic use density in Korea.

Eradication Rates of Helicobacter pylori in Korea Over the Past 10 years and Correlation of the Amount of Antibiotics Use: Nationwide Survey.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of proton-pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin therapy for H. pylori eradication has decreased over time. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the trend of H. pylori eradication rates over the last 10 years and the relationship between the eradication rates and the amount of macrolide antibiotic use in a country with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection. METHODS: This vast nationwide multicenter study was conducted with 34,139 adults treated for H. pylori infection from January 2001 to December 2010. The defined daily dose per km(2) (DSD) of macrolide antibiotics was calculated (n = 141,019) using the Health Insurance Review & Assessment data base from 2008 to 2010 in the two cities which had the lowest (Jeju city) or highest (Chuncheon city) eradication rate. RESULTS: The eradication rates of proton-pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin therapy ranged 84.9-87.5% from 2001 to 2007, and those of 2008 to 2010 ranged 80.0-81.4% with a decreasing trend (p < 0.0001). The decreasing trend of eradication rates for the overall first-line therapy was observed only in three of the seven geographic areas in Korea (p < 0.0001). The DSD of macrolide antibiotics was significantly higher in Jeju than Cheunchon city (0.85 vs 0.52, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication rates with clarithromycin-containing triple therapy in Korea showed a decreasing trend over the past 10 years, although the trend varied among geographic areas. This difference may be associated with the amount of macrolide antibiotic use.

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Esophagectomy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Background/Aims: The efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is unclear. This study compared the survival and recurrence of patients with locally advanced ESCC after definitive CCRT and surgery. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent CCRT or esophagectomy at Kosin University Gospel Hospital from January 2010 to December 2016. The patients' baseline characteristics, pathology, recurrence rate, and three-year/five-year overall survival were obtained. Results: This study evaluated ESCC patients with cT1-T2, N+ or cT3-T4, or N, who were treated by definitive CCRT (n=14) or esophagectomy (n=32). No significant difference was noted between the two groups, except for the location of the cancer and performance state. The respective three- and five-year overall survival rates were 30.8% and 23.1% in the CCRT group and 40.2% and 22.5% in the esophagectomy group (p=0.685). In the CCRT group, three patients (21.4%) had a complete response, and two (66.7%) had a recurrence. In the esophagectomy group, an R0 resection was achieved in 28 (87.5%) patients, and a recurrence occurred in 18 (64.3%). The median disease-free survival in the CCRT and esophagectomy groups was 14 and 17 months, respectively (p=0.882). Conclusions: These results showed no significant difference in survival between the definitive CCRT and surgery as the initial treatment. Nevertheless, larger prospective studies will be needed because of the retrospective nature and small number of patients in this study.

Direct gastric invasion from the liver metastasis of colorectal origin: A case report.

RATIONALE: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer diagnosed worldwide. At the time of diagnosis of colorectal cancer, one of the most common metastatic sites is liver. Gastric metastasis from colorectal origin is rare. Moreover, a direct invasion of the stomach, by hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer, is particularly uncommon. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 56-year-old male patient with hematochezia was referred to our hospital. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with unresectable colorectal cancer because of the presence of >10 metastases involving both lobes of the liver. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: After chemotherapy, the metastatic nodules in the liver nearly disappeared, except for a small nodule in segment VI. The patient underwent a radiofrequency ablation for the single lesion in the liver and laparoscopic low-anterior-resection for the primary tumor. Despite receiving various chemotherapy regimens, he experienced 6 recurrences, leading to 5 hepatectomies including a right hemi-hepatectomy, 1 pulmonary wedge resection, and 2 courses of radiation treatments. Lastly, a metastatic lesion in the liver was observed with invasion into the stomach. Subsequently, gastric wedge resection with resection of segments III and IV of the liver was performed. Direct invasion of the liver metastases into the stomach was confirmed histologically. LESSONS: The patient is still alive, with a good quality of life, even after more than 8 years since the initial diagnosis. In the last instance of metastatic recurrence, direct invasion from the liver metastases into the stomach was observed, which is rare, and there are currently no reported cases.

[A Case of Type II Achalasia Occurring in a Nonagenarian Diagnosed with Acute Food Impaction].

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by loss of esophageal peristalsis and impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Patients with achalasia often complain of persistent symptoms for several years before diagnosis. On the other hand, achalasia diagnosed as a sudden esophageal food impaction is uncommon, and no report has been issued on the diagnosis and successful treatment of achalasia in a 95-year-old patient. We report a case of achalasia diagnosed by high-resolution esophageal manometry and timed barium esophagography after food material removal by endoscopy in a 95-year-old woman who visited the hospital due to sudden esophageal food impaction and was successfully treated by endoscopic balloon dilatation.

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DW1903 in Patients with Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 study.

Background/Aims: H2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) have been used to treat gastritis by inhibiting gastric acid. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are more potent acid suppressants than H2RA. However, the efficacy and safety of low-dose PPI for treating gastritis remain unclear. The aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose PPI for treating gastritis. Methods: A double-blind, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial randomly assigned 476 patients with endoscopic erosive gastritis to a group using esomeprazole 10 mg (DW1903) daily and a group using famotidine 20 mg (DW1903R1) daily for 2 weeks. The full-analysis set included 319 patients (DW1903, n=159; DW1903R1, n=160) and the per-protocol set included 298 patients (DW1903, n=147; DW1903R1, n=151). The primary endpoint (erosion improvement rate) and secondary endpoint (erosion and edema cure rates, improvement rates of hemorrhage, erythema, and symptoms) were assessed after the treatment. Adverse events were compared. Results: According to the full-analysis set, the erosion improvement rates in the DW1903 and DW1903R1 groups were 59.8% and 58.8%, respectively. According to the per-protocol analysis, the erosion improvement rates in the DW1903 and DW1903R1 groups were 61.9% and 59.6%, respectively. Secondary endpoints were not significantly different between two groups except that the hemorrhagic improvement rate was higher in DW1903 with statistical tendency. The number of adverse events were not statistically different. Conclusions: DW1903 of a low-dose PPI was not inferior to DW1903R1 of H2RA. Thus, lowdose PPI can be a novel option for treating gastritis (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05163756).

Missed synchronous gastric neoplasm with endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasm: experience in our hospital.

AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely accepted as a less invasive treatment for early gastric cancer and adenoma, but research on missed synchronous gastric neoplasm (SGN) with ESD has been limited. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the incidence and characteristics of missed SGN during follow-up endoscopy in patients who have undergone ESD. METHOD: We investigated the clinicopathological features of 602 patients and gastric neoplasms treated by ESD from January 2005 through July 2009 at our institution. We defined any second neoplasm found within 1 year after ESD as a missed SGN. RESULTS: Out of 602 patients, 12 (2.0%) had missed SGN. Among the 12 missed SGN, seven (58.3%) cases were carcinomas. All cases of missed synchronous gastric cancer (SGC) were exclusively discovered in the posterior wall of the stomach (7 of 7 cases, 100%, P = 0.016). Missed SGN were more frequently observed when the primary gastric neoplasm was adenoma (4.0% vs 1.0%; OR = 4.114; 95% CI = 1.224-13.831). Furthermore, the risk of missed SGC increased 12-fold in the primary gastric adenoma group compared to the primary gastric carcinoma group (2.9% vs 0.24%; OR = 12.308; 95% CI = 1.472-102.939). CONCLUSION: Endoscopists need to make an effort to find SGN, especially when they carry out ESD for an adenoma, which is a less serious lesion. The important blind spot in screening endoscopic examination before ESD is the posterior wall of the upper third and middle third of the stomach.

Hypercontractile Esophagus: Clinical and Manometric Features From a Multicenter Korean Cohort.

Background/Aims: Hypercontractile esophagus (HE) is a heterogeneous disorder with variable clinical presentations and a natural course, leading to management challenges. This study aims to investigate the characteristics of HE and evaluate its treatment outcomes. Methods: Four Korean referral centers recruited subjects with at least 1 hypercontractile swallow (distal contraction integral > 8000 mmHg·s·cm) in this retrospective observational study. Subjects were classified according to the Chicago classification version 2.0 (CC v2.0), CC v3.0, and CC v4.0. criteria. The clinical and manometric features were also investigated. The treatment modalities and outcomes of subjects with CC v4.0 were evaluated. Results: In total, 59 subjects with at least 1 hypercontractile swallow were analyzed. Among them, 30 (50.8%) had increased integrated relaxation pressure values without meeting the criteria for achalasia. Among the remaining 29 patients, 6 (20.7%) had only 1 hypercontractile swallowing symptom (CC v2.0) and 23 (79.3%) met both the CC v3.0 and v4.0 criteria for HE. Dysphagia (91.3%) was the most prevalent symptom, followed by chest pain (56.5%), regurgitation (52.2%), globus (34.8%), heartburn (21.7%), and belching (8.7%). Twenty (87.0%) patients received medical treatment, and 8 (47.1%) and 5 (29.4%) showed moderate and significant improvements, respectively. Proton pump inhibitors were the most common option (n = 15, 65.2%), followed by calcium channel blockers (n = 6, 26.1%). One patient received peroral endoscopic myotomy and showed significant symptom improvement. Conclusions: Sixty-one percent of patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for the high-resolution manometry are diagnosed with symptomatic HE based CC v4.0. Chest pain and regurgitation were also observed in over half of them. The overall medical treatment efficacy was moderate.

Case of Concomitant Endoscopic Treatment of Achalasia with Superficial Esophageal Cancer.

Achalasia, a rare motility disorder of the esophagus, is generally accepted as a premalignant disorder. This paper presents the case of a 72-year-old male with achalasia and synchronous superficial esophageal cancer who experienced dysphagia symptoms for five years. As achalasia is associated with an increased risk of esophageal cancer, both can be treated simultaneously if detected at the time of diagnosis. Achalasia and synchronous esophageal cancer are rarely detected and treated endoscopically. This paper reports a case of concurrent successful treatment.

When should patients take simethicone orally before colonoscopy for avoiding bubbles: A single-blind, randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have reported the use of simethicone before colonoscopy removes bubbles. However, guidelines weakly recommend simethicone administration before colonoscopy. The present study aimed to confirm the advantages of taking simethicone and determine the appropriate time for taking simethicone. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients to the following 5 groups according to the administration time: 4 groups were divided based on 2 parameters (the day before and on the day of colonoscopy and before and after bowel cleansing) and the remaining group was the control group. We compared bubble score (BS), number of simethicone solution irrigations when visually obscured, satisfaction score of the endoscopist, insertion time. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were included in the study. There was a difference in BS according to the timing of simethicone administration (P < .001). The group taking simethicone on the day of the test had a better BS than the group taking simethicone the day before (P < .001). The group taking simethicone on the previous day had a better BS than the control group (P = .001). In the group of taking simethicone on the examination day, the number of irrigations was lower, and satisfaction with the inspector was higher than group of taking simethicone on previous day and control group (both P < .001). The insertion time showed a non-significantly decreasing trend (P = .417). CONCLUSION: Administering simethicone reduced bubbles and facilitated effective colonoscopy, especially when administrating it on the day of examination. It needs to be administered on the day of the examination regardless of bowel preparation.